Category Archives: Selective enforcement

‘What would happen with a scarf over my face?’: Outrage of Fireman Sam creator detained and branded racist for innocent burqa joke at airport security

Posted on by

Welcome to Great Britain. A wholly owned subsidiary of The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

 

Daily Mail:  

By Jonathan Petre

Last updated at 1:20 PM on 26th February 2012

 

Humiliated: David Jones, who created Fireman Sam, is outraged by the way he was treated at Gatwick AirportHumiliated: David Jones, who created Fireman Sam, is outraged by the way he was treated at Gatwick Airport

The creator of the popular children’s character Fireman Sam has told how he was accused of racism after making a light-hearted remark at Gatwick airport.

Dave Jones said he experienced an ‘Orwellian nightmare’ after commenting on the ease with which a woman with her face covered by a hijab, another form of the burqa, had walked through security controls.

As he placed his scarf and other items into a tray to pass through an X-ray scanner, he quipped to an official: ‘If I was wearing this scarf over my face, I wonder what would happen.’

To his astonishment, he was met on the other side of the barrier by officials who detained him for an hour in an attempt to force him to apologise and the police were called.

Mr Jones, 67, who was supposed to be meeting his daughters, said: ‘Something like George Orwell’s 1984 now seems to have arrived  in Gatwick airport.

‘I feel my rights as an individual have been violated.

‘What I underwent amounts to intimidation, unlawful arrest and detention. I was humiliated and denigrated in full public view.

 

 

‘I am a 67-year-old pensioner and have lived my life within the law.

‘I do not have even one point on my driving licence.’

Mr Jones said that when he had made his original remark, the guard had appeared to agree with him, responding: ‘I know what you mean, but we have our rules and you aren’t allowed to say that.’

Tight security: David Jones was detained after being searched at Gatwick AirportTight security: David Jones was detained after being searched at Gatwick Airport

As he went through security where he hoped to meet up with his two grown-up daughters, he was confronted by a woman official who said he was being held because he had made an offensive remark.

Click to Continue

Does Canada have two laws, one for Muslims and one for the rest of us like England does?

Posted on by

The EDL have been the most vocal about it, but British people in general have been expressing their feelings that the government of the UK seems to be applying two very different standards in law, both in terms of verdict, excuses for a not-guilty and sentencing on conviction. Most Brits are careful of how they express it of course because at this stage any show of belief in Britishness in Britain is often viewed as racism somehow.

But is Canada different or different only in degree and stage?

Recently a four year old Kitchener, Ontario girl drew a picture of a gun in her public kindergarten school class. Police were called as were Family and Social Services. A warrantless search of her father’s property and premises was done and he was arrested for possession of a firearm although none had been found before that and frankly, none has been found since.

Now I am no lawyer but this seems like a peculiar reading of Habious Corpus. (sp)

At the end of Ezra Levant’s rather excellent and direct TV remarks on this issue he ended with the question of whether or not the same thing would have happened had the fathers name been Mohamed or something similar.

Well as it turns out we don’t need to wait for an answer.

Below, is a drawing done at a Muslim school by a young student that not only was a gun, but was incitement to genocide, to the destruction of an entire nation for Islam and not only were the police not called, but despite the national attention this received when a reporter saw it, no search of the family home was done, no arrest or strip search of the parents.

From Ottawa Muslim school

Ottawa Muslim school drawing of gun

So there you have it. Canada also has two sets of laws. One for the docile, law abiding Canadian people where if your single digit aged daughter draws a gun-toon with crayons, you lose all your rights before the law, and I mean real rights, not fake ones like ‘not being offended’ but ones that protect you from a fascist state that can arrest you, search you and your property and humiliate you in any way they see fit without warrant at any time.

Remember, this drawing of the machine gun as a cover for an essay on how Muslims must destroy Jews and Israel and take over the world was international news for some time as you can see from this link from England’s the Telegraph.

 

Here are a few points about the Muslim school essay:

The essay was an 8 page, fictional story accompanied by a cover illustration written by a Muslim boy as part of a creative writing essay competition at the school.

1. (former) Principal Aisha Sherazi expressed “shock” despite the fact that the essay was displayed in a glass case at the school.

2. From what I can tell, there were no reports of police being called by any school staff member(s) in response to the content of the essay even though it clearly glorified violence/martyrdom/Jew hatred.

