Prince Leo von Hehenburg on the dangers of current policies as an existential threat to civilization

There is a video on YouTube of a woman injecting herself into this speech at a ratio of about 3:1, meaning she speaks about three times as much as he does as she plays snippets of this speech and then interprets it in a way perfectly suited for those who would dismiss what he says as activist white supremacy. As opposed to what it is, A plea for European survival.

We chose to post the actual video of the Prince instead.

Interview with Canadian veteran and freedom fighter, Jeff Evely

On the 7th of October, Chris and Tamara received their sentencing for the Mischief conviction they got for protesting against an illegal state diktat concerning lockdowns and coercion, often existential coercion to take an experimental mRNA-DNA gene therapy.

A lot of true heroes of the Canadian freedom scene were in court that day and we ran into one, and interviewed him as the court let out after the final verdict.

Jeff Evely was fined over twenty thousand dollars for walking about ten yards into the woods in Nova Scotia. The same province that made it a crime to cheer on the trucks headed to the Freedom convoy in Ottawa for those who don’t remember.

Yes, Nova Scotia made it a crime to stand on a highway overpass and cheer on the trucks as they went to cheer on the cavalry headed to peacefully protest the communist revolution that was clearly taking place across Canada in 2022 (started much earlier of course but that depends how you decide to measure it) and then more recently, NS made it a crime to walk in the woods or stand on the beach.
Were there reasons? Of course. There always are. Do those reasons justify taking away the most central human rights we have? Never. Even the right of exit was removed during Covid. The last right a communist authoritarian state removes, is the right to leave for your own reasons.

The whole story can be read at RAIR Foundation, including the video Jeff took of himself walking into the woods with whatever authorities are in charge of fining people for woods-walking observing and ticketing him.

 

Another truly excellent video from Counter-spell: Counter-revolutionary ethics

This site has repeatedly stated that allegiance to people in uniform is only prudent when they are acting on the principles of a republic. In simpler terms, fealty to the police is a good idea when the police are enforcers of the law and protectors of your safety and your property.

When the police are agents of the state doing the exact opposite of these things, then they are state thugs and should be feared and treated as the enemy of the people. Because they are.

The same exact reasoning needs to be applied to all the institutions of state. When they serve the purpose for which they were created, then they are venerable. But when they are captured and serve the purpose of the enemy of Western Civilization, individualism and individual rights, and the right to property, then they must be disobeyed. They are no longer the institutions for which we were all willing to make small sacrifices for.

Counter-spell tends to overconfidence perhaps. Much like Stephen Coughlin’s thinking, which runs along similar lines. This site likely does as well, and for that I apologize. But this video should be stopped and thought about whenever you hear a sentence that doesn’t click right away. Stop it, think about it, and continue.

 

ANTIFA tactic of “Sleeping Dragon” is a Gordian knot …

There is a tactic that communist, anarchist protestors such as ANTIFA use in order to make whatever the issue de jure is, or more accurately, whatever their pretence of the day is, into our collective problem. This tactic is called, “Sleeping Dragon”. And they use it to stop traffic or make it very difficult for police to remove them from whatever crime scene they create.

The way it works is they create a sort of Gordian knot. They get or make devices known as Lock-ons, or pipe-locks, although I have a dim recollection of them being referred to as ‘dragon-sleeves’ by STRATFOR which would make sense given the name of the tactic.

The idea is that each protestor puts one of his or occasionally her arms into a PVC or metal pipe and inside there is a lock of sorts that makes it very difficult to get the arm out of the pipe. This slows down police considerably and creates the desired level of anger and frustration for all the rest of us trying to get to work, or home or a hospital or wherever we may want to go other than stuck at an intersection while college kids get extra credit for pretending they care about something when really they are trying to bring the temple down.

For those not familiar with the term, “Gordian knot” it refers to an Ancient Greek story:

In the city of Gordium (in Phrygia, modern-day Turkey), there was an ox-cart tied to a post with a massively intricate knot — so tangled that no one could see how it was tied.

An oracle had declared that whoever could untie the Gordian Knot would become the ruler of all Asia.

When Alexander the Great reached Gordium around 333 B.C., he was shown the famous knot. After struggling with it for a while, he realized there was no point trying to loosen it the normal way — so he drew his sword and sliced straight through it, cutting the knot in half.

This solution was known as the ‘force majeure’. When faced with a difficult problem sometimes the only solution is to apply a superior force to it till the problem goes away.

Thank you Y.

Canada’s top constitutional law firm has a serious warning for Canada about currently debated authoritarian legislation

The following video is an interview for RAIR Foundation with the founder and senior person at The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms in Canada, John Carpay.

This law firm has a very special modus operandi.

They only take clients where the case represents a serious concern to the constitutional and individual rights of all Canadians.

They take these cases pro-bono, depending on donors to fund their efforts. This is very important. This goes to motive for the defence as well as motive for choosing the cases. The JCCF has defended many people in the Freedom Convoy, and has taken on some of the more egregious cases in the wake of the dialectically named, “Canadian Human Rights Councils” if memory serves.

In this video Carpay covers many impending bills that the Carney regime is putting through as laws that will absolutely gut the very concept of individualism, let alone individual rights. Carney also indicated he may resurrect various Trudeau era bills that will do the same.

The synopsis of this interview can be seen at RAIR. 

I hope any Canadian or British person who reads this site will watch this interview and spread it around. Frankly, Canadians really need to understand this material. And John Carpay delivers the facts with a calm, rational manner that makes this even more chilling than the kind of hysterical hyperbole we see around these issues by counter-narrative media As that has become the new normal, the constant hysteria has also become less effective.

 

Trump and the executive order to restore beauty

For some years now, we have been caught up in the mental gymnastics of trying to understand the relationship between Marxism and postmodernism.

At one level though, it’s extremely simple. Postmodern art is dialectical art.

In other words, it is art that is launched on the public as a weapon to destroy art itself. To deracinate our sense of aesthetic beauty. To show contempt where respect and appreciation was the norm. It is anti-art, art. Like all dialectic attacks on Western Civilization. Take an attribute of classical thought and its expressions, and destroy it with an intersectional line of attack.

Below is Stephen Coughlin’s graph, which I think was taken from a feminist-Marxist think tank showing how they destroy western paradigms with dialectical lines of attack:

Screenshot

(For a complete explanation of that graph, please see this brief by Maj. Stephen Coughlin)

But if I were to make one, I would have spokes that showed how mass line narratives such as:

“Diversity is our strength” was the intersectional line of attack against the well understood and axiomatic, “United we stand, divided we fall”.

“The Religion of Peace” is the intersectional attack on “kill the unbeliever wherever you find him”. etc. etc.ad nauseam.

In the book Explaining Postmodernism (Available as a free audiobook on YouTube) by Steven Hicks, or Human Accomplishment by Charles Murray, Post modernism is explained very well. And in both books it is clear that the purpose of postmodern art is to destroy art.

So it was with a sense of tremendous joy that I became aware of one of President Trump’s lesser known executive orders, and from back in August:

MAKING FEDERAL ARCHITECTURE BEAUTIFUL AGAIN

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered:

Section 1.  Purpose.  The Founders, in line with great societies before them, attached great importance to Federal civic architecture.  They wanted America’s public buildings to inspire the American people and encourage civic virtue.  President George Washington and Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson consciously modeled the most important buildings in Washington, D.C., on the classical architecture of ancient Athens and Rome.  They sought to use classical architecture to visually connect our contemporary Republic with the antecedents of democracy in classical antiquity, reminding citizens not only of their rights but also their responsibilities in maintaining and perpetuating its institutions.

Washington and Jefferson personally oversaw the competitions to design the Capitol Building and the White House.  Under the direction and following the vision of these two Founders, Pierre Charles L’Enfant designed the Nation’s capital as a classical city.  For approximately a century and a half following America’s founding, