“The secret of all victory lies in the organization of the non-obvious.” -Marcus Aurelius
This is one of the best things I have seen in a long time as a comprehensive but understandable explanation of Islam and its intentions.
Both people conducting this interview/discussion are major experts in Islam. For more on them, read the story at RAIR.
The video is below:
This is not a drill. This is not data points or indicators that the direction appears to be leftward. These are overt laws which obliterate rule of law, the presumption of innocence, and criminality becoming arbitrary and whimsical at the state’s fancy based on dialectical processes rather than what may be true.
1. The first video must be seen in its entirety. Sorry about all the damned commercials. I wonder if Google puts way too many on videos which expose the revolutionary efforts by the COMINTERN Viceroy of Canada in order to get people not to watch it all the way.
I would like to add that although he does intimate it at the end, it should be stressed that what this bill C-2 does is far worse than merely making all procedure that protects privacy disappear. It is that what constitutes criminality itself will become arbitrary and of a dialectical nature. If you oppose the state or state narratives, reasons will be found to make you a criminal, if indeed they don’t simply say that you are an enemy of the people, as they did in the Soviet Union.
Please watch all of this.
2. A superb example of dialectical law:
A federal labour board has ruled that Employment Insurance’s call-centre management acted properly when it fired a probationary agent whose on-the-job tirade questioned Black Lives Matter protests and asked coworkers, “When will there be a day to remember white people?”
Public Sector Labour Relations and Employment Board adjudicator Christopher Rootham said the remarks showed the worker “unsuitable to serve in a diverse public-service workplace committed to equity and respect.”
Although the discussion had no link to her duties, Rootham wrote that behaviour during working hours is part of a probationary review and that dismissal was a “good-faith response.”
The six-month employee launched into her commentary on what a colleague described as a “slow day for calls,” criticising 2020 demonstrations where then-prime minister Justin Trudeau knelt with marchers.
Witnesses recalled her saying Black Lives Matter protesters wanted to erase history by scrapping brands like Aunt Jemima and Uncle Ben and insisting that “it’s not like Hitler was walking around killing people.”
Affidavits also recounted her claims that Covid-19 threats were exaggerated, that masks were unnecessary and that media coverage of suspected graves at an indian residential school in Kamloops, B.C., was overblown because the events “happened years ago.”
I guess the joke was on her. There were no graves at all.
3. This is Germany, but its clearly in concert with Canada:
I think we can guess which politicians it is criminal to insult. The current German govt actually PAYS ANTIFA to attack, insult, lie about and otherwise frame AfD supporters as they attempt to make the party itself illegal.
4. Top constitutional lawyer slams Indigenous land acknowledgements as virtue signaling
Indigenous land acknowledgments have increased in Canada since unproven claims that unmarked graves were discovered at former residential schools gained media attention.
(LifeSiteNews) – One of Canada’s top constitutional lawyers gave a blunt assessment regarding his views of so-called Indigenous “land acknowledgements” that have become commonplace in all forms of Canadian society, saying they are nothing more than “hypocritical virtue signaling.”
“Aboriginal land acknowledgements are hypocritical virtue signaling by people who would never ever give away their own home for free to an Aboriginal,” Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF) president John Carpay said in a recent video message.
“They like to pretend the land was stolen, but they themselves are not going to give up their own home or land and give that back to an Aboriginal.”
Carpay noted that in his view, if the land is “stolen,” then to “give it back.”
“If you’re not willing to give it back, don’t describe it as stolen land acknowledgements do nothing to help Aboriginals on reserves who are facing poverty and unemployment and high rates of suicide, drug addiction, often very corrupt local governments,” he reasoned.
Indigenous land acknowledgments have become common in Canada and have increased since the unproven claims that unmarked graves have been discovered at former residential schools gained media attention. Indeed, so prevalent that even King Charles III gave one recently while delivering the Throne Speech on behalf of Prime Minister Mark Carney’s Liberal government.
John Carpay and his law firm, are at this point the last hope for rule of law, and actual constitutional rights in Canada. But he is wrong in a key aspect of his assertion. In fact, Land Claims are FAR MORE than mere virtue signalling. They are the dialectic narrative attack on Canadians to ensure they feel they have no grounds with which to object to the deracination of their culture, laws, beliefs, reproductive taboos or any other aspect of their identity whatsoever as it is destroyed in part by mass immigration.
The Land Claims narrative attack is to make it clear that Canadians have no claim on Canada and have no more right to be here and determine the laws and culture than say, 60 million Muslims, Africans and Chinese. And this is FAR MORE than BS virtue signalling.
At a Holocaust memorial ceremony that took place a week or so ago after the monument had been vandalized, the first speaker invited to talk to those people who had gathered there was a woman who identified as an Algonquin. It is pretty clear what she is saying to the Jewish community here.
Tomorrow I hope to write up a bit about the foreign operatives who did a needle attack on a Music festival in France.
One might hope it might give the French a little greater understanding of the events of Oct. 7th at another music festival in Israel. But that would not be the actual issue.
Music festivals, and all Western cultural events, certainly things like Christmas Festivals and any other mainstay of Western Civilization will increasingly disappear. The auspices will be public safety, as it is so much collectivist totalitarianism. After Covid and the Vaxx mandates, no one should be arguing with me about that.
But clearly we see the process of encouraging, protecting to the max, even to the extent of not allowing criticism of illegal public gatherings such as Muslims blocking roads with public spectacles of religious ritual behaviour, fully unnecessary by any religious standard but an excellent way to assert dominance. Those acts are protected. But hundreds of people being pricked by needles, or run over at Christmas markets, well those are technically illegal but the results of all this are a foregone conclusion. Western people are not allowed to defend themselves in any meaningful way and deference? forget it.
Our own governments pay invaders to invade.
The land claims bollux is entirely about delegitimizing any argument using what we call, ‘temporal relativism’ (you did this back then so you have no right to object to others doing this same awful thing now even though if it was so awful, why should it be OK now and not then?) against our utter deracination by mass immigration.
… as the election for Democrat front runner is tomorrow.
The same Iranian patriot responds to Charlie Kirk:
Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.
This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.
So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.
This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.
For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like.
One of the more effective, and infuriating dialectical tricks of the left is the moving from one level of abstraction which is actually relevant to another one that is not.
On this site we have covered this theme many many times. But its importance now deserves another visit as it is being used to potential great harm when it comes to the Israel-Iran war. Or for that matter, the Ukraine Russia war, or any war people are made to care about enough that it is worth the cost of the propaganda effort.
Early in the days of WWII there was a large anti-war effort by leftists across the USA. Nothing like we see now of course, but it was organized and would look familiar. Far less kinetic than today’s and certainly less vulgar, but based on the same con.
That war itself is inherently bad, and anyone who wants war is bad, and not engaging in war is always good.
I will step out on a limb here and say that all the organizers of all these anti-war protests in the West are indeed very pro-war, but on the other side.
War is generally a horrible horrible thing. But when it is done on a cost benefit basis, it’s just like any other decision. Is it more costly in lives, treasure or liberty to wage war or not. Is surrender to an existential enemy better than a war for the survival of your people, however you may define “your people”?
Then we get to the issue of preemptive strikes. In theory, it is always vastly cheaper in every way to destroy an enemy’s capacity to destroy you before they have it than it is to defend yourself against that capacity and face all out war as in WW1 and WW2.
Israel’s strike on the Osirak reactor in Iraq was an excellent move. Not even the Russians, who were the Iraqi protectorates at the time during the Cold War, wanted Iraq to have the bomb. So there was agreement between the US, The USSR and Israel that Israel should fly a sortie over the reactor, take it out, the Soviets would object at the Security Council, the US would veto the objection and end of story. Everyone was happy and certainly a lot safer.
Iran has been stating for decades that it intends to build nuclear bombs and use them against Israel and the United States. They have spent billions on facilities and technology to do exactly that. And, each year that goes by where this capacity was not removed, has made the operation more risky, more expensive and more dangerous to do.
Clearly however, the point de bascule has arrived. The chance to remove the Mullah’s regime’s capacity to build and deliver nukes is fading. And once they have a deterrent like that, they clearly will increase their status as regional hegemon far beyond what it already is. And yes, it already is. Yemen, Lebanon, and under Al Assad, Syria, although I don’t know the extent of Iranian influence in that country now.
So Tucker Carlson’s curiously naive position on all war being bad seems vaguely reminiscent of all the anti-war protests of the past. Maybe he should have been a character on the 70s & 80s TV show M*A*S*H where the cool kids all mocked the US, patriotism as an antiquated primitive modus for the perpetually square, and the really cool kids would get drunk all the time and bitch about how the war they where fighting against North Korea had no justification was a total waste of time and resources.
In essence, the concept of pro-war Vs anti-war is about as much a dialectic con as pro modern medication Vs anti-modern medication. It depends what is wrong with you, what else you can do about it, and the cost benefit of those meds. Assuming of course, unlike during Covid you can actually get real information about what you’re taking.
Natural Vs. artifact is about the same. I think taking properly made aspirin when you need it is a lot safer than scraping the bark of a White Willow tree and taking your chances on the dose and whatever other crap might be mixed in with that bark.
So when the real issue is A, the left will elevate the issue to one or more layers above and beyond A to make the case that you must be against A.
War with Iran should not be supported because war is bad.
Corporate medicine should never be taken because corporations are bad.
One of the best examples of this which worked all too well until it didn’t, was the concept of “Asian Grooming Gangs” to describe exclusively Muslim Child-Sex-slave gangs.
When you hear Asian Grooming Gangs you might visualize a small gay Taiwanese hair dresser. The facts though, are horrifying beyond any decent British person’s ability to believe it was taking place at the time. Which is why they pulled the level of abstraction trick. Make it about Asians so the Islamic connection and motive won’t be identified. Also so that the plot to continue to import millions of Muslim men would not be interfered with by people who don’t want their daughters turned into industrial strength sex slaves for Muslim men.
These are just two egregious examples and of course, current ones. But it is a constant in the arsenal of Leftist dialectical devices.
Feel free to add any others you notice to the comments and as I remember them, I’ll add the odd one here.
Screenshot
This post was inspired by watching the first 13 minutes of this video where this aspect was entirely missed
This is good to see. Imagine if this took place in Great Britain or Canada. Mischief and Hate Crime charges would follow amid social ostracism, loss of jobs, millions in legal fees etc.
One might think that there is really no point in trying to explain to people that Canada is communist. We really are at the stage of demoralization Yuri Bezmenov detailed: “Even if I took them by force to the Soviet Union and showed them the concentration camps, they would refuse to believe it”.
Portugal seems not to be quite at that point yet, as they can publicly recognize that Islam is a threat doctrine and Mosques are where this doctrine is spread. But then again, we don’t know what happened to these people after this march.
Short excerpt of Yuri from his 1984 interview with CBC (before the CBC became the chief agent of exactly what Bezmenov is discussing.)
The communist revolution is if not World Wide, certainly across all developed nations. So it is somewhat of a surprise to see this march in Portugal. But as already mentioned, we don’t know what happened afterwards to the marchers. But we all can know for a fact what would happen to this march in the UK, Australia, Canada etc. Protests which do take place and with no resistance from the state, and which are disruptive and often physically destructive are always promoting destruction, or at the least the official side of a narrative attack, itself destructive. Or, they are intensely protesting any grass roots push back on a state narrative. Usually using the same devices. That those who oppose state narrative attacks are ‘racist’ ‘nazi’ ‘hateful’ etc. etc.
Islam is one of the major weapons of the state. See Mark Carney, General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Anglosphere’s statements on Islam in Canada:
Islam actually created its doctrine to be an antithesis to Western thought and values. It was literally written to be in opposition. In fact it really offers nothing else but opposition to all other systems of human thought and societal organization. But unlike Hegel/Marx, there is no intention to destroy Islam and its anti-thesis by combining them to create a synthesis and then so on and so on in an endless cycle of dialectic fusion and destruction. There is only destruction and hatred of the other, and the installation of Islam and its sharia law governance in Islam.
Carney’s line here is a perfect and unvaried active measure which perfectly matches Trudeau’s. Although he does not specifically say, “Diversity is our strength” He does make that same point as a rephrase. That is of course, a dialectic attack on the obviously true statement: “United we Stand, divided we fall”. And of course, “A house divided against itself cannot stand”, (Abraham Lincoln from Mark 3-25) and perhaps “A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within.” attributed to Cicero in Rome.
In other words, “Diversity is our strength” is a way of forcing the nation state of Canada, its culture and laws to fall using Hegelian dialectics. The insertion of a weaponized idea for the sole purpose of destruction of all the demonstrably true and even axiomatic statements and beliefs which hold a country together. Also to get the people who are marked for destruction, the culturally and ethnically Canadian, to carry out that process. And Islam is one of the most powerful weapons the communists have to undo Western values, thought, and of course, our traditional religion(s).
For those of you that have not seen the presser by Campaign Life Coalition last week, please watch their event video again and listen to the list of legislation passed or proposed by the Carney/Trudeau government over the last 10 years and ask yourselves if any of these new laws will be applied to Islam. ANY of them. Especially removing any equality let alone tax advantages to organizations that “promote religion”. Although frankly, the de-incentivizing of the promotion of religion is all by itself, a pretty powerful bit of evidence of the communist nature of this government in Canada, the UK and across the Anglosphere.
And communism is famously opposed to Christianity in particular.
The group behind the largest pro-life march in Canada every year, Campaign Life Coalition (CLC) often attracting 5000 to 15000 participants, held a very unusual event Thursday in front of the US embassy in Ottawa.
They collected 20,000 signatures on a petition they delivered to the person in the PMO, Mark Carney, and presented a formal letter to President Donald Trump to maintain all punitive trade measures on Canada until Canada stops it’s blatantly anti-Christian laws and practices, and slightly less overtly communist policies when it comes to Christianity’s place in Canadian society. Please watch these few short speeches given at their presser where there was no media other than RAIR Foundation present at all.
The speeches were as interesting as much for what was not said, such as how Islam likely will not have any of the impediments to its spread and influence applied to it as Christians most certainly already do, as for what was said. Also when listening to the list of legislation they are objecting to, when heard altogether like that, it is pretty much inescapable to come to the realization that this is a communist revolution.
1. While RFK Jr struggles to get rid of the astonishing grip big pharma has on the entire set of regulatory bodies of the American medical system, Canada is insulting itself with narratives and dialectics on the issue.
Ottawa Citizen: Experts fear upheaval in the U.S. could fuel vaccine distrust in Canada
Health and immunization experts are reassuring Canadians that vaccine guidance is independent and based on scientific rigor in Canada after all 17 members of the committee that provides vaccine guidance in the United States were abruptly purged this week.
Article content
U.S. Health Secretary Robert Kennedy Jr. dismissed all members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), long considered the gold standard of vaccine guidance. Kennedy said the move would restore trust in the medical establishment and vaccines.
In other words, although the US is trying to parse the actual beneficial medications and immunization products from a growing list of untested and often dangerous bunch of injections causing a mass health crisis in the US, Canadians should rest content that they should never feel a need to question the state, the medications, or the orders to take it.
Meanwhile, in Illinois:
Even if the mRNA shots were safe and effective, and even if these first thing after birth, taking a baby away for 10 hours and injecting it with whatever it is but claiming it’;s vitamin K, is, let’s say that calling it ultra-vires by the state is putting it too kindly. There is no excuse for a free nation to ever behave this way. At MOST the state should act as an advisory body suggesting to parents what their neonate might need. But this goes way past even the coercion we saw during Covid. This is taking the baby from the parents for something as trivial as a vitamin shot!
2. I believe this is what we use to define the word, “Dilemma”.
3. These are really very typical examples of contemporary Canadian media. This isn’t even rage bait or a call to action. This is the state of Canadian media as it is. And a large percentage of people believe it. Likely due to the boiling frog method by which it was done, or because people like to belong, or because people tend to elevate the state in their minds in much the same way they do entertainers who are well known. But for whatever reason, this is how a lot of people think. Enough that it makes trying to tell the truth about Iran or the Israeli-Iranian conflict as the evidence has presented itself for 30 years, very difficult.
Part of the difficulty is accepting the controlled opposition in places of tremendous influence. Like Tucker Carlson. And it pains me to say it as he was the only big-microphone during Covid who had people like Dr. Peter McCullough on and many other counter-narrative scientists concerning the vaxx and Covid narratives overall. But his opposition to any hostility towards Iran, who has been overtly fomenting genocidal and existential threats daily to Israel and equipping at least 2 major regional proxy armies, and having taken over at least 3 countries in the Middle East as puppet states. And then Tucker’s odd closeness with Alexander Dugin who may be the most capable of engineering divisiveness among the counter-revolutionaries in North America today, Tucker is worth close scrutiny at this point.
From 2021. What looks a lot like an active measure.
Tucker, as did 60 Minutes and most legacy media also brought on ranking USAF officials to talk about aliens harassing US bases and non-US bases. This was indeed an active measure, and a narrative attack for a global scale problem which of course, requires a global solution. So while Tucker was seemingly opposing the effort to make the world submit to a global health crisis, crashing all individual and national sovereignty, he added several logs to the fire of a unified response to a non-existent alien invasion. Although that narrative did come in handy when the US was testing killer drones for Ukraine to use against Russia more recently. The US media was quite content to let the alien explanation fill in the void for the military drones buzzing around NJ high rises. An obvious dress-rehearsal for this:
4. actually you kinda have to admire the brazen nature of this propaganda. This is right up there with Chemical Ali, for those who remember the first Gulf War and the Iraqi propagandist who claimed the American army was no where near Baghdad and they were winning the war as US tanks drove up right behind him. Mind you, the Trans movement and a great deal of the entirety of the Western belief system is really pretty much operating on the same degree of, oh what the hell, The Orwell Scale.
For those interested in the alliance between communism and Islam, or, more importantly, communists and Muslims, this video is a fascinating watch.
Later today most likely, a highlight reel will be released from this. Some of the choice bits are how Communists could never hope to assemble a standing army as Islam has prepared. Paraphrasing in fairness. Watch this whole video and make your own interpretations. But a conscientious watch, especially understanding what dialectics actually is, meaning crafted line of destruction of all aspects of the polemic, reveals more than he says out loud.
Actually he does lead us to the concept of dialectic negation of two poles, but then veers away before anyone can think of asking the question: “Once you have used Islam as a dialectic line of destruction against America, what will you oppose Islam with in order to negate that system of power and authority?
In any case, this is a worth watch and instructive. The entire thing frames Islam for what it really is. A tool of destruction of everything else. Which is why so many Marxists, and for that matter, legacy Nazis converted to Islam.
Article at RAIR Foundation
I have only watched 45 minutes of this so far. But if one was to look up active measures and think on it for a minute before watching this, some things may fall in to place. For example: Why bring in millions of criminals, and then have the police not stop crime? Why allow the kind of looting and liquor store robbery we see daily everywhere now? Well, this documentary makes the prediction that once CBDC and digital IDs are in place, you won’t even be allowed in to a store let alone by anything if your social credit, to borrow a term from the Chinese, isn’t up to snuff.
In other words, the problems the communists are causing is of course, in order to have us accept and even embrace the total control society they are currently putting in place.
Another more pointedly active measure is the weird LED streetlamps everywhere. They offer an explanation here that they are ‘smart lamps’ and part of an information and surveillance grid.
This is highly worth watching, and as we mentioned, if you factor in the stuff this site talks about a lot, you get a richer experience of the information presented here.
So I am now just about an hour in, and I decided to fact check some of their claims about the Club of Rome as I find myself in discussions about this organization and its nature and intentions from time to time,
They explain a significant factor in the Global Warming Mass line Narrative attack on the world has its genesis in the Third Report of the Club of Rome, The first Global Revolution, on page 115:
Corruption:
This may be a longish ride so let me put the punch line first so you can decide if you want to read further.
If someone puts a strip of plastic over your nose and mouth after writing down somewhere that you have to have a strip of plastic over your nose and mouth by decree, and you poke a hole in it so you can breathe, is that corruption?
If the state kicks you in the knee and you discover you can only walk with a limp, is walking with a limp corruption? Or just the only way you can walk as a consequence of being kicked in the knee?
Let me start with a couple of anecdotes from people I know well:
A Canadian store owner back around the turn of the century, somewhere between 1998 and 2002 or so, was buying goods from a wholesaler in NY. He asked the wholesaler to please provide him with an invoice to ship with the goods for less than half the actual price of the goods with a real invoice to follow later by mail.
The wholesaler laughed and asked the question: “Is your government (in Canada) trying to turn you into a nation of criminals?”
The store owner asked for details, even though, as I am told, the shop owner perfectly understood the comment.
The wholesaler continued: “Every Canadian I deal with asks for fake invoices because they simply could not sell the goods competitively if at all if the official tariff rate was paid on these goods! (This was decades before Donald Trump remember!) Your costs would be too high to do business at all! What’s Wrong with your government! They are making you a nation of criminals!”
Much more recently, and for similar reasons, when you buy a used car, the government of Ontario will not accept a sales receipt presented by the buyer from the seller. So a car, which has already had all sales taxes paid on it when it was purchased new, must also have sales tax paid on it when you buy it used from someone who bought it new and paid tax on it, or also bought it used and paid tax on it. The government has decided not to accept a sales receipt as proof of price paid, because simply no one would present the honest price they paid as the tax required would make the car, if not unaffordable, much more expensive than it was likely worth.
So now the Ontario government demands that you go to a specialized garage and get an estimate on the worth of the car, so that the state approved level of taxation can be applied to the sale of the used car. This is irrespective of what the buyer actually pays. The tax rate is set by an appraiser approved of by the state.
Which then sets the appraiser up in a position where he might be tempted to split the difference with a purchaser. Offer a lower appraisal rate for the car for a higher appraisal fee. Now I am not saying this happens, just that this would be a fairly predictable market response to being kicked in the knee when buying a car.
As a response to this non-practice which likely never happens, the state of Ontario has decided they want a video tape of the appraisal itself so they can judge if the appraisal was honest.
By the way, this applies even when the car is a gift, unless it’s within specified relationships. Those include common law spouse or actual official married partner, and direct descendants.
This additional 13% can change the decision to purchase the car as it can take it from affordable to not affordable.
Is that corruption? Or is the system forcing a free market to behave this way?
So is trying to work around these state imposed, anti-free market measures corruption? Or walking with a limp, or breathing through a hole in a suffocating gag?
Remembering a book I read in 1976 by Hedrick Smith called, The Russians, the entire book was dedicated to describing day to day life in the Soviet Union. How in fact the official or state mandated artificial economy was something like only 10% of the organic or real free market economy, which people called corrupt, or “the black market”.
A person would rapidly discover that their government pay checks would not pay the months food and rent or even close to it. The reason being that while the state had artificially fixed the cost of food and rent so that your monthly wages would cover it, in order to actually get to the food, or be allowed to stay in your government owned apartment, you would have to pay usually around 10X the official price of the thing in bribes. You had to bribe the doorman to get into the store, The cashier to get the goods, and of course, they would issue you a fake receipt showing the official rate of the loaf or bread for example, as opposed to the 10X rate you really paid, since, like all Canadians Soviet Citizens you are now a criminal, they had to cover your crime of actually buying food with paperwork that conformed to the state narrative of the cost of goods.
One can stand in a field and scream orders at the earth as much as one likes but it won’t produce a single grain of wheat without seed, water, fertilizer and lots and lots of hard work. So there are, shall we say, real-world costs to things. We measure those costs in money. But we cannot change those costs by merely revaluing the money itself arbitrarily any more than we can make an 8 inch ruler, for example, say that it is 12 inches when it’s really only 8. The man who is five feet two is no more attractive to women just because the ruler insists he is six foot four. There are real world and organic standards. And a free market economy is one of the best ways of measuring them. Yes, to a degreee this can be regulated. And to a degree, a very successful one can be slowed down with taxation etc. in order to control growth or create a tax base to advance civilization itself. But even in a perfect world like that, taxation etc. slows growth. And what we have now is that one and only feature of taxation, the slowing of growth and disincentivisaiton of production in place.
Taxation increasingly is a weapon against the middle class. And as the government simply prints money to do things which are damaging to Canada and claims it cannot afford to do the obvious things, like look after war veterans, we can say with some certainty that taxation is not about generating revenue for the benefit of Canadians and Canadian culture and society. It is punitive.
But to the point. Clearly in Hedrick Smith’s The Russians, and to Canadians who try and find a work-around from punitive taxation and regulations beyond any reasonable explanation for them, this also cannot be called corruption but a reflexive survival response. The corruption is the system that necessitates such responses. And even then, it is not technically corruption, but a pure and properly constructed and directed weapon against Canadian liberties and free market system.
Nazis who shot at allied forces in WW2 were not corrupt. They were ideologically pure. As were those allied forces that tried not to get shot and also shot back at them.
So the word corruption at this point looks like another dialectical or rhetorical weapon to manipulate public sentiment in such a way as to assist them in total self destruction.
“Radical” or “extremist”
Sometime in the early 2000s, a study was done on US mosques. It was conducted by a very reputable survey company who had a reputation, and much more importantly, used excellent methods for determining the nature or views of the thing under study.
The purpose of the study was to find out what percent of US mosques taught “radical” or “Extremist” Islamic values such as jihad for conquest of the US and what percent taught a sort of narrative version of Islam as another religion of personal choice within the US with no frothing at the mouth sermons about jihad.
From memory, the number of mosques who did not teach jihad, violence and hatred was well under 10% and those that did, over 90%. That is within the USA.
A large number of mosques were sampled and across the whole of the country.
So now we run up against what might be the most important aspect of this.
How can 90% of a thing be “radical” or “extremist”?
Sam Harris, author of the book, End of Faith put it best: “The problem with Islamic Fundamentalism, is the fundamentals of Islam”. A clip I have posted many times but can no longer find on YouTube. Curiouser and curiouser. In any case, clearly the words, “extremist”, “Fundamentalist”, “Radical” are rhetorical weapons against those people that observant Muslims would destroy, namely us, and to help us destroy ourselves.
The central dogma and doctrine of Islam is of jihad. and destruction of all other systems of human organization, belief and law and to replace it with Islamic orthodoxy. To dismiss this as the view of “extremists” etc. is to use a version of Hanlon’s Razor. Instead of claiming those who create destructive policies or actions are merely stupid or incompetent to divert the fact that they are malicious, we are saying that all those constant string of stabbings, mass casualty events, ramming with cars and so on represent only a tiny minority of people within islam who, perhaps, do not understand their own religion. Sayeth the people who have never picked up a Koran but claim they have read “parts of it” because they heard a few out of context quotes on CBC or CNN.
The way it works is, a few people wage acts of kinetic jihad in a way that kill some small number of people, but is horrific and then treated by the media in a specific way. The state, will simultaneously claim this is not what it obviously is, but admit there is a security problem, and take away knives from old white German women that they may have as a protection from a very legitimate fear of being raped or otherwise abused by Muslim migrants. These crisis can be conveniently reworked by the state-media apparatus to justify the removal of all people’s most essential liberties. And is.
So you don’t actually need a lot of these acts of jihad. But they achieve the results both the Muslims and the communists are after.
Bonus word: Minority:
One really outstanding example of a dialectic might be the word, ‘Minority’.
It is brilliantly used as a cover to mean anyone but white people.
White people, or caucasians, which might be a more scientific nomenclature for white people, are in fact a minority if we are allowed to use the anthropological definition of races. There are certainly more East Asians than white people. Probably more South Asians as well. Certainly more Africans. But the media will still refer to say, Muslims as a minority in a city in the West when they are in fact an overwhelming majority of the population and have transformed the culture to an Islamic one to the extent that the kids don’t even know they live in a non-Islamic country. Although perhaps was, is a better tense.
It is important to also remember all the emotional attachments that the word has today. In essence, a minority, being non-white is always oppressed, and are always victims, and must always be given higher status in law, and a lower standard of expected behaviour and conformity to the law than non-minorities, meaning whites and Jews. The Jews of course, are or are not part of the majority depending on if they are conservative or leftist. Leftist jews still get to have a victim/minority label. But Jews who stand up for Western civilization will be accused of everything the constant marches through every city insist they are. Colonizers. Oppressors and commuters of genocide.
The selective use of the word, ‘minority’ might be one of the easiest examples of dialectical weaponry to expose.
I’ll leave it to the reader to decide why this video is in this article and how it fits.
And this:
I wonder if Hamas paid her enough to cover the loss of the boat and other expenses for making this obscene propaganda effort.
Oh well. As Greta herself chanted shortly after Oct. 7, “No Climate Justice; on occupied land”. You would need Alexander Dugin himself to decode that one.
Maybe they should drop her off in a nice mountainous Muslim village somewhere. Afghanistan or Pakistan for instance. Or even Gaza.
1. Mark Carney is actually going to start the destruction of the use of cash, starting with making all cash transactions over $10,000.00 illegal. With only a minimum of sarcasm, things remaining as they are, this could mean a months worth of groceries for a large family within a few years. If CBDCs are introduced, it means what kind and how much food you can buy will be set by the state as CBDCs are programmable. Also, once they ban cash over a certain amount, then they can ban cash to any amount very quickly and easily. From legal tender to legally tenderized.
In case anyone is in need of a proper explanation of what CBDC’s are beyond the statement that they are the last wall of the panopticon to be erected, please watch, and spread this astonishingly good explainer video on the subject.
2. FBI Arrests CCP-Linked University of Michigan Researcher for Smuggling Agroterrorism Pathogen
According to a press release from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Michigan, Yunqing Jian, a University of Michigan research fellow, and her partner Zunyong Liu have been arrested by the FBI and charged with conspiracy, smuggling, making false statements, and visa fraud after allegedly importing a dangerous biological agent into the United States.
The two Chinese nationals are accused of smuggling Fusarium graminearum—a fungal pathogen that causes devastating “head blight” in staple crops such as wheat, corn, and barley, and is classified as a potential agroterrorism weapon due to its capacity for widespread food supply disruption and severe human and animal toxicity. The fungus produces toxins linked to vomiting, liver damage, and reproductive abnormalities.
3. Here is a great example of Qanon controlled op BS. Granted, there are some facts sprinkled in to seed the nonsense, but this is for all intents and purposes, to create false hope, get people to feel they don’t need to actually do anything cause the system, which is what is tyrannizing Canadians, is what is going to fix it. It’s complete nonsense except for the part where a riding in Quebec was won by the Liberals by a single vote. That part is true. So far at least, I cannot find a single bit of evidence of the rest of it. No by election, no judge no court etc. Also its an AI voice.
And the actual content of this video once you remove the hyperbole and child-level propaganda would be about 25 seconds. The source is, “Canadian Newspaper” and the video cannot be embedded. The embed below is from moving a copy elsewhere.
Note how he hits all the talking points of narrative to sell the lie.
I really hope to be wrong on this one, but there is no evidence that there will be a by-election in the riding he doesn’t name or the existence of a Judge he doesn’t name. As far as the riding of Terrebonne Quebec, there is nothing other than weeks to months old challenges by the Bloc Québécois over the recount and nothing indicating that the Conservatives have any kind of new lease on power. Classic Qanon propaganda, or so it looks at the moment. Reality continues to be liquified.
4. A non-leftist party leader and candidate for President in Colombia was shot in the head.
In the BBC report linked above there is nearly zero substance. But there is a lot of deflection from the obvious reality of the motive of the shooter.
Here is the only bit that contains any meaning:
Uribe, a right-wing critic of Petro, announced his candidacy for next year’s presidential election in October. He has been a senator since 2022.
He is from a prominent political family in Colombia, with links to the country’s Liberal Party. His father was a union leader and businessman.
His mother was Diana Turbay, a journalist who was killed in 1991 in a rescue attempt after she had been kidnapped by the Medellin drugs cartel run at the time by Pablo Escobar.
I asked Chat GPT how the media has described Uribe over the past few years:
Here’s how the media and academia have described Álvaro Uribe over the past several years:
? Media Descriptions
Right?wing / far?right:
Outlets like The Washington Post labeled him a “populist, far?right leader” in connection with his opposition to the 2016 peace referendum reddit.com+15goodauthority.org+15democratic-erosion.org+15.
The Los Angeles Times described Uribe as part of “Colombia’s far?right wing” when referencing his support for Donald Trump washingtonpost.com+10latimes.com+10reddit.com+10.
Right?wing populist:
The Nation asserted he “may very well be the most influential 21st?century Latin American populist,” pointing to his militaristic and polarizing style reddit.com+15thenation.com+15reddit.com+15.
NPR referred to him (and his protégé, Iván Duque) as “right?wing populist” on multiple occasions .
Right?wing (without strong populist/far-right tag):
Earlier sources like the CIA’s political profile described him simply as “right?wing,” emphasizing his robust security policies newyorker.com+15ciaotest.cc.columbia.edu+15thenation.com+15.
? Academic & Local Perspectives
Some scholars argue that Uribe is not actually a populist:
A 2021 analysis from Georgia State University contended he’s better understood as a neoliberal/conservative technocrat, backed by mainstream institutions, not a populistreddit.com+8democratic-erosion.org+8tandfonline.com+8.
A 2019 political science paper described “Uribismo” as a neoconservative, market?oriented movement appealing to upper?class voters—not the typical “us vs them” populismmontevideopost.com+4tandfonline.com+4reddit.com+4.
Local public sentiment from Colombian Reddit threads shows nuance—many users resist labeling Uribe as “extreme?right,” calling him more a conservative or security?focused leaderen.wikipedia.org+10reddit.com+10washingtonpost.com+10.
Now we know what it means when the media calls any politician, “far-right”, or populist. It is essentially how in 1984,
Uribe joins a growing list of counter-revolutionary figures who have been disenfranchised from representing the people as political leaders.
Here is a PARTIAL list from memory only. But this site has documented all we became aware of.
US President Donald Trump who survived three shooting attempts we know of, and was actually shot once. He was also charged with various criminal offences and convicted by activist DAs and Judges, all of which were overturned on appeal, and more importantly, the charges themselves were both ludicrous and unprecedented. They required massive stretching of definitions in order to make an experimental gene therapy into a vaccine a normal financial transaction with only winners and no victims into crimes. Also multiple impeachments with closed door hearings, and illegal spying on campaigns, not to mention FBI election interference by claiming a laptop they were sitting on and contained election-changing information was “Russian disinformation”. There is more but the point is made.
French leadership candidate, Marine Le Pen was convicted of non-crimes concerning minor financial things while sitting as an MEP in the European Parliament. She was even sentenced to jail although I don’t know if she has to serve it inside or if it’s pending appeal. But the judge decided that she was not allowed to stand for election. This came right after the polls showed she would win against the COMINTERN French President, Emmanuel Macron.
Slovakian non-communist leader, Robert Fico. Shot in May 2024. According to the Guardian, Rico was a: “Politician serving his third term as Slovakia’s PM has navigated successfully between pro-EU positions and fiercely nationalist, anti-western rhetoric”.
At this point, anti-Western could as easily mean anti-communist. Hopefully our local expert, Xanthippa will weigh in on this in the comments. We have subtitled videos on this man and this issue. Here is a video of the man who shot him explaining his motives.
And a video of Fico on his position concerning the mRNA vaxx, which he was against. This makes him a counter-revolutionary even if there is no other policies opposing the left.
Actual winner of the Romanian election, Calin Georgescu, was arrested. The media calls him a “Far-Right populist” which translates from propagandese to counter-revolutionary in English.
The election was subsequently rigged in such a manner as to get the leftist party to win.
Geert Wilders is the leader of the party in the Netherlands which won I believe an unprecedented electoral victory since the fully gameable system of Proportional Representation was created, but again, in an unprecedented move, the rest of the parties would not form a government unless Geert agreed not to be the PM. And of course the important cabinet positions are held by people that do not hold the views the people voted for. So once again, a “cordon sanitaire” but next level in the Netherlands.
Brazil: Jair Bolsonaro was stabbed nearly to death by a left wing terrorist during his first campaign for president, which he won. His second term was taken from him by a complex set of circumstances involving a highly communist set of Supreme Court judges, who freed a jailed criminal and made him president.
. From Eugyppius: The European Union is paying NGOs millions of dollars to conduct what amounts to soft economic warfare against its own member states
Please read the whole article at Eugyppius’ substack. But here’s an excerpt where he describes the EU bill, which I will take the liberty of naming for them, The ‘Seize the means of production” act.
The documents hidden there attest to the unsavoury tactics that the Commission has deployed to promote its so-called Green Deal – a range of policy initiatives designed to make the Continent “climate neutral” by 2050. If they are ever fully realised, these policies will spell the unilateral deindustrialisation of Europe, and the Commission is determined to force them through over the heads of dissenting voices in the EU and where necessary even behind the backs of member states.
On our supersecret terminal is a truly insane contract concluded in 2022 between the EU Commission and a non-governmental organisation known as ClientEarth. In this instrument, the Commission agreed to pay ClientEarth €350,000 in exchange for specific activism in Germany. This included the things you’d expect; for example, the NGO pledged to cooperate with the environmentaloid scene and to help stage civic protests and climate camps. But ClientEarth also sold the more nefarious service of waging lawfare against coal-fired German power-plants, and this in the immediate aftermath of the German energy crisis. The Commission specifically wanted ClientEarth to “increase the financial and legal risk of the ownership and operation of [coal-fired] power plants,” by targeting their emissions and water use permits in court. They were to carry out their work without the knowledge of the German government, effectively weaponising our own courts against us.
Thank you all for checking out this site. Those of you that still are, or are able to access it.
The communist revolution in the West is moving from Covert to Overt. You don’t need to believe this. You just need to think about it for a minute, and then go out and see what’s going on around you, the laws being made and how media (miss)represents everything and it will be crystal clear to you that this is the case.