Category Archives: Political Correctness

German Press on Attack on Merkel: When someone runs towards you, yelling ‘Allahu Akbar’, don’t be bigoted!

Posted on by

Berlin – on Wednesday, a loudly yelling Afghan ran towards Angela Merkel, as she was leaving the Reichstag, and was wrestled down by two security guards. It was caught on camera, and aired live, more or less accidentally.

Please have a look at the two following videos and compare.

The first one aired LIVE, so the interviewer and his guest keep on talking, as they have no idea what is going on. The sound is un-edited and you can hear the yelling very clearly.

Then please watch the second clip, produced by Bild newspaper afterwards, and compare the sound of the two.

1. The clip that aired live, relevant part beginning at 7 seconds in:

2. Bild’s edited clip. Please pay attention to the sound:

Die Welt reassure us that the “disturber was merely running towards Merkel”, no harm intended, and that there is no reason for a “knee jerk reaction”, just because someone runs toward you, yelling “something in a foreign language” that “sounds similar to Allahu akbar”.

We are translating it for the humor:

“Heart stopping moment in front of the Bundestag: On Wednesday, an Afghan ran towards the chancellor, yelling something – then, a bodyguard stopped him. WELT learned from police insiders what they know about the man and how they assess the incident.

(…) He is an Afghan, 23 years old. But he does not live in Berlin. He is from Swabian Ostfildern, southeast of Stuttgart. And he has no police record so far.

His motive does not seem to have been hostile. He simply ran towards the world-famous chancellor. Upon doing so, he was stopped by a bodyguard, whose job it simply is to prevent such incidents. And he did not yell anything political – no slogans, and definitely no suicide attack slogans.

So the case is treated by regular police, not by state security.”

One is reminded of the famous advice that a German criminal psychologist gave, after the axe attack on board a Würzburg train:

Criminal psychologist Jens Hoffmann, commenting on the Würzburg train attack in Tagesanzeiger.

“It is understandable that you feel threatened when someone with an axe enters the train. But we mustn’t become paranoid. It helps to go there and politely ask what it’s all about.”

More data points on British leftist-totalitarianism

Posted on by

First, thanks to Ava Lon, a translation of an interview with a Polish journalist who is a conservative, and has ancestry which fought both the fascist collective right (Nazis) and the fascist collective left (Communists), who was banned in the UK along with threats to close venues for 48 hours that hosted meetings of Polish conservatives who actually wanted to discuss conservative issues about Poland in the UK.

More on this individual and what happened at Gates.

Now, from yesterday, more events showing the enforcement of thought crimes, so selectively enforced against conservative, or Enlightenment values, that it makes the official stated laws on thought and hate crimes, such as they are, grotesque Soviet like distortions of what actually takes place.

Notice the Police reaction to assault by ANTIFA against Tommy:

And Lauren Southern on the banning and detention of Youtube conservative bloggers.

By far the most evil and powerful tool in the arsenal of the tyrant is selective enforcement. The fact that muslims who preach genocide, slavery and systemic rape as a political tool can come and go from the UK, and Canada for that matter, uninhibited while people like these, and Michael Savage, Pamela Geller, Robert Spencer, Martin Sellner, and others have been prevented from entering the UK, and even deported, who had no criminal history whatsoever but merely objected to the transformation of Western nations into Islamic communist ones. Even actual members of Parliament of European states like Geert Wilders.

The interview below is from Washington DC at the Congressional Library in 2009, with Lord Pearson, who had invited Geert Wilders to speak at the House of Lords.

Black Pigeon speaks:

 

 

Government-media complex so Marxist, it should have a warning label

Posted on by

Examples of fake-news and selective enforcement to a predictable, post-Marxist, postmodern set of rules instead of classical liberal principles of one law for all, are so common they barely rate as post worthy. But still, most people don’t even get it yet. So we will plod on.

Some examples however, are next-level selective enforcement and really do have to be seen.

A Hungarian women wrote that she is so ashamed of Hungarian PM Viktor Orban’s anti-National suicide policies that she would “never have a Hungarian boyfriend again”.

Her punishment for what would under other circumstances be considered abhorrent racism got her, her own column in the UK”s Guardian newspaper.

At the moment, I don’t much like being Hungarian. In recent years I’ve started feeling that my nationality resembles a nasty skin disease that I want to scrub off. When I’m abroad, I hide my accent and I call myself a “world citizen”. I’ve vowed never to have a Hungarian boyfriend, or even to settle down in my own country. I hate the fact that much of the world now believes Hungarians to be intolerant and longing for authoritarianism. Not that long ago we were barely ever mentioned in the international media. Now, we’re a primary example of illiberalism in Europe.

An observant and thoughtful commenter added this to the comment section:

The ‘turn-around’ logic is pretty reasonable really. Sauce, goose, gander and all that.

So what did the guardian do with it scant minutes later?

That is correct. The state of controlled, Soviet style Marxist and Marxist race theory, or postmodernism, has reached a stage where a polite, well worded comment that shows the fallacy of anti-white racism as a form of morally superior, anti-racism, is now a violation of community rules and will be removed.

The time to buy old Shakespeare books from estate sales and store them in weather proof barns is now. It won’t be long till those that control the present start to more aggressively control the past in order to secure a controlled future.

(An afterthought. Notice the hijacking of the term, “Illiberal” by the author. In fact her article is racist, supremacist and illiberal. A liberal view is that all people are equal before the law, and that one decides on an individual basis who is worthy of your attention based on whatever standard you set for yourself for your own purposes.)

 

Tommy Robinson Suspended from Twitter for Stating Statistical Fact About Muslims in Grooming Gangs

Posted on by

(When truth is no longer a defense, the rules governing our societies need close scrutiny)

Breitbart:

The controversial activist Tommy Robinson has been suspended from Twitter for quoting research which found that nearly 90 per cent of convicted grooming gang members in the UK are Muslim.

Mr. Robinson was suspended from the social media platform for 7 days for stating the findings of the Quilliam Foundation think tank, whose founder worked as an adviser to Prime Minister David Cameron on issues around Islam.

 

“90% of grooming gang convictions are Muslims,” Mr. Robinson wrote in a tweet on February 25th, rounding up the number identified by the Quilliam research, which found that 84 per cent of convicted groomers were Muslim in December last year.

Its time those of us who have not signed up to Gab.ai do so. At some point Twitter is going to be the new, Myspace.

 

 

 

Legacy media is an actual weapon against reality

Posted on by

Much like how CBC and other lying press is when it comes to reporting non-Leftist, non Islamic events, the German press reported this protest against Merkel’s forced suicide of the German people and culture as “300 people”.

Anyone interested in the CBC’s record on this should check their reportage of the annual pro life march on Parliament Hill every year. Thousands and thousands of people are there consistently and CBC downplays it massively. Now we have to depend on Youtube, while it allows it, to report on the reality of non-Marxist or non-pro-Islamic events.

Why firing a black chef for making classical black American food is perfectly consistent with the narrative

Posted on by

Recently a black chef was fired from NYU for making a meal in the cafeteria for black history month. The meal, was foods that many, if not most black Americans grew up on as the video explains. So why fire him? Why is a black chef making fried chicken, watermelon water and cherry Kool aid for black history month racist?

Most people would laugh and say its “political correctness gone to extremes”.

Its actually political correctness hitting a bullseye.

The point of postmodernism, Communism, leftism and Islam, is to utterly obliterate the past of all cultural groups that stand in the way of their total dominance.

Both communism and Islam have strict rules about obliterating the past of conquered peoples. In fact Muslims refer to any habits, customs, inventions etc. that predate Islamic rule as being from “the time of ignorance”. Islamic ‘archaeologists’ actually destroy evidence of pre-Islamic peoples, which is why there are no Churches or Synagogues in Saudi Arabia despite it being Jewish and Christian lands for centuries before Mohammad.

It is also easy to prove that vegan gluten free food is infinitely more stereotypical of leftists or feminized males and classic far leftist white females than is fried chicken to black-americans. That will never be pulled from the menu for being stereotypical though.

But every group’s traditional foods will be, as soon as they are able to.

Different groups like different foods for a variety of possible reasons. It could, in some cases, even be genetic where one group evolved under conditions which favoured eating some foods over others, or it could be cultural where a group was raised a certain way because it was an homage to their ancestry. Both theories however, are in direct contradiction to The Blank Slate.

One thing all flavours of communism have in common, is the absolute and unchallengeable idea that all human beings are perfectly maleable, and equal in potential. That taken from parents young enough, and with their environment carefully controlled, you can create whatever you want from them. This has been repeated by leftist leaders across the 20th century from Mao, who referred to all babies as “a blank piece of paper upon which you can write what you want”, to Stalin and Hitler.

In order to create this perfect socialist man therefore, you have to divorce people from their pasts, which is what gives them a large part of their identity, and from their nation-state for the same reason. hence traditional Black-American food stuffs must be viewed as racist and the chef made an example of, even if he was black, and grew up on this food and made it because it reflects a very personal and real aspect of his past and the past of his entire group experience as a child, as is so well explained in this video.

Curious though that halal, Popeye chicken seems exempt from this prohibition isnt it?

“He who controls the past, controls the future. He who controls the present, controls the past” -George Orwell

H/T Ava Lon

Facebook owner posts his intentions to force left-leaning, often fake news on its users

Posted on by

First, the link, special thanks to https://twitter.com/RedPillTweets who answered my request for the original post, after a fruitless couple of hours with a friend trying to track it down.

An excerpt:

The idea is this update will show more news from sources that are broadly trusted across the community and not only by those who read them directly. For example, take the Wall Street Journal or New York Times. Even if you don’t read them or don’t agree with everything they write, most people have confidence that they’re high quality journalism. On the flip side, there are blogs that have intense followings but are not widely trusted beyond their core audience. We will show those publications somewhat less.

 

Preventing false news, hate speech, and other abuse is another important area of focus for us. In order to protect the security and integrity of our platform, we’re investing in both people and technology. We now have around 14,000 people working across community ops, online ops, and our security efforts. That’s almost double where we were a year ago. We’ve also built new technology to detect suicidal posts that has helped first responders reach more than 100 people who needed help quickly, and we’ve built AI systems to flag suspicious behavior around elections in real time and remove terrorist content. Thanks to our AI systems, 99% of the ISIS and Al-Qaeda-related terror content we take down is now removed before anyone flags it to us — and in some cases, before anyone sees it.

 

We’ve also made progress demoting false news in News Feed, which typically reduces an article’s traffic by 80% and destroys the economic incentives most spammers and troll farms have to generate these articles in the first place.

So what YOU find meaningful or credible, will be downgraded and what HE finds important and what you should think, will be upgraded. Just to be clear on what all that bulls*t means in his post.

Below, screen caps of the whole thing:

David Wood on the Jordan Peterson-Channel4 TV debacle

Posted on by

Normally I would never give this much attention to an event as I and we are doing with the Peterson TV debates.

The reason for doing so in this case, is not about gloating whatsoever.

It is because her approach to this ambush is indicative of a societal problem that is profound and serious and far reaching. For those who saw the Wendy Mesley attack, which was both more dishonest and more effective as character assassination disguised as an ‘interview’, (and was also an Ambush, even more so than the Channel4 one) you may know what I mean.

These TV networks with massive reach are determined to destroy a point of view, and not with facts, science or honesty and not because it is wrong.

But because they don’t like it.

And that makes it worth posting about until the problem goes away.

H/T Perfect Child

 

Why do they call it “Lügenpresse” in Germany? German media amplify “boos” at Trump speech

Posted on by

An original translation by Ava Lon and Egri Nok with much thanks!

From this German publication

Volume of boos during Trump’s Davos speech turned up by German TV

Tagesschau boosted boos for Donald Trump

The boos should be heard clearly: The Tagesschau admits a tone change in a report about Donald Trump. Critics speak of an impermissible manipulation.

The ARD openly admits the change: at the end of a post about Donald Trump, which the Tagesschau published on Twitter, the sound level was turned up higher. The reason: Boos against the US president should be strengthened.

Trump spoke last Thursday at a press conference at the World Economic Forum in Davos about a “nasty, mean, vicious, fake press”, and for that he was booed by people who were present in the hall. But the boos weren’t loud enough for the newscast.

“(and it wasn’t until I became a politician that I realized how) nasty, mean, vicious, fake (the) press (can be)” is the original quote, so Tagesschau just excerpted the five words without context.]

Tagesschau explains its approach

“Yes, we indeed increased the volume a bit in the end so that one can hear the boos. Only in doing so, we were able to reflect what our correspondents had reported on. The microphone recorded mainly Trump, and not so much of the crowd-noise in the hall,” the Tagesschau explained their approach in a Twitter message.

Yes, we indeed increased the volume a bit in the end so that one can hear the boos. Only in doing so, we were able to reflect what our correspondents had reported on. The microphone recorded mainly Trump, and not so much of the crowd-noise in the hall.]

But critics accuse the ARD flagship of improper manipulation. “You know what? You confirm exactly what Trump accuses you all of,” a user commented on Tagesschau’s procedure. Another joked: “But then you make the boos a little quieter at the next Merkel appearance. That’s how we know you and love you.”

The editor-in-chief of the Bild newspaper, Julian Reichelt, also sounded the charge and tweeted to the Tagesschau’s boss: “The Tagesschau ‘help a little’ so that boos against Trump become louder and clearer. Clear crossing of boundaries for a news format, dear Kai Gniffke. And difficult to imagine you would have done the same had it been applause.

The @tagesschau “help a little” so that boos against Trump become louder and clearer. Clear crossing of boundaries for a news format, dear @KaiGniffke . Difficult to imagine you would have done the same had it been applause.

573 Retweets 1,301 Likes]

Tagesschau’s editor-in-chief responds to critics

Gniffke didn’t want to leave it at that. He spoke up on Saturday afternoon with a statement on the Tagesschau website. In his blog post the ARD editor-in-chief again justified the change in volume after the speech with the acoustics in the hall, and also pointed out that the change was made transparent.

“If a reporter conveys the information that the US President was booed, then he has to prove it, and that’s what this tone is, it’s the original sound from the hall, nothing was invented, nothing was suppressed or manipulated,” writes Gniffke, and draws parallels to print media: “By the way, newspapers also make comparisons when they enlarge image sections and may even mark them with a red circle — nobody would come up with the idea of calling this manipulation, but rather journalistic precision.”

The New York Times requires a new word for the deceptions it sells as information

Posted on by

 

The New York Times managed to put out a news piece on a kidnapping of two Americans and two Canadians which contains a clear lie of omission.We need a new term for this.

Maybe gap-information? Or Lapse information? But a neologism is necessary for sure to describe what the post-modern and Muslim leaning press has become.

Read the article at the times:

LAGOS, Nigeria — Gunmen ambushed two Americans and two Canadians traveling through the Nigerian state of Kaduna, kidnapping them and killing two police officers, a state police spokesman said Wednesday.

The visitors were heading south from Kafanchan in Kaduna to the capital, Abuja, on Tuesday night when they were ambushed around Kagarko, the Kaduna state police spokesman, Mukhtar Aliyu, said.

“The two police escorts attached to them engaged the kidnappers in a fierce gun battle, which resulted in the unfortunate death of the two police officers,” Mr. Aliyu said.

The Americans and Canadians are investors setting up solar stations in villages around Kafanchan, Mr. Aliyu said.

Security officers, including an anti-kidnapping unit, have been sent to the area to try to rescue the abductees, he said.”

The article continues on to mention a German pair that was also kidnapped without saying anything meaningful about by who or what. Just by some Niigerian Herdsman on a sort of jaunt, The way Portuguese people might just break out playing Fado.

Now lets look at the demography of the North of Nigeria. Although the article does not say the kidnapping was in the North, ABC News does:

From Wikipedia:

Main article: Religion in Nigeria

Nigeria is nearly equally divided between Christianity and Islam. The majority of Nigerian Muslims are Sunni and are concentrated in the northern, central and south-western zones of the country, while Christians dominate in some central states( especially Plateau and Benue states), and the south-east and south-south regions. Other religions practiced in Nigeria include African Traditional Religion, Hinduism, Bahai, Judaism, The Grail Message, and the Reformed Ogboni Fraternity[19]

Islam of course, has as one of its central doctrines, the time honoured tradition of kidnapping unbelievers for ransom. Something the Somali pirates are quite adept at.

How odd that all the media would fail to mention who kidnaps these people and why.

Also notice that the Canadian and Americans who were kidnapped most recently were there to set up solar electric stations,using technology invented and developed in the West, and the services from which, the locals would likely benefit greatly.

Instead, any attempt at development is met instead, with the short term strategy of ransoming for the few, those who would create long term gains for the many.

We can’t know for certain that this is an islamic thing. But we can know for certain that the government-media complex has a policy of deliberately shielding Islam from blame for its own actions, even to the extent of arresting people in some European countries who speak plainly about it.

So given the tiny amount of research into Nigerian demographics I did, its more than just a reasonable assumption.

H/T Wrath of Khan