“The secret of all victory lies in the organization of the non-obvious.” -Marcus Aurelius
WARNING: Great load of steaming leftist propaganda ahead
https://vimeo.com/159671084
H/T Tasha Carr
My response to 60 Minutes:
H/T Nash Montana
There is, among those of us who fight Islamic and leftist totalitarianism and global manifest destiny, a kind of acid test of acceptable affiliation. Its an easy one really. Those of us with whom we choose to affiliate must recognize Israel under the same set of criteria they would any other nation on Earth. This means they must not be antisemitic, as typically anti-Israel people apply an impossibly high standard to Israel in order to demonize and delegitimize it when it inevitably fails that impossible standard.
The most probable reason for doing so, is it is a Jewish and liberal state more or less based on a free market system in the same way the rest of Western states are more or less free market.
This makes it unacceptable to Muslims, who must rule the world by sharia and doubly so because their scripture commands the extermination of Jews and Israel as a Jewish state and Jews were the first to reject the founder of Islam, Mohammed,’s alleged divine right to rule.
It also makes it unacceptable to socialists/communists who initially had hoped for a secular communist state of Israel which would live in harmony with its Muslim neighbors. Of course this required them not to be Muslims but just some other kind of communist, but reality never stopped a communist from killing to create a Marxist utopia.
Here is a brilliant example of a true rational liberal from Australia. A new Senator named James Paterson. An excerpt from his maiden speech given on March 15 2016
Lets contrast that with this official US government map of the region:

Notice anything missing? Tiny Gaza is listed, but not the official, 6,000,000 people strong, world-leader in patents etc. state of Israel.
As time goes by, and more and more of those who fight on behalf of a free and classical civilization get frustrated and frightened, the tendency to blame the Jewish people for this problem, the one that Merkel and Obama and others can easily be seen to be the prime movers along with financiers such as George Soros etc. grows like a cancer.
Yes, there are Jewish leftists who follow multicultural policy like the useful idiots they are. Then you have truly pernicious Jewish activists such as Barbara Lerner Spectre, who truly is all that the antisemites claim the jews are, and has been referred to as “God’s gift to the Ku Klux Klan”.
But it must be understood that neither Babs Lerner nor George Soros are connected by anything actually Jewish other than ethnicity perhaps. And to blame their Jewishness for their actions would be identical to blaming the communist millions-of-killed by Mao Zedong on his being Chinese.
There is a mountain of Jewish activists working for freedom and Jeffersonian liberalism. They just don’t make a big deal out of their Jewish heritage as it shouldn’t matter. In fact its typically the leftists who form groups like “Jews against Trump” because they don’t have a real argument and stick to vectors of attack via ethnic identity for the sake of cultural Marxism. Just like feminist groups and Black Lives Matter etc. etc.
There is no scriptural basis for the destruction of Greek thought and English legal thought in Jewish history nor in any other component of Jewish doctrine. (I speak here of course, of real Jewish doctrine not forgeries or imputed texts written by historical Nazis of one stripe or another)
Here is one example of a liberal Jewish man fighting for all our rights to freedom. He is likely Jewish but only refers to his time proudly serving the United States in the armed services as his credentials and not what gene pool he happens to be from.
For every Babs Lerner, there are a thousand like Aaron Wiess in the video above.. How do I know? I work with dozens of them, fighting for all our rights to freedom of speech and all that entails. And it is my great honour to do so.
And this brings me to the thing about which, I want to apply a powerful spotlight.
For those that remember the attack by religious Muslims, probably from Pakistan’s ISI against India via the attacks in Bombay Nov. 2008, there was a notable aspect to it.
The terrorists, being in fact, terrorists, intended to do as spectacular an attack as they were able to do with the limited number of people and ordnance they could smuggle into India via light water craft. The bigger the attack, the more terror. But they chose to use a significant portion of those resources to go after a Chabad house at the other side of the city in order to kill Jews. This meant that the strategic objective had more than one component. Had they not done that, they may have been able to significantly increase the number of dead and amount of damage and terror caused.
The exact same thing for the attacks against Charlie Hebdo in Paris. Significant resources went into killing people at a delicatessen on the other side of Paris. Frankly most terrorist attacks in the West have a component of murdering Jewish people. So we can see where the dividing line is.
Now lets look at the inverse case.
We have a historic and monumental speech by Hungarian Prime Minister, Victor Orban.
In it, he quite clearly states that importing antisemitism into Hungary (meaning Muslims who are ideologically obliged to it) is unacceptable.
Lets think about the strategic resources spent on such a statement in this speech.
Hungary has a political party, Jobbik, that are actual Nazis.
This is not a fringe party. They have seats in Parliament. They have influence and a following. For Orban to make this statement
“We shall not import to Hungary crime, terrorism, homophobia and synagogue-burning anti-Semitism.” (7 mins 31 seconds on video)
must be taken very seriously. He spent real political capital to say this in the exact same way that terrorist groups spent resources to do the opposite.
In this, Orban has established himself firmly as a true liberal in the Jeffersonian sense. He has earned our respect and passed the acid test at potentially great cost to himself. He could be much more popular and have a larger mandate if he went the other way perhaps, or by just not saying that one line.
And so I put it to suicide-Jews out there who still rest on sanctimony and leftist feel-good politics and demonize what the left and leftist media tells you to demonize without thought and without research, you must support this man and all who think like him should you wish your children to enjoy sharing the oxygen in the atmosphere, and if you wish your grandchildren to see adulthood.
This is it.
Your last chance, Children of Israel, to recognize who genuinely holds your basic interests at heart.
I suggest that the opportunity to support such as he is taken.
Carpe diem.
Eeyore for VladTepesBlog
H/T to Oz-Rita
This is stunning. Its like something the Python gang would have done in the 70s.
Yes you see this right. The legend of the Croissant, which may or may not be true but should be, is a source of ‘Islamophobia’ and yet the Muslims had laid seige to Vienna and were intending to sack and look at rape and kill its residents as they did to Constantinople and then on to the rest of Europe. This is horrifying historical revisionism.
Thank you very much Dzsihádfigyelo for the rapid and excellent translation of this most important speech. May as many people see it it’s gravitas would deserve.
An original translation by Nash Montana
A man was brutally beaten to death. The police investigated against the suspected offender, but lacked a motive. In court the man finally breaks his silence – and made a surprising confession.

Masked officers in protective gear and an offender bound by his hands and his feet. The Arnsberger state court took no chances during the process against the 27 year old. The man is accused of manslaughter, he is considered unpredictable and dangerous. Last September he brutally beat to death a 56 year old, then he attacked officers while in custody and injured them. But a motive remained absent.
But as the court proceedings against the defendant began, he dropped a surprise. While he had remained completely silent as to the accusations against him, he broke his silence even before they could be read to him as the court hearing opened: “I admit everything. Don’t need to talk more”, he said while the judge was still trying to verify his personal information. After the reading of the accusations against the defendant, the German-Moroccan man repeated his confession and added: “I killed him because hew as an unbeliever.”
Prosecutor Klaus Neulken was surprised. “I did not expect that”, he said. It is unclear at this point how the defendant’s confession should be assessed. Because there were so far no leads that would have shown an islamist background or contact in that scene during the investigation.
The defendant first attacked the victim with a knife and then he beat him to death with a blunt object, during which the face of the 56 year old victim was rammed multiple centimeters into the ground, the court imparted.
Expert witness has to decide criminal liability
Judge Klaus-Peter Teipel acknowledged the defendant’s confession, but did not inquire further. Because as the court proceedings began, the expert witness who was expected to decide the defendant’s criminal liability, remained absent. In order to avoid that the accused had to be dismissed after 6 months of investigative custody, the court wanted to proceed even without the expert, and had planned to present the charges against him.
Although planned otherwise, the defendant did not wear the spit-preventative hood. According to his attorney Marcus Ostmeyer his client didn’t need to wear the hood al the time. He did show to be cooperating with authorities during the transport to the court. But it wasn’t always like that. When he was arrested last fall and during custody he attacked and spat at officers multiple times.
On March 30, the court will continue under similar security proceedings. It is then the court wants to hear a statement from the defendant and hear witnesses.
After the kerfuffle by ANTIFA and their Islamic partners/directors in Montreal, to try and stop the Paul Weston presentation booked at Ruby Foo’s March 8, I had a chance to sit down with Paul and ask him a few questions that have been plaguing me. This was pretty late in the evening and after a very long day for everyone.

– “This is not a humanitarian issue, If it was a humanitarian issue, countries in the Middle East would take care of their own rather than putting the burden on us.”
– “These people are not willing to fight for their country, and based on that they are not going to fight for our country.”
– “I think the people in that room have mixed up the victims and the perpetrators of what’s happening in countries like Syria.”
– “We are very disappointed that the Flathead County commissioners have been misled to believe it is impossible to adequately investigate refugees coming to the United States.”
– “I was told that if there is enough unease about refugees, the government will not place them in the area. … Let’s make them see and hear the unease.”
– “I believe it is not in the best interests of Montana and the United States to allow refugees or immigrants to come to the United States who do not agree with our Constitution, our values and the separation of church and state.”
– “Islam is not just a religion, it is a theocracy that controls every part of a person’s life and requires its followers to put Sharia law in place wherever they go.”
– “They have Sharia law in Dearborn, we do not want that here.”
– “The potential impact of receiving a contingent of individuals from an unknown origin, without credible documentation, is frightening to say the least. But we also realize we must ensure the safety of our families and the sanctity of our communities.”
– “The entire refugee resettlement agenda is a (United Nations)-inspired plan to erase borders and dilute Western culture through mass immigration.”
A year earlier:
The mayor of Great Falls, Montana, wrote a blistering editorial that condemns the Council on American-Islamic Relations for a recent public relations campaign that apparently brought a Quran to his door right before Sept. 11.
“Last week, I received a copy of the Quran,” Mayor Michael J. Winters wrote in a Friday article for the Great Falls Tribune. “During a heightened period of instability in the Middle East, beheadings of Americans by Islamic terrorists, and ongoing national security threats, the Council on American-Islamic Relations sent me a copy of the Quran for my reference library.
CAIR reacts to Mayor’s statements about koran mailings:
These two events, the protest and the koran mailings are not directly connected as an event. But one likely informed the feelings of those that attended the other. The good people of Montana appear to be ready to do what we all have to do. Actually go out and defend our own way of life, our culture etc. No one seems to begrudge Saudi Arabia for living thier way even if its horrific and barbaric and bereft of reason. No one seems to think it was wrong of South Africa or Zimbabwe to resort to ethnic nationalism and treat the whites as people with no rights whatsoever. Then why can the people of Montana not defend that which they built, and their laws and protections.
H/T Richard