Category Archives: Selective enforcement

Terrorist group, ‘Anonymous’ knocks CIA website offline for a few minutes

Posted on by

Just great to have another vigilante group hiding in the darkness while attacking any institution or individual it disagrees with. Fortunatly all they did was take the CIA website offline for a bit and hopefully not do any actual damage. But after what we saw them do to Stratfor and it’s subscribers we know that ‘Anonymous’ is capable of damaging anything or anyone at a whim because they can make up the justification to do so.

Personally I have a hard time differentiating between ‘Anonymous’ and the descriptions they use of their targets.

If they really have damaging information about these groups or people that actually matter in terms of what they do that is against the public interest, then publish it. Let the public be the judge and jury. But attacking their computers, networks and anything else they can get to with no due-process, is terrorism.

 

Ismail Faruqi: Muslim Leader in Montreal (1958-1967) and Founder of the Main Muslim Brotherhood Research Institute in the West (1981)

Posted on by

Point De Bascule is an exceptional site that does a great deal of original research. Please click through and read the rest of this article and check with it at least weekly.

Eeyore

From Point De Bascule:

Écrit par Point de Bascule on 10 Février 2012. Posted in Articles par Point de Bascule

After various Muslim leaders held Jews responsible for the 1986 killing of Muslim Brotherhood leader Ismail Faruqi, a police investigation and a trial demonstrated that the murderer was an American Muslim who suspected Faruqi of having homosexual relationships with his Malaysian students at Temple University in Philadelphia.

Version française ICI

faruqi bote

In July 1986, a Montreal Gazette reader wrote to the editor to complain that the assassination of Muslim leader Ismail Faruqi in Pennsylvania had been “deliberately left out” of the newspaper. He was particularly upset since Faruqi had been a leading figure of the Montreal Muslim community from 1958 until 1967.

“When a member of the Moslem community is a victim of terrorism, there is no coverage,” he complained. “But you (the media) choose to print news that portrays Moslems as terrorists.”

At the time, this Gazette reader also contacted the Muslim Community of Quebec on Chester Avenue in Montreal (also Canada Revenue Agency) to express his indignation. Agreeing with the Gazette reader, MCQ president Mohammed Amin claimed that the lack of coverage was part of a pattern of “biased reporting of the media in general and of The Gazette in particular.”

Clair Balfour, the Gazette’s ombudsman, rejected the claim of “anti-Muslim bias” (the term Islamophobia had not yet been invented by the Muslim Brotherhood). He concluded that the lack of coverage was understandable given the fact that Faruqi was not an international newsmaker. No major press agencies on which The Gazette relied for its information had alluded to Faruqi’s activities in Montreal, added the ombudsman.

Please click to continue:

David Harris on Ezra Levant’s The Source discussing Amnesty International

Posted on by

This is a little sad. I really thought Amnesty was the last hold out from the Leftist-Islamic take over of every activist group that worked for greater human rights around the world back in the day. Like Greenpeace, Amnesty would appear to be another false-front for far left groups and similar agendas having little or nothing (and sometimes the opposite) to do with the stated goals and agendas of the organization. Basically just cashing in it’s good reputation and Amnesty International had a great reputation.

Now, they are a bunch of frauds who actually censured Stephen Harper for cutting government funding for some far-left political activist organization as if it was a basic human right for these groups to receive it, putting Harper and Canada on par with actual totalitarian regimes which deny real rights for huge groups.

Saudi Arabia: Christians Arrested at Private Prayer

Posted on by

HRW.ORG

  • More Coverage: 

While King Abdullah sets up an international interfaith dialogue center, his police are trampling on the rights of believers of others faiths. The Saudi government needs to change its own intolerant ways before it can promote religious dialogue abroad.

Christoph Wilcke, senior Middle East researcher for Human Rights Watch

(Beirut) – Thirty five Ethiopian Christians are awaiting deportation from Saudi Arabia for “illicit mingling,” after police arrested them when they raided a private prayer gathering in Jeddah in mid-December, 2011, Human Rights Watch said today. Of those arrested, 29 were women. They were subjected to arbitrary body cavity searches in custody, three of the Ethiopians told Human Rights Watch.

The Ethiopians gathered to pray together on December 15, during the advent of Christmas, in the private home of one of the Ethiopians, when police burst in and arrested them, three jailed members of the group, two women and one man, told Human Rights Watch.

“While King Abdullah sets up an international interfaith dialogue center, his police are trampling on the rights of believers of others faiths,” said Christoph Wilcke, senior Middle East researcher for Human Rights Watch. “The Saudi government needs to change its own intolerant ways before it can promote religious dialogue abroad.”

In October, Saudi Arabia, together with Austria and Spain, founded the King Abdullah Bin Abdulaziz International Centre for Interreligious and Intercultural Dialogue, located in Vienna, and funded by Saudi Arabia.

The Ethiopian men spent two days at al-Nuzha police station in Jeddah, after which the police transferred them to Buraiman prison. The women had already been transferred to Buraiman prison. Two of the women said that officials there forced the women to strip, and then an officer inserted her finger into each of the women’s genitals, under the pretext of searching for illegal substances hidden inside their bodies. She wore a plastic glove that she did not change, the women told Human Rights Watch. Officers also kicked and beat the men in Buraiman prison, and insulted them as “unbelievers,” the jailed Ethiopian man said.

