Category Archives: Islam
Two people murdered at Jewish museum in Washington DC
Two people were gunned down by a man shouting “Free Free Palestine” in Washington DC. To get utterly gaslit about it, watch this FOX video which I call, 17 minutes of potboiler Bulls*it, as the mayor of DC has been such since 2015. This means that likely she, as well as the CIA, in part FUNDS ANTIFA which is either directly, or indirectly responsible for this shooting, along with the UN that has launched a number of active measures such as the ones illustrated below:
In other words, given her actions and statements during the first Trump term, the riots during the election year of 2020, her statements concerning the January 6 protests…:
“What happened yesterday is what [President Trump] wanted to happen, and we must not underestimate the damage he can do to our nation and our democracy over the next two weeks. It’s not just the President who must be held accountable. So too, must their domestic terrorists who stormed the Capitol and threatened Members of Congress.”
Mayor Bowser advocated for D.C. statehood and for the District to have control over its National Guard, highlighting the challenges faced during the response:
“Congress must immediately transfer command of the District of Columbia National Guard from the President of the United States and put it squarely under the command and control of the Mayor of the District of Columbia.”
Etc. etc. we can safely assume what her politics are, and what she allows, encourages, and prevents in the city of which she is the mayor.
ANTIFA is a COMINTERN army for the purpose of colour revolutionary events. Chemnitz is a really excellent example, where one video forged by ANTIFA (Another active measure) resulted in the replacement of the head of the office for the protection of the constitution in Germany, with a state agent who worked to overthrow the constitution instead of protect it. The German government in fact, directly funds ANTIFA.
In other words, ANTIFA did an amazing job of facilitating the transformation of Germany from a Western republic to a communist state.
In terms of the efficacy of active measures in this case, just read the thread and comments under this early tweet on the murders in DC:
The hatred of Israel and repetition of fabrications is clear.
During the Freedom Convoy protest in Ottawa, there was a truly amazing sense of unity of those present. And there was 10s of 1000s who where regularly, despite temperatures so cold, it was often near the same in F as it is in C. (-40 degrees)
People were united because those who attended, had woken up to state narrative attacks on Covid, the Vaxx, and also Global warming and other various active measures against the Canadian public. But for various reasons, that united in freedom group has been successfully fragmented due to the active measures against Israel and Jewish people. This was so successful that various freedom groups that formed during Covid measures have been greatly lessened over that one issue. A major Freedom oriented evangelical Church in Ottawa, who are very pro-Israel and pro the existence of Jewish people, even if they wish Jewish people would recognize Jesus as the messiah as Christians define messiah, have lost congregants who were fully on board with every other aspect of the doctrine and views of the Church.
(I would like to take a special moment to thank that church actually for their astonishing bravery, and frankly much more than bravery, their astonishing degree of integrity which I have not seen from any other religious group, including Synagogues to the best of my knowledge.)
The active measure against Israel by the COMINTERN, from the UN to the EU, now officially, Canada, France and the UK are all conspicuously at this point, COMINTERN polities. (Meaning that anyone who does not see that they are operating as communist states to one degree or another, and recognize that the leaders are all WEF or Fabians, or EU agents etc. chose not to. But anyone actually able to see what’s in front of them would know.)
And it worked spectacularly to divide the freedom movement and thereby make it massively less effective. It is interesting that the very people who heaped well deserved scorn and contempt on the CBC buy this narrative attack/active measure without even looking at this horse in the teeth.
For anyone uncertain about the CBC’s role in creating and amplifying active measures against Israel, just subscribe to Honest Reporting for a month.
The man who shot the two people in the Jewish Museum in DC chanted a well used Islamic/Leftist slogan. “Free Free Palestine”. But not Allah Hu Ackbar. So we can safely assume he was a leftist for the moment. The responsibility for his actions falls on him. But also the people who created the narratives under which he felt inclined and justified to commit this act.
The real nature of the UK and Canada are coming into focus, as well as the corruption and ideology of the last US administration: Links 1 for May 21, 2025
There is quite a laundry list of items waiting to be posted I’m afraid, and all of them are worth attention from the perspective of this site.
The fact that the UN-WHO has actually passed the “Pandemic-Treaty”, with all the totalitarian and anti-democratic measures reinstalled into it, including that the WHO can declare when there is a Pandemic, (and there is one at least every year, even if reality matters anymore) and thereby suspend all national laws to all member states should be grounds for a people’s revolution the likes of which has never been seen. But most don’t know about it. And if you try and tell people, they will likely take you off their Christmas card list.
The head of the WHO, a certain Eritrean Marxist terrorist called up Fico, the PM of Slovakia a day or two ahead of the UN treaty vote and asked him to just sign the thing and skip all that pesky democracy, knowing that the Slovak Parliament would vote against the treaty. He said no. It passed anyway at the UN.
Mark Carney is likely shoulder to shoulder with the architects of this new ‘treaty’. And when they call a pandemic, and they will soon, Canadians will think Covid was a cake walk. The ability to refuse some kind of treatment will be much lessened than during Covid. Carney has been creating new powers for himself, similar to executive powers in the US but more arbitrarily created, and apparently, Canada won’t have a budget this year meaning no need to even pretend to Parliament, which I dunno, is it still prorogued? No idea… which means he doesn’t even have to pretend to be accountable with all the billions he is just signing for, and dispensing willy nilly without any kind of transparency.
HIs supporters will either deny this or claim its adult behaviour that we desperately need. It doesn’t matter anymore though. Carney is or is not a tyrant. If he is, it won’t matter who supports him or what they say about him. The only people able to do anything about it will be in his employ.
