Category Archives: Alex Berenson

Alex Berenson thoughts on video of CEO Health Co assassination (Video)

Posted on by

New Alex Berenson post on Tucker Carlson could be evidence of Alexander Dugin at work via Carlson

Posted on by

For those of you who have not seen the interview RAIR Foundation did with expert on Communist agents in the West, Trevor Loudon, here it is again.

The bottom line on it is that there is a Russian dialectical engineer who fabricated a plan to inject the anti-woke MAGA movement in the US and elsewhere, with a kind of Stalinist, Hitlerian racist brand of communism as a counter to the woke feminist sort of communism we all suffer under now..

This of course would be a classical dialectic maneuver. And a pretty effective one.

Today, Alex Berenson, who has appeared on Tucker’s show on FOX many times, and in fact, Tucker was the only large microphone willing to listen to counter-narrative truths on the vaccines, is discussing Tucker’s recent interview with the Nazi apologist and historical revisionist, Darryl Cooper.

Reading the article, one cannot help but be reminded of the interview above with Trevor. The attempt to use Stalin/Nazi communism against woke feminized marxism is quite clear with Tucker’s guest.

It might be related that Tucker Carlson also interviewed Alexander Dugin himself, as well as Valdmimir Putin.

Now a journalist should offer a voice to influential people from the other side of the narrative. This is the job of journalism. And in the last decade or two, we have seen our own media devolve into enemy propaganda, and even criminalize truth that runs counter to state narratives instead of providing information that may help a free people come to determine their own truths.

But there is a line between letting a state enemy explain himself, and celebrating those enemies and enemy views.

The Tweet, now redacted, below is from Tucker’s guest, Cooper:

Cooper tweet Nazis better than woke

Quoting Berenson’s article:

“…Which is why it hurt to hear Tucker playing footsie on his incredibly popular podcast this week with Darryl Cooper, a historian who is a Nazi apologist and – at best – walks to the edge of Holocaust denial.

To take a recent example, Cooper posted on X that the Nazi occupation of Paris was “infinitely preferable” to the (admittedly idiotic and offensive) opening ceremony of the Olympics in July. The Nazi occupation of Paris led to over 70,000 French Jews being sent to gas chambers. (Cooper later deleted the post.)

This week, Tucker posted a two-hour long interview with Cooper in which Cooper called Winston Churchill the “chief villain” of World War 2, arguing that Churchill forced the war by rejecting Hitler’s overtures for peace in 1940.”

The rest of the article in our opinion is a fairly average and even amateur look at US military adventurism since WWII.

For instance the claim that WWII was the good war and Vietnam was the bad one.

In our view, any war against encroaching communism is a good war. The bad part was that the US stopped right when they could have taken Vietnam back from the Chinese communists and lberated it all for the Vietnamese. And having interviewed many Vietnamese Canadians, and even recently here in Ottawa I know they feel the same way. They wish the Americans had finished the job.

Korea even more so.

I remember having dinner with a friend at a restaurant in Montreal. The restaurant, as is so common now, was polluted with TV screens all over the walls.

I remember stopping eating at one point to stare at an old episode of MASH. A show I enjoyed as a kid when it was on, but now I was seething with anger. “Hawkeye”, the cool, flippant, witty anti-establishment anti-war doctor who’s moral superiority reeked off the screens like a crowd of 1980s businessmen in an elevator drenched in Polo, was pretty much nothing but a communist apologist. A Tokyo Rose, trying to demoralize American efforts to free the North Koreans as well as stop them from taking South Korea and putting it under a regime too awful for Western minds to even imagine.

So let me help with that:

Part II:

“We have the leader, we have the army, and we have the party” speaking about the conquest of the South Koreans which they call, “reunification”. Which of ocurse means under the communist revolutionary system.

Part III:

“If you have a like, philosophical dialectic Marxist problem then  you can go to the philosopher library and ask the sort of philosopher God…”

In a way, the videos above are just a kind of ‘What if Hawkeye Pearce was on the other side mocking the North Koreans instead’.

As bone chilling as they are, videos about the truth of the NORK gulags, and how one gets into them are, for example, if you tore a page from a magazine that had a photo of Dear Leader in it, (and all magazines do), and you rolled a cigarette with that piece of paper, you would go to a gulag for life, your children would also be in for life if you had any in the camps, and your grandchildren. Disrepsecting the leader, unlike what happened to the VICE guys, leads to THREE GENERATIONS in slave labour camps. The women are of course sex slaves to the guards untiil they get pregnant. Then they are hung till dead.

So suddenly M*A*S*H doesn’t seem as funny. It seems like the kind of enemy propaganda that has brought the West to where it is now.

And Alex Berenson maybe unaware that he is exposing Carlson’s Duginist efforts, if indeed that is what is going on, but the net effect may be the same.

We know our governments are lying to us to enslave us. OK we know that. But reacting to everything as if the opposite is the truth is equally enslaving. Not to mention just plain lazy.

What we should have learned during Covid was to use our own sense of logic, reason and true science to establish if not the truth, at least what isn’t shown to be truthful. Instead, many of those we feel have awakened are simply reflexively oppositional. And our enemies use that against us as well.

 

New information on White House censorship of vaxx critics

Posted on by

“First amendment? First amendment! We don’t need no stinkin first amendment!!”

Before Alex Berenson’s post, maybe a look at some of the damage and suffering cause by the White House by censoring people’s ability to look at information critical of the damned mRNA/DNA vaccines.

https://twitter.com/vaxcasualty/status/1805359701758296430

 

Full text of the Tweet below in case he gets censored again. Please click through and retweet it if you have an account on TwitterX.

THE PFIZER/WHITE HOUSE FILES
In July 2021, a senior Pfizer board member secretly began working with a Biden Administration operative to suppress criticism of Covid vaccines on X, newly released internal documents from X show.
Top officials at Twitter (now X) viewed the men – Dr. Scott Gottlieb, the Pfizer director, and Andy Slavitt, the operative, who had officially left a senior White House post just weeks before – as speaking for the administration in their censorship demands, the documents show.
The new documents raise constitutional and legal concerns about the Biden Administration’s social media censorship efforts, as well as Pfizer’s role in banning criticism of a product that made up almost half its sales in 2021.
Within days, the Supreme Court is expected to decide Murthy v Missouri, a landmark lawsuit over the administration’s efforts to control debate on social media.
The new documents provide crucial perspective on the Missouri case, showing how far would-be censors went in 2021 to prop up public confidence in the Covid jabs. The documents also show the power the White House had over Twitter, which badly wanted to avoid a confrontation with it.
At the time, the Biden Administration was threatening to “review” a federal law commonly called Section 230, because it was angry social media companies were allowing Covid vaccine skepticism.
Section 230 was crucial to those companies for the near-total immunity it gave them against lawsuits from users. Twitter took threats to it seriously. “We will always be proactive and vigilant about protecting 230,” Lauren Culbertson, the company’s then-head of United States public policy, wrote on July 22, 2021.
—
None of these internal documents has been previously released.
They are part of a tranche of censorship-related material X is making available to me following searches of its internal archives.
Lawyers for X are reviewing the documents before releasing them. But so far only one document they have provided – an email from Jim Baker, Twitter’s then-deputy general counsel – contains any redactions.
In addition, no one at X, including Elon Musk, asked for or placed any restrictions on or had any input into the writing of this article. (Lawyers for X did ask to review it after writing but before publication, to be sure the names of junior employees or their email addresses were not included. Their review did not result in any changes.)
—
The censorship conspiracy by Slavitt and Gottlieb targeted me personally.
I am not named in any of the new documents provided so far. Slavitt and Gottlieb used careful – almost coded – language in their outreach to Twitter on July 18 and 19, 2021. They did initially not refer to any particular censorship targets by name. But emails and other internal Twitter documents that have already been released show I was a top target of both men.
I intend to use the newly released documents to amend Berenson v Biden, my complaint against Slavitt, Gottlieb, Pfizer chairman Dr. Albert Bourla, and the Biden Administration for conspiring to force Twitter to ban me in 2021. Gottlieb’s lawyers previously argued I had not alleged Gottlieb had had any contact with Twitter officials before August 2021. The documents show otherwise.
In fact, Slavitt introduced Gottlieb to Todd O’Boyle – a senior Twitter lobbyist who handled most of the company’s interactions with the White House – by email on Sunday, July 18, 2021. Slavitt, a longtime Democratic operative, had served as senior advisor to the Biden administration’s Covid response team.
“I wonder if you would be open to a 20 minute call with Scott Gottlieb and me about a policy matter,” Slavitt wrote. Slavitt referred to Gottlieb as “FDA commissioner under Trump” and failed to mention his role on Pfizer’s board.
Although he had officially left the Biden Administration weeks before, Slavitt’s email signature also contained his White House email address, asking that “Government Email” be sent there.

Slavitt’s outreach to O’Boyle came as the public debate over the Covid mRNA jabs was intensifying. The jabs, which had appeared very protective against Covid in the spring, were abruptly losing their effectiveness, causing the Biden Administration to consider encouraging Americans to receive a third “booster” shot.
The White House knew boosters – and potential vaccine mandates – would be controversial. As it tried to keep public confidence in the shots high, the administration escalated its attacks on Covid jab skeptics and on the social media platforms that gave them their biggest audiences.
Only two days before Slavitt’s email, on Friday, July 16, President Biden had said social media companies were “killing people” when they allowed vaccine skepticism. The firestorm that followed was mostly publicly directed at Facebook. But the new documents show that top officials at Twitter wanted to avoid similar criticism – or put Twitter’s Section 230 protection at risk.
On Monday, July 19, Gottlieb followed up by emailing O’Boyle directly, complaining about “false narratives on key public health issues” on Twitter.
Gottlieb told O’Boyle Twitter had an “affirmative obligation” to muzzle large accounts that made posts that concerned him. Gottlieb did not mention that he served on the board of a company that stood to make billions of dollars from the federal government if the Biden Administration rolled out booster shots and or jab mandates.
O’Boyle had already responded to Slavitt, offering to set up a conference call with the men that afternoon. “I’d be glad to speak with you and Scott,” he wrote Slavitt.

Note that O’Boyle’s response is time-stamped with a “UTC” code – he actually sent it at 9:22 a.m. Eastern time Monday morning, about 90 minutes before Gottlieb first emailed him.

O’Boyle also forwarded Gottlieb’s email to Culbertson, the head of Twitter’s United States public policy.
In turn, Culbertson sent it to even more senior officials with a comment indicating she viewed the email from Pfizer board member Gottlieb as directly related to the White House’s pressure campaign against vaccine skeptics. While the administration was angriest at Facebook, Twitter “could be next” and needed to “keep up the responsiveness,” she wrote.

Gottlieb increased the pressure on O’Boyle later in the week, after O’Boyle – apparently accidentally – failed to set up their promised conference call. Gottlieb, a regular panelist on Sunday morning political talk shows, wrote O’Boyle on Friday that he would be discussing the issue “on TV this weekend and wanted to just see if you still wanted to connect so I may have the benefit of your views.”
Within minutes, O’Boyle sent his “sincerest apologies” to the Pfizer board member and said he was “absolutely available.”
At the time, I was arguably the most prominent Covid vaccine skeptic on Twitter.
Slavitt had targeted my removal at least as early as April 2021, when he and Rob Flaherty, another White House official, met with Twitter and asked a “really tough question” about why the company had not suspended my account. I was also a sharp public critic of both Gottlieb and Slavitt.
But Jack Dorsey, Twitter’s chief executive, supported me internally, and the company initially refused to ban me. By the summer, however, the Biden administration’s attitude towards vaccine skeptics had hardened. Meanwhile, Dorsey’s position at Twitter was increasingly tenuous; he would step down as chief executive in November.
Other Twitter officials did not appear to view the free speech rights of their users as a crucial issue in the same way as either Dorsey or Facebook’s top executives did.
In a note to other top Twitter lawyers and policy executives on July 19, Jim Baker, Twitter’s deputy general counsel, wrote only that “we have to be very thoughtful about how we interact with the government and what we say about it in communications with the USG [United States Government].”
So the White House censorship campaign came at a time when Twitter’s users were more vulnerable than they had ever been.
And it succeeded. In a matter of months, it forced Twitter, which had once called itself “the free speech wing of the free speech party,” to become willing to ban anyone – including me – who questioned the efficacy or risks of the Covid jabs.

Note: as X releases more documents to me about Gottlieb, Slavitt, and the 2021 censorship campaign, I will write more articles.

 

Two Tweets concerning Twitter and censorship

Posted on by

1. Twitter reneged on an agreement to allow a stream of the Matt Walsh film, What is a Woman. Just so you know, freedom of speech, and reality itself is illegal.

It’s very important to read the whole thread here. 16 short tweets. It provides an excellent landmark in time to show the degree of Marxification, to coin a term in line with Islamification of a nation, to which it is identical in the main, if not the details, of our civilization. The thread includes a back and forth with Elon Musk at the end. But clearly the film was suppressed despite his protestations.

After viewing several warnings about “hateful conduct” the movie is visible.

Two working links for the documentary:

https://twitter.com/MattWalshBlog/status/1664431757628698625

https://twitter.com/JeremyDBoreing/status/1664425452063141894

2. Another important Twitter thread: Alex Berenson explains that even Twitter’s own lawyers felt Twitter could not defend its censorship policies concerning Berenson’s lawsuit

“Academic freedom may be dead, but that means so is academia” “Universities are just Marxist hatcheries.”

Posted on by

Alex Berenson asks one and all to please retweet this. He feels its critically important. So do I. Maybe a few more items like this will wake people up to the reality of the Marxist revolution that has taken place across most of the West and in particular, in North America

Click through and read the thread. Maybe keep some Gaviscon handy.

From Alex’s Substack:

VERY URGENT: The president of a big research university may be about to lose his job. His crime: liking my tweets.
ALEX BERENSON
38 MIN AGO
If you are in Twitter, PLEASE retweet this and raise the alarm. How can we expect any honest discussion of the mRNAs if raising questions about them is a fireable offense?

A couple of posts by Alex Berenson on his Substack and a few questions on the Ozzie doctor converts

Posted on by

As posted earlier, two ranking Australian doctors have now come out 4 square against the mRNA shots. Both of them have apparently suffered permanent damage from the shots they advocated so hard for, and likely caused so many thousands or tens of thousands to get. Here is the Daily Mail story on it.

Alex Berenson dedicated a post to this item today. And did a good job of it.

An excerpt or two:

During 2021, Professor Kerryn Phelps wanted mass Covid vaccinations for adults and kids.

Now Phelps has reversed course. She is sounding an urgent alarm about the dangers of the mRNA shots.

Yesterday, Phelps, a former president of the Australian Medical Association, pleaded for an Australian parliamentary committee to examine dangers of the mRNA vaccines. Their risks go far beyond their known dangers of myocarditis, and both she and her wife personally suffered long-term side effects following their Pfizer jabs, she said.

Phelps also warned medical regulators have censored physicians from talking about Covid vaccine injuries. Regulators are afraid honest discussion might cause to the public might lose confidence in the shots, she said […]

Phelps joins a growing number of high-profile physicians worldwide, including British cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra and oncologist Professor Angus Dalgeish, who have turned against the shots after publicly supporting them in 2021.

But Phelps’s history of aggressive advocacy for the Covid vaccines – and all Covid countermeasures – makes her comments particularly hard to dismiss.

(Her Tweet appears to have been deleted where she was promoting the shots for primary school children in January of 2022. But we found it)

[…] Even in March, Phelps tweeted that booster shots remained a key to controlling Covid.

Just a couple of questions. How long did they wait to be vaccinated? And if they got the shots right away, as all medical staff in the West was mandated to do, why did they wait so long to report their own vaxx damage? Surely they were symptomatic soon after the shots. Or did it take a long time for the symptoms to manifest?

According to the Daily Mail article: “According to Dr Phelps, her wife Jackie Stricker-Phelps ‘suffered a severe neurological reaction to her first Pfizer vaccine within minutes’.”

And if the symptoms were shortly after the shots, and they took the shots early as all medical staff had to…

The rest of the questions write themselves. One thing is for sure. Once you know you are being lied to, you know a great deal. This is the reason many of us never took the shots. For the most part we are not medical experts. But we knew there was a lot of lies about the pandemic and the vaxx and the restriction on treatments. That was enough not to trust the shots. And now its the trampoline from which a healthy skepticism should leap on all claims like these doctors who suddenly are the victims of the policies they pushed.

Alex did a second Substack item today on the vaxx:

URGENT: Two new studies show mRNA-jabbed people have a much higher risk of getting Covid than unvaccinated people

People who have received mRNA Covid vaccines are at least twice as likely to be infected with the coronavirus as unvaccinated people, according to two new papers from researchers in Indiana and Ohio.

Worse, the newer of the two studies, which covered Omicron this fall, found risk actually rises with the number of shots.

People who had received three or more shots were more than three times as likely to be infected as those who hadn’t received any.

Source:

For people who have been vaccinated – especially those who have received a third or fourth shot – the papers will make for disturbing reading. They suggest vaccinated people may have few good options to protect themselves from infection should a more virulent variant of Omicron emerge.

Please click though to the posts by Berenson for both the whole articles. If paywalled, they will be available to see for free by Friday.

Pfizer and Biden silenced Alex Berenson on Twitter

Posted on by

From Alex Berenson’s Substack:

Pfizer board member Scott Gottlieb secretly pressed Twitter to censor me days before Twitter suspended my account last year

After White House pressure failed to force Twitter to ban me immediately, Gottlieb, who was in contact with federal officials, stepped in; I will be suing him, Pfizer, and the Biden Administration

Alex Berenson
74
7

On August 24, 2021, Dr. Scott Gottlieb sent an urgent email about my reporting to a contact at Twitter.

Gottlieb is the former commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration, a close colleague of many federal officials – and a senior board member of Pfizer, which has made $70 billion selling mRNA vaccines.

In his email, Gottlieb forwarded an article I had written about Dr. Anthony Fauci on this Substack and complained, “This is whats promoted on Twitter. This is why Tony needs a security detail.”

The mRNA shots and fertility in Singapore

Posted on by

This deserves its own post since it has been a suspicion of this site that not just the “vaccines” but most policies delivered to us by Maoist mass line narrative attacks in the past decade or three, are primarily about population control. From advantaging homosexual people to convincing children to sterilize themselves  without their parent’s knowledge or consent, to easy free access to any kind of pornography Among many other policies.

Now Alex Berenson has again published first-world-quality government statistics from Singapore that show a strong correlation between the injections and a decline in birth rates.

In the first two months of 2022, Singapore received welcome news. Births actually rose about 7.5 percent.

Then came March. Again, Singapore began mass mRNA vaccinations of women (and men) of childbearing age in June 2021; March 2022 is exactly nine months later.

In March, the increase in births abruptly reversed. Between March and June 2022 – the most recent month for which figures are available – Singapore has recorded about 1,000 fewer live births compared to 2021, a decline of 8.5 percent. The drop has been consistent each month.

(Births in Singapore. See how the blue line started falling below the others in March? That’s births in 2022. That’s not good. Also, I know it’s a photo of a laptop screen. Bear with me.)

A 16 percent shift in birth rates practically overnight is, to say the least, highly unusual.

Please read the whole article on Mr. Berenson’s Substack linked above.

UPDATE:

This seems like a good time to repost the video from a Hungarian MP on their observed birth rate drop since the start of the shots. This was first posted on or near July 1st, 2022

URGENT: mRNA shots raise the risk of Covid infection in children under 12

Posted on by

Alex Berenson re-sent this post, originally for paid subs, out to everyone as he felt its too important not to have as many as possible know about it right away. Lets hope it stops a few people from injecting their children.

Six weeks after becoming “fully vaccinated,” kids under 12 are 40 percent MORE likely to be infected Covid than those who never received mRNA shots, a huge New York state database shows.

The mRNA jabs provide some protection for the first two weeks of “full vaccination.” But it declines rapidly, turns negative by the fifth week, and more sharply negative in the sixth.

“Negative” vaccine efficacy means that vaccinated people are more likely to become infected. It is not clear how high the increased risk may become for young children, since the database only covered six weeks and the trend worsened each week.

The blue bar in the chart below shows the relative odds of unvaccinated and vaccinated children to get Covid. The dashed red line equals a risk ratio of 1 – a 50/50 risk.

See how the blue bar falls each week and drops below the red line after 35 days? At point, unvaccinated children have lower risk. (The orange bar is kids 12-17. They still have some protection six weeks out, although it too is declining.)

Source:

Please see the whole post at AB’s Substack here.

(You know, the mRNA shots are such a catastrophe, that its gonna take something huge like a war to tamp down people’s rightful rage when they find out how our own governments blackmailed, coerced, forced, and otherwise ruined all our lives to one degree or another, not to mention our constitutional rights to make us take these shots. Not to mention divided families and created enmity like never before seen in countries like Canada.)

 

Alex Berenson: “I guess the rules are stricter for cows”

Posted on by

Remember how health authorities said serious vaccine side effects always will be seen fast?

Turns out that’s not true… as Pfizer (and its veterinarian chief executive) should know better than anyone.

In 2010, German scientists found that a Pfizer veterinary vaccine to reduce diarrhea in cows caused a fatal bleeding disease in their calves.

Even after pressure from Germany caused Pfizer to stop selling the vaccine there, the company kept selling it elsewhere. A top Pfizer official told British farmers it was safe to use and that “other factors” were likely involved.

A month later, Pfizer stopped selling the vaccine. European regulators later found it caused a 1-in-6000 risk of the bleeding disease. “For a prophylactic measure such as vaccination this figure was considered unacceptable for a potentially fatal disorder,” the regulators found.

The risk of Covid-vaccine induced myocarditis – which can be fatal – in young men is now estimated at somewhere between 1 in 2000 and 1 in 3000.

Apparently the rules are stricter for cows.

Please read the rest at AB’s Substack

 

URGENT: A huge Israeli study shows natural Covid immunity is far superior to the vaccine-generated kind

Posted on by

From Alex Berenson’s Substack. Please read the complete report here.

And getting vaccinated if you have natural immunity appears basically useless.

mRNA vaccine protection from Covid is far weaker than natural immunity and declines very fast, according to a new study of almost 6 million people in Israel.

During the summer Covid wave, more than 140,000 Israelis who had been vaccinated but not received a booster shot became infected with Covid. Put another way, in just two months, about 1 out of every 20 vaccinated Israelis became infected with Sars-Cov-2.

Natural immunity – the protection following infection and recovery – lasts much longer, the study shows.

In fact, people who had already had Covid once had better protection from the virus more than a year later than people who had been vaccinated only three months before.

The gap was even larger in cases of severe infection.

Vaccinated people were more than five times as likely to develop severe infections than people with natural immunity. Only 25 out of roughly 300,000 Israelis with natural immunity developed severe Covid infections in the summer wave – compared to almost 1,400 vaccinated Israelis.

The difference did not result from gaps in age between vaccinated and recovered people. People over 60 benefitted even more from natural immunity relative to vaccination than did younger people.

Please continue at Alex Berenson’s Substack