“The secret of all victory lies in the organization of the non-obvious.” -Marcus Aurelius
1. Leftists thug the Bannon debate using varying types and degrees of totalitarian tactics to oppose the event, while CBC attempts to smear Bannon with the actions of ANTIFA there to oppose him. It is, they imply if not outright state, his fault that people behave so badly around him.
2. The actual debate. It seems that Mr. Bannon won in terms of changed minds at the end.
All of us reading from the Anglosphere. Ask yourselves if you have ever seen this quality of debate on TV ever on this subject.
Our own Buck left a comment under this video at Youtube which expressed my feelings on first watching it exactly. He, like I, was fully angered that BBC/CBC never would dare show something this honest or democratic in nature.
This one deserves to be spread as much for the amazing illustration of what the rest of us do not have, as much as the excellent content. Remember, chances are Youtube Sandboxes or otherwise grey lists this video in some way. Its up to us to spread it directly.
Thank you Elle for this translation.
LANGUAGE WARNING:
H/T Fausta
Geert was never better than he is in this remarkable video.
For those who have seen other debates in Parliament with the Rt. Hon. Geert Wilders on the issue of Islam in Europe, you may notice a subtle change in the opposition who seem a little less hostile and a little less contrarian to the premise this time.
Debate: Filip Dewinter (Vlaams Belang) and Centre-right winger Jan Jambon (N-VA) about the Qur’an among other things. House of Representatives, 22nd of January 2015
H/T Pym purnell
Thank you H Numan and Gates of Vienna for translating and editing this important video
On Feb. 11 2015 in Washington, an illustrious group of experts including but not limited to, Diana West, Stephen Coughlin, Clare Lopez, Frank Gaffney, Geert Wilders and many more, delivered a seminar on what the problem is in terms of the geopolitical threat coming from muslims, and what can be done or is not being done about it.
This was a section at the end where Diana West, author of American Betrayal, asked the question about Islam Vs. ‘Islamism, and what is the difference and where does the threat come from exactly.
I only cut a couple of people’s responses, not because they effected the discussion one way or another, but because I felt they made points which were not directly on topic but dealt with more arcane aspects of American law. For those who wish to hear it though, the entire thing is still available on Youtube starting at hour 5:00
There are many things to watch out for in this clip. One interesting moment is when the woman convert insists on not being called a convert, presumably because muslims pretend all people are born muslim and their parents convert them to something else so they ‘revert’ back to islam. The woman therefore is demanding that all people ignore their own system of thought, and for that matter, reality itself, and submit to her values, at least outwardly or be branded with the new ‘scarlet-letter’ of racism.
H/T Snaphanen
Scroll to about 4 minutes for the start
Thanks UK Pete
(Caution: This is one hour long)