Update on the Toronto Prof. who took a hit for us and for reason itself.

In the earlier post I linked to a National post article about a professor in Toronto who is in trouble for sticking to his guns and refusing to rejig an entire class or make special arrangements for one person who refuses to be in a room with women for religious reasons.

The National Post article is not accepting comments but the Globe and Mail article is as is the Toronto Star. This is an important issue and a chance for us to support reason and our own culture. Please go comment there. The story does beg the question, what would happen if women were to say, “We refuse to be in a room with muslim men because it is a clear and demonstrable threat to our safety”. I think we know. But it would be far more reason based a demand than a muslim’s to have a special accommodation because of ancient and irrational demands not to be near women, and which got a professor in trouble at his school.

The professor also asks a reasonable question. Would he be an accessory to sexism if he did accommodate the request? The answer of course is yes, if the request was made by a white Christian male even if the man had a denomination of Christianity which might expect this such as the Pennsylvania ‘Dutch’ perhaps or something similar.

Once again we see people using the notion that their personal beliefs, something we cannot even prove they have in any case, should limit other people’s choices as opposed to their own, the traditional case for people who wish to operate outside the cultural norm, and the consequent inversion of the notions of freedom and democracy that result.

This is an item that requires some action on our parts.

Eeyore for Vlad.

**I just left the following comment at the Globe and Mail site. As they are moderating comments I am quite confident it will not be published, so here it is for them anyway**

 

I have a couple of questions. What if a woman were to say that she refused to be in a room with muslim males because she felt it was a threat to her safety, which she could easily demonstrate to be true with rape statistics world wide and especially in the West. Would she be branded a racist and a bigot? Yet somehow if a person refuses to be in a room with women for irrational and superstitious reasons we all have to reduce our own freedoms to accommodate that and call it a progressive move.

My advice to women pregnant with a male muslim child is get a sex-selective abortion. That way the male muslim won’t have to endure being in a room with a woman for 9 months, you as a woman can assert your right to an abortion at any time for any reason and you can show you are a progressive and strong female with genuine tolerance for muslim beliefs.

 

Thank you Grace for finding the links and the story.

 

Sharia law enforced in Syria where ‘our allies’ have established themselves

Here is a video of men being publicly whipped in the streets apparently for selling goods while prayer services were taking place. This is by the Al Qaeda members who have established sharia law where they have defeated the Assad regime.

For an inside look at this in its more nascent stage, please watch this video from the fall of 2013 by two French journalists that managed to document both openly and somewhat clandestinely the way this was set up. (Sorry, the original makers of the video would not allow embedding. But the video is there with our translation.)

As muslims gain influence, they force their rules on the population.

In this article in today’s Daily mail, the point is made which is well illustrated in the video from French journalists that we translated and titled a few months ago.

From the Daily Mail article:

An armed Islamist organisation fighting on the rebel side has established sharia law in northern Syria, which has seen children whipped and adults executed in public, Amnesty International reports today.

The Islamic State in Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS) control a large part of northern Syria, including the country’s biggest city, Aleppo.

ISIS are in charge of at least seven ‘detention centres’ in the area where children as young as eight have been detained, young teens have been flogged, and adults executed after ‘trials’ lasting just minutes.

Al Qaeda group: A man holding the flag of Islamic State in Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS) walks across a hill in a propaganda video for the organisation

Al Qaeda group: A man holding the flag of Islamic State in Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS) walks across a hill in a propaganda video for the organisation

 

ISIS, previously known as Al Qaeda in Iraq (AIQ), practice several forms of torture, including electric shocks and stress positions, and regular floggings with rubber generator belts or cables, in secret prisons in al-Raqqa and Aleppo

 

It is critically important that people become aware of the systems that muslims create in the wake of an islamic invasion. This issue is not just one of having a large number of people with a foreign system of religion and ethics living amongst us. That would be important enough too warrant thorough study indeed. But this is vastly more.

It means the utter destruction of systems of reason and governance that we in the West beginning with the ancient Greeks and Romans etc. have developed for thousands of years and which we must, from time to time protect from those who would destroy it and take everything we have. And not just material possessions but our right to exist as we want to exist or even exist at all.

The Daily Mail article reproduced above is a partial illustration of what various muslim groups are doing in Syria but what Choudary and his gang are doing in the UK is no different and is being utterly disregarded in the media (DM excluded) as trivial or silly and when Choudary and his gang start actually whipping people for violating islamic ‘law’ they will treat it like random crime instead of what it is. The after effects of an actual invasion and process of Balkanization of the United Kingdom.

For proof of this, look at how vast numbers of muslim pedophile-rape-slave gangs are being ignored or covered up by the British establishment, press and government (much more to come on that early in 2014!) as well as how they are treated when one can no longer be ignored. As crime, and not as seditious organized behavior intended to destroy our entire way of living and viewing each other in day to day transactions, which is what it is. A replacement of our ethos, one which allows women and children to walk the streets of our own cities with a sense of safety, and that all of us have enough similarity in our sense of values that people who do rape or kidnap are rare and criminal, with an islamic-supremacist value set where those who do not belong to the elite group, Islam, will have no rights or sense of personal safety and the cost of existence as a non-muslim in our own cities becomes to high to bear.

Other examples of post invasion islamic behavior will be treated in the same way as it is the actual strategy of our government to pretend that things are other than they are for the illusion of good governance.

Please click over to the DM and if you have not seen the French video yet, please watch that. Unfortunately the TV station in France that made this video disabled embedding of it for some reason but at least you can see it at Youtube directly.

Eeyore for Vlad.

 

Today’s demo to enforce sharia law in parts of England.

This will be a dynamic post added to as materials become available.

Anjem C’s gang of pirates have planned a march today to force the islamic code concerning alcohol on others in a certain area of London.

Article and videos on it below. Here is a link to the whole video of which I will post a segment so you don’t have to see all the LOTR style Arabic crap at the start. I have also edited out the justifications for their push for forcing sharia, for reasons good or bad.

Below is the legal notice Choudary’s pirates are handing out to local stores. Be advised abolitionists and/or Christian or other religious fundamentalists: The machinery the muslims are creating to enforce rules you may agree with will be used to remove your rights to your own freedoms and much sooner than you think.

34jdn37

Another video of Choudary’s anti-freedom demo

Here is the EDL article on this issue.

The IBTimes article claims that Choudary’s protest was a flop.

This is because the IBTimes like nearly everyone else utterly misreads what it is Choudary and his fellow travelers are attempting to do. This was not about some large march to democratically show that sharia would replace common law. This was an announcement that muslims are about to begin to use force to make sure that sharia rules are enforced and those who do not obey it or operate in contradiction of it will be physically hurt.

This is about the replacement of democratic law, even in the barbaric and mob-rule sense that the IBTimes are imagining it is here. It is almost like the entire Western world has forgotten how to read. If you look at the notice they handed out, it is perfectly clear what they intend to do and the fact that there were no arrests beggars the imagination. It is pure intimidation and extortion.

 

The BBC, moral relativism and dangerous, even treasonous deceptions.

Yesterday I posted a story as part of the links & News of the day, an item about universities in the UK and gender segregation at lectures.

I had another listen to it today and noticed what was said at just after the 50 second mark. (link should bring you right there.)

Did you hear that? The BBC reporter actually said:

“…the muslim right to segregate trumps women’s right to sit where they want”.

Get that?

The BBC reporter made the statement that there is such a thing as a ‘muslim right’, which of course there is not, and this fictitious right actually trumps the real right of women to choose where they want to sit.

For clarity’s sake there is no such thing as a collective right. If Jews for example want the right not to eat pork or work on Saturday, then they have the individual right to not order pork or cook it or eat it which may mean they have to change jobs etc. and they have the individual right not to work on Saturday, which again, may mean they may have to change jobs as some companies may be open Saturdays and it would be grossly unfair to non-Jewish employees to force them to work more saturdays to accommodate a Jew who chooses not to. However that Jewish person has the individual right to choose a job or career that doesn’t require working on the Jewish sabbath. He does not have the right to force others to not eat pork or work on Saturdays. These is because there is no collective ‘Jewish right’. Only how people make choices within the parameters of their own rights.

What this BBC reporter has said is tantamount to treason if such a thing was still a crime in the UK, as they are inventing laws which actually undermine the most fundamental in free societies. That of individual rights which cannot and must not be “trumped’ by imaginary collective rights to bully those who do not adhere to those religious principles.

Muslims have, and always have had in free societies, the right not to sit together. If some bearded clam and his burka clad slave want to attend a lecture together and sit apart they are already perfectly entitled to do so. But to force this on the rest of the population and claim it is a right? Well that would be like forcing non-Muslims to not have pork as a menu option in a publicly funded school because it offends muslims just to be near it. And that, we all know, could never happen. Right?

I wonder how Rosa Parks would do in today’s United Kingdom. I suspect I know.

Eeyore for Vlad Tepes

13 year old girl in France struck down because she refused to lower her gaze

Original translation by Gaia with thanks

From This French site:

A 13 year old girl has made a complaint about a violent attack, sayings she was struck by a group of girls at her school in Narbonne because she refused to ” lower her gaze ” .

