About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

8 Replies to “Historian David Starkey says that Enoch Powell may have been partly right on BBC”

  1. “we need to face head on what the issues really are.”

    What people really mean when they say that is that we have to accept from THEM what the issues are. We have to allow the speaker to determine what can be addressed and what cannot be addressed. Who is to blame and who is innocent. If we come to a conclusion that is not usefull to them it is because we don’t see things correctly and don’t percieve things with the same subtlety as the self appointed talking heads.

    More particularly, what she means by looking at “the real issue” is that we have to pick the right people to blame. In this case she means the decisions of the dominant society that must be “the real issue”. It is the dominant establishment that has to change and give even more. She is saying the rioting is everyones fault but the actual rioters.

  2. The more libral panelists said this started as a “peacefull protest” and a “community protest”. They are lying.

    Read the reports from the first night of rioting.

    The original “protestors” intentionally incited the police to violence in a highly organized manner that shows they were led by people who had the full intention of causing a riot. They did that by the old standby methods of charging the police in formation and hurling projectiles at them untill they were forced to respond. Peacefull community protest?

    These two commentators are intentionally lying.

  3. I think it was a good debate. I feel the old chap was a bit outnumbered but no one bandied the racist smear around though the “tiny group of extremist” mantra traditionally applied to muslims was applied to the rioters. The author Jones did make a telling point that black culture has impacted positively in Britain. I live in the UK and this is true. So many musicans, sportsmen and hilarious comics have been black. This is not the case at all with the muzzies. Though there is a boxer who is muzzie. The exception proves the rule. It was on the whole a somewhat unfair discussion but the old chap did a good job and both sides made some telling points. The one point that was missing was why the Chinese and Indian communities though making a minimal cultural impact in the UK culture have so little crime and do so well in the education system. They seem to be the mirror opposite of the blacks who make a huge positive cultural impact and yet seem to do so badly in the economic sphere. The muzzies of course make no cultural impact of any real significance and do badly at school and do badly economically. They usually end up bottom of the pile in everything. Plus they are the number one terrorist group now that the IRA has gone away. The Muzzies are really something.

  4. The white man speaks the truth. And the truth is offensive and of course, racist.

    Too bad Michael nutter wasn’t on that panel. The liberals all sound the same no matter where they are. Listen to the baloney coming from the black women, “We need to stop with this Us and them–we need to get along–ephemeral euphemisms galore.” What good is the fortune cookie solution going to get. Starkey has a point.

  5. Yes, and our government just commissioned a huge study to support higher immigration refugee numbers …….. are they insane?????????
    Against all the intellectuals in the policy groups who warn about the same thing happening here as in the over populated over immigrated countries of Europe
    We have high unemployment here and the excuse they use, the nonsense paradigm they push to get people frightened and agreeing to not protest more immigration is that we must have and do need more people in order to support the aging population.

    hOW ABOUT USING THE 2 TO 3 BILLION A YEAR SPENT ON THE REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT PROGRAM TO TOP UP ANY NEEDS FOR AGING POPULATIONS AND STILL HAVE PLENTY TO PUT INTO PROGRAMS FOR EDUCATING AND ASSISTING THE UNEMPLOYED ALREADY HERE YOU SUCKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKING IMBICILES
    program the braindead masses to believe all this through the cbc your vehicle of mass propeganda

  6. An old gentleman with some life experience being debated by younger socialists (obvious with their statements) is always doomed to failure. Why? Because common sense and facts are no longer part of the debate. Pat Condell has is right in his last video on the London riots. It is worth the watch and all the answers are in his speech.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*