1. This site uses the term dialectics a lot. We also often state that it does not mean hypocrisy, or selective enforcement. It means a grand strategy to take down Western civilization by a very specific means of steering media and what people think to create a reaction, or a process. More specifically to get an end goal that is nearly NEVER stated by what people mistake for information. It is what we are told is intended to DO rather than what the material we are told MEANS.

During Covid, this was bare naked to us all. No science was presented, only material intended to create mass conformity of dangerous and irrational policies. The total loss of all individual rights to the point where citizens who did not know each other felt comfortable accusing each other of crimes against the collective for even questioning state narratives on Covid or the state measures as a ‘result’ of Covid.
I put ‘result’ in scare quotes because it was actually the purpose. It never had anything to do with a pandemic.

This requires a teleological approach. Looking at the trajectory of EVENTS given an informational input.
In the simplest terms, let’s say you want to do great harm to a population. You launch a narrative attack on that population that either appeals to their fears so that they adopt an emergency behaviour that is deleterious to them, or, you appeal to their desires. A perfect sex robot for men, that will drastically reduce the number of babies born and heterosexual relationships. These are just a couple of random examples off the top of my head, both of which are happening or happened, but there are likely even better exemplars out there.

All of this is because the following simple meme must be seen in this light if any progress is to be made.

There is no hypocrisy here. There is just a teleological intention. To destroy America and its law enforcement and all institutions of state. The stated reasons for opposing ICE is utter nonsense. This is about the destruction of the organizational principles and even the thinking behind a Republic and replacing it with something so similar to communism that it’s minutia to the ultimate to quibble over the name of it.

When you look at nearly all the information we are presented with, even that which appears to be supportive of the position of the ‘right’, as actual information, we lose. If you look at it all as tactical to achieve an end state that is deleterious to us as a nation, a people, an identity, we have a fighting chance.

Below, an interview we did with Stephen coughlin where a lot of this is detailed. Also his essay, Re remembering the Misremembered left, the left’s plan to destroy America is what you want to read for an understanding that gives a clear enough model to offer predictive value. At the link, it is available as a free PDF download.

2. Related heavily to 1.

Stephen also refers to what he calls, “allowable counter-narratives”. I’m not sure 100% what he means exactly, but our own understanding of events on that term play out this way.

When someone argues reality against a state narrative attack, it is allowed, unless of course the person is too authoritative. Then they are personally destroyed. Not because they are wrong, but because they are right and their speech is a threat to the intention of the narrative attack. Whatever it may be. For example if a person is in a position of real political authority, a mayor or even wife of a mayor, or they have real credibility as a scienctist and point out that there is zero evidence of mass graves at Canadian residential schools, and that further, the evidence presented that there are any is faked and misrepresented for political purposes, they will be hurt one way or another.

Most of us can get away with telling the truth for the moment without too much personal damage. Maybe being severely limited on social media for example. But the point we want to draw here, is that generally speaking, opposing a mass-line narrative attack with truth and science is more or less allowed because it is also distracting people from the telos of the narrative attack itself.

When people argue for or against Abortion, they are not looking at the state’s role in promoting it, likely as a way of destroying the Judeo-Christian concept of the sanctity of life itself. Which of course is why it led to MAiD, and why MAiD went very quickly from a program that can be argued for on compassionate grounds to what it is in Canada. A way of killing white people. Or at least the statistics seem to indicate that this is the result, and therefore the purpose.

The mandates to pretty much force everyone across the West and in particular, the Commonwealth countries to inject multiple doses of an experimental genetic compound, likely had more to do with destruction of the concept of bodily autonomy and acceptance of stat control than anything to do with preventing a cold.

Recently, I attended a lecture on how the global warming mass line attack on Western Civilization no longer mattered because no one believes it anymore, so it will be dropped and its a non starter,

From our perspective, this is as far from any practical truth as can be, or very nearly.

The purpose of the Global Warming mass line was destruction of Western power and industry. It was never about the climate. Therefore, arguing the science, like arguing the science of the vaccines, actually had little to nothing to do with the issue as it was presented.

Not that there is no point to arguing for the truth of these things. Regina Watteel and her book, Fisman’s Fraud, and Tom Harris, whose lectures and interviews on climate we have posted numerous times are brilliant and important. But from our perspective their true value is just step 1. To get people to understand that the state narrative is incorrect. Step 2 is to demonstrate, as Regina does brilliantly, that it was knowingly untrue. That it is, as she says in her book title, Fisman’s Fraud. David Fisman being the architect of the faked data that justified the illegal Covid measures the state undertook, allegedly based on his faked data.

What is much more likely of course, is that the state demanded data they could use to justify the measures they wanted to implement. Again, a teleological based analysis, rather than a face value one.

The state always knew it was lying. So telling or revealing the truth is not going to change policy, since the narrative was created to justify the policy. The policy was not created in response to a problem. This is dialectics at its core. So the people not believing in a narrative will not affect the policy. In Canada, laws are being passed right to this day that allege to be in response to Climate Change. It doesn’t matter one iota if not a single Canadian believes any of it. Sadly of course, many many do. It’s very disheartening. But it’s still besides the point. Canadians are still being told to take the mRNA injections by the state broadcasters. And many do. I know a 21 year old girl who recently spent the night in hospital with serious heart issues 2 days after getting her flu and Covid injections. We can only hope that the damage to her heart will not have too serious an impact on her life. But this was within the last 30 days.

If the narrative is dropped, it is because it did its job. That the policies they wanted are established. The state has zero ethical difficulty pivoting 180 degrees on a narrative when it is needed to reach an agenda.

We went from nuclear winter to global warming and barely skipped a beat. But the intention was exactly the same. Destroy Western industrial power. And now, we are a vassal state of China in Canada. If one needs internal logic for all this, that would be it.

4 years ago, the UN produced a bizarre video where a Dinosaur spoke to the UN to warn us all about Climate Change as an existential threat. All the evidence in it was fraudulent. It had no science. But it is a brilliant example of the UN’s narrative attack on the West. China still continues building thousands of coal plants a year. Outside the West, this kind of propaganda has no effect beyond giving them a massive advantage over Western nations that invented all this technology.

Below, a counter-propaganda video which is actually factually accurate. The irony in its presentation won’t go unnoticed either.

This is essentially a very entertaining version of Tom Harris‘ presentation on the same subject. But listen to CBC, CTV or Global. When they stop pushing the climate change narrative, if they ever do, it will just mean they are on to the next one. Not that we ‘won’ anything with the truth.

Here is a link to the most recent interview I did with Tom Harris for all who may be interested in actual climate science, and more details from the video above.

3. a driver repeatedly slammed his vehicle into the Chabad World Headquarters in Brooklyn on Wednesday 

NY Daily News

The NYPD is beefing up security around houses of worship in New York City after a driver repeatedly slammed his vehicle into the Chabad World Headquarters in Brooklyn on Wednesday in a suspected hate crime, according to NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch.

A Honda sedan struck a side entrance to the Chabad building located on Eastern Parkway near Kingston Ave. in Crown Heights around 8:46 p.m., Tisch said at a press conference outside the Chabad movement’s international HQ.

The car was then seen reversing before striking the entranceway a second time, Tisch said.

Video posted online by Kol Haolam News shows the Honda sedan repeatedly slamming into a side entrance to the Chabad headquarters, with the driver backing up and then driving into a pair of double doors multiple times.

When the male driver finally emerges from the vehicle — after ramming the entranceway at least five times, knocking one of the doors off its hinges — he can be heard shouting “I f–cking slipped, you a–hole,” the video shows.

The current wave of antisemitism in the West is a perfect example of telos based analysis of narrative attacks. In another interview with Maj. Coughlin, he explained the purpose of the Oct, 7 attacks against Israel as being the seed for massive anti-Israel protests based on misrepresented narratives on the Israeli reaction to the attack. The purpose of which, would be to laser paint Jewish people and institutions for these kinds of actions. It has been fairly successful overall. People who formerly would have thought of themselves as of the left in a way we understood that term in the 60s or 70s, the useful idiot form of leftists, are now looking to kill Jewish people, or damage their institutions and actually see the state of Israel as illegitimate and a threat to basic human rights. But somehow not any of the dozens of Islamic countries where mentioning Human rights can be grounds for prison or execution.

The press is apparently playing the mental illness card already before releasing his name. Which frankly, is almost as informative.

One last thing.

This site frequently posts the same videos or books or points. We feel that one of the human weaknesses which is well exploited by our enemies, is our unending thirst for novelty. This is exploited as much by pornographers in what at least is in effect, an attack on the family, as it is by the narrative makers who know our need for ‘infotainment’ will lead us by the nose from narrative point to narrative point. A constant state of reacting to attacks rather than settling on what we know is true, understanding the enemy strategy, and then developing tactics that work to counter them.

Just as an example, we post the video below on the origins of the Trans-narrative a lot. And here it is again.

Thank you all for your attention to this site and its ideas. Increasingly we are shadow banned. Emails don’t go out, our X account gets ZERO views on original posts and a few on responses. So those of you that make the effort to navigate here and have a read are really appreciated.