Does the right to peacefully protest and freedom of speech still exist in Canada?
The Freedom Convoy was sparked by the Liberal government’s insistence that truck drivers entering Canada who were unvaccinated be required to quarantine for 14 days. Others entering Canada who were unvaccinated were required to quarantine for five days. The requirement was an outlier among nations where other countries continued to view truck drivers – who drove their trucks in solitude – as an essential part of the supply chain, and foundational to sustaining the economy. In response to the protest that lasted from January 28 to February 20, 2022, the government invoked the Emergencies Act, froze hundreds of citizens bank accounts without warrants, and had police use physical violence against non-violent protesters to end the protest.
Two of the participants in the Freedom Convoy protests in Ottawa in the winter of 2022, Tamara Lich and Chris Barber, have been found guilty of mischief. On April 3, 2025, a verdict was delivered in the longest mischief trial in Canadian history. I was in the courtroom to hear the verdict read. Mischief trials typically last half a day. The verdict was delivered after 45 non-consecutive days of a trial which stretched from September 5, 2023 until September 23, 2024.
Showing unity with a large group of people, no matter how long someone participates, can also be considered mischief. Both Lich and Barber were charged with six counts: 1) counselling mischief “which was not committed,” 2) intimidation and counselling intimidation, 3) counsel others to obstruct police, 4) obstruct police, 5) “that they…did wrongfully and without lawful authority, for the purpose of compelling one or more persons to abstain from doing anything that the person had the lawful right to do, or do anything that the person had a lawful right to abstain from doing, block or obstruct one or more highways,” and 6) Mischief. [1]
On a seventh count, Barber alone was charged “with disobeying a court order which was not committed,” regarding the February 7, 2022 injunction to stop honking horns (or encouraging others to honk horns in the future). [2]
Please read the rest at the link above. Also this Chris Dacey thread on today’s testimony by Chris Barber with important facts about his role in the Convoy.
2. A British woman made this Tweet shortly after 11 little girls had been stabbed in Sothport by a Muslim waging jihad and during the minimalist pushback immediately after. She got two and a half YEARS in prison.
By this standard everyone who ever fought the Nazis or encouraged others to fight the Nazis would be in prison for years.
Which goes to the hypothesis that the Nazis, as represented by the Fabian Society, are actually in control of the UK.
Seems insane to you? Ladies and Gentlemen, The FOUNDER of the Fabiens:
Charlie Kirk speaks on this issue with GBN News:
3. Truly fascinating Tweet by President Trump. It goes a very long way to revealing the fact that Biden was never in control of his own bowels let along the US government. That he had been used by an evil group of people and that they should be hunted down, and tried for a large variety of very serious crimes. Crimes which are in the constitution as death penalty offences.
Related:
4. Going back to item 2 for a sec, if you thought the UK couldn’t get any more Orwellian than it is now…
5. I am certain this site has readers that have the mathematical skills to verify the claims in this Facebook video. Almost as certain as I am that his claims are accurate on the face of them. Any and all comments appreciated on this one. But it really does look like the paint, the furniture, the curtains and the lights of the theatre are coming down fast and the cinderblock substance of the authoritarian nature of Canada is coming into view. To borrow an analogy from Frank Zappa.
Thank you for checking out this site and its perspectives.
Gotta like this guy
If you can’t see the forest, you can’t save the trees: Understanding and Measuring Islam and communism’s dominance over the West
Suddenly that old expression, “Can’t see the forest for the trees” makes a little sense.
The other day we posted a couple of items on the state of the communist revolution in Germany. Unfortunately, Rumble is up and down a lot this past several days, so the video of Dr. Thoma in the post appears intermittently.
But in our post or the RAIR article, it refers to a secret report by the current government which justifies declaring the only non-leftist party a criminal entity. That report can now be seen here after it was ‘released’ to the public.
Although I cannot get it to load at the moment, those who can tell me it is interesting as it is pure allegations with no actual evidence, that any school kid could have written it in a few hours, that it was clearly made with Chat GPT and most interestingly, there are NO REDACTIONS AT ALL including names or other indications of state censorship which at this point we now find, even on grocery lists. Had it been leaked, the lack of censorship would make more sense. But as it was released after ‘pressure’ to show it, its a data point that this is purely fabricated in order to justify disenfranchising the AfD.
At this stage its worth a point form dive into what communism is.
It won’t be detailed because anyone who reads this site already gets it. But as I have had multiple conversations with strangers in the past few weeks where I introduced the notion that certain countries were nascent communist states such as Great Britain, Canada and Germany and I get a good initial degree of incredulity as a rapid response, it may be worth a point-form explanation of how people have been misled to believe what communism is, and what in fact it actually is.
The interesting thing is that when presented with a few facts, you get a lot of stunned silence back when they realize that they may have been incorrect for all these years. It’s easier than one might think.
One of the obvious go-to points is the criminalizing of opinion which is in opposition to state narratives.
Now even those who believe that the state narratives are factually correct, will hesitate to say that making it a crime to present evidence to the contrary is under the rubric of a “free and democratic society”.
Evidence of this is pretty easy. Let’s say you oppose the Canadian and British state sacrament of abortion. You can now be arrested and jailed for praying inside your own home if it is near an abortion assembly line.
A Canadian priest has been taken to jail on a couple of occasions for having a sign within the forbidden zone of a block or so near an abortion facility merely advocating for freedom of speech and nothing else. Not speaking, not praying or interfering with any passers by. Just a sign saying that freedom of speech is a cornerstone of Western Civilization.
That priest and his sign is occasionally shown by this site as a banner actually. He passed away some years ago now.
Also people have been arrested just for standing near an abortion facility in Great Britain and admitting to police that they were silently praying when asked why they were there. Hardly a protest. Hardly an impediment to a medical procedure. But very very communist. One must not oppose a state narrative. It is always a much bigger crime than, well, crime is.
Another fun line of conversation is explaining to people that the Nazis were not in any way whatsoever “right wing” far or moderate. The conversation usually moves along quickly when you ask them to name one communist state where there is freedom of speech and any kind of actual equality of citizens and distribution of wealth based on any kind of merit. Then point put that Hitler’s Nuremberg speeches where pretty much all Karl Marx chapter and verse with class warfare etc. etc. and that the Nazis and Soviet Union where allies at first.
That the Nazis had all the benchmarks of a communist society with minor variations a million times more so than to any kind of libertarian polity, which is the genuine far right wing article. Communism/Nazis use Brutal violent state enforced narratives, as well as criteria for success/survival that have nothing to do with actual merit but based on some abstract criteria like race, religion, ethnicity or beliefs. Not that these things don’t have real world consequences. They most certainly all do. But in a free society these things sort themselves out based on their own momentum and for the betterment of all involved as a general rule.
In other words, people who are good at activity A tend to dominate activity A and people who are not, don’t. The rest of the public understands that and harbours no resentment against the group which typically is at the top of that field, because they either worked harder, were more motivated, or were more naturally talented at that activity. Communist societies insist that all people are born tabula rasa, and therefore, anyone who is better at anything than anyone else is because of ‘Systemic XXXXXX” where you can plug in anything you want after systemic. Recently it’s racism. But it used to be lots of other things, usually class related. The result? Massive resentment and hatred at anyone who succeeds at anything.
Eugyppius who does the best writing on Germany has this update today:
The previously secret dossier assembled by the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution leaked on Tuesday. It is unbelievably retarded.
In my last post, I wrote that “The campaign to ban Alternative für Deutschland is not going well.” Today – a mere seventy-two hours later – you could say that the campaign to ban Alternative für Deutschland is all but dead. This is because the people most committed to banning the AfD also happen to be some of the stupidest, most incompetent legal and political operators the world has ever seen. Their incompetence is so enormous that I am for once willing to entertain conspiracy theories as to why they might have undermined their own project. It is that bad.
Read the rest at his substack linked above. But you get the idea. The German state is so casual about its dialectics that it can invent and publish the sloppiest lies to disenfranchise counter-revolutionaries with no real fear of it being an impediment to the state’s ambitions.
But our focus is understanding what is happening across the West, most notably in Germany, Australia, Canada and the UK with the UK possibly being the most advanced of the communist revolution. And by advanced I mean the shift from a Socratic system to a dialectical one. From a people’s self governance polity to an all powerful state which dictates reality itself. Also where they are in terms of moving from Covert to Overt communistic systems.
Also what things constitute a crime. I just interviewed a man who was fined 120K$ by the state of Canada for election interference. Why? He brought Jordan Peterson to Alberta to present a talk on things as Peterson sees it. We know that theft in leftist US states and Canada overall is not a crime, somewhat depending on who you are. Ask anyone who works retail what happens to people who get caught stealing and what they are prevented from doing to people who are stealing.
And then look at sentences meted out to people who simply say things which are true that defy state narratives. Particularly on Islam these days. But it might easily be extended to the CO2 narrative attack at any time. They are already calling those who present factual evidence of the lack of CO2 caused warming, ‘denialists’ and Holocaust deniers are already criminals in Germany. Which itself is a crime. People should be able to believe what they want, and making it a crime not to, is more in keeping with he Nazis than any false claims about the genocide of the Jewish people in Nazi occupied lands. Not to mention that it fuels suspicions that there may be something to the claims against it. Anyone actually interested in Nazi Holocaust policies and results can examine actual Nazi records from the time. As far as I know, no one has ever accused the Germans of being sloppy record keepers or a badly organized people.
After all, they called serious career scientists, even ones who were world class vaccinologist and even one Nobel Prize winner in Medicine, “Anti-vaxxers” for defying the state narrative, and while they were not criminally prosecuted, having a doctor lose his licence is probably a much bigger punishment than a fine or even a few months in jail.
It is destroying them permanently in some aspects.
Which takes us to the processes themselves. Hearings or trials which used to be based on Socratic principles, where “truth was always an absolute defence”, something lawyers still like to trumpet now and again, but a lot more quietly than they used to, now is about manipulating the process to achieve a predetermined political outcome.
Failure to understand what is taking place but complaining about the individual events within it, is colour commentary. And some argue controlled opposition. If you don’t know a war is being waged upon you, then you cannot possibly fight back let alone win.
Islam for instance is waging a war against the rest of the world, because it has to. Islam is obliged to do nothing else but conquer the world for Islam, using every means possible. We used to say that we are losing to Jihad because we treat a military problem as if it was a law and order one. That was true then. But now we don’t even treat it as a law and order problem.
Eeyore for Vlad.
Lies my gov’t told me, Second commie pope, Bernie does his tight 5: Links 1 for May 9, 2025
1. Since we are looking at lies the government told us…
2. First ‘American’ Pope ‘elected’ at the Vatican
Newly-Elected American Pope Has Taken Multiple Shots at the Trump Administration in Recent Months
With bated breath, the world found out on Thursday that Cardinal Robert Francis Prevost would become the first American pope in the Vatican’s history.
On a related note, that also meant that the world now knows the X handle of Prevost.
And that means that the world knows what Prevost has been posting and re-posting about — and those posts could make things very interesting when it comes to a relationship with Prevost’s home country.
I understand that the new Pope has issued his first Motu Proprio that his title be changed from His Holiness to “Comrade”.
Although personally we are mildly surprised. We thought they would pick the Archbishop/Cardinal of This guy in other words:
More on Archbishop Marx at Gates of Vienna
We did have several subtitled videos of his admonishing Germans that did not wish to be deracinated by mass Islamic immigration. Once found, we will restore. At the moment they have all mysteriously vanished from my hard drives. Some are still up on Rumble though
Separation of Church and State, unless the Church is communist. Then have at it
3. Gotta love Bernie sanders. Nothing he says is really a surprise. But it does make his followers look like total morons.
Bernie makes millions on his book attacking capitalism.
Thanks for checking in. With luck, some serious material a little later on about how Germany along with the rest of the COMINTERN is destroying liberty and the people’s franchise to self govern across the world. But Germany is worth watching since they tend to get pretty militant about their leftism.
If you want a jump start on that, read Eugyppius’ Substack. he really covers that well.
For those that wonder what the term, ‘dialectics’ means, this chart pretty much nails it.
Website exposes FDA’s Dr. Peter Marks, CBC propaganda, Poilievre refused Joe Rogan and LOTS of geopolitics, missiles from India and Israel: Links 1 for May 6, 2025
1. A new website exposing the most pernicious, FDA staffer, Peter Marks and his role in the vaxx crisis. In fact he did know about the adverse effects and from multiple doctors, as he continued to pimp the mRNA shots, even to pregnant women. Watch the video below, then peruse the site.
2. CBC is such blatant propaganda it should probably come with the same kinds of warnings you see on a pack of cigarettes in Canada
3. Joe Rogan INVITED Pierre Poilievre to go on his show.
Thinking about Poilievre today, I was inspired to make this stupid graphic. For non Canadians, the people in it are: Left Pierre Poilievre, the current controlled opposition leader who is about to lose a seat in an election for the second time, centre is the person who was head of the “Conservative” party right before him, Erin O’toole who also voted for every Trudeau bill, and on the right, the ” Conservative” Premiere of Ontario, Doug Ford who since the Covid revolution, is more often seen as a kind of prop for federal Liberal leaders and actually endorsed Mark Carney in the recent election,
4. India fires 9 missiles into Pakistan as retaliation for what was most likely an ISI planned attack in Kashmir on April 22. More on that as soon as there is more. Might be a good time to invest in some iodine for the medicine chest.
UPDATE: There appears to be return fire from Pakistan now. LIVE Broadcast
5. Israel destroys Yemeni international airport following attack on Ben Gurion
Israeli warplanes strike Sana’a International Airport in Yemen’s Houthi-occupied capital city, destroying the passenger hall and other buildings, and bombs power station days after a Houthi missile exploded outside Israel’s largest airport.
By David Rosenberg, World Israel News
Israeli warplanes on Tuesday afternoon bombed multiple targets in the Yemeni capital city of Sana’a, days after pro-Iranian rebel forces in Yemen launched a missile that exploded next to Israel’s largest air travel hub.
According to preliminary reports, IDF fighter jets struck the Dhaban power station, just outside of Sana’a, along a power distribution facility and a cement factory.
In addition, Israeli warplanes hit the Sana’a International Airport.
Multiple aircraft were destroyed in the strike, and the passenger hall and flight service areas were also hit.
Thank you all for checking out this site.
Robert Spencer: On the Jihad attack in Garland Texas in 2015, what was the FBI’s role there?
Garland Texas Ten Years After: The FBI and Islamic State attack on free expression
A quick reminder:
All those that get emails with our posts in it, never see the embeds or videos embedded within the email. So they likely make zero sense, since most of this site’s material is looking at videos and trying to understand them in a way which gives a predictive model. So if you become aware of this, or any post we do, and you wish to understand it, please click through to this site and the actual article itself.
Thank you.
May 3rd, is the tenth anniversary of quite a significant event in terms of Islamic terror in the United States.
Given that, and that Trump is in the White House, and the Texan government is in theory at least, constitutionally oriented, this may be the moment where a little pressure can be applied and Trump along with Pam Bondi and Kash Patel might open up the FBI files on the attack and tell us what actually happened. In retrospect, knowing what we now know about the FBI, it may not be surprising what their role in all this was. But at the time, it was unthinkable that the FBI would have a central role in a jihad attack against American Citizens unless you were really paying attention to Obama and his Office of the CVE. Like we all were here at Vlad. ?
RAIR Foundation has been doing a series of articles with interviews of the principal people involved in the event. To recap: A few months after the Islamic jihad brutal slaughter of cartoonists and staff at Charlie Hebdo in France, Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller rented a venue in Garland Texas and held a Draw Mohammad cartoon contest. The reason being, the only rational response to a group of violent Islamic terrorists telling you what you cannot express, must be met with everyone expressing it. Especially, although not exclusively, when it comes to something as benign as merely drawing a potentially fictional historical character.
The attackers were two Muslims who drove to the building from somewhere in Arizona, accompanied by an undercover FBI agent. The name of that agent and files on the event, have been sealed. But if the FBI agent was able to be convincing enough to join a cell of Islamic terrorists, and in fact was the one who chose the target, we can make a few guesses about him.
Tom Trento was the man on site live streaming the event. The following interview contains some footage of the events as they took place inside the Garland conference centre. Tom was a central figure in the counter-jihad at the time as well. He explains events as they happened with a great deal of clarity.
The winner of the cartoon contest is an American whose family is of Bosnian descent, Bosch Fawstin. One would call him an apostate if one was Muslim, but one would just call him American if you knew him.
This interview is really lucid and to the point. I would hope as many people as possible get a chance to see it. Article at RAIR
Please stay tuned for at least one more interview on this topic.
At this point I am going to play advocatus diaboli a little bit in terms of the FBI involvement.
The files are hidden for the moment. But it’s a huge open question. So in the interests of an intellectual exercise, here is how it could have gone down. It might explain some things, but NOT that the FBI had promised to inform the organizers of any potential plot against the event, and then failed to do so.
The FBI agent, in this case certainly an agent, as he likely was recruited to penetrate cells as opposed to a trained FBI officer, was probably Muslim and either was religious, or appeared religious enough and knew enough to fool an Islamic State cell well enough to be taken into confidence.
The initial intention was to attack the Super Bowl, which was somewhere nearby in time and location, but it was the FBI officer who convinced the IS cell to change targets to the Curtis Culwell Center in Garland. This is the truly inflammatory aspect to this event.
What makes it possibly less horrifying than it does on the surface might be that the Super Bowl could be considered a soft target where multiple locations might offer access to jihadis where they could do a great deal of damage before being stopped. But the Garland centre was a very hardened target. They had police, private armed security, snipers and participants were inside a building with few exits and entrance was scrutinized.
The terrorists pulled up and open fire on security, wounding one man and then where shot dead by the various lines of defence established to protect the event. So one might argue that this was a way to save a lot of lives, Force the terrorists up against a hardened target where they would do little to no damage and get killed by trained gunmen instead of hiding somewhere and killing and wounding huge numbers of football fans, exiting the event.
IF this is the case, then the question is why did they not inform the organizers of this plan as they promised they would? After all, the FBI agent was alone in his own car following the two jihadis as the drove to the Curtis Cullwell Centre in Garland Texas? He would have had a lot of time to make the call. And even according to the X files, the FBI had cell phones back in 2015.
In any case, this is a more significant event than it is in the public consciousness. And that is likely in part, due to Obama’s office of the CVE and its modus operandi. So please watch these interviews and subsequent ones on this subject, and pass them on to your own circles. Its understanding events like this that help build a model with some predictive value of how our civilization is rapidly becoming both communist and Islamic in nature. And both systems are anti individual, anti rights for people with rights being granted to fictional collectives, and especially with communism, arbitrary laws that change without notice but are often applied to people retroactively against anyone who can be made to even appear counter-revolutionary.
There is more than one way to fight back against totalitarian demands on our society. But surrendering to their arbitrary demands is not one of them.
Mostly on how media has become tools of narrative enforcement and propaganda, and why it makes no difference that the ‘Conservatives’ lost the ‘election’: Links 1 for April 30, 2025
1. Canadian media has become quite masterful at writing articles which relate to a newsworthy event but say next to nothing at all.
In this case, the entire article consists of 2 lines of real information. Specifically that police shot a man at Ottawa’s Rideau Centre shopping mall, and that employees at Chapters Indigo got the day off because of it.
The real information lies in the metadata and analysis of this fact. All news orgs. are now tightly constrained from publishing factual information which may be counter-narrative for government policies which are intended to be destructive to Canada. And mass immigration is likely the most destructive policy of all, as well as its embracing of Islam and observant muslims.
When these policies first started, we saw written evidence of it through something called the Union of Journalists or something similar.
It is hard to find even that now, as even evidence of memory holing is being memory holed. But it listed groups who had to be omitted from stories about very bad behaviour in order not to allow people to understand that these groups had a culture or other impetus to these behaviours. So we could use media metadata to know who they were more or less.
In other words, if the article did not name the suspect, even when they had been arrested, we knew it was likely a Muslim name. If the suspect was not described, it was likely not someone of European descent. Over time, they removed any useful metadata as well such that now they generally don’t ever name or describe the suspect, although if it confirms state narratives, such as it being a white, male, ‘incel’ the name and description is usually available immediately, even to this day. I would remind people of the Hijab Hoax ion Toronto where the CBC and CAIR-Canada as I recall, got to the scene of the non-crime before the police even did.
Read the article at the Citizen. It’s not even remarkable really. Just another example of how ‘news’ is a lot of words about nothing with a few dedicated to describing an actual event. It is worse when there is a dead victim. Then the stories are politicians offering hopes and prayers and people 2 blocks away talking about how they felt when they heard about it on the same news which is interviewing them.
It is these aspects of Canada which make it a communist country. The liquification of reality. The forced narratives. Making reality itself illegal. For example. item 2 below.
2. This is a video of the Canadian ‘Conservative’ party, not only unanimously passing a bill that allows children to be sterilized and mutilated by drugs and surgeries by the state, but criminalizing parents who even attempt to suggest to their children that they should wait till they are old enough to buy a beer before making such a decision.
And worse than even that. This is the Conservative Party of Canada, actually asking to pass the bill without even a second reading or any of the normal procedures that makes a bill a law, and just skip to the part where they all dance in the isles once it’s passed. Really. Watch the blonde woman in the red jacket with the blue medical mask. And the house gives itself a standing Ovation. This was Dec. 1, 2021
3. Ezra Levant interviews a lawyer who is a QC (Queen’s Council now King’s Council or kind of a certified high authority lawyer) on Alberta separation. However, as interesting as this is, anyone who still thinks we use stuff written down and passed by Parliament as the defacto law is deep deep asleep. We predicted Carney would be made prime minister without any kind of vote or normal procedure 2 years ago on this site and in private conversations, and if I recall correctly, in comments, people were hammering us with rules and regulations about how that cannot be the case. But Canada and the West does not work that way and has not for a long time now. The COMINTERN has an agenda. It will make whatever it needs to make happen, happen. It does usually make up some post-hoc explanation for why it may be unusual, but is still perfectly legitimate and the sleepy go along with it because swallowing an opiate to avoid the reality of single issue red-pill is a lot easier than waking up and taking the whole bottle or red pills at once.
But if Alberta thinks they can use law or even constitutional rules to peacefully take their oil and leave Canada as an independent or join the US, they didn’t learn a single thing during Covid, or all the years of mass migration without any normal vetting or proper policies to ensure we were not getting terrorists or criminals. Or even paying attention today to the dialectical manner in which the law operates, jailing a grandmother event planner for potentially years for helping trucks coordinate a counter-narrative protest in Ottawa, while releasing murdering raping migrants back on to the streets till trial. Mischief, is more serious when it’s counter-narrative, than murder if it’s not. So enjoy the prospect below. But Alberta if it has a single brain cell that still has working dendrites, had better be prepared for what every people who yearn to be free has had to do in all cases to escape tyranny. Remember this story from yesterday?
4. Just one more example of how Canada failed to learn a single thing from open blatant totalitarian rule by the Liberal Party.. The NCI was an astonishing effort. All the witnesses were under oath when they gave testimony as to what happened to them personally, or how they used their personal field of expertise and experience to explain how dangerous government narratives and coercion had been, during Covid.
And her story is far far from the worst. Its just a great example of the ludicrousness of it, as well as the astonishing amount of force the state used for people in violation of of arbitrary state diktats that accomplished nothing good and did an incalculable amount of harm.
5. Alex Berenson has TWO posts exposing the propaganda nature of the NYT and on two central issues.
5a: The New York Times “investigates” the DC jet crash – and buries the truth it finds
The New York Times cannot stop mangling the truth to serve its political goals.
On Sunday, the paper exhaustively examined the collision between an Army Black Hawk and an American Airlines jet that killed 67 people over the Potomac in January.
The massive 4,000-word article claimed the crash had many causes, including an overworked air traffic controller. “Missteps, Equipment Problems and a Common but Risky Practice Led to a Fatal Crash,” the Times proclaimed.
Except that’s not really what happened. Or what the Times found. […]
What the Times actually found, the news in the article, is that the Lobach’s copilot repeatedly warned her the helicopter needed to descend in the minutes before the accident. Just seconds before the crash, he suggested she tack left, a path that would likely have avoided the jet.
5b: URGENT: Yet more legacy media deception on a vital issue
Yesterday, just past noon local time, the electric systems in Spain and Portugal failed without warning.
Power remained out across both countries for much of the day and wasn’t fully restored until today. The disruption was profound. Subway riders evacuated stalled trains in darkened tunnels. Cellular service (which, unlike landlines, does not have backup batteries) went down. Elevators were stuck. ATMs and traffic lights went out. […]
Just after the outage, Portugal’s electric network operator supposedly blamed“extreme temperature variations” in Spain for “induced atmospheric vibration.” Those led to “oscillations” on high voltage lines, according to several newspapers, including England’s Guardian.
“Millions without power in Spain, Portugal after ‘induced atmospheric vibration’,” a USA Today headline incoherently but confidently explained.
Of course. Induced atmospheric vibration. If that sounds like gobbledygook, it’s because it is. By Tuesday morning, the Guardian had disappeared those words, claiming the Portuguese company “said the statement was falsely attributed to it.” […]
But in the rush last decade to pacify climate change activists and decarbonize the world (except, of course, for India and China), niceties like the realities of physics seem to have been overlooked. European countries have moved quickly away from boring, reliable sources of power generation and towards solar and wind.
No country has moved faster than Spain, which has sol to spare. In mid-April, Spain ran its electricity grid fully on renewable energy on a weekday for the first time.
Do read the full articles at the source links given.
Thank you all for reading this site
Gotta love this. A woman at a Muslim day or whatever at the Texas capitol took over the mic. Among other gems she said: “Bow down to a stupid rock”.
David Horowitz of Front Page Magazine passed today.
For those wishing to get a sense of who he was, they may wish to read Diana West’s book on him.
On Tamara Lich and the state of Western nations measured by their responses to Islamic terror: Links 1 for April 24, 2025
1. Tamara Lich comment on her substack and our response to it:
7d
Tamara Lich ??
In our trial, the longest mischief trial of all time, we set hearing dates to set hearing dates.
There will be a ‘speak to’ this afternoon to set a date for the sentencing hearing which we think will take 3-4 days. Following that hearing, Chris and I will return to Ottawa again for the actual sentence.
The Crown is seeking 2 years in a federal penitentiary for both of us, plus they have decided to file an application to confiscate Big Red. Funny, there hasn’t been a single other convoy case in which the Crown demanded that persons property or vehicle, yet they seem to want Big Red. You need to ask yourself why.
Chris raised his children in that truck, changed their diapers in that truck, had his old dog, Buddy, put to sleep in the passenger seat when his time came because that was Buddy’s favourite place in the world.
This is not about the rule of law.
It’s about crushing a Canadian symbol of Hope, Pride & Unity
VladTepesBlog
8m
In a communist polity, which is what Canada is becoming and in many ways already is, the state and its agents seek to destroy the symbols of the existing order in order to destroy the things those symbols represent.
They use various dialectical methods to get away with it initially. For example, destroying the founders of Canada’s statues as “racist” or any other personal attacks they can use, such that pushing back against leftist destruction, places you in the same target zone. ‘Opose the destruction of the symbol makes you a ‘racist’’ etc.
The fact that the accusations either aren’t true or don’t matter make it work even better for the left. That is how dialectics works. The narrative attack must not be true, in order to target the people who defend the actual truth.
As Winston Smith writes in his diary in 1984: “Freedom, means the freedom to say 2+2=4”.
So yes. Demanding the truck is the same as trying you both for years under Mischief. You and the truck are symbols of Canadian individual liberty, and resistance to state narratives.
Therefore, they will work triple shifts to destroy all of the above.
Weirdly, I left this comment and it disappeared within a minute. So I left it again, and it disappeared again within a minute. Tamara has no idea why. But Mark Carney is actually on the board of Stripe, which is the only way you can be financed via Substack. So…
2. JD Vance exposes one of the purposes of the ‘Global Warming’ dialectical scam
3. Paul Joseph Watson demonstrates that Germany is exactly where Great Britain is in terms of a dialectic state, rather than one ruled by law.
4. Belgium appears to be exactly the same:
5. Canada on the other hand, is exactly the same:
KLEIN: Bill 43 crosses the line: Wab Kinew has no right to police our words
The Manitoba government has decided its priority isn’t fixing health care. It’s not tackling crime. It’s not dealing with rising taxes, failing infrastructure, or a broken education system. Instead, they’ve introduced Bill 43, an amendment to the Human Rights Code, that makes using the “wrong” pronoun a violation of the law.
Under this proposal, intentionally using a pronoun that doesn’t align with someone’s preference will be considered discrimination. Let that sink in. If you decline to use someone’s chosen pronoun — whether out of conviction, confusion, or principle — the government will classify it as discrimination under human rights law.
It doesn’t stop there. The legislation explicitly includes things like dress, hairstyle, makeup, body language, and voice in its definition of “gender expression.” Justice Minister Matt Wiebe said the change will bring Manitoba in line with federal law and other provinces.
When did we, as a province, ask for this? When did the voters of Manitoba decide that policing speech was the government’s role?
Thank you all for checking out this site.
Here is a terror plot you almost certainly didn’t hear about. A Muslim, who self identifies as Hamas, and was in the US Air Force, was busted for a number of terror charges and plots in the US. Also some of his friends.
Experts: a tool of Communist narrative enforcement
There are at least three ways of considering what an expert is, and what it means.
Here we will look at 4 of them.
The first, is psychological. According to some studies, there is a thing called “The 10 year rule”. Ten years of dedicated practice results in what we would call, expertise. This definition relies on our general and intuitive understanding of an expert though, which would be the second. Someone we accept has knowledge and experience in a field to the extent that we might accept their opinion as fact or practical advice on the strength of their expertise as we perceive it. The first is really a drill down on what it takes to be the second. An expert as we commonly understand and use it. Sometimes that expertise is codified with some sort of certification. Ay there’s the rub. The third kind. Someone with paper that declares them an expert.
But then there is the abuse of the power, we give to those who are presented to us as experts. If someone wears medals they did not earn or pose as veterans of the military, it is called Stolen Valour and in the US is an actual crime. But the abuse of the reputation and belief in experts is not. In fact, it’s “more”, as Shakespeare said, “honoured in the breach than the observance”. And nowhere is this more true than in government.
In the following video made of Thomas Sowel’s view on the abuse of the concept of expertise, we see what this site often refers to as colour commentary in the sports event sense of the term. This isn’t a bad thing neccesarily. Colour commentary as we see it, is the description of something we all know is going on and is bad, and presenting it as it really is on the surface, but not the strategic level of the events or processes behind the events. Calling out the vaxx as not safe or effective, but not talking about the actual intentions behind it, or that those who foisted it on us never intended it to be either. Or calling out Islam as not the religion of peace but in fact what it really believes, but not explaining how the left uses Islam as an attack vector on Western civ is colour commentary. Colour commentary can be even controlled opposition, as Stephen Coughlin might say, albeit usually unwittingly so.
In this case Sowell presents the experts’ presentation of reality as near accidental or a product of corruption which led to catastrophic results as a by product. We believe the catastrophic destruction in many cases is in fact the intended result, which cases an entirely different light on the use of experts by the state. Viewing it as accidental, incompetence is Hanlon’s Razor. A ruse to avoid the knowledge of the real intention by writing it off as stupidity or incompetence.
Colour commentary is better than no opposition perhaps, but it’s incomplete. Failure to understand the actual strategic use of, in this case, experts as a concept, means failure to be protected from that form of dialectical attack.
Here is the Thomas Sowell video. Well worth watching:
Growing up in Canada, cabinet members in government once upon a time were usually experts in their own fields based upon very practical standards. I have attended lectures by former ministers of agriculture who were in fact, successful farmers. They were able to set policies which assisted farmers and the production of food. Made food more available and less expensive, and made sure famers could make a living doing it.
So that would be experts in the way we all expect them to be.
Some months ago, watching a video on Soviet communism, it may have been James Lindsay or TIK History, a brief explanation was given on how the Soviets would appoint a “panel of experts” to allegedly represent the people, but in fact, really enforce government narratives by cloaking them in the language and rhetoric of science to make them appear as if the narratives are in fact empirical truths. This is known as “Scientism”. The cloaking of narrative in the language of science to make it more authoritative and thereby saleable.
I have never been able to find that video since, but inspired by a conversation with a friend this morning, I checked the concept with Chat GPT and hit the motherlode:
Me:
I saw a video once, I believe it was on the New Discourses channel by James Lindsay, where he briefly discusses how the Soviet Union createdd a panel of experts, allegedly to represent the people, but actually to affirm state narratives from a scientism PoV. Can you find either the video and time it is at, or any documents which explain the Soviet Council of Experts?
GPT:
I couldn’t locate a specific video on the New Discourses channel where James Lindsay discusses a Soviet “Council of Experts” established to represent the people but actually used to affirm state narratives from a scientism perspective. However, the concept aligns with known Soviet practices where the state employed panels of experts to legitimize its policies under the guise of scientific authority.
For instance, the Soviet Union often utilized scientific rhetoric to support state narratives, a practice sometimes referred to as “scientism.” This approach involved presenting political and ideological decisions as scientifically validated truths, thereby discouraging dissent and promoting conformity. Such strategies were evident in various aspects of Soviet governance, including the suppression of dissenting scientific opinions and the promotion of state-approved theories.?
While I couldn’t find a direct reference to a “Council of Experts,” the broader strategy of using scientific authority to bolster state narratives is well-documented. For more detailed information, you might explore archives such as the Hoover Institution’s Soviet State Microfilm Collection or the Wilson Center’s Digital Archive, which house extensive records on Soviet governance and propaganda strategies.?
If you’re interested in a deeper exploration of how the Soviet Union employed scientific authority to support its narratives, I can provide more detailed information or suggest specific resources.
See if that changes your perspective on all the above and below:
Now it may be worth revisiting excellent works of actual science debunking Canadian government scientism which set the policies during Covid. The book, Fisman’s Fraud for openers. And maybe a fresh look at the diktats of people like Anthony Fauci and a look at Kennedy’s book, The Real Anthony Fauci. And suddenly the various stories that appear to show hypocrisy by all those who set Covid and Vaxx policies become clear. It was not incompetence. it was Malice. They all knew masks didn’t work and took them off the second the cameras stopped rolling. The Ontario Science Table was a panel of experts who gave cover to state diktats that took the lives of enormously large numbers of people as compared to actual Covid deaths. The British equivalent of Fizman and Fauci, Neil Ferguson, whose models caused the lock downs and other polices but didn’t stop him from racing across town to have sex with his married lover. Or the Governor of California, who was one of the most draconian governors in the US but had no problem booking a private restaurant for a large number of his friends to party in with no masks while everyone else in LA was forbidden from eating out or being in groups. Nanci Pelosi and the hair salon.
They knew. But that isn’t the point. The panel of experts that force policies based on narratives is the point. And with Carney on the horizon, the climate line of operation based on CO2 is gonna be huge.
Today at a presentation to the Canadian branch of the Club of Rome, the speaker, Madeline Weld, was presenting on the Century Initiative. The quasi illegal NGO/Lobby group that is arranging for Canada to have a population of 100,000,000 people by the year 2099, One of the participants pulled a fairly classic dialectic attack on the presenter. He asked a question that sounded somewhat related to immigration but was really trying to force consensus on climate change due to anthropogenic CO2, as a main priority. When he failed to get it from the presenter, he accused her of denialism.
Denialism is a dialectic attack. It is not science. The essence of science is to deny consensus. In fact, if a theory is not falsifiable, it isn’t even science, or a theory at all. Consensus is also not science. Religion is done by consensus. It kinda has to be. But science is a method for obtaining models which are closer and closer to objective reality, usually as determined by the predictive value of the model itself. And Global Warming has failed in every prediction.
And this is now the world we live in. Awareness of how it works will help us individually navigate around some of these policies. At least mentally. But we cannot escape the very real consequences of policies which will create scarcity and destroy what little individual rights we have left if we don’t stand up for those rights and refuse to accept the consensus of scientism. It’s not rocket science after all. In fact it isn’t science at all.
Remembering Pope Francis
On the often lethal Covid mRNA gene therapy injections
On illegal migration to Europe and the West
On Islam’s right to violence when they hear something they don’t like
Video on Pope Francis and his Catholicism
Islamic State affiliate, (Religious Muslims) planned to murder an entire town in France
UPDATE: unfortunately I embedded the wrong video last night. The correct one is now in place!
Thanks to Oz-Rita for finding this video and doing this translation for us all.
Grand Mufti of Pakistan declares official World Wide Jihad against Israel and all once Islamic lands
This was a major conference of Islamic leaders from across the Islamic world and this fatwa is authoritative. It is no small thing.
Additional details can be found here, and at RAIR
A few Canadian election items: Links 1 for April 14, 2025
1. Dear Sikhs in Canada. If he is willing to do this to Canadian culture, how long till he does the same to yours?
2. Pierre doesn’t go as far as Trudeau to pander to Sikhs, he just has a cloth hat. At least Pierre’s message is for Canadians. All of us.
The Sikh festival in Vancouver:
3. Not to be outdone, Mark Carney does the Sikh festival
4. Imam explains the mission. Take over Western countries and make them Islamic. Not gonna wait though, till they do it by demographics. it’s gotta be jihad. Cause after all, the ONLY way to get to paradise for Muslims, is die in Allah’s way. It is the only sure fire way to do it.
5. There has been a lot of weird election BS taking place in Ontario and elsewhere it seems. One candidate marked their sight posts with a special paint to test the theory that in Mark Carney’s riding, all the conservative signs were being taken down and the posts used to put up Carney ones. It turns out yes, that was exactly what happened as the other candidate discovered her specially marked sign posts now had Carney signs on it.
I wasn’t going to bother with the one below, till I saw who the person actually was. Now that we know what he is willing to do in the name of stopping “evil”, what was he willing to do when he was working for elections Canada?
So I decoded to make my own Vote Carney sign:
Thank you all for checking out this site.
Tomorrow, the JCCF, John Caray’s truly Human Rights oriented law firm, is holding a special Zoom on the dangers of a CBDC. Carney most certainly would implement it once he is installed. For those who wish to attend, it should be easy to find by searching for the JCCF, and otherwise, key moments from the presentation should be available shortly afterwards.