The event occurred on Tuesday afternoon, said the girl, a pupil in year 5 at the Victor Hugo College, a facility downtown without any particular problems . According to her account, the girl was waiting for a bus with a friend before school to go after school. A group of five girls she did not know arrived on the scene and asked her to “lower her gaze ” .

The girl refused to do so and one of the unknowns grabbed her by the hair and pulled her backwards. She added that she was slapped and pushed before finding her head stuck between the bars of the school gate.

Continue Reading →

It is now alleged that it was a “muslim Patrol” that attacked an American tourist and cut his face

A few links:

Daily Mail: American student scarred for life after brutal mob attack that was caught on CCTV three days after he arrived in the UK

Wast London Advert: 

Injured man:

Youtube video:

To quote the DM:

Investigating officer, Detective Constable Ben Mott, said: ‘We believe the suspects picked a fight with the victim as he was obviously not from the local area and they took exception to the fact that he was a bit different.

‘The victim has an Italian accent, his own style of dress and mannerisms and, when challenged by the Asian males, answered them back.

I read the above as, the victim was gay, not muslim, and dared challenge the authority of the tard-patrol. I think the facts of this may come out sooner or later, but the fact that it had to be written in code is an extremely bad sign for England and for all of us.

Eeyore.

Thanks EDLBuck, Snaphanen.Dk,

Iran passes a new law allowing a man to marry his adopted daughter from Age 13

(Should we call this, the Woody Allen bill? Except being age of consent is a rather large difference)

The Guardian:

Human rights activists say approved bill, making girls vulnerable to the ruling from age 13, ‘legalises paedophilia’

Iranian children in veils
Young girls in Chah Bahar, Iran. Iran’s body of clerics and jurists has not yet vetted the new legislation on child marriage. Photograph: Jamshid Bairami/EPA

Parliamentarians in Iran have passed a bill to protect the rights of children which includes a clause that allows a man to marry his adopted daughter and while she is as young as 13 years.

Activists have expressed alarm that the bill, approved by parliament on Sunday, opens the door for the caretaker of a family to marry his or her adopted child if a court rules it is in the interests of the individual child.

Iran’s Guardian Council, a body of clerics and jurists which vets all parliamentary bills before the constitution and the Islamic law, has yet to issue its verdict on the controversial legislation.

Click to continue:

Invading sunni muslims set up illegal sharia courts in Aleppo Syria

I would have to say this video is in the top 4 of all counter-jihad videos I have done since I started this project. I cannot think of a more clear example of how Islam operates. An area is taken over by any means possible, and Islam, a barbaric and primitive system of living beyond the comprehension and imaginations of civilized people, becomes the law, enforced by chimps and brutally and perhaps worse, arbitrarily.

This video has been a three day project by a lot of people and I would like to thank all of them. First of all, M for finding it and sending it, S. Victoria who spent some time with it, and C.B. Sashenka who stayed up all night writing it out and then working with me all day to time it. I sincerely hope you all feel it was worth the effort.

Lastly and mostly, the people who went and made this thing deserve a Pulitzer. I cannot imagine having the courage to be in a room with these jihadis and when told to stop filming managed to just keep on going knowing what would happen to them if they were caught. I hope they are not upset with our translation and republication.

Clip originally found at F Desouche. 

Youtube has disabled embedding for this video.

But you can see it here.

MRC:


 

Sharia for Belgium attempts the moral high ground by interfering with muslims entering a brothel.

I could write an entire book about the absurdity of this one. But I think I would rather read what people have to say in the comments. Although the koranic phrase, ‘What your right hand can posses’ does spring to mind. Its like the only sex that is forbidden in islam is the sex that women are in control of.

Jordanian lawyers file lawsuit against Google, producers over anti-Islam film

H/T M

Ammonnews:


[6/13/2013 5:05:42 PM]
AMMONNEWS – A group of Jordanian lawyers filed a lawsuit in Jordanian courts against the producer of a controversial anti-Islam movie and against Google, the owner of Youtube.

The lawsuit was filed by the Freedoms Committee at the Jordan Bar Association (JBA), represented by Lawyer Nour al-Imam, Mustafa Yaghi, Adel Saqf al-Hayt, and Faisal Khoza’i.

An indictment decision was referred to the specialized courts on April 28, 2013, with the lawyers citing personal right against the movie “Innocence of Muslims,” which sparked major controversy and violent protests over what many Muslims considered as a major offense to the person of Prophet Muhammad.

The case was also filed against the producer of the 14-minute movie Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, and movie director Alan Roberts.

The indictment decision was also filed against Google, the owner of YouTube, for allowing the movie clip to be published on their site.

Click to continue: