The Europeans are waking up: Surveys show rapidly increasing support for Islam-critical parties

By Nicolai Sennels

If you think Europe will sleep through its Islamisation, you are wrong. Surveys predict a sharp increase of power to Islam-critical parties in coming elections in several European countries. This reflects the Europeans’ increasingly negative attitude towards Islam and Muslim immigration. This does not mean that the explosion of Muslim violence against non-Muslims all over Western Europe will stop, or that the heavily armed Muslim bastions that are eating up thousands of cities on our continent will start obeying secular law and authorities instead of imams and homemade sharia courts. Nor does it mean that Islamic terrorists will quit their plans to destabilize our societies with the use of bombs, poison, kidnappings, highjacking, train derailments, cyber attacks, political lobbying, etc.

What it means is that the final blow between Islam and Europe will happen earlier than many expected. The point where the conflict could have been solved through a full stop for Muslim immigration and refugees, crackdowns on mosques preaching the unrevised and thus unconstitutional version of the Quran, complete rollback of any kind of islamization, effective policing in troubled ghettos, repatriation of criminal and unemployed immigrants without full citizenship, decreased welfare for people unable to speak the country’s language, child support limited to two children, paid repatriation, and much heavier sentences for engaging in gang-related crimes, violence and rape (with the possibility to get a cut in the sentence if they emigrate to a non-EU country) without losing blood, sweat and tears fighting civil war-like riots and organised Islamic guerrilla groups was passed more than a decade ago.

Please click through to Jihad Watch for the rest

Also by Dr. Sennels, an important analysis of the meaning of jihad, both the greater and ‘lesser.’

Jihad Watch—Greater jihad is an inner struggle aiming at removing psychological habits and biological instincts that keep Muslims from following the Islamic teachings. The problem is that the pinnacle of these teachings is the lesser jihad, killing or subjugating non-Muslims. Greater jihad is just another word for self-radicalisation.

In some Islamic traditions, scholars talk about two kinds of jihad: greater jihad and lesser jihad. Greater jihad denotes an inner psychological struggle of submitting to Muhammed’s example and the teachings of Allah. Lesser jihad is what is commonly known as Islamic holy war — the attempt to spread Islam by submitting non-Muslims and non-Islamic areas to Sharia through preferably violent, but also non-violent, means.

Lesser Jihad

It would be a grave mistake to think that just because the term jihad is used in two different ways, violent jihad is a misinterpretation of Islam. It is not. Using violence to physically impose Sharia on the world is a duty of all Muslims, stated many places in the Islamic scriptures.

And just because the inner psychological jihad is called the “greater”, it does not mean that it is better than the “lesser” — the outer and violent jihad. On the contrary. The hadiths, the Islamic scriptures describing the life and sayings of Muhammed, clearly define killing and being killed fighting non-Muslims as “the highest jihad” — and therefore also higher than the inner jihad. One example (Ibn Nuhaas, Book of Jihad, Translated by Nuur Yamani, p. 177): “Aman asked Rasulullaah: ‘…and what is Jihad?” He replied: ‘You fight against the disbelievers when you meet them (on the battlefield).’ He asked again: ‘What kind of Jihad is the highest?’ He replied: ‘The person who is killed whilst spilling the last of his blood.'”

Click through to Answering Muslims for the rest please.

 

 

Australia’s Q Society leads the way on exposing halal cert. scam

We need to do this

Volunteers of Q Society of Australia will hand out free shopping bags this Saturday 31st August, at selected supermarkets around the country. The bags, which state “Halal certification schemes fund mosques, madrassas and jihad,” are designed to generate discussion amongst Australian consumers.

While the re-usable shopping bags are free of charge, the imprint and info material in each bag alerts consumers that halal certification schemes are not free and have developed into a hidden Islamic goods and services tax.

Q Society’s spokesman Andrew Horwood points out: “Halal food itself is not of concern. Nearly all our food is naturally permissible to Muslims and observant Muslims can make food of unknown origin halal by proclaiming ‘bismillah’ over the food before eating. What is of concern for Australians are the recently invented certification schemes, designed to permeate the supply chain from feeding trough to super market shelf, including non-food goods and services.”Q society bag

Police examining CCTV footage of mosque hit in arson attack last night in UK

Jeez I wonder if there has been a sudden influx of Burmese Buddhists to the UK. Let’s hope so.

My money is on an attempted insurance job though. We will know if we don’t find out. If it is White British people, then we will know quite quickly.  Story here video below. H/T M

This is the first I have heard of sealing a building with foam to spread fire. Typically one adds oxygen, not seals a place, to spread fire. Sealing it with foam would guarantee the damage isn’t too bad I should have imagined. Comments?

Forum on Islam sparks heated debate at Orland Park Library

Americans appear to be getting hip to the BS Islam peddles as we see here in this group of typical Americans. H/T M

Chicago Trib:

What a southwest suburban library had promoted as an educational forum this week on Muslim life in America quickly turned into a contentious debate about Islam.

The tone for the Thursday evening event was set while the three panelists at the Orland Park Library were still introducing themselves. In the first of many interruptions, a half-dozen audience members stood up and demanded that everyone recite the Pledge of Allegiance.

Library Director Mary Weimar denied their request. She explained that it wasn’t standard practice to recite the pledge at library events and requested that the attendees show more respect for the panelists.

Click to continue:

Blonde of Youtube: “The time for talk is over”

Terrifying video of the charming patriot “The Blonde Youtube” entitled Let justice be done, Mr. Valls , which tells the plight of a family of “dirty céfrancs” insulted, assaulted, whose house was ransacked several times and whose mother, terrified, ended up missing his birth. An amazing testimony to be missed under any circumstances. The testimony of a France struggling in terror everyday.
http://ripostelaique.com/valls-laisse-la-racaille-faire-mourir-un-bebe-et-terroriser-une-famille-de-sales-blancs.html
Published on August 22, 2013 by Mireille Greschter – Item No. 317

Thank you Oz-Rita for the translation

Quebec takes the gutless, ‘kindergarten’ approach to Islam and the West

Quebec seems to be following France’s policies on dealing with the conspicuous uniform of Islamic manifest destiny now more and more common on Western streets. And while I applaud pretty much any effort that our politically-correct and neutered ‘representatives’ make at fighting the values of islam and sharia norms that increasingly are replacing hard-won freedoms, some of them are downright stupid, childish and perhaps worse, actually as anathema to a free and democratic society as islam itself.

Here are three articles from todays papers courtesy of Grace.

1. The SUN: Quebec’s proposed ban of religious symbols in public buildings provokes defiant reaction

2. National Post: ‘Like Putin’s Russia’: Parti Quebecois’ ‘unthinkable plan’ to ban religious symbols in public sector

3. Dan Delmar: PQ leaders know their secularism plan is illegal. They just don’t care

 

A blanket ban on all religious symbols is a lot like dealing with motorcycle noise by banning all musical instruments. Or trying to get rid of elderly people by closing all the Swiss Chalet’s. Think of it this way. If it was 1938 and lots of people started realizing that Nazis are a huge freaking problem and if not dealt with could result in millions of deaths and trillions in damage and so authorities decided to ban all political symbols thinking the problem of course, is politics. The problem was not politics or political parties, it was just one of them.

Like France, this half measure is an attempt to solve a problem without naming it. Fear of admitting that Islam is the problem and dealing head on with it has led several states now to actually interfere with good people’s genuine rights who at worst are no threat to the state and at best are massively net contributors to it in many ways. Like the Kindergarten teacher who punishes all the children because one of them was chewing gum in class, governments are now going to punish members of religious groups who have never meant the state or its citizens any harm, just to deal with an aggressive and dangerous Islam. And does anyone think that after the riots that ensued after muslim women were asked to comply with the laws in France that any cop will enforce them? How about Australia after the Carnita Mathews debacle?

How this will end up is extremely predictable. Everyone who has tried this blanket solution ends up with the same result. You anger and disappoint all sorts of great people and then muslims find some sort of work around so they end up being the only ones who actually do get to display their symbols. This happened in Belgium when the state banned conspicuous religious gear in government buildings and at the end of the day it was decided that it was discriminatory to Muslims because it meant they could no longer work in them so they made an exception to the law that was created to deal with them.

A case could be made that the exact same thing happened at airports world wide, all because no one has the raw guts to come out and talk about the problem. And it isn’t religion. It is Islam. And one doesn’t even have to ban that. Just stop making exceptions for Muslims with respect to common, already existing laws. No covering your face for example or wearing a disguise in public. This means you Aisha. No public speaking about killing members of an identifiable group. This means you imam and your constant calls to genocide for Jews and homosexuals etc. We don’t need new laws to start to deal with this problem we just need to stop making exceptions for existing ones to suit muslims.

This Quebec plan will backfire mark my words. There will be just as many burkas and face covered haters of us all in important government positions displaying their contempt for us all openly, but all the people who actually generate wealth and build things and cooperate with us all to make life good will have to make difficult choices.

It will be good for Ontario though. I welcome all the Christians, Jews, Sikhs, Hindus and so on who will be flooding this way in the near future.

Eeyore for Vlad