Nigel Farage, being debanked and the West moving towards maskless fascism

It appears that the developed world is inching its way towards a more honest fascism in some ways. First, a couple of Soviet style quips to indicate where we are now, then we get to Nigel.

“Why does China not have to care about Global Warming? Because they are already communist!”

“Why does China not have to concern itself with gay and trans rights? Because they are already communist!”

As we see it, this is why Sweden didn’t have to do any real Covid measures. They had already let in enough Muslims and other means of destruction of themselves as a free and identifiable people that there is no going back for them. The Health ministry there also set out directives, which we posted a leaked copy of in 2020 if memory serves, showing that they intended to kill a lot of elderly people by lack of treatment, a valium variant called Medazolam mixed with Morphine, for the pain you know, and which in combination with medazolam is known as an “end of life” drug.

Back to the issue.

Many of us know of people who have been ‘debanked’. This means that someone, although it is hardly random, suddenly finds that their bank will not do business with them anymore for reasons that have exactly nothing to do with their finances or dealings in any way that would constitute bad faith with the bank. No bounced cheques, no unpaid overdrafts, nothing. The bank calls and says yer outa here and an explanation might come in the future and it will be fully unsatisfying when it does. Think of it like when Idi Amin Dada was dictator of Uganda, and each day people would listen to the radio to find out if they had disappeared or not. If they heard their own name on the list they know they had precious few hours to get the hell out of Dodge. Or in this case, Kampala. Think of debanking as the financial version of this.

What is interesting about the Nigel Farage debanking, was the slight move towards honesty in the reason given. He is you see, a “PEP”!

A “Politically exposed Person” sure feels like code for ‘counter-revolutionary’ to me. And a great deal like another code word we get fed a lot, “controversial”. How that scam works, is a person who defies a leftist convention, especially when the defiant person is correct and therefore a threat to the narrative, (think Covid origins, vaxx, war in Ukraine, The Religion of Peace etc. ad nauseam) gets attacked by organized leftists or better put, communist revolutionaries. Then, they label the attacked person as ‘controversial’ and therefore a risk to whatever or whoever they need to say they are a risk to, in order to diminish them in reputation and or rights and abilities to operate in normal life. The people doing the attacking are never controversial, just the victim. The people who say a man who claims he is a woman is a woman, they are not controversial and face no ill effects from that statement. Well, not counting the ones being stabbed by muslims but thats pretty recent and the media is still hiding that from us as much as they are able. But the person who says that a man is a man which is a taxonomic and biological fact, he is controversial and therefore can lost his basic rights as a citizen. And the more integrated we become through technology, the more dire the consequences to the controversial people in question.

So a PEP is a move towards honesty relative to saying controversial as it is a lot closer to counter-revolutionary than is to ‘controversial’. A “politically exposed Person” means one who is politically incorrect. And by now readers of this site should know that phrase is actually a communist term that dates back quite a ways to mean anyone in defiance of leftist narratives. Who knows. Maybe next we will move from plural pronouns like they/them and xe/her to the more honest one size fits all, “comrade”. And all the iterations of sexual deviancy flags can just be replaced with a hammer and sickle on a red field and therefore, be truly all inclusive.