Global News fully disenfranchises all criticism of Islam

In this story about a protest at a mosque in Toronto, Global News has a misleading headline and misleading poster frame for the video.

HEADLINE: ‘Anti-Islamic’ protesters demonstrate outside Toronto mosque calling for ban on Islam

Also notice how they managed to make sure none of the signs are clear enough to read. I highly doubt the original sign is just a green rectangle with a smudge.

They make it appear that it is a story about a protest at a Toronto mosque. And the poster frame for the video shows a group of people with signs. But the article is pure, 100% condemnation of the protest and protestors and so is the video, with no footage of it, no interviews with them, and zero representation of their point of view.

Now maybe these were ugly thugs. Maybe they had a repugnant PoV. but we will never know because Global News robbed them of the chance to be seen as they are.

In the book, The Future of War, by Friedman, one of the founders of STRATFOR, the claim is made that wars happen not because people are different, but because different people are FORCED to mix.

Jordan Peterson, perhaps the most gentle and articulate man to speak on the issues of the day, predominately leftism and its full frontal assault on classical civilization, repeatedly says that when you deny people’s right to be heard, you in fact create the conditions under which violence becomes their only option.

I put it to Trudeau and Global News and all the other water carriers for the narrative that seem to have forgotten that multiculturalism also has to include our culture, and the natural right to defend it, and that diversity includes people other than muslims.

And that if violence takes place, it was a 100% predictable consequence of their policies and therefore, they bear a large degree of the responsibility for it.

 

RFB Radio with Kel interviews the aunt of the two teens murdered in a muslim femicide in the back of his cab

Link to Blog Talk Radio program here.

There are quite a few unpleasant revelations about the murders in this interview.

The interview starts at about the five minute mark for those that wish to skip the intro music.

From the BTR page:

The last words from Texas teenager Sarah Said were ‘Oh my God, I’m dying’. Then the 911 emergency operator heard a barrage of gunshots. Sarah, 17, and her sister Amina, 18, were found shot 11 times in the back of their father’s taxi, abandoned in a hotel parking lot in 2008. Their father Yaser Abdel Said is wanted by the FBI for their murders.

Today, their Great Aunt, Gail, alongside Pastor Michael Green, joins us to discuss this tragic story…

Welcome to the Red Fox Blogger with Kel Fritzi, Tim Burton of Liberty GB  http://www.libertygb.org.uk/  and Joshua of  Fahrenheit 211 http://www.fahrenheit211.net The show where we are left to our own incorrigible devices… No apologies, Folks, as we are always fed up about something… We are the Infidels your Imam warned about…

Join the program Mondays and Thursday @ 2PM ET!

Ask to join our Facebook Page @ Infidels Are Watching

https://www.facebook.com/groups/181395245292460/

For a refresher on these murders, here is the Daily Mail, which seems to have scrubbed the Islam out of the story, when it was 100% of the motive.

It was Google that destroyed anonymous political dissent.

In the previous post is a video busting Facebook for its clearly Marxist ambitions as written in its manifesto. (please hear today’s Michael Savage where he discusses Zuckerberg in some detail)

However in today’s reading of Assange’s book, when Google met Wikileaks there was a disturbing revelation.

Yep. It was GOOGLE that actually came up with the totalitarian policy of all social media accounts MUST be under YOUR REAL NAME.

And this is why I was kicked off of Facebook. Because of the selective enforcement of contemporary leftist governments and supranational social media giants who have decided for the exact reasons that, at least in the US, the right to anonymous political commentary was considered essential.

From Washington’s Blog:

Anonymity is a shield from the tyranny of the majority. It thus exemplifies the purpose behind the bill of rights, and of the first amendment in particular: to protect unpopular individuals from retaliation– and their ideas from suppression– at the hand of an intolerant society.

***

Though often maligned (typically by those frustrated by an inability to engage in ad hominem attacks) anonymous speech has a long and storied history in the United States. Used by the likes of Mark Twain (aka Samuel Langhorne Clemens) [and the founding fathers in the Federalist Papers], we think ourselves in good company in using one or another nom de plume. Particularly in light of an emerging trend against vocalizing public dissent in the United States, we believe in the critical importance of anonymity and its role in dissident speech. like the Economist magazine, we also believe that keeping authorship anonymous moves the focus of discussion to the content of speech and away from the speaker- as it should be.

Selective enforcement meaning that Islamic supremacy will never be curtailed or condemned and is in fact, government subsidized and often fully funded as Trudeau spends tax dollars to build mosques across Canada.

But most certainly enforced against those who speak truthfully about Islam in a way that makes it look as it should look to all non-Muslims.

 

 

Quite a good expose of an American leftist icon

Angela Davis uses what I call the “Spaghetti Method” tactic. That is, grab a large handful of bullshit and throw it against the wall and see what sticks.

It would take days to properly refute her stuff, not because its difficult, it couldn’t be easier. The commentator in this video does a decent job, although that isn’t his purpose in this video.

It would take days just because there is so much of it.

So I hope that readers will take a single point or two and post their own refutation in the comments should the desire arise.

Thank you EB.

Odd sort of presser at Canada’s Parliament Hill over the Liberal bill 103, “Return to the Middle Ages” Blasphemy motion

We are waiting to interview one of our people who was actually there to watch all the debate over Trudeau’s bill 103, the anti “Islamophobia” bill.

But here you can see at least some of the proceedings.

They say you can take an American statistic and divide by ten and get a Canadian one.

Apparently that is also true for politician IQs if this video is any indicator.

The take away is, how can they possibly make any kind of bill against “islamophobia” without restricting freedom to criticize religion and in particular, Islam. Of which the focus of the bill is stated to be.

The Liberal party members defending this motion talk around this. But clearly it is meant to pave a road to legislation which will give muslims a very special status in Canada. To be free from criticism while simultaneously calling for attacks and specific punishments to all who dislike their religion, and the Islamic freedom to attack all other faiths or degrees of faith other than their own to as an extreme a degree as is imaginable.

More on this as we get more.

Please comment on this clip. More sane analysis is needed.

Interview with captured IS jihadis.

 

This video is unusually good.

It exposes not just the cruelty and horror of the Islamic State, something which most Western news sources are willing to do, but also speaks to the Islamic manifest destiny ambitions of Muslims in Europe who, in large numbers, go to the IS to wage jihad.

It also shows categorically that the war in Syria is not, nor has it ever been, a civil war, but in fact a war of Islamic conquest.

*** THIS VIDEO WAS PULLED DOWN FROM TWO PLATFORMS WITHIN A MINUTE***

We are working on trying to bring it to you. We felt this was an unusually important video in fact, and the transcript is below. But you really have to see this one. It is a sterling expose of the Islamic agenda of which the Islamic State is merely step one.

Both platforms pulled it on a CR basis, but that doesn’t make a lot of sense these days as most places monetize their videos in such a way that they get revenues from our work and reach a wider audience and everyone is happy.

So its unusual that they would throw away an opportunity to earn revenues and choose to only have this seen by a Bulgarian speaking audience as opposed to all those who speak or read English to a degree sufficient to understand this video.

Which leads people to suspect there is more at work here.

Full transcript below thanks to Gates of Vienna and Tanya T

Continue Reading →

North Korea demands no autopsy for leader’s half brother

North Korea demands no autopsy for the half brother of Kim Jong Un. Most likely because it would determine that he was murdered, and most likely by Kim Jong Un’s assassins.

(The second video is just for the worst word play ever done on the word autopsy, maybe just ever)