This is my talk in Pembroke in August, attempting to explain how our various institutions of state actually work:
Category Archives: Exposing Leftism
Geert Wilders victory and let’s play Media Bullsh*t Bingo
PJ Watson on the electoral victory of Geert Wilders
Here is a link to a BBC assassination piece on Wilders. Perhaps we should adopt the Global Warming rhetorical scam-spotting game, Bullsh*t Bingo and adapt it to dialectical tactics by the MSM.
On your card you could have:
Insulting insinuations not used for leftist candidates. An example would be a critique of Wilders’ hair style but never attacking any leftist candidate for hair plugs or dye or any other form of quaff.
“Controversial”. One of my personal favorite dialectical/rhetorical weapons of the MSM. CBC uses it sprinkled on eggs every morning for breakfast. A politician is controversial if he is counter-revolutionary. If that politician or person is a communist revolutionary that word is not used. A general example would be a Prof. of Biology with Ph.D.s in the field, who says that a man cannot simply become a woman by saying so, is controversial. While a man claiming to be a woman on one day to take all the top spots in women’s sports and then going back to being a man afterwards is not controversial. Because of the stance that J.K. Rowling has taken on this, she is now considered a far right wing, and highly controversial figure. A Canadian nurse was investigated in fact, for involvement with a billboard saying I (heart) JK ROWLING.
(Her ordeal is still ongoing as of November 9th this year)
The article continues in more subtle ways to disparage Wilders. They discuss his arrest for a thought crime and that communist UK refused to allow him into the country, even though Wilders at that time was an MPs in the European Union and the UK was still inside the EU. This shows the real nature of the beast. The European Union is a revolutionary organization like the UN. Although their rules stipulate that one country must grant access to members of parliament from other EU states, the truth was that this only applies to agents of the revolution. This site emphasizes the single metric by which all things work today. And that is communist-revolution Vs. counter-revolution. The evidence for this is as common as gravel and salt on the roads in the winter in Canada. All processes work this way. When a court or hearing or ‘Human Rights Tribunal” adjudicates on the actual evidence, rule of law, and real human rights, meaning individual ones and not arbitrarily defined collective ones, it’s the exception.
In the case of Wilders, think of it this way. Leftist activists invent all kinds of bogus organization to create awards to give to left wing activists in order to add gravitas to their agenda. There is one dialectical-Jewish man (He uses his ethnicity as a sword and a shield to advance leftist objectives, hence ‘dialectic Jew) who heads a dialectical communist organization much like the SPLC in the US, in Canada who even speaks at events sponsored by CAIR-Canada (now NCCM) to combat ‘islamophobia ‘who’s talks are prefaced with all kinds of awards. We see this often with the left. It is a way of getting people to listen, and giving authority to people who have accomplished nothing but are advancing the communist agenda. With Wilders, they invent charges and events which are not legal or proper procedure which they know will fail under scrutiny of any court not yet fully revolutionary. But that doesn’t matter. What does, is that they can talk about the accusation. So kind of the inverse of the awards scam. For leftists, invent fake awards to give gravitas, for counter-revolutionaries, invent charges and prohibitions to destroy their public image. Alinsky Rule 13.
Wilders was convicted of inciting discrimination, although later acquitted, and he was refused entry to the UK back in 2009.
Accused. They took him to court over asking his constituency a question of immigration policy. The actual job of government. They accused and tried him twice of a thought/speech crime because the question he asked, “Do you want more Moroccan immigration (to the Netherlands) or less”? was a counter-revolutionary one. See in a contemporary democracy you have total freedom of speech so long as its all in perfect accordance with the communist nation-destroying, individual-crushing agenda. Wilders dared ask the people of the Netherlands what they want for the future of the Netherlands and was tried twice and acquitted for it. But the BBC uses that accusation as a cudgel. Same as his rejection from the UK, which is actually a breach of rules, if not illegal, of the UK not Wilders. The BBC are dialectical engineers.
For those interested, here is Geert’s closing statement at one of the struggle sessions trials he was put through over this matter:
But Europe’s far right believes their views have now become more mainstream.
This one above we all know. It’s called, Moving the Goal Posts. What was once the absolute obvious reasonable goals of any nation state, to protect itself, to protect its citizens, to have equality before law for all etc. etc. is now “far right wing”. There is a double irony here. The left, in what is probably the greatest con of the 20th century, have convinced people that the Nazis are some how right wing. The National Socialist Worker’s Party under Hitler, far right wing by some act of alchemy. The party who”s leader’s speeches, notably at Nuremberg, quoted Marx chapter and Verse, who hated the Russians because he didn’t think they could pull off socialism while the Germans could, those guys were right wing. All powerful state and the crushing of individual rights is in no way right wing. That is Hegelian/Marxist communism. Libertarian, maximal individual rights with minimal state power, is the true right wing. And there is the double, and maybe even triple irony. It means that Wilders, Orban, Trump, The new Argentinian guy, possibly Poilievre in Canada and other people the media call “far right wing” are in reality somewhat right wing, but in the opposite way of the impression they are trying to create. Frankly, by libertarian standards, all these leaders are still more collectivist and big government than is desirable. So in fact they are just more right wing in the good way than the revolutionary communists now running the Western world and its media and institutions. Hence the triple irony.
With a little more effort we could flesh out all the score card points for Bullsh*t bingo of leftist dialectical journalism. Probably all of it from that one BBC article, although I’m sure there are other devices they may have neglected to use in that one article. Feel free to leave ones you may have noticed in the comments.
Recent interview with Det. (Ret.) on Helen Grus trial
Although this interview was recorded last Sunday, it is the latest info on the very important trial/hearing of Ottawa Police Detective, Helen Grus. This hearing will determine if policing will go forward dialectically, in this case meaning to advance the power and ideology of the state at the expense of the truth and the facts, or if policy and results will be determined after a proper objective investigation to determine the facts and the truth.
This is not a small thing.
Those not familiar with the case, please click through to RAIR to read the whole story so far as we have covered it from the start. The hearing will resume in January when a verdict is expected. I do not think the bookies are offering decent odds on a not guilty, specifically because it is so obvious she is not guilty. And because the trial procedure is so flawed, and even corrupted from a jurisprudence point of view, it would have been thrown out before it began.
Iranian Dr. Sheila Nazarian responds to the epiphany of Mayim Bialik, former star of The Big Bang Theory and Blossom, on Islamic and leftist antisemitism
Diana West: The new American Police State
Tweet from Hungarian Prime Minister, Viktor Orbán
Tucker Carlson with Victor Hanson: What we need to get rid of the Jacobins is a counter-revolution
Neil Oliver provides evidence of the communist nature of our civilization, Vlad Tepes puts it out there at Rally in the Valley
Neil Oliver in his own way explains a few things in terms of effect which we know about the communist polity we live in today. We know it is narrative driven and not fact based or truth based. And we know that with the left, the point is never the point, the revolution is always the point. This sums up Neil’s video in its essence. Oliver describes the effects of these axioms in more details in this video in terms of how it effected himself, and ion the public in general.
In August, I was asked to speak at a gathering of open minded people who are willing to assemble to try and make sense of the changes we have seen over the last years in Canada. Most ‘woke up’ as they say, during the Covid pseudo-crisis, but we know that was just one of the most effective lines of effort, of Maoist narrative attacks on us which has been followed by ever more of them and repeats of previous ones, like Global Warming, aliens and more.
It has taken till now to decide to officially publish it (although I have linked to a sound cloud of it previously) but here it is. I hope its useful. For those willing to put the effort into a thorough understanding of this perspective, one which will actually give you a model sufficiently accurate to give you predictive power, please consider reading this, either ordering a print or printing it yourself, or reading it online for free. This is Stephen Coughlin’s paper on the true nature of the left, and the revolution we now live under. He also has many more newer and older papers all of which are worth the effort and time. For the moment though, start here.
ERRATA: I made a mistake on the graphic. The speech was on August 25th, 2023. Not tomorrow!
As an afterthought, here is an interview from the September 20th march against grooming of children in schools. This fellow seems to get it.
Dutch Cabinet walks out when one MP exposes the Marxist education of Finance Minister Sigrid Kaag
This is a fascinating video. Dutch MP, Thierry Baudet begins to explain the infiltration of Marxism in modern governments and then mentions that the Finance Minister went to one of the main training grounds for Marxist leaders and the entire cabinet walks out. The rest of the video is just arguing procedure. But reading one layer up you can see what is in fact really taking place. Like everywhere else in the West, there is no counter-revolutionary speech allowed. At least nothing that could be effective. The reasons will be made up as needs be. But the real rule, is no one is to expose the communists behind the curtain, and no one is to present information from an authoritative place that threatens the revolution.
Organizer of Million Person March set for Wed. Sept 20th, responds to ‘leaked’ video by govt and union leaders planning to interfere with it
First, the response from the organizer of the planned Canada-Wide march against SOGI:
This is the video I believe he was responding to. We posted it here a few days ago as well.
For those of you who do not get how leftists perpetually use the politics of victimhood to in fact be the oppressor, and work three shifts to destroy every aspect of what is important to the rest of us, right down to the last brick and mortar of our reality, please watch these two videos on formal leftist semantic weaponry. Regulars to this site will have already seen them. On Marcuse’s repressive tolerance, and how truth becomes hate speech.
Repressive tolerance in under 3 minutes:
How truth becomes hate speech
In the Union leader’s and other associated Marxist Leninists at the secret Zoom near the top, it is fascinating to hear the attempt to conflate “Islamophobia” with “transphobia, which is of course the narrative attack vector, as well as mitigate the fact tt is a Muslim who you see in the top video who organized this and announced it at a nearly all Muslim protest of SOGI at the Catholic School board!
Related: Toronto Security Meeting:
We spoke with Jeff in June of 2022:
Counter-demo ad:
Dr. McCullough now is aware of the CPSO and interviews some of it’s victims
Earlier this summer, Dr. Peter McCullough was called as a witness in the star-chamber hearings for the removal of the medical licence of Dr. Mark Trozzi.
This was at the CPSO, or the Ontario College of Surgeons and Physicians. Now the college forbids anyone from recording these hearings, although I have no clue what the legal status of such an act would be, but they make all kinds of warnings about recording the hearings so I contented myself with watching at a friend’s who had a link to the broadcast of it and making a few notes.
To start with, Peter McCullough does not suffer fools gladly. The main lawyer for the tribunal uses the same tactic with all defence witnesses, and the tactic has nothing to do with determining the truth of the matter at hand, only of attempting to smear the witness, usually with guilty by association fallacies for the purpose of attempting to not allow their testimony to be heard. This alone is a far far cry from the purpose of the creation of the colleges in the first place.
As we understand it, the colleges were created to represent patients when a patient feels they were badly or improperly treated by a doctor. If a patient made a complaint, then the college could demand the patient files and examine them to try and determine if the doctor was malfeasant, or if the patient was inaccurately assessing the situation, or perhaps being vindictive.
And now we run up against the word that causes all the eye rolls, as Maj. Coughlin says.
We see now that the courts operate dialectically, as opposed to in the socratic method of evidence based decision making.
In this context, it means that the CPSO now is demanding patient records, not just with no complaints from the patients, but in fact where the patients are deeply grateful for their care. The college is now acting to protect the state ideology and narratives, and the facts of the matter are only a mild inconvenience.
When Dr. McCullough was being questioned, the lawyer for the CPSO tried her usual tactic of wasting the witness’ time by making them listen to her reading things and then agreeing that what she read was in fact whatever the document said. The purpose of this was to create the impression that the doctor was a bad person or an in-credible witness for having agreed with what the lawyer read was an accurate representaiton of the document in question, which had the effect of shaming the witness, even though the document was usually some other material from a site with which the witness had appeared on as a guest or an interview.
In other words, they may have made a witness agree with a reading from say, Info Wars, and then point out that the doctor had appeared in an interview on Info-Wars and therefore, everything Alex Jones ever said before or since goes to credibility.
This is a rhetorical trick and not any attempt to determine value. But where it becomes dialectical, is the nature of the crime, perhaps even more so than the methods to force a guilty verdict.
The college is now after any doctor that wasn’t sufficiently in jack-boot step with the universal application of the experimental mRNA gene therapy for Covid19. Even in one case we know of, for simply refusing to take one themselves and maybe offering some form of assistance to others who rejected the shots.
The issue of their safety or efficacy is not discussed. Only the failure of the doctor to align with the narrative view. This is communism, or more specifically, dialectical. This is about the power and reputation of the state, and the state ideology. And, like in Islam, truth is not just a distant second, it is the enemy.
Dr. McCullough handled the state inquisitioner deftly though. He refused to play their game and explained that if they had any questions of substance, they can ask them but he will not waste a minute listening to her read things and then assessing if she read them correctly. In fact, his treatment of her was kinder than she deserved, but he didn’t want to further jeopardize the case against Dr. Trozzi so he remained exceptionally compliant, other than refusing to be part of the CPSO tactical deceptions.
But the CPSO woke the dragon on this one. As they say, when you look into the abyss, the abyss looks into you, and Dr. McCullough became aware of how the CPSO operates, and what it means to any kind of fair process and medical care for the public.
At this link, there is a 44 minute interview of two other people entangled with the College in a similar case to Dr. Trozzi’s. In fact the College appears to be going after all doctors who took patient health over state diktats. This is worth watching as people who read this site, will likely get more out of it than most. You can hear by their answers the meta-text on what is actually taking place here. Remember, with the left, the point is never the point, the revolution is always the point. My current favorite example is this reveal of the Trans-dialectic for what it really is, by the person who created it.
Unfortunately i have no idea how to embed Substack videos here so you have to click above to see the interview. But I couldn’t resist this three minute segment of it I had to grab from the middle. In this section, a great deal is said. But do click through and watch the whole thing. The CPSO is a microcosm of every institution and regulatory body in Canada, and perhaps across the developed world now. Understanding how they operate is the key to predicting how things will go with much greater accuracy.
Below is the interview RAIR did with Dr. Mary O’Connor from Aug. 2022 where she details how the college sent thugs in all but name to steal patient files from her office, in order to get evidence that people were avoiding the carefully constructed rat trap that was mask and vaxx mandates. They were a rat trap in the sense that all exceptions were built in to the mandates, such that it was fully up to the discretion of the mRNA pushers to decide if your exemption was legit or not. They could literally claim to read your mind on this one. They could claim that they did not believe your faith was real, or even act as a cleric of any faith and interpret it to allow the vaxx, no matter what it actually said. They could allow or disallow a priest or doctor’s exemption note, forcing some people to get second and third shots after initial adverse reactions, based on logic as bad as all the rest of it all was for the last three years. In other words, dialectical. Where the purpose of speech was to create an outcome, and not convey information for better decision making. It was a rat trap where exits where provided that you could see before going in, but what you could not see, was that all exits led right back to the entrance of the trap. The purpose of the fake exits, was to lull people into walking into the trap in the first place.
On the Catholic Church, globalism, and vaxx policies
YouTube censored this video. Here it is below:
Pope Francis Labels Transsexuals “Daughters of God” Following Meeting
Pope Francis, head of the Roman Catholic Church, met at the Vatican with a group of transgender individuals—men who identify as women—who he referred to as “daughters of God,” a statement that appears somewhat contradictory to his past statements on gender ideology.
The supreme Pontiff spoke about the meeting, and what he said could apply to any of a number of meetings, as he met with transgender people in Rome several times last year.
Speaking to the Spanish Catholic magazine Vida Nueva, Pope Francis recalled the meeting saying, “[t]hey left crying, saying that I had given them my hand, a kiss, as if I had done something exceptional for them. But they are daughters of God,” Il Giornale reports.
Other publications have translated Pope Francis’ statement differently, including the online Catholic publication Crux Now, which states that Pope Francis said the transgender individuals were children of God, rather than daughters.
The translation by the news outlet seems unlikely, as the Spanish newspaper La Razon, quotes Pope Francis as saying the word “hijas”, which is Spanish for daughter.
A critical video from the gov’t of Ontario from January 2022 concerning the CPSO and the new rules
One of the concepts that this site deals with repeatedly is the notion that a communist revolution has indeed taken place in North America. Many people now concede that to one degree or another, this is indeed the case. Many more will deny it but agree that appears to be the direction the country is headed in.
The difference in opinion is usually rooted in a number of factors. What a given person is prepared to accept, but also how people define communist and compare that definition to what they see around us. At this point let me say that it is no accident that so many who came to North America from the former Soviet Union or behind the Iron Curtain are far more likely to agree with the proposition that we are communist now than most native-born in North America. And that is because they recognize it. Even if they don’t understand the machinery that make it such. But they recognize the language, the discomforting divide between what we know is true and what we are are told to believe, and the galloping power of the state with the simultaneous diminishment of the individual, even in the minds of those still plugged in to CBC, CTV, Global News and to a lesser degree perhaps, all the subsidized print media.
So let us offer the metric on what makes us communist here:
What makes North America a communist polity, is that it no longer operates on lines of truth, evidence and democratically created institutions for the purpose of serving the public and defending the rights and liberties of the public. Instead, it operates dialectically. In practical terms, this means that the purpose of these institutions is now to grow the power of the state and enforce state narratives, especially when they are harmful and untrue. This being one definition of dialectic. The other being an entirely different system of thought in which you take two opposites and use them to cancel each other out and create a new ‘synthesis’ which later will likely be used to cancel itself out in the next round of dialectic negation/destruction. You can see that with mass immigration and many other contemporary programs in play daily. There is also what would be seen on the ground as selective enforcement such that any actions which advance the left are encouraged and not punished when illegal, while any legal actions by the defenders of Western thought and liberties which inhibit the power of the left and the direction of the revolution will be punished and even framed as criminal when in fact they where not, and many orders of magnitude less so than similar actions by the left.
The point of all three of these definitions of the dialectic is to move the culture to the left at all costs, and in all ways.
Please watch the following video from January 2022 from the Government of Ontario directed at the College of Surgeons and Physicians of Ontario, and break it down in the comments. Anyone who has watched even 20 minutes of the various ‘trials’ of doctors who using their best judgement tried to save patients from taking the mRNA shots by the colleges (anyone who still believes these shots are not dangerous and were a good policy along with mandating them, please click over to CBC. They need the support) would recognize the rhetoric in this video becoming the modus operandi of the tribunals.
When we were a democracy, the universal slogan, even on PSA ads on TV if you go far enough back, was to go get a second opinion, when considering a course of medical action. Now it is that all medical advice has to be a direct quote from public policy no matter how dangerous that advice is, and doctors who fail to submit will be punished. For the moment by career death. We can guess what comes next for them and all who refuse to obey state diktats. But this one example shows brilliantly how we went from a Western nation derived from Aristotle, to a communist one based perhaps on Plato, and certainly Hegel/Marx.
Nigel Farage, being debanked and the West moving towards maskless fascism
It appears that the developed world is inching its way towards a more honest fascism in some ways. First, a couple of Soviet style quips to indicate where we are now, then we get to Nigel.
“Why does China not have to care about Global Warming? Because they are already communist!”
“Why does China not have to concern itself with gay and trans rights? Because they are already communist!”
As we see it, this is why Sweden didn’t have to do any real Covid measures. They had already let in enough Muslims and other means of destruction of themselves as a free and identifiable people that there is no going back for them. The Health ministry there also set out directives, which we posted a leaked copy of in 2020 if memory serves, showing that they intended to kill a lot of elderly people by lack of treatment, a valium variant called Medazolam mixed with Morphine, for the pain you know, and which in combination with medazolam is known as an “end of life” drug.
Back to the issue.
Many of us know of people who have been ‘debanked’. This means that someone, although it is hardly random, suddenly finds that their bank will not do business with them anymore for reasons that have exactly nothing to do with their finances or dealings in any way that would constitute bad faith with the bank. No bounced cheques, no unpaid overdrafts, nothing. The bank calls and says yer outa here and an explanation might come in the future and it will be fully unsatisfying when it does. Think of it like when Idi Amin Dada was dictator of Uganda, and each day people would listen to the radio to find out if they had disappeared or not. If they heard their own name on the list they know they had precious few hours to get the hell out of Dodge. Or in this case, Kampala. Think of debanking as the financial version of this.
What is interesting about the Nigel Farage debanking, was the slight move towards honesty in the reason given. He is you see, a “PEP”!
A “Politically exposed Person” sure feels like code for ‘counter-revolutionary’ to me. And a great deal like another code word we get fed a lot, “controversial”. How that scam works, is a person who defies a leftist convention, especially when the defiant person is correct and therefore a threat to the narrative, (think Covid origins, vaxx, war in Ukraine, The Religion of Peace etc. ad nauseam) gets attacked by organized leftists or better put, communist revolutionaries. Then, they label the attacked person as ‘controversial’ and therefore a risk to whatever or whoever they need to say they are a risk to, in order to diminish them in reputation and or rights and abilities to operate in normal life. The people doing the attacking are never controversial, just the victim. The people who say a man who claims he is a woman is a woman, they are not controversial and face no ill effects from that statement. Well, not counting the ones being stabbed by muslims but thats pretty recent and the media is still hiding that from us as much as they are able. But the person who says that a man is a man which is a taxonomic and biological fact, he is controversial and therefore can lost his basic rights as a citizen. And the more integrated we become through technology, the more dire the consequences to the controversial people in question.
So a PEP is a move towards honesty relative to saying controversial as it is a lot closer to counter-revolutionary than is to ‘controversial’. A “politically exposed Person” means one who is politically incorrect. And by now readers of this site should know that phrase is actually a communist term that dates back quite a ways to mean anyone in defiance of leftist narratives. Who knows. Maybe next we will move from plural pronouns like they/them and xe/her to the more honest one size fits all, “comrade”. And all the iterations of sexual deviancy flags can just be replaced with a hammer and sickle on a red field and therefore, be truly all inclusive.
On Hitler and the Nazis’ leftist socialist beliefs
This video is 5 hours long. The probable reason is that the left after WW2 did everything they could to distance the horrors of the Nazis from their reputations as representatives of the left. The same thing happened after people learned about the gulags, arbitrary detentions and imprisonment and of course, more deaths than any statistician would be comfortable accurately tabulating lest he become one of them. The left also tried to distance itself from Soviet and North Korean horrors but that wasn’t quite as easy as it was to convince people that the shots are safe and effective Islam is the religion of peace aliens are attacking US military bases, the ozone hole will kill us all, Y2K bug will kill us all, killer bees will kill us all, bee colony collapse will kill us all, global warming has already killed us all the Nazis are somehow “far right wing”.
I have not seen it all yet, but based on his past videos I take it as an act of faith to post this as I do plan to watch it all over the week as his other videos have been very good. He has even found very important errors in James Lindsay’s material but still does recommend Prof. Lindsay’s videos.
I look forward to any and all comments on this video. It actually does matter if the Nazis are left or right wing because frankly, it appears that the Nazis have rebranded and are at it again.