CBC update on fake hate crime accusation seems more like doubling down on it

The title of this video is:

UPDATE: Reported cutting of girl’s hijab ‘did not happen,’ police say

And for anyone who is confused by the video, this is WHY CBC did a NON UPDATE UPDATE:

Alleged attack on hijab-wearing girl didn’t happen: police

An alleged attack against an 11-year-old girl where a man supposedly cut off her hijab while she walked to school last week, did not in fact happen, Toronto police say.

On Jan. 12, the girl told police that she was on her way to Pauline Johnson Junior Public School in Scarborough when a man dressed in black came up behind her. She said the suspect – described as an Asian man with a moustache — pulled off the hood to her jacket and cut off her hijab with a pair of blue-handled scissors before fleeing the area.

Toronto police responded and said they were investigating the alleged incident.

However police said Monday morning that after a thorough investigation, they don’t believe the incident happened.

“There was an extensive investigation Friday and over the weekend and quite simply, investigators came to the conclusion, considering all the evidence they had, that what was described did not happen,” police spokesman Mark Pugash said.

“Extensive investigation”.

Shiela Gunn Ried makes an excellent point.

They actually FABRICATED evidence!

CBC does most hard core anti-democratic, and anti-liberal hit piece, maybe of its history

Good luck getting through all of it, and kudos to those who do.

A pop song generally gets to the hook within one minute. Its a defining aspect of pop songs. This video compares Trump to Hitler within 26 seconds.

Will write more when and if I can make it to the end.

Canadian postmodern, and anti-Western propaganda after jihad attack in Edmonton

You probably should pour a drink before you watch this one.

CBC made a video to run damage control for the Muslims after the Alberta jihad attack where one of the panelists, all of whom, in classic CBC format, are on one side and of one goal, actually dared to claim that the attack, in part, happened because people are jealous that we have Justin Trudeau as Prime Minister. Seriously. The attack happened because of jealousy because Canada has Trudeau and he is so great.

At this point it is worth making an important distinction.

Despite CBC’s annual government Hand out of over one billion dollars, or a Carl Sagan as we like to say, it is not at all a government mouth piece. The CBC, is the Liberal Party propagandist, and the Liberal Party happens to be the government at this time. So that helps make sense of the extraordinary video you are about to watch, where a Muslim attacks police near a football game for Islamic jihad, and somehow it becomes about how great Trudeau is, the “diversity” of Canada, and by the end, the real problem. Right wing Canadians who might do the eternally predicted, and never actually happened, backlash.

Here is the Rebel’s take on the CBC’s actual coverage of the terrorist attack in Edmonton.

Proof that the CBC has the exact same ethos as CNN

For those of you who watch this sort of thing often you will recognize where CNN usurped and distorted the context and meaning of the clips of Gavin Mcinnes.

Its pretty grotesque actually and dead centre for CNN style defamatory fake news.

Gavn’s bit on things he hates about Jews was a comedic tribute piece to Jewish culture. The costumes he wore in one of the clips was also ironic. This CBC report is about as biased and dishonest as anything on CNN these days. But what makes CBC worse, is its a government funded propaganda network with over ONE BILLION DOLLARS a year to keep it going. They don’t care if they are sued. Its just Canadian tax dollars for which they have contempt anyway. The more they cost the better the parties and the more coffee boys they can bring on junkets.

For anyone who has followed Gavin, you will recognize the dishonesty, distortions and deceptions in this clip.

By the way, being against globalization, mass immigration and all the other objections this clip calls “more sinister” is what opposition to government is supposed to be. These are policies not religious edicts.

watch CBC do damage control instead of reporting on potential Muslim false flag op for M103

Notice how they deftly sidestep the fact that the man who called in the anti-Muslim bomb threats is a muslim. Notice how they soften the whole issue until by the end, there is no concern for alarm and the whole thing will bring us all closer together.

Classic CBC.

“This is not news, but it takes you away from reality”.

The new CBC version of Peter Truman’s tag line.

The Rebel’s coverage:

CBC segment on M103

The CBC in its typical far left wing extremist purveyor of the narrative fashion, has seen fit to disable comments for this video at Youtube.

So please feel free to leave them here.

Allow me to start with my own.

I think the former MSA leader and MB sympathizer in the Trudeau government either wrote those comments and insults herself, or members of her various support groups did in order to add inertia to the Islamophobia bill she wants passed in Canada.

 

Marine Le Pen turns around a CBC ambush

Thank you Oz-Rita for the hard work on this important translation.

The definition of bullying might be a state broadcaster that uses over a billion dollars in revenue they take from the public by force and then use it to push their own ideas on that same public, even though the mandate is to inform and connect the public.

In this ambush of French presidential candidate Marine le Pen, the interviewer managed to turn it around well enough that the station sort of hid it on their website rather than advertise it. Its worth the watch. Its nearly a template as to how people who are not cultural Marxists, AKA “Far right wing extremists” have to handle pretty much any legacy media contact they may have.

CBC tips its hand, shows its political underwear

The CBC actually ridicules a man who rescued many slaves under the Islamic State because he supports Stephen Harper. Yes, the CBC hatred of Harper is more important to them, than rescuing actual slaves from the most evil torturous state actors since the Ottoman Empire.

Link to Rebel Media page on this

 

Three interviews of Ayaan Hirsi Ali

Here are a few interviews with one of the most interesting and important voices of our time. Its critical to understand the basics of her background to appreciate the gravitas of her message and the best way to get that is her outstanding book, Infidel. One of the best reads anyone might experience, at least according to the people I spoke to who have read it, including myself.

But I post these interviews more to show the bias of the CBC rather than much about Ayaan who is likely well known to readers of this site.

First, an older interview by a left wing extremist named, Avi Lewis, who I believe left the CBC to go work for Al Jazeera. June 2007

Notice his repugnant treatment of someone who has endured more hardship than Mr. Lewis can fathom in his privileged existence. Because she didn’t fit his culturally marxist narrative of an evil US (as Bush was president at the time) and all cultures other than white European as morally superior to that one, he felt he could show that much derision and contempt on live TV.

Let’s see if things have improved at all now: May 15 – 2015 Wendy Mesley

Its noteworthy that the CBC interviewer lied twice by minute 7. For one thing, Prime Minister Harper did not say Islam was rooted in a culture that was anti woman but that the niqab or face cloth is rooted in a culture that is anti woman. By implication however that could mean islam. But many muslims claim that the face cloth is a tribal or cultural practice like FGM and have nothing to do with islam. So while I agree with Prime Minister Harper in either case, he did not say that. Secondly the interviewer claimed PM Harper was denying the head cloth. This is an outright fabrication. (Pun not intended but allowed to stand in evidence) Stephen Harper objected to the covering of the face with a face cloth during important ceremonies in government buildings. This is significantly different from what the interviewer said, not implied, but stated. Ayaan herself without knowing the facts differentiated between the head cloth and the face cloth.

All in all, it would appear that the CBC has learned to conceal its contempt for all things conservative better than Mr. Lewis did, while still trying to shape the narrative in the same way. When the interviewer tries to trap Ayaan into advocating for Omar Khadr as victim it becomes clear what the agenda of the show is. At least Mr. Lewis’s show, The Agenda, was more honestly named.

Now lets watch Bill Mahar in his most recent interview with Ayaan Hirsi Ali:

He starts out by revealing her bias. This is fair. But the questions allow her to explain her PoV and not his agenda. Even though its safe to say at this point, they may be very similar.

She is of course, wrong about the idea of an Islamic reformation. It is having one now, Its called, Salafism, Wahabism and the Islamic state In fact the problem with islam is the reformation of it into what it always was, instead of the tamed version of it we forced during the colonial years. If we are no longer willing to accept the responsibilities of colonialism, then we should at least protect ourselves from the fallout of abandoning that responsibility.

(The Bill Mahar segment was removed from YT but this small but very good part is working at the moment, even if it doesn’t make the point as well)

CBC interviews Mark Steyn and a sharia enforcer on the Charlie Hebdo images

The only surprise here is that the CBC actually hosted Mark Steyn. The CBC typically finds people to represent the side they don’t like, who are the worst drooling idiots they can find. More to say about this once I have watched it all. I hope Steyn manages to guilt the CBC into showing some of the images, because CBC is, like the BBC, among the world’s worst offenders when it comes to deconstructing the Enlightenment and reversing the gains of modern man.