3. An investigation was launched by Ministry of Education officials.The two teachers that praised the boy’s work were suspended by the school. I don’t believe they were ever reprimanded by ministry officials.

4. The boys father was not apprehended at the school by police officers, nor was his home searched. He was not detained, nor was he strip searched.

5. The boy’s name, age or grade were not disclosed to the public citing “privacy” concerns.

6. The boy’s cover illustration for his fictional story entitled ” The Long Road” clearly showed the drawing of a machine gun ( accompanied by other vulgar, hate-filled images).

7. The story made international headlines in March of 2005.

** Abraar Islamic school was est. in 2000. Students from kindie- age 13 attend. It does not receive state funding. All classes are subject to the Ontario curriculum except Arabic classes (in which the story was written). As of 2005, the school has not been inspected by government officials. (that may have changed to date, but I don’t know for sure).

 

Lastly, here is a webpage advertising this years ‘Israeli apartheid week‘ poster contest. Think anyone will be arrested, strip searched or raided at home based on the drawings we will see here?

Eeyore for Vlad with lots of help from Grace

US Muslim judge demands to know why a person had a certain Halloween costume.

Posted on by

This is outrageous. The judge asks questions which are way way outside the issues at stake and even the law. It doesn’t matter why he wore any costume at all. The USA last I checked (granted that was several weeks ago) is a free country and people are allowed to dress up how they want.

Please click here for the story and thank you Diana West for the link.

Here is a transcript of this whole thing. 

“I only wanted to scare her with it”

Posted on by

This is a recurring theme it seems when muslims stab. beat or shoot someone in the UK. “I only wanted to scare them-him-her with it” (the shotgun bomb or knife or blade in this case. Is there even any point in playing the turn-around game with this? Like what would have happened had the white indigenous British girl slashed the Somali with a blade like that?

Well after all, its worth it. Think of all the great restaurants. I mean who wouldn’t suffer a few stitches to get a chance to eat at one of London’s finer Somali restaurants.

Eeyore

UPDATE:

THanks to an observant reader I have been informed that I missed the date in this article which is  30 June 2006

I posted it because I thought it was recent, but also because the phrase was also used in a recent fatal shotgun shooting of a British man by a Muslim who also claimed ‘he only wanted to scare’.

Thanks for the heads up Robert.

From the Daily Mail:

  • Shanni Naylor

Shanni Naylor pictured after the attack

A 13-year-old girl who slashed a classmate across the face, leaving her needing 30 stitches, was today given a two-year supervision order by a judge.

Yesterday the girl, who cannot be named, was found guilty of unlawfully wounding Shanni Naylor at Myrtle Springs School in Sheffield last year when both girls were 12 but she was cleared of the more serious charge of wounding with intent.

Today at Sheffield Crown Court, the Recorder of Sheffield, Judge Alan Goldsack QC, said he did not have the power to give the girl a custodial sentence.

The three-day trial was told that, the day before the attack, the girl was subjected to a “vicious” assault by Shanni, who punched her repeatedly, banging her head against a wall, as more than 100 pupils looked on without helping.

The court heard the defendant describe how she did not plan to attack Shanni the next day but had found the blade and only wanted to scare her with it.

The jury was told how the girl had an extremely low IQ and had lived in Somalia for the first 10 years of her life without any formal education and having been orphaned when she was young. Continue Reading →

The problem isn’t men, its Muslims. The non-case for women-only-taxis

Posted on by

By Eeyore and Grace for Vladtepesblog Feb 19 2012

A St. John, New Brunswick entrepeneur has decided to study the merits of an all female, small fleet of cabs to chauffeur women around the city. Dave Barnes said he is in the process of researching the idea and wants to know if women in Saint John would use the service. The Saint John businessman said the service would offer “some women a greater sense of security”, particularly those who have had unpleasant experiences with male drivers.

Will this be next?

“They’ve all had stories about getting into taxis and having an, ‘Oh my God’ moment as soon as they close the door, ‘Perhaps I shouldn’t have gotten in with this guy,'” Barnes said.

“I know that there are some women who feel uncomfortable getting in a cab with a man,” Barnes added. Barnes said the idea has caught on in Europe and he thinks it could work in Saint John. “In Europe, they’re springing up all over the place,” he said. “And they’re having a great deal of success in particular with the growing Muslim community, and I think that’s a target market for me here”.

At this point it really needs to be said, that in a frighteningly, although not surprisingly, disproportionate number of cases, cab-driver harassment and rape of passengers are by Muslim cab drivers. As Islam is an ideology, culture and basis for decisions, it clearly has a profound influence on a persons behavior. (To point this out is not racism no matter what the ‘charter of rights’ may say as Islam is a voluntary system of beliefs not a race)

The West Bank has pink-women taxis. As does Cairo.

So here’s my ‘Oh my God’ moment. I don’t believe for a moment this initiative has anything to do with providing women a greater sense of security in any Canadian taxi cab. Most likely it has everything to do with satisfying imported sharia standards into the nation coming from Muslims who create a problem by which Islamic law is the only solution. We’ve seen this demanded before regarding the removal of face coverings at airports and voting booths by which a female only employee is to identify a muslimah in a separate space away from men.

Canada already has sufficient laws regarding harassment providing open recourse to anyone, regardless of gender, who are subjected to it. There is simply no need to segregate women from men in Canada in taxis or otherwise. In fact, this issue like so many Islamic inspired issues in Canada and the Western world has the same solution. Stop making special exceptions for Muslims from rational extant Canadian laws. For example, we have a law saying one may not wear a disguise in public. Stop excepting Muslim women from that rational law.

We have a law saying no discrimination because of gender or race. Stop making exceptions for Muslims so they can create a sharia state here in Canada and while we are at it, scrap affirmative action while you’re at it. Either you are racist or you are not and calling it ‘affirmative action’ does not make it not racist.

As I write this the following thought also occurs to me.

Here is how such a program will likely go…

Several Muslim women will be hired as cab drivers for this new program because the Muslim passengers who use this service likely won’t want a ‘Kuffar’ woman driver and the cab company will want to show how diverse and progressive they are by hiring Muslims.

Now of course, these Muslim women drivers will be obliged to not drive men as they will not want to be alone with a man in their car. This will not be seen as the crime it actually is because we all love making exceptions for the rules of civilization to make extra room for the primitive barbarism that is Islam to show how tolerant and progressive we all are.

Of course this scheme will utterly fail to make any money and will be a huge loss to the cab company as well as the women drivers, so a special government subsidy will be created to show how progressive we all are and now the taxpayer will be shelling out the jizya for sharia law here in Canada. Again. In yet another area.

 

 

 

Muslim convicted of racially motivated assault required to do community service and pay a small fine

Posted on by

Once again, the EDL mantra that England has 2 laws, one for the indigenous British people and one for Muslims is clearly more than correct. Hell a woman who said a few rude things about foreigners in the UK was held without bail in jail over Christmas even though she had a young child and a Muslim man convicted of spraying bleach at people while hurling (presumably anti-white) epithets gets off with community service after his conviction?

People of England, what does it take to demand the actual rule of law be restored equally for all?

From The Examiner:

Huddersfield man Mohammed Khan in court for spraying bleach at 13-year-old girl

A GIRL was sprayed with what she thought was water when a van drove past.

But a court heard the liquid sprayed on the 13-year-old in Penistone Road, Huddersfield, was actually bleach.

Bradford Crown Court heard the girl’s cardigan was damaged by the liquid but she was unhurt.

Another pedestrian was also sprayed with bleach by Mohammed Khan, a passenger in the van.

The court heard Khan, 26, of Springbank Crescent, Huddersfield, said that he thought it was a joke.

Khan admitted common assault and also racially-aggravated assault, after the court was told he hurled racist abuse at one of the pedestrians.

He was ordered to do 180 hours unpaid work, to pay £600 costs and to pay £150 compensation to each of the pedestrians.

Here is an unrelated story from 2011 but shows another grotesque example of British selective enforcement. Try to imagine that a white British person punched a 92 year old Black person or Muslim out for no reason on a bus and imagine the news and jail time.

Police told suspicious landlord to “Leave the man alone” when he thought the DC terrorist was making bombs

Posted on by

From The Boston Herald:

WASHINGTON — A northern Virginia landlord says he thought a Moroccan man arrested in an alleged suicide bombing plot in Washington was suspicious and called police a year and a half ago.

Frank Dynda said today that a woman who leased an apartment in his Arlington building apparently married Amine El Khalifi and then moved out. He says when Dynda told El Khalifi to leave, he said he had a right to stay and threatened to beat Dynda up.

A counterterrorism official says El Khalifi was taken into custody Friday near the U.S. Capitol with an inoperable gun and inert explosives in a suicide vest given to him by the FBI.

Dynda says he thought El Khalifi was making bombs, but police told him to leave the man alone. Dynda had El Khalifi evicted in 2010.

Canadian police routinely suppress racial data: study

Posted on by

Canada.com

By Douglas Quan, Postmedia NewsFebruary 1, 2012

Many Canadian police agencies “actively suppress” racial data when delivering their annual crime reports to Ottawa — a trend that is both disturbing and growing, according to a study released Wednesday.

Photograph by: AFP/Getty Images, National Post

Many Canadian police agencies “actively suppress” racial data when delivering their annual crime reports to Ottawa — a trend that is both disturbing and growing, according to a study released Wednesday.

 

The study, published in the Canadian Journal of Law and Society, said the continued “whitewashing” of criminal data makes it virtually impossible for researchers to gauge whether police are dealing with racial and ethnic minority groups in an equitable manner.

 

“Community relationships are so important for policing. If you want to develop better relationships, show you’re working on issues these communities are concerned about,” said lead author Paul Millar, an assistant professor of criminology at Nipissing University in North Bay, Ont., in an interview. “Be accountable.”

 

Police agencies gave several reasons Wednesday for why they don’t collect or report racial characteristics of the people they come in contact with.

 

RCMP spokesman Sgt. Greg Cox said asking a victim or accused person to identify their race “may give rise to human rights and privacy concerns.”

Click to continue:

Girl, 5, told off at school for talking of God

Posted on by

Why do I suspect that this is not the whole story.  If you click through, you will get a hint that they do not enforce these rules against their muslim students but most likely enforce these rules against non-Muslims in order to accommodate the bullying of Islamic parents. And after several personal interviews with teachers who for obvious reasons need to remain anonymous, I can assure you all that Islamic parents bully the hell out of teachers in public schools.

In any case, the issue below smacks of the worst kind of thought control and selective enforcement, the second being considerably worse than the first as infractions in my world goes.

 

This is Exeter:

A HEADTEACHER has defended his actions after a religious row erupted at a Devon school where a five-year- old girl told a classmate she would “go to hell” if she did not believe in God.

The youngster, a pupil at Landscore Primary School, Threshers, in Crediton, complained to her mother after she was told off for the comment.

  1. ?Primary school receptionist Jennie Cain, from Crediton, is facing a governors' investigation

     

    Primary school receptionist Jennie Cain, from Crediton, is facing a governors’ investigation

     

Her mum, Jennie Cain, who works as a receptionist at the school, is under investigation for professional misconduct after she sent a private email to friends about the matter.

Mrs Cain, of Queen Elizabeth Drive, Crediton, initially complained to Jasmine’s teacher.

Her daughter had come home in tears and said she had been told off for “talking about Jesus”.

The 38-year-old mother was then called into headteacher Gary Read’s office about the matter.

The email, written after this meeting, which asked friends to pray for her and her daughter, fell into the hands of Mr Read.

It allegedly contained claims against the school and its staff.

Mr Read defended the school’s treatment of the matter and said they encouraged all children to “think independently”, but would not condone one child “frightening” another.

He said: “We have 271 children in our school from a diversity of backgrounds.

“We encourage all our children to think independently and discuss their beliefs with their teachers and classmates when it is appropriate to do so.

“What we do not condone is one child frightening a six-year-old with the prospect of ‘going to hell’ if she does not believe in God.

Click to continue

 

N.C. Food ‘Inspector’ Sends Girl‘s Lunch Home After Determining It’s Not Healthy Enough

Posted on by

From The Blaze:

North Carolina Girls Lunch Sent Home for Not Being Healthy EnoughStudents make selections that include organic produce and alternative protein selections at Lincoln Elementary in Olympia, Wash., Friday, Sept. 10, 2004. (AP)

A North Carolina mom is irate after her four-year-old daughter returned home late last month with an uneaten lunch the mother had packed for the girl earlier that day. But she wasn’t mad because the daughter decided to go on a hunger strike. Instead, the reason the daughter didn‘t eat her lunch is because someone at the school determined the lunch wasn’t healthy enough and sent it back home.

Yes, you read that right.

The incident happened in Raeford, N.C. at West Hoke Elementary School. What was wrong with the lunch? That’s still a head-scratcher because it didn’t contain anything egregious: a turkey and cheese sandwich, banana, potato chips, and apple juice. But for the inspector on hand that day, it didn’t meet the healthy requirements.

Click to continue: