More from the doctor who the Daily Mail humiliated over Hydroxychloroquine use

In this presser, our Doctor not only describes her experience with Covid patients, but explains why she feels there is so much pressure against Hydroxychloroquine. Perhaps more importantly, she tells all Americans who want this medicine as a prophylaxis that she will help them find a doctor who will prescribe it to them.

THIS is the video Twitter censored Donald Trump Jr. from promoting

Agree or disagree with Hydroxychloroquine treatment, the way the elite, both political and industrial, are treating the public in totalitarian and unacceptable. Traditional Media and amazingly, even more so, social media these days are violating ethics and even laws to shape the ideosphere, the cosmos of thought, to conform to one narrative using grotesque vagaries like “potentially harmful information”.

Don Jr. was promoting the video below for which Twitter censored him, as well as the video.

(Skip ahead to about 4 minutes for the start)

Either you are a citizen and capable of making your own decisions, or you are a servant of the state. In Canada it is more clear each day which we are. In the US, its about direction.

The Twitter hack in 4 Tweets

Resignation letter to the New York Times of Bari Weiss

This was powerful enough that it was worth getting out of bed and posting.

I joined the paper with gratitude and optimism three years ago. I was hired with the goal of bringing in voices that would not otherwise appear in your pages: first-time writers, centrists, conservatives and others who would not naturally think of The Times as their home. The reason for this effort was clear: The paper’s failure to anticipate the outcome of the 2016 election meant that it didn’t have a firm grasp of the country it covers. Dean Baquet and others have admitted as much on various occasions. The priority in Opinion was to help redress that critical shortcoming.

I was honored to be part of that effort, led by James Bennet. I am proud of my work as a writer and as an editor. Among those I helped bring to our pages: the Venezuelan dissident Wuilly Arteaga; the Iranian chess champion Dorsa Derakhshani; and the Hong Kong Christian democrat Derek Lam. Also: Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Masih Alinejad, Zaina Arafat, Elna Baker, Rachael Denhollander, Matti Friedman, Nick Gillespie, Heather Heying, Randall Kennedy, Julius Krein, Monica Lewinsky, Glenn Loury, Jesse Singal, Ali Soufan, Chloe Valdary, Thomas Chatterton Williams, Wesley Yang, and many others.

But the lessons that ought to have followed the election—lessons about the importance of understanding other Americans, the necessity of resisting tribalism, and the centrality of the free exchange of ideas to a democratic society—have not been learned. Instead, a new consensus has emerged in the press, but perhaps especially at this paper: that truth isn’t a process of collective discovery, but an orthodoxy already known to an enlightened few whose job is to inform everyone else.

Please read the rest at Bariweiss.com

We suggest downloading and saving the page as it likely won’t be online long.

Adding tweets as we find them:

“The real story is the loss of the news altogether, and the news cannot report on it”

CBC and the enforcement of Marxism over rule of law

First and chief among words that white people are not allowed to say, is the one that starts with a letter between M and O.

If you do say that word, even in a private conversation, your explanation for why you think that word might be OK to say will not be listened to. Context means nothing. No amount of contrition will be enough. This is not about anything excpept the wielding of totalitarian power in the interests of a Marxist world view.

The fact that on the recording in this video, the teacher awkwardly attempts to make an explanation means nothing. It was not listened to. She was guilty for saying that word.

No explanation can suffice. No legal protection of rights can interfere with the Marxist mob/media justice the CBC will bring to your door as fast as they can. Just as fast in fact, as they will hide news that contradicts that replacement for rights and law.

Wendy Messley may have paid a price for uttering that chief among words only “people of colour” can say, and in any context they want. But of course we don’t really know if she will. We don’t know how long her suspension is, or if its with pay. For all we know she is doing a month at Club Med in the Mediterranean somewhere. But we are supposed to believe that she is in serious trouble for saying the between M and O word, even though it was to try and make someone else look really, really bad.

Context doesn’t matter. Truth, does not matter. There is a new order, and it will be obeyed.

We are the cavalry. If we expect to fix this, we will have to get more involved.

 

Trump retweets Malkin video on big tech leftist censoring, big tech deletes the Malkin vid

 

Documentary on Vaccines that Youtube took down after a day

I have no idea who these people are, or if this is factually correct or not.

I do know that one should resent a government or a company that takes it upon itself to determine what is ‘true’ and then forbid you to see what it deems to be ‘not true’. So here it is again.

This video had over 1M views before it was taken down after about a day or two on Youtube.

Thanks to PePi for bringing this to us.

Anyone knowledgable in these sciences please feel free to post your opinion of this video in the comments. Posting it is not an endorsement. It is rather a strike against government-corporate tyranny.

Harriet sent us this:

Fox News’ Laura Ingram comments on YT censorship of the 2 Cali Doctors

More on the two doctors who tried to present another angle on the Covid policies of lockdown

The viral video which was taken down by Youtube:

A good comment under the FOX youtube video:

When they took down Alex Jones, they announced that no one is immune to their censorship, and FOX did not defend Alex.. soon Fox will be censored also. Meanwhile CNN and MSNBC still put out FAKE NEWS and democrat propaganda no one has censored them.
This seems like a good time for the overused poem, “When they came for the…”

CBC lies by omission. Again.

The CBC does what it always does and protects Islam as much as possible, and arguably endangering the safety of all Canadians by attempting to deceive us all of the threat of that culture and value set.

Lets have a look at The Montreal Journal:

(Machine translation)

Nacime Kouddar was charged Sunday by telephone with armed assault with a vehicle, aggravated assault and hit and run for hitting a 25-year-old security guard in the parking lot of the Walmart in Sherbrooke.    

• Also read: Accused of hitting a security guard

At the end of the day Saturday, the security guard and father of five, Philippe Jean, refused to let Kouddar and the woman who accompanied him both enter Walmart. The store rule states that only one person per vehicle is allowed to enter the business due to the pandemic.   

Then, the couple and the security guard exchanged a few words right in the middle of the parking lot.       

“At a certain point, the frustrated customer drove directly with his vehicle to the employee, even dragging him over the hood for several meters,” said Sherbrooke police.      

Severely wounded in the head, Mr. Jean victim is said to be still in critical condition.      

 

Sherbrooke police director Danny McConnell launched a “call for calm” on Sunday with his fellow citizens affected by the COVID-19 crisis.     

A crowdfunding campaign was launched to help the father of five children. To date, it has raised $ 43,545.

Please remember, both of these reports where available at the same time.

The CBC had access to the exact same information as did the Journal de Montreal. They chose not to name the attacker because they do not want Canadians to form opinions that are true and which may threaten the policies of the far left Trudeau government and the stratospheric management at the CBC.

This is why BBC and CBC MUST be privatley funded. If they want to hawk a utopian communist agenda and destroy classical Canada while they are at it, let them find private sponsors to do it. Don’t make Canadians pay for it.

At least in the UK, the BBC licence fee is separate from taxes and they can refuse to pay it and suffer the consequences. What an enviable position they are in compared to Canada. There is nothing we can do but suffocate in the smug and the sanctimony of the CBC.

 

Thank you Sassy for the translation of the French video.

Canadian sportscaster icon, Don Cherry, fired for speaking obvious truth

American readers might think of Don Cherry as a kind of Canadian Howard Kossel but who focuses exclusively on hockey. Don is probably the CBC’s most popular personality, but is far from a socialist so is likely not to popular at the office Christmas party.

Here is his remark that got him fired:

Obviously the tweeter agrees that you should not be allowed to say some true and important things. But judge for yourself.

Reader, Johnny U added these thoughts in the comments:

I heard about his firing this afternoon.

Not an iota of surprise here. Cherry has always called it like he saw it. When the Russian kicked and speared in ’72 he called them dirty, which they were. When the Europeans took dives like in soccer (football) he called them fakers. When the Swedes wouldn’t hit he called them sissies. Hardly anyone escaped his wrath over the years. He was threatened with dismissal numerous times for remarks, but the revenue he generated always made the broadcaster (CBC) more money than anything else they aired. In fact I could be mistaken, but his 5 or so minute segment on Hockey Night in Canada has had the highest ratings of any program in Canada for many years. He switched to another broadcaster in recent years, but I’m sure he made them plenty of money, too.

He’s always been a great patriot and supporter of the armed forces.

Criticism of white European or North American players was never an issue for his employers. Make a likely-true remark about the downtown Toronto demography, however, and it’s off with your head!

I can’t think of a more appropriate way for this old warrior to go out. Good for him. At 85 years old he’s done his part.

More censorship in Europe. An article from Jihad Watch on electronic censorship

Below I will reproduce the entire post of the article, as there isn’t much point is just linking to it as all the people who need to see it obviously will not be. But there are things that need to be added beyond the mere technical. That will be at the end.

Also a mirror of the post in full can be read here, which should be able to be seen world-wide at the moment.


  BY 3 COMMENTS

We constantly see emails and tweets, “I can’t see the articles when I click on the links in your Daily Digest.”

Lately, we’ve been getting even more of these than we usually do. Here’s why. In my post here from last June, I reported that three major Internet service providers listed as blocking this site:

We are now seeing a new block by Sky, one of the largest internet providers in the UK, added to the list. Mind you, this list consists only of providers that disclose their censorship. Many do not.

“Weapons”? This is a new false charge, totally unfounded. We don’t promote or advertise weapons, the purpose of this site is clear in the meta data: Jihad Watch is dedicated to “exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts.”

Clearly this censorship is politically motivated. For whatever reason, the providers don’t want the truth about jihad violence and Sharia to get out. But there is a way around this censorship, and it’s quite simple: change your DNS servers by using https://use.opendns.com/ or https://1.1.1.1/, or better yet, using a VPN such as FreeDome.

I have blogged about this before, and many of the responses were really not helpful: “But I can see the site,” or, “I was blocked by Facebook.” All that may be true, but it is not the point. The point is that legitimate commentary is being blocked by the people who literally supply the Internet and how this can be easily circumvented. This is not just going on in the UK, I just have better documentation at hand for how it is being done in that country.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation is an organization that is meant to protect these right of access and to combat such censorship, but it has abandoned us. Please use the contact page to ask them why, politely, calmly, and respectfully.

You can also check which of your other favorite sites are censored here.

Along with the Google bias that is well documented, this censorship will be the death of everything we hold dear if it isn’t challenged and defeated. This is not a matter of your right to say “nuke Mecca” on Facebook; this is the prevention of legitimate criticism of a destructive, inhumane agenda from seeing light of day, and although what is happening is widespread and growing, it is still not well understood. If you encounter someone who can no longer access Jihad Watch, please pass on to him or her this information about how to beat the blocks.


While the article is important as it offers a work around to the problem of the current state of informational-totalitarianism that is now infecting the West as a whole, it is in its own way a form of submission to it.

This is what could be called, “Technical Leapfrog”. 

The state invents a way to stop you from getting information which interferes with its planned engineering of society and not in your interests. You find a way around that with a fix. You feel clever for a moment, but in effect you are now committing a kind of crime where it was your actual right the day before.

While it may not be an actual crime on the books yet, we already see that the state and law enforcement has pretty much abandoned the entire history of all jurisprudence except where it is convenient to enforce the narrative, and harass or otherwise destroy people’s lives for having the wrong opinions or questioning basic biology as one example.

So the next move in technical leapfrog could be where the state finds a more effective way to block sites that contain evidence that the narrative is inaccurate or against the interests of the electorate, or more likely, they will come to your home and ask threatening questions about your use of technology to bypass censors.

And while you did not break a law to access Jihad Watch, the man who tweeted out a limerick about ‘transgenders’(single quotes because generally speaking we do not believe there is any such thing outside of a tiny tiny fraction of biological abnormalities) also did not break any laws but had the authorities place warnings at his place of work that he may be a threat to the LGBTQ community for his wrong-think.

Other things were done to him that are tantamount to a state punishment without the benefit of any inconvenient democratic procedure like a trial or lawyer or those pesky facts.
People who use SKY or any other ISP that blocks sites without your knowledge or content must get phone calls from you, the paying client, and if they do not change the policy, change ISPs. You may even have to settle for poorer service and less speed.
But that is a pretty small sacrifice compared to having the state determine what you can see. Especially when it is true.
“The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie.
It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth becomes the greatest enemy of the State.”
–Josph Goebbels, Nazi propaganda minister

Filmmaker Michael Hansen on Infowars with Matt Bracken, Aug. 1, 2019

Direct link:

https://d.tube/v/vladtepesblog/QmRsRm9sG2eniVT9hPrXV4EmYKf8R7482JKiPdED1WpatK