Click to Continue:

Halifax salon offers women-only day for Muslims

Posted on by

Tolerance of the intolerant leads to a layered society, where the nicest people are doormats for the bastards.

What about ‘No Jews’ for the Muslims? Certainly no dogs, but what about having a no colored folk for the Nazis who might want a nice quaff?

Notice how the CBC spins this so that the people who insisted on not segregating clients to accommodate the intolerance of Muslims are somehow the rude-racists in the scenario below.

But just wait….

Wait until they try and get rid of the gay people in the salon….

From CBC News:

 

A downtown Halifax salon has introduced a new service geared toward Muslim women, offering female-only hairstyling days to protect the privacy of women who choose to cover their hair.

Some Muslim women, for modesty purposes, choose to cover their hair in public and only uncover it in the presence of other women, or male relatives. Continue Reading →

When Muslims play football.

Posted on by

Answering Muslims have a great post on this issue, explained by the video below.

Answering Muslims is actually a fantastic site which has a great perspective on all issues Islamic and anti-Christian that I have seen so far.

I have to admit, Muslims have a great racket going. When they commit violent crimes against the Kuffar in Western nations, any attempt at applying the law is ‘Islamophobia’ or, ‘racism against Arabs’. While when Muslims commit violent crimes against non-Muslims in Islamic lands, well it is the sharia. It is lawful that these crimes be committed and perhaps even a religious duty to commit them.

If there are any non-Muslims left working in immigration boards in Europe and North America, please reconsider your admittance policies.

Atty Says School Threatened, Punished Boy Who Opposed Gay Adoption

Posted on by

FOX News:

Atty Says School Threatened, Punished Boy Who Opposed Gay AdoptionJan 24, 2012

By Todd Starnes/TWITTER

A 15-year-old Wisconsin boy who wrote an op-ed opposing gay adoptions was censored, threatened with suspension and called ignorant by the superintendent of the Shawano School District, according to an attorney representing the child.

FOLLOW TODD ON FACEBOOK

Mathew Staver, the founder of the Liberty Counsel, sent a letter to Superintendent Todd Carlson demanding an apology for “Its unconstitutional and irrational censorship and humiliation” of Brandon Wegner.

Wegner, a student at Shawano High School, was asked to write an op-ed for the school newspaper about whether gays should be allowed to adopt. Wegner, who is a Christian, wrote in opposition. Another student wrote in favor of allowing gays to adopt.

Wegner used Bible passages to defend his argument, including Scripture that called homosexuality a sin.

You can read Wegner’s editorial by clicking here.

After the op-ed was published, a gay couple whose child attend s the high school, complained.

The school immediately issued an apology – stating Wegner’s opinion was a “form of bullying and disrespect.”

“Offensive articles cultivating a negative environment of disrespect are not appropriate or condoned by the Shawano School District,” the statement read. “We sincerely apologize to anyone we may have offended and are taking steps to prevent items of this nature from happening in the future.”

But Staver said what the school system did next was absolutely outrageous. He said the 15-year-old was ordered to the superintendent’s office where he was subjected to hours of meetings and was accused of violating the school’s bullying policy.

“The superintendent called him ignorant and said he had the power to suspend him,” Staver said. “He’s using his position to bully this student. This is absolutely the epitome of intolerance.”

Staver said the boy’s parents were never notified.

At one point, Staver said the superintendent gave him a chance to say he regretted writing the column. Continue Reading →

Hate crime charges in England, only apply against whites

Posted on by

This is an interesting video:

From the YOUTUBE up loaders page.

         Uploaded by on Jan 22, 2012

The recent convictions in the Stephen Lawrence trial have caused some controversy. It seems no effort will be spared to bring the killers to justice. However, some serious questions need to be asked of media coverage of the case. Was a fair trial even possible, given the level of frenzied media reporting?

Newspapers have jeopardised the outcome of trial proceedings before. And it is becoming increasingly obvious that editors shrink from covering violent crimes by ethnics because of fears of accusations of racism.

The suggestion is the huge media attention was accorded the case simply because Gary Dobson and David Norris are white.

AUSTRALIA’S NIQAB LADY FINALLY LOSES OUT, FORCED TO PAY COSTS OVER FALSE TESTIMONY

Posted on by

Filed under lying Muslim.

The only sour note is that this woman didn’t get to sit her rear in the pokey for six months, that in itself is a miscarriage of justice. KGS

In June last year Carnita Matthews, 47, successfully appealed against her conviction and six-month jail sentence for knowingly making a false complaint.

The charge was in relation to a now infamous incident in June 2010 when she was stopped by a highway patrol officer at Woodbine, in south-west Sydney.

It was alleged that Ms Matthews later claimed in a statutory declaration that, after she refused to remove her veil fully for the purposes of identification, the officer tried to remove it himself.
This declaration was later found to be false, and she was charged.

However, a judge later found there was no evidence the statutory declaration had been made by Ms Matthews or even that it was knowingly false.

She then claimed that the entire prosecution was improper and unreasonable and demanded that NSW Police pay her legal costs.

That claim was rejected by Judge Clive Jeffreys in the Downing Centre District Court today.

AAP reports: The judge said he could not find that the investigation into the alleged offence had been conducted in an unreasonable or improper manner, or that the proceedings had been initiated without reasonable cause.

Read more: