Category Archives: forcing sharia

The Hypocrite from Paris

Posted on by

By Carpe Diem

abbas

Terror supporter Mahmoud Abbas at the Paris solidarity march

 

Reuters reports1 that Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas has ordered an investigation into a cartoon apparently depicting the Prophet Mohammad in an official Palestinian newspaper.

The move came less than a month after Abbas joined world leaders in a march for free speech in Paris following a deadly attack by Islamist gunmen on the French satirical weekly Charlie Hebdo, which had caricatured Mohammad.

A drawing in the West Bank-based newspaper al-Hayat al-Jadidah on Sunday showed a robed man standing astride Earth and reaching into a heart-shaped pouch to sow seeds of love around the world. The caption reads: “Our Prophet Mohammad”.

newspaper

The caricature published in Palestinian daily Al-Hayat Al-Jadidah

Artist Mohammed Sabanneh, a Muslim, said he meant no harm. The figure was not Mohammad but “a symbol of humanity enlightened by what the Prophet Muhammad brought,” he wrote on Facebook.
Islam frowns on any depictions of its most revered prophet. Strict interpretations of Islamic scripture ban drawing any sentient beings, although court artists in past centuries drew Mohammad in illuminated manuscripts.
In a report late on Monday, the official Palestinian news agency WAFA said Abbas had ordered “an immediate investigation.”

Abbas in France oddly happy

The new Charlie Hebdo cover.

Posted on by

1. Charlie Hebdo’s new caricature ‘unjustifiably provocative’: Egypt’s Dar Al-Ifta

(it is stupefying to try and grasp that muslims believe that any drawing is a greater offense than the murder of some 16 people over them. But that is Islam in a nutshell. Where it belongs.   *~@:^{)>   <—– An atypical moment of a happy mohamed in ASCI art)

Charlie Hebdo’s decision to renew the publication of caricatures of Prophet Mohamed is “an act unjustifiably provocative to the feelings of a billion and a half Muslims worldwide who love and respect the Prophet,” Egypt’s Dar Al-Ifta warned in a statement on Tuesday.

The new issue of Charlie Hebdo will cause a “new wave of anger” in France and the West in general, the statement said, adding that it “will not serve the dialogue between civilisations which Muslims seek.”

The cover of the first edition of the French satirical weekly Charlie Hebdo since 12 of its staff members were killed by Islamist gunmen last week showed a cartoon of the Prophet Mohamed crying and holding up a “Je suis Charlie” sign under the words “All is forgiven.”

Note from Eeyore:

The thing about this graphic I like, is it is even funnier upside down:

Post killing Charlie hebdo Cover 180 degrees.1

H/T Grace

BBC Asia interviews a Hamas leader on their ties with Iran and ambitions.

Posted on by

This is a significant interview and while it was supposed to be available in English by request, no request was answered by those who asked. Please download and spread this video by any and all means in case it is removed. It must be seen and understood. While it isn’t a ‘sexy’ video of psychos screaming, it is an extremely powerful person calmly discussing geopolitically significant matters such as nuclear weapons, genocide, strategic alliances and enmity as well as ambitions as well as the implementation of sharia in Gaza. Add to this recent demonstrations of Hamas’ alliance with Turkey and we see what could be a game changer in the region.

A brief look at what sharia law looks like in the UK

Posted on by

Most people are appalled by sharia because of its draconian punishments. Personally I find that absolutely the least problematic aspect of it.

Earlier today I happened to have the chance to chat with a friend about the nature of sharia and I asked him honestly, “what is wrong with beheading and cutting off the hands of thieves?”

He was flabbergasted that I would even ask that and was stuck for an answer. I pointed out that in fact we incarcerate thieves and in the US we execute some people. While I do agree that amputations etc. are not an acceptable form of punishment thats actually a rather academic problem in terms of the sharia.

The real problems are:

The nature of the charges

The process used to determine guilt or innocence

The systems used for the implementation of force in the event of a guilty verdict.

In the sharia, anyone can make an accusation, especially against an unbeliever. Not only can they be accuser, but they can also be the police, the judge, the jury and the executioner. The process for evidence is hearsay and the punishment is often death at the hands of the accuser on the spot.

Religious muslims see absolutely nothing wrong with that. For example, in the ultimate victimless crime of blasphemy, a person can be killed on the spot and the killer will be celebrated by the community. Even if there are no witnesses. Even if in reality, a muslim man borrowed a lawn mower from a Christian who wanted it back and so the accusation of blasphemy was leveled. No one will ask questions. And no one will check his garage.

So how would that look in its initial stages in England? Would people use force against someone who blasphemed? Which way would a Muslim expect the police to act? To side with the person who used grotesque force against a blasphemer or to side with the person who was attacked?

Video from CLASH DAILY

Imam in Philadelphia attempts to cut off a man’s hand who is suspected of thievery.

Posted on by

This is  a very important item.

More so than most because it speaks to an issue which is of central importance in terms of the cognitive dissonance that is costing the Western world so much in its blindly fought battle with Islam and its followers.

Most people feel that there is no danger of sharia law being enforced in Western nations and those who think it will are viewed as racist or crazy or some other label that allowed them to be dismissed. Those that do understand the problem to a degree are arranging to have various state legislatures pass new laws re-entrenching US constitutional law and adding the notion that foreign law may not be used in US criminal courts etc.

While this needs to be done so that judges are prevented from using cultural Marxism to make judgements involving foreign nationals or even Americans who claim to be muslims, this is really not a deterrent.

The fact is that sharia law is basically a kind of pirates code. All that is needed to implement it, is enough muslims in the area to make it worth the risk and then believing thugs to implement it and not care what happens to them when and if they are arrested for doing so.

There is no nice way to fight back against this. There is only force.

It breaks my heart to write that.

From Reuters:

(Reuters) – Two men described as leaders of a Philadelphia mosque were accused of trying to cut off the hand of a suspected thief, whose wrist was sliced so deeply it required hospital treatment, police said on Friday.

The 46-year-old victim said two officials in the mosque accused him of stealing jars of money from the house of worship after morning prayers on Monday.

The officials, described in police reports as the mosque’s imam and amir, dragged the victim to the rear of the mosque, and attempted to chop off his hand with a machete, according to a police statement.

Click to continue at Reuters:

 

 

STOP THE PRESSES! Feminist group takes stand for WOMEN’S RIGHTS!

Posted on by

Things must be really bad when feminist and women’s groups actually take action of any kind to protect women and genuine human rights anywhere at all as opposed to dedicating all their efforts towards enforcing cultural Marxism.

Found at Bizpak Review

(Updated with different but non-autostart video)

Brunei: ‘Stone the gays’ law to be phased in from tomorrow

Posted on by

Anyone think this will shift homosexual activist groups away from hatred of white Europeans, the USA and Israel? Didn’t think so. I wonder if there will be a gay pride march in Brunei? Or even one in Canada to protest sharia law on homosexuality? No, I don’t think so either. They will continue to protest and insult and push the line on states that openly embrace homosexuality even in the schools etc. and continue to show hostility to Israel, the only state in the entire Middle East where homosexuals can experience any kind of security of life and lifestyle.

Story from Pink News:

The Sultan of Brunei has confirmed that a law calling for homosexuals to be stoned to death will be phased in from tomorrow.

The law was announced earlier this month, and replaces the maximum ten-year prison sentence for homosexuality with death by stoning.

It was condemned by the UN, and a host of celebrities including Stephen Fry, Ellen DeGeneres and Sharon Osbourne, who targeted the Brunei-owned Dorchester Collection for boycotts.

The sweeping law was initially due to come into effect on April 22, but was postponed due to ‘unforeseen circumstances’.

Despite the delays, the Sultan today confirmed the law, which will apply to both Muslims and non-Muslims, will be phased in over a two-year period from tomorrow.

Click to continue:

H/T Fjordman

Video: News from Islamia – Stoning and Burning in Morocco

Posted on by

This is an original translation by Oz-Rita

From PI News:

Those who live in an islamic country have to submit without any compromise to the “religious” ideology in force, otherwise their life can end very brutally. allegedly in Morocco, a young man has “offended” the “Prophet” Mohammed, this led – already in his (Mohamed’s) times to deadly punishment. 1400 years later, not much has changed: a jeering crowd stones the man, children watch from the first row, some film with their mobiles, some passers-by walk past the scene, seemingly unconcerned, cars drive around the dying man. Videos like this one are contemporary documentation from a “religious culture” which legitimizes brutality through their god, and where human civilisation does no longer exist.

Warning, horrible images:

This document of inhumanity appeared on the page of a certain “Rassd Maroc” Facebook site eines gewissen “Rassd Maroc”. . In the following video the cruelty even increases as the stoned man is burnt alive at the end.

In our schools they are just about to establish the “religious teaching” of this killer-cult , Politicians compete as to who will demonstrate more “respect” towards (islam) and Church leaders are eager to affirm the equality between their faith and this Barbarism. Germany is going down while her political rulers roll out the red carpet for these deadly ennemies of the people.

Interesting article on the implementation of sharia laws in Malaysia over non-muslims

Posted on by

On another post today, a short discussion took place about how muslims reinvent the word ‘defend’ as a rhetorical trick to justify out-and-out attacking people, arguing that it is defending the religion, to use force to make islam and sharia law the supreme organizing principle over non-muslims.

Please read this article about the pending implementation of sharia in another state within Malaysia and notice how the logic of the advocates is similar, if adjusted to the circumstances. One example:

  Abdullah was responding to the stand of non-Muslims in Kelantan who are opposing the implementation of hudud in the PAS-governed state.

He said non-Muslims should not be so greedy to the point that they want to interfere with the exclusive rights and interests of the Malays and Bumiputera, who are the original inhabitants of the country.

Non-Muslims, he argues, are being greedy by expecting the continued (nearly) equal rights under the law when they should expect to be dhimmis as it is ‘rightfully’ an Islamic nation. Of course to muslims, “the whole world is a mosque” so there is a rational for the conquest and forcing of Islamic supremacy and sharia world-wide.

The logic is very similar to classic islamic logic which justifies attacking autonomous non-muslims in order to force sharia and islamic supremacy on all.

Bylaw enforcement in Tower Hamlets. Today’s entertainment is tomorrow’s tyranny.

Posted on by

This video is about a woman who was being irrationally treated by what appears to be a muslim bylaw officer on the matter of invisible dog droppings in Tower Hamlet, one of the most enriched areas of England.

I downloaded the original, linked here, and leveled the speech so it would be easier to listen to. Please feel free to go to the original site and make a comment if you are so inclined as the view count and comments really should go to the woman who took the video, I just couldn’t understand it as it was so I juiced up the volume etc. below:

Below, an article on this brave new world style policing…

Meet Theo… the not so strong arm of the law now patrolling a street near you

(Excerpt)

In fact, they work for Tower Hamlets Council. Theo stands for Tower Hamlets Enforce­ment Officer. But just days into their duties these sub-plastic bobbies – who have one week’s training with real police – are already being dubbed Keystone Kops.

However, they are no joke. They represent a largely unnoticed but growing trend by councils to assemble their own mini-police forces, accountable to politicians rather than the public.

They are so popular in the corridors of Whitehall that the Government’s “crime tzar” Louise Casey has told councils she is impressed.

And an article straight to the point here:

A park attendant called for police “back-up” after threatening a woman for arrest over an elusive dog foul.

Amber Langtry, 35, was walking her dog with a friend on New Year’s Day when a lone Tower Hamlets Enforcement Officer accused her of not clearing up after her pet.

When she explained to the officer that he’d made a mistake and asked to see the offending evidence, he refused to show her, then pointed to a spot in the opposite direction to where Miss Langtry’s dog had been. He then proceeded to issue her with a ticket and called the police.

Is this enforcing sharia norms in Tower Hamlets? Or just some good old fashioned 3rd world corruption based on salary over tickets written. My money is on both.

H/T GoV