Category Archives: Dr. John Campbell

The following interview was conducted on September 16th, 2022 with one of the few mortician/embalmers to come forward after the vaxx mRNA injection rollouts to expose the never before seen calamari like blood clots they found in the bodies of people who had died after getting the mRNA gene therapy shots.
At first, I even thought this was disinformation. It was too bizarre and took away from the real information as I saw it, which people needed to know in order not to take any more of the shots. In my defence, the information already solidly out there scientifically should have been enough to stop ANYONE from getting the shots, even without all that came after. For that matter, it was enough that all the political leaders of the Western world assured us they were safe and effective when it was a categorical impossibility that they could know that.

This meant they were lying. And when you know someone is lying you actually know a great deal.

It didn’t take long till people I had come to know as extremely reputable actors assured me that the unnatural long white rubbery blood clots in the bodies of the post mRNA injection rollout was both true, and an increasingly common phenomenon.

This interview is one of a few we did of an embalmer that went as public as he could about these long white bizarre clots and provided a lot of photos he took of clots he pulled out of bodies.

We bring this up now because Dr. John Campbell Ph.D. nursing, who has done some of the very best science on the real dangers of the shots, (once he realized how wrong his initial position was) now has some solid published papers on what these clots actually are. And it is worth knowing for the science minded.

Welp. This is one. Has Campbell jumped the shark on this one? Or is the unbelievable true? or is it as he says, given that he links to peer reviewed papers from Japan and South Korea. Or was he set up to publish this to destroy his credibility for being over the target for so long now on so much government and phrama-fraud?

Watch and decide.

Also it is possible that this is a sort of crystallization phenomenon and may not be a deliberate effect of the vaxx, but some sort of Crystal structure that forms from some component in the vaxx.

No idea.

YouTube has pulled the video. Here is is on Rumble below:

Link to peer reviewed study.

Several more related links.

***Additional thoughts on Sept. 8, 2024***

The reasons for not taking the shots were scientific and had massive political consequences as well, because the state itself moved from science and reason and rights to scientism and dialectics and collectivism.

But the reason not to take the shots was that the evidence was not there that it was safe or beneficial, so when the state said it was, we knew the state was lying, not wrong, but lying. And therefore we should do our own research and analysis best we can rather than trust the state’s word to be reflective of reality or the public interest.

Lenin, I believe it was, said the best way to defeat the opposition is to lead it. And shortly after people started to recognize and identify issues with the shots, massive claims bordering on, and sometimes entering the realm of the supernatural started to be made about the negative effects of them.

When it first was said that the shots caused massive long weird blood clots, I dismissed the claims. It seemed unlikely and there was no evidence for it. Subsequently, a number of practicing embalmers came forward with the same set of experiences and a great deal of evidence. Then, I did believe it.

Determining what this means then, is another matter.

Many people came forward also saying that post injection, self assembling things that looked mechanical was found in people’s blood. The claims about these things were fantastical. That they where bluetooth networks or I dunno, alien base stations or any number of things.

John Campbell now has produced two peer reviewed studies showing that there are “self assembling” objects in people’s blood after taking one or more of the mRNA injections. So for the moment, unless Campbell himself is being punked or set up to be discredited, which I would believe as that would be a fairly ordinary and common information warfare move, let’s accept that this is true about the self assembling objects.

OK then…

The following is PURELY speculative. I am NOT a scientist. I make no claims from my own credentials or research. These are just speculations which would be my thought process in terms of attributing a position on these phenomenon for the moment, accepting what we think we know, and not conflating that with what other people impute is the meaning behind these phenom.

The Blood clots:

The mRNA within the shots was delivered to our blood cells via something called “Nano-lipid particles”. Lipid means fat. The blood clots they are pulling from people are made of fibrin I have been told.

Here is what CHAT GPT says Fibrin is:

Fibrin is a tough, insoluble protein that plays a critical role in blood clotting. It forms when the protein fibrinogen, which is present in blood plasma, is converted into fibrin by the enzyme thrombin during the clotting process. Fibrin strands weave together to form a mesh that, along with platelets, helps to stop bleeding by creating a stable blood clot at the site of an injury.

Ok we already know that the shots cause clotting. In fact, it was known very early on that after injection, some people had to go into hospital for anti coagulant infusions for some time. MANY died of heart death caused by various forms of clots. So it is easy to see how the same factors in the shots would also cause the formation of these freaky calamari like fibrin clots in the blood.

No one has said that it means we are being attacked by space octopi, but you can see where I’m going with this.

Most life on Earth is Carbon based. This is because Carbon seems to have the greatest ability to bond with other elements and form complex compounds. I think the next most likely is silicone, which is why some science fiction speculates about silicon based life, and of course, people who make sex robots are working 3 shifts to figure out how.

Carbon also forms crystals, the most famous of which is diamond. Diamond is in the cubic crystal system. It can be cubic, or like the more desirable structure from a gem cutter’s point of view, 2 X 4 sided pyramids back to back. But it forms crystals easily.

I asked Chat GPT to list examples of carbon based crystals:

Examples of carbon-based crystals include:

1. Diamond: A crystal structure where each carbon atom is covalently bonded to four other carbon atoms in a tetrahedral arrangement. This gives diamond its hardness and transparency.
2. Graphite: A crystalline form of carbon in which the atoms are arranged in layers of hexagonal rings. These layers are weakly bonded, allowing them to slide over each other, making graphite a good lubricant and conductor of electricity.
3. Graphene: A single layer of carbon atoms arranged in a two-dimensional honeycomb lattice. It is known for its extraordinary strength, flexibility, and electrical conductivity.
4. Fullerenes: Molecules composed entirely of carbon, in the form of a hollow sphere (e.g., buckminsterfullerene, C60), ellipsoid, or tube. Fullerenes are used in nanotechnology and materials science.
5. Carbon Nanotubes: Cylindrical nanostructures composed of carbon atoms in a hexagonal arrangement. They have exceptional strength and electrical properties, and they are used in various applications from electronics to nanomedicine.
6. Lonsdaleite: Also known as hexagonal diamond, this rare carbon crystal is similar to diamond but with a different arrangement of carbon atoms, making it slightly harder than traditional diamonds.

These forms of carbon exhibit unique properties due to variations in how carbon atoms bond and arrange themselves.

We already know the shots contain graphene. No idea if it is graphene oxide or straight graphene, but it doesn’t seem unreasonable that a meta material like graphene, given the properties of carbon, and especially the meta-material Graphene, that it could form 10 micrometer structures like the ones in the studies.

Leaping to what those structures do, or are capable of, or even that they are deliberate requires evidence. And those suggesting the purpose of them without evidence are just the same as those who say the shots are safe and effective.

Reason and science might save us. Scientism and reflexive opposition will destroy us.

This isn’t to say that everyone who speculates on this is wrong. Just that the reasons for the specific phenomenon of the clots and the structures in the blood have simple and ‘reasonable’ explanations based on what we KNOW is in the vaxx, and what we know they do. The nano-lipid particles alone are thought to cause clumping of cells to form clots. (That is crudely put and as I write it, I can hear Dr. Shoemaker’s admonishing voice in my head on that point.)

Also this isn’t to say that the clots are not dangerous. They are clearly lethally dangerous for untold thousands. Maybe more. As for the nano-structures, I do not believe at this particular moment that they are more than odd crystalline artifacts from the graphene. I doubt they have a purpose. But lets see some experimentation to see if they do. We actually did some testing on some of the claims about the vaxx. Crude ones, and ones I wouldn’t submit to a journal, but we did our best with what we had and some of them seemed to be true. The spots where the vaxx was administered seemed to have a magnetic property for a while at that spot. Other claims were not. Like chip readers registering something at the injection site. That was a hoax to mock the rubes by a vet tech. She put a dog ID RFID chip under her folded short sleeve shirt and pretended it was the vaxx that made her reader show numbers.

Personally I think that was a loathsome thing to do under the circumstances. To create disinformation as a way of winding up the vaccine skeptical. And It would be just as bad if we skeptics were wrong.

In any case, just because the state lied to us in a way unprecedented perhaps in Western nations, and certainly since WW2, does not mean all who agree with us on some issues are also not lying to us, either for personal gain, because of poor thought processes, or in fact are agents of the state pied pipering us to destruction through a path that appears to be of our own choosing, but is just another state line of operation in an information warfare battlefield.

Oh and yeah also now this:

John Campbell Ph.D. speaks to a New York Times article which actually talks about damage done to people from the mRNA vaxx

Dr. Campbell does a good job here navigating what he actually thinks about this article with what can be said on YouTube, which he admits he doesn’t actually know at this point. Probably because Google, the owner of YouTube has become the most censorious organization since Joe Biden’s White House.

A few thoughts of our own:

Once upon a time I asked Stephen Coughlin if a news item in an MSM publication which leaned towards our understanding of events meant that we were winning, or at least gaining ground. His answer, (quoting from memory of course, so any error is mine) was that it means the government media complex will never allow us to be ahead of the public narrative. As I understood the answer, it means that the media in order to manipulate us for the purposes of the revolution, or COMINTERN or however you want to label the forces in action to remove our individuality, will say whatever part of the truth, or as much of it they need to, to stay ahead of the next lie. ‘Some of the vaccines you took might have been unsafe’ they tell us at the NYT. They do say the BioNTech is linked to an inflammation of the heart which is surprising as the emphasis seemed to be on the ones removed early like J&J. For those who have already forgotten, J&J is the same company that can’t seem to make talcum powder that doesn’t give you cancer. But as Diana West once said, Beware of anyone claiming to be from the inside who doesn’t tell you anything you don’t already know”.  It would be good to know if the NYT still pushes other mass line narrative attacks on the public like Carbon dioxide is causing catastrophic climate change and aliens are attacking our militaries and criticism of Islamic scripture is hate speech and so on and so on. Wierd that overpopulation isn’t on the list anymore isn’t it? I guess that would interfere with the mass immigration effort which is the actual plan to destroy Western civilization, the rest often seeming like a distraction from that.

The article is quite artful in its deceptiveness:

The officials each responded with “that very tired mantra: ‘But the virus is worse,’” Dr. Murphy recalled. “Yes, the virus is worse, but that doesn’t obviate doing research to make sure that there may be other options.”

1. No, the virus is not worse
2. It wouldn’t matter if it was, since the vaxx has been proven not only not to protect anyone from the virus, but to actually make it more likely they will get the disease. This from official Canadian Government statistics as it happens.

The NYT article actually reads more like a kind of self absolution though, than any kind of reveal of the actual nature or damage of the vaxx. While they do pick out one or two noteworthy victims, it would still be well within the realm of acceptable costs to most who convinced themselves the vaxx saved millions of lives.

The article mentions two principle people from the FDA. Janet Woodcock and Peter Marks.

From the article:

Marks:

Asked at a recent congressional hearing whether the nation’s vaccine-safety surveillance was sufficient, Dr. Peter Marks, director of the F.D.A.’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, said, “I do believe we could do better.”

Woodcock:

But in a recent interview, Dr. Janet Woodcock, a longtime leader of the Food and Drug Administration, who retired in February, said she believed that some recipients had experienced uncommon but “serious” and “life-changing” reactions beyond those described by federal agencies.

“I feel bad for those people,” said Dr. Woodcock, who became the F.D.A.’s acting commissioner in January 2021 as the vaccines were rolling out. “I believe their suffering should be acknowledged, that they have real problems, and they should be taken seriously.”

Same people not altogether that long ago. I mean when it mattered. I mean when people still were injecting this material and when many had not but could be coerced into doing so. When it actually mattered what these people said because it could influence their decision to take the shots as opposed to what they say once people stopped taking it and it doesn’t matter anymore:

This one is a little different and far far more horrifying. Dr. Marks said they sped up the approval process in order to make people more likely to take the insufficiently tested mRNA injections. And he says this like its a good thing.

Janet Woodcock compilation:

The article goes on to blame those of us skeptical about the safety or efficacy of the shots for the inability to properly research it:

The rise of the anti-vaccine movement has made it difficult for scientists, in and out of government, to candidly address potential side effects, some experts said. Much of the narrative on the purported dangers of Covid vaccines is patently false, or at least exaggerated, cooked up by savvy anti-vaccine campaigns.

Questions about Covid vaccine safety are core to Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s presidential campaign. Citing debunked theories about altered DNA, Florida’s surgeon general has called for a halt to Covid vaccination in the state.

“The sheer nature of misinformation, the scale of misinformation, is staggering, and anything will be twisted to make it seem like it’s not just a devastating side effect but proof of a massive cover-up,” said Dr. Joshua Sharfstein, a vice dean at Johns Hopkins University.

That’s risible. The difficulty in researching a thing has nothing to do with what people think about the thing. If that was true, people would still believe rain came from holes in the firmament.

In other words, this NYT article starts to look like a fire-escape down from the gallows where these characters are beginning to look like they belong.

It’s weird that Pfizer obfuscates so hard under questioning when the only people in the entire world that actually got any immunity from the vaccine is actually Pfizer and ModeRNA.