DEMOCIDE: Socialism, Tyranny, Guns And Freedom
Category Archives: Totalitarianism
SPD Planning on Going After Pegida for Being Anti-Constitutional
An original translation by Nash Montana
[Ed: Germany has become a fascist state again where the state monopoly on force will be used to crush any dissent against a horrible and destructive ideology. There is no democracy when only one side of an issue, one that was never voted on, can be allowed]
From Die Welt:
According to the SPD Secretary General Yasmin Fahimi, supporters and followers of Pegida need to be pursued to the “fullest power of the police under the protection of the Constitution”, as there is the threat of ‘rightwing Terror’ emerging.
The SPD demands a strict crackdown of the police under the Constitution against the xenophobic Pegida movement. Last Saturday, SPD General Secretary Yasmin Fahimi said, ‘gatherings of Pegida are meant to show concerned angry citizens’. But in reality Pegida is nothing more than an accumulation of “petty, hypocritical arsonists and seditionist hate mongers.” And as such, “to protect our constitution, they have to be pursued by the police to the fullest extent.”
Fahimi made these comments at a small party convention of the Bavarian SPD in front of a crowd of 1500 people. She said there are an average of two attacks per day on refugee camps and homes. “This is how right wing terror grows, and we cannot underestimate this.”
The integration of refugee will last years. “We have a decade of integration to organize (…) And that is why we have to transform Chancellor Merkel’s “we can do it” into “that’s how we will do it” in our government.” Therefore new teachers, new educators and new apartments on a massive scale are necessary. The SPD General Secretary emphasized, that not all refugees will be able to stay in Germany. “We have to be honest to be able to say, not everyone is entitled to a positive decision.”
Hamburgs Capacity for Refugee Housing is Exhausted
An original translation by Nash Montana
From De Welt
The city can’t take in any more refugees at the time, 500 have to sleep under the open sky. The citizenry decided to confiscate empty properties.
“In Hamburg-Bergedorf, refugees were sleeping on the street to protest conditions, whereas in Hambur-Harburg refugees are sleeping on the street because they have no other choice.”
Hamburg can at this time not take in any more refugees. For the first time since the beginning of the refugee crisis, they have exhausted their capacities, says Bjorn Domroese, the office manager of the Senator of the Interior Michael Neumann (SPD), on Wednesday.
500 people couldn’t be accommodated last tuesday. So they had to spend the night in front of the registration center at Harburger Poststrasse, in open air. And on Wednesday there still was not enough room for new refugees. “At this point in time we do not see an easing on this situation”, Domroese adds. The Hamburger Abendblatt also reported on this:
We are doing everything we can to create new accommodations. Domroese tells the newspaper, “It could be as early as tomorrow everything will be better.” On Tuesday they registered 600 refugees, but only 100 could be housed at the registration center in containers and tents.
Thursday night bore similar concerns to the municipal office of the interior. Employees were asked to bring in sleeping bags and serve hot drinks. At the beginning of the week, there were between 400 and 500 new refugees arriving daily in the city, and at the moment there are about 30,000 registered refugees in Hamburg.
Using Properties Even Against the Will of the Owners?
The Hamburg citizenry made a first step towards the confiscation of empty properties and use them for the refugees. In a first session the parliament decided on Wednesday with a majority on the “Law for the security of refugee accommodations in camps”.
The final send off of the new bill happened on Thursday, because the CDU, AfD and FDP had impeded a second session in the Parliament. The final voting resulted in 81 yay and 37 nay. It is therefore the will of the SPD, the Green Party and the Left, that Hamburg has the green light to confiscate properties even against the will of the owners of said properties. This is to prevent that refugees have to live in tents during winter. The FDP has said they will take legal action against this decision.
The Interior Minister Joachim Herrmann (CSU) states that throughout Germany, there were more than 270,000 refugees coming into the country just alone in the month of September 2015 – widely surpassing the amount of refugees of the entire year of 2014.
Freedom of Expression is so yesterday! If you post hate,your children can be taken away
An original translation by Nash Montana
From this German website
Article 5 GG in the Constitution
(The right to freedom of expression)
Born: 5.23.1949 Died: 9.27.2015
RIP:
The Pack of the Federal Republic of Germany”
“Until the last day you fought, and in the end you lost the war anyway.
If you speak the truth in today’s age, or if you point your finger at the disgraceful way the refugee crisis is handled, you’re not only facing contempt from your family and friends, no, you hazard the possibility of losing your place of work. But that isn’t good enough by a long shot. The drunk on tolerance Gutmenschen in this country come up with the craziest ideas to forbid a citizen his right to utter his opinion. For instance, the German Police Union (DPolG) demands you to turn in your drivers license, should you post so-called hate comments on Facebook. But the bounty hunters of political correctness think that doesn’t go far enough. There has to be something new and something even more harsh. And so, the self proclaimed “hate speech investigators” have put their sights on: Parents!
“Whoever posts xenophobic paroles and slogans on Facebook, is essentially gambling with their own children. There doesn’t even have to be a concrete criminal offense for a court to judge the welfare of the child as endangered.
(…)
In that sense it is of course irrelevant if a parent is committing a criminal offense. “The ‘Umgangsrecht’, (right access law), is for the welfare of the child, and parents have a duty, according to paragraph 1684 Absatz 2 BGB, to see to that welfare”, says the Ulm Attorney-at-law Viola Lachenmann.If it is determined that there is an existing endangerment to the welfare of a child, the ‘Umgangsrecht’ (right of access law), will first be severely restricted. As in, organized chaperoned visits with the child for instance, where a child care worker will be present, and can intervene should there be a need to.
In straight talk, this means that if someone is agitating against “minorities” (refugees, foreigners, muslims, homosexuals etc), then said person has to expect the consequence that at some point, child protective services will knock on their door, and they will remove the children from the house, or how else is that to be understood?
Most of all: Who gets to decide when a comment is a hate comment?
In the internet there are plenty of self appointed ‘detectives’ who have made it their sanctimonious duty to seek out hate comments on the internet and to hunt down the writers of said comments and eliminate them! Continue Reading →
Quebec’s bill 59. Canada’s French province runs screaming from the Enlightenment.
For the past couple of days, a Quebec law professor and former director of a George Soros funded ‘progressive-leftist’ group called Open Society Foundations, has been arguing in the Quebec legislature, that criticism of islam should not just be illegal but punishable by massive fines for a first offense and life destroying ones for a second.
The National Post editorial puts it this way:
National Post View: Quebec hate speech bill would re-establish bureaucratic despotism
Strong stuff for a national newspaper. But potentially an understatement.
As this site has argued since its inception, the most problematic aspect of any lever of power like Bill 59 is the fact that it will be selectively enforced. In this case it would be a safe wager that it will be enforced using the guidelines of UN Resolution 16/18 making it a criminal act to criticize Islam, but not stopping Islam from calling for the genocide of non-believers under their right to religious freedom.
Back to the Post:
Bill 59 assigns new powers to the Quebec Human Rights Commission (QHRC) to combat hate speech, as well as a variety of other provisions meant to protect against extremism, by censoring speech that promotes “fear of the other.” Ominously, the bill would allow the QHRC to pursue websites that in its estimation describe and denounce Islamism.
The bill takes its inspiration from recommendations made public by the QHRC in November 2014. Jacques Frémont, the commission’s president, explained that he planned to use the requested powers to sue those critical of certain ideas, “people who would write against … the Islamic religion … on a website or on a Facebook page.”
Let’s let that sink in for a moment before we move forward.
The Quebec Government is contemplating a bill that seems, even overtly, to criminalize and punish anyone who criticizes a political/religious ideology. Even if islam was not a threat doctrine this bill is an outrageous affront to the most core principles of democracy. One cannot make an informed choice without information.
So who is this Jacques Frémont?
Below is a short video with a couple of tiny excerpts from an hour long speech in French where he seems to tip his hand a little bit. In all fairness, I do not speak French, so I cannot be certain that these short excerpts which were sent to us properly represent his point of view. So here is a link to the entire video. Anyone wishing to and who can speak French may want to check it out and make sure these quotes are fairly taken. They are at:
12:11 16:39 and the first cut is within the first 3 minutes. Its only one line.
The Montreal Gazette covered yesterday’s hearings on Bill 59
Quebec hate-speech bill prompts strong opinions at public hearings
But the most heated debates took place at the end of the day with the Association des musulmans et des arabes pour la laïcité au Québec (the Association of Muslims and Arabs for a secular Quebec).
Bill 59 was one of a slew of initiatives presented June 10 by the Quebec government to combat radicalization leading to violence, as it pledged to work with the city of Montreal on a deradicalization centre — their concerted response to terrorist attacks last October and the phenomenon of youths leaving Quebec to join terrorist ranks.
But it was also an answer to how to deal with the growing problem of Islamophobia, and on both counts AMAL-Québec welcomed the initiative.
“It is obvious that when the call to hate, demonize, and dehumanize certain groups becomes commonplace, it has the effect of accentuating attitudes filled with prejudice and stereotypes,” said AMAL president Haroun Bouazzi, before the Commission des institutions at the National Assembly in Quebec City.
For anyone uncertain about what “the call to hate, demonize, and dehumanize certain groups” means, just read a koran, the hadiths and the Sunna, or book of the life of Islam’s founder, Mohamed. Alternativly, sit in for a week or so at any mosque and listen to the sermons. Maybe bring a tape recorder so you can have the Arabic bits translated later.
One might wonder if this particular pernicious individual is so dangerous to real liberty and the Enlightenment if he had caught the notice of any of the Counter-Jihadists before?
Check out this post and video from Dec. 2014:
“I’m sorry. The debate is over. Islam is the religion of Peace!”
This is an interview with the President of the Quebec Human Rights Commission. In it, he appears to be saying that Quebec, or Canada, is going to be implementing something which looks a whole lot like the criminalization of criticism of Islam.
I would like to remind every man, woman, child and bureaucrat that freedom of speech was implemented for one thing in the West. To criticize religious and political authority. That once you limit that freedom even one little bit, all other freedoms of speech will diminish exponentially, because all things can be seen as functions of islamic observance.
Thank you Poste De Veille for the interview video and Sassy for the Translation.
Could it be that the time to make that most ancient of decisions which almost define human history has arrived for Quebecers?
The answer to that appears imminent. The desicion?
Do we stand and fight, or do we move to somewhere not as far along the downward spiral of despotism.
Eeyore for VladTepesBlog
Venezuela: Totalitarianism takes it’s mask-of-the-people off
Here is a link to the Spanish article that got me to check with Fausta’s Blog, one of the best resources on Latin America and the jihad there on this matter.
Here are a couple of links and snippets to English and Spanish articles on this very serious matter.
Venezuela: Fire at will
The Venezuelan government has authorized its military to fire upon civilians at rallies and public demonstrations:
The armed forces are now directed to use “potentially lethal force, whether with firearm or any other potentially lethal weapon”, as last resort to “avoid disorders, support legitimate authority, and reject all aggression, confronting it immediately and by the necessary means.”
( “uso de la fuerza potencialmente mortal, bien con el arma de fuego o con otra arma potencialmente mortal”, como último recurso para “evitar los desórdenes, apoyar la autoridad legítimamente constituida y rechazar toda agresión, enfrentándola de inmediato y con los medios necesarios”.)
The resolution makes no distinction between peaceful or violent demonstrations, and may most likely be unconstitutional (link in Spanish), but, as Emiliana Duarte points out, […]
English Article: (Analysis)
Case in point: Resolution 8610, sanctioned on Jan. 27, through which the Ministry of Defence authorizes the use of “potentially lethal force, be it with a firearm or with another potentially lethal weapon” as a last recourse […], “to avoid public disorder, to support the legitimate authority, and to immediately reject aggression using any necessary means.”
Naturally, this innovation in military protocol is meant to “regulate the Armed Forces when guaranteeing public order, social peace, civil coexistence during public meetings and demonstrations, within the context of a Democratic State, the Rule of Law and the Protection of Human Rights.”
So basically, the military can now shoot protesters. How’s that for short and sweet?
Thank you Shabnam and Fausta
The immune system of the west creates its own hell in response to Islam
Already several nations are trying to protect themselves from Islam while simultaneously claiming that Islam is peace and having a preposterous number of welfare sucking, sharia demanding, terror planning muslims in our midsts is a wonderful enriching thing for which we all should be grateful and pay a large sum out of our various incomes for the privilege.
But that turns out to be the least of the problems. The methods we are creating to protect ourselves are every bit as totalitarian as the demands the muslims make, and are being granted, on our societies. We may end up with the worst of both worlds. A sharia compliant society with Western style totalitarian laws.
Example 1: Many states are passing anti burka laws. I have written extensively and frequently on why this is a horrible idea. In summary though, you dont preserve freedom by passing laws against women’s clothing. if you are gonna do that, at least start with Miley Cyrus. The way to solve that problem is give people back the freedom to discriminate against people covering thier faces in their own businesses and homes and enforce existing laws against wearing a disguise in public. Hey presto! You have solved the burka problem with zero new laws, and actually by getting rid of some bad ones.
Example 2: Rescinding the right of exit.
Our governments seem determined to deny muslims the right to leave to go fight for whatever they want wherever they want. The right of exit is a defining characteristic of Western democracy. I do not care WHY a person wants to leave we have no damn right to stop them. Reagan did not even stop Americans from leaving the US to go join the Soviet Union, even if they were high level scientists or valuable assets. But for damn sure the Soviets would not let them leave once the defectors realized they had made a horrible mistake and there was a solid chance the US would not let them back in or jail them if they did. Fair enough. But you must not stop them from leaving.
And now this.
I am so shocked and horrified by this new law in Sweden that about half of me doesn’t even believe its true. I really and truly hope it is not. Imagine each and every one of you, not in Sweden, that your government passed a law criminalizing criticism of a main government policy. How could you possibly call yourselves a democracy? If one may not talk about how the government is handling the economy, what makes each and everyone’s lives work, or call a talk show and speak about foreign policy, how your nation is dealing with the world at large, or most important, immigration, how your government is determining the very future of your entire culture as well as the rules, laws and climate for your children etc. then you live in a totalitarian state. So surely this last example cannot be true. Someone who reads this site from Scandinavia or is familiar with this situation please tell me this article is a hoax and the site it is from is hysterical conspiracy theory nonsense.
Eeyore for Vlad.
H/T Shabnam
The Director of the NSA asks us all to see the agency a little differently
Canadians object to being looted by their own police force
It would be interesting to see a definition of looting where what the RCMP did in Alberta did not fit perfectly. In fact, that the RMP used lists that it was specifically illegal for them to be in possession of in order to know what homes to break into and steal people’s property makes it worse than random looting. It makes it political and fascist.
Paul Weston Arrested in UK for quoting former British PM, Winston Churchill
This is, at one level, the best proof that the UK is now a communist nation in Cultural Marxism terms. Not only is it an arrest able offense to say something true but that may offend a protected group, even if you quote a recent elected prime minister you can be arrested and potentially sent to prison for it.
Whatever one may think of Paul Weston and his party, this is a travesty and an abomination of democracy. However I doubt it would be different in the US or Canada at this point. I think we shall know soon however.
From the Liberty GB Press release:
Winchester: Churchill Quotation Gets Liberty GB Leader Paul Weston Arrested
Today Paul Weston, chairman of the party Liberty GB and candidate in the 22 May European Elections in the South East, has been arrested in Winchester.
At around 2pm Mr Weston was standing on the steps of Winchester Guildhall, addressing the passers-by in the street with a megaphone. He quoted the following excerpt about Islam from the book The River War by Winston Churchill:
“How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries!
Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia
in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent
in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture,
sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the
followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this
life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The
fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his
absolute property – either as a child, a wife, or a concubine – must delay
the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a
great power among men. Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the
faith: all know how to die but the influence of the religion paralyses the
social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force
exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant
and proselytizing faith.”
Reportedly a woman came out of the Guildhall and asked Mr Weston if he had the authorisation to make this speech. When he answered that he didn’t, she told him “It’s disgusting!” and then called the police.
Six or seven officers arrived. They talked with the people standing nearby, asking questions about what had happened. The police had a long discussion with Mr Weston, lasting about 40 minutes.
At about 3pm he was arrested. They searched him, put him in a police van and took him away.
Interview with NY film maker who was in Nevada during the Bundy ranch moment.
Nevada. The Gates of Vienna assessment of the immediate future. Feds make tactical retreat
Anonymous video on the Nevada cattle matter
Interesting video. They basically recap events as they understand them, and then do not issue any threats really, as per the usual quasi fuzzy-TV style super villain/dark knight super hero kind of thing. Just saying they will look into the role of the FBI etc. They better have Eddie Snowdon working for them if that is their planned target though.
Below, another analysis by an American wearing a T shirt with an anonymous logo.
Live stream from the area of the newest great government shame in the USA
When one is up to speed about the corruption and sell out by the US Government one realizes that truly the time has come for the government to dissolve the people and elect a new people,