Category Archives: Soft totalitarianism

Facebook is blocking Prager U!

Posted on by

Why does anyone still use that megalomaniac’s platform?

Does anyone believe Facebook’s reply? Does this sort of thing ever happen to leftist sites?

IMPORTANT NOTICE RE YOUTUBE

Posted on by

As I posted last night, the video we did of the man in the Jewish skullcap in Berlin, attacked by a muslim was pulled from youtube, and, a community guidelines strike was applied to my account.

This is the exact same video that RT has up on its Youtube channel and you can bet your bottom dollar its still there, and, if YT ends u pulling it there will be no strike on their account.

This is a SERIOUS thing as one more strike and we lose the entire channel, which is hundreds or more videos many of which are a valuable resource to a great number of people and organizations.

So I ask all of you to please subscribe to my Bitchute channel right away, which has mirrors of all the Youtube videos for the past few months, and will have all the new uploads for the next few weeks, as Youtube has removed my ability to add videos to the usual channel. Which means my 20,000 + subscribers cannot reach the new material, and if they delete it, it means losing those people if they have not subscribed to the Bitchute channel.

You can find it here: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/vladtepesblog/

At some point this evening I hope to also post an interview with that same man who was attacked in Berlin to this site but it should make it to Bitchute tonight for sure. So those wishing to see it before its posted here may want to subscribe.

Youtube’s treatment of us, and of the channel we use, is an excellent example of the kind of selective enforcement being used to crush those who believe in a classical West. Again, its not a small thing.

Thank you.

Eeyore for VladTepesBlog

Tommy Robinson Suspended from Twitter for Stating Statistical Fact About Muslims in Grooming Gangs

Posted on by

(When truth is no longer a defense, the rules governing our societies need close scrutiny)

Breitbart:

The controversial activist Tommy Robinson has been suspended from Twitter for quoting research which found that nearly 90 per cent of convicted grooming gang members in the UK are Muslim.

Mr. Robinson was suspended from the social media platform for 7 days for stating the findings of the Quilliam Foundation think tank, whose founder worked as an adviser to Prime Minister David Cameron on issues around Islam.

 

“90% of grooming gang convictions are Muslims,” Mr. Robinson wrote in a tweet on February 25th, rounding up the number identified by the Quilliam research, which found that 84 per cent of convicted groomers were Muslim in December last year.

Its time those of us who have not signed up to Gab.ai do so. At some point Twitter is going to be the new, Myspace.

 

 

 

Could this be part of the 4 page memo?

Posted on by

Persians may have to teach Germans how to win freedom. And many others

Posted on by

Banned video:

1956 interview with the author of Brave New World, Aldous Huxley

Posted on by

A minor proof that he was right, is that you cannot show people on TV smoking anymore. In fact I suspect this was cropped to get rid of the cigarettes at least one of them was smoking during the interview.

It was Google that destroyed anonymous political dissent.

Posted on by

In the previous post is a video busting Facebook for its clearly Marxist ambitions as written in its manifesto. (please hear today’s Michael Savage where he discusses Zuckerberg in some detail)

However in today’s reading of Assange’s book, when Google met Wikileaks there was a disturbing revelation.

Yep. It was GOOGLE that actually came up with the totalitarian policy of all social media accounts MUST be under YOUR REAL NAME.

And this is why I was kicked off of Facebook. Because of the selective enforcement of contemporary leftist governments and supranational social media giants who have decided for the exact reasons that, at least in the US, the right to anonymous political commentary was considered essential.

From Washington’s Blog:

Anonymity is a shield from the tyranny of the majority. It thus exemplifies the purpose behind the bill of rights, and of the first amendment in particular: to protect unpopular individuals from retaliation– and their ideas from suppression– at the hand of an intolerant society.

***

Though often maligned (typically by those frustrated by an inability to engage in ad hominem attacks) anonymous speech has a long and storied history in the United States. Used by the likes of Mark Twain (aka Samuel Langhorne Clemens) [and the founding fathers in the Federalist Papers], we think ourselves in good company in using one or another nom de plume. Particularly in light of an emerging trend against vocalizing public dissent in the United States, we believe in the critical importance of anonymity and its role in dissident speech. like the Economist magazine, we also believe that keeping authorship anonymous moves the focus of discussion to the content of speech and away from the speaker- as it should be.

Selective enforcement meaning that Islamic supremacy will never be curtailed or condemned and is in fact, government subsidized and often fully funded as Trudeau spends tax dollars to build mosques across Canada.

But most certainly enforced against those who speak truthfully about Islam in a way that makes it look as it should look to all non-Muslims.

 

 

Italy: Do an anti-migrant protest. Get sentenced to jail

Posted on by

This is an Original translation by Fousequawk with much thanks!

From this Italian Website:

 

Alex Cioni, the leader of the Committee Prima Noi [First Us], sentenced by the Tribunal of Vicenza to 5 days in jail and €1,310 fine for unauthorized protest

Five days in jail and a €1,310 fine. This is the punishment to which Alex Cioni, leader of the Committee Prima Noi was sentenced by the Vicenza Tribunal.

He was guilty of staging a demonstration in front of a hotel designated as a future center for migrants in order to show his dissent against the arrival of refugees.

The facts go back to last July 17, when some representatives of the Committee Prima Noi affixed a placard and posters onto a glass door of the Hotel Eden di Schio to express their dissent concerning the announced arrival of a continuous number of asylum-seekers. An unauthorized demonstration because according to the judge, it had not been formalized beforehand by a request to the public security authorities.

Thus Ciano was convicted even though the punishment was suspended because he was a first-time offender. The accusation on the part of the offices of Digos and the sentence by the Vicenza Tribune stated: “The missive from the Committee represents in an unmistakable manner a clumsy attempt to intimidate our activities.”

Islam Workshop in the Ministry of the Interior: Are Chief Editors being influenced?

Posted on by

German news article about how the Merkel Government is instructing the media on how to report on Islam, translated by Ava Lon with much thanks!

From this German site:

At the beginning of 2017, Interior Minister Thomas de Maizière, together with Islamic associations, invited to a workshop for journalists. Photo: picture-alliance / dpa]

Frankfurt am Main – The journalist Volker Siefert (Frankfurt am Main) practiced a sharp criticism of a planned event, organized by the Federal Ministry of the Interior, together with Islamic associations for chief editors.

As he writes in a commentary under the heading “Heile-Islam-World-Workshop in the Ministry of the Interior” in the magazine of the German journalist association “Journalist” (Remagen), the member associations of the German Islam Conference demanded of Thomas de Maizière (CDU) a course “in which chief editors of all relevant media in Germany should learn how to correctly report on Islam”.

He said it was going to be on the ministry’s premises in early 2017 and had been developed by the Ministry of the Interior and Islamic associations: “This is what the associations have created what lobbyists otherwise dream of: namely, that the state intervenes in the process of opinion formation, about something that is directly discussed with the media’s responsible leaders. “

Siefert: A minister cannot give tuition lessons to journalists [how they should write]

The action is downplayed by the Ministry of the Interior as “perfectly normal”. Siefert: “If this were normal, the Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology would have organized a workshop on a” workplace-friendly “reporting in the Diesel affair together with the car industry.” The state has to keep out of lobbying: “A minister isn’t allowed to act as co-organizer (neither for a group nor for a person) together with a group of interests to provide tutoring lessons for journalists.”

Siefert works as a freelance journalist for, among other things, Hessischer Rundfunk (HR) and is primarily concerned with Islamic motivated extremism. In 2006, the then interior minister Wolfgang Schäuble (CDU) wanted to create the “institutional framework for dialogue between people of Muslim faith and representatives of all levels of our community” with the German Islam Conference.

Ten umbrella organizations, including the Turkish-Islamic Union of the Institute for Religion (DITIB), the Central Council of Muslims in Germany and the Alevit Community Deutschland (all in Cologne), are participating in the project.

 

At last someone is speaking the brutally honest facts of the Clinton crimes and seditions

Posted on by

Just setting up a private server, at the very very least, to avoid access to information requests, was itself enough of a crime to drum her out of politics at least.

Then there is all this stuff.

Comey was direct to Gowdy’s questions. But they still wouldn’t move forwards. Then you have this. 

But frankly i do not believe a word of it. There is no way it played out like that article suggests. Lynch is right there with that administration. On top of that, she would not have been afraid to throw bill from the aircraft.

And would she have let anyone on board her plane who said: “The president wants to speak with you”, and would the secret service agent have told that lie? None of this makes sense.

And then this:

Leaked Email Reveals Google Chairman Wanted To Be Clinton Campaign’s ‘Head Outside Advisor’

Those of you who read the Free Speech Defense article on the relationship between Google and the Obama admin won’t find this surprising. But if you haven’t read it, they would make enlightening companion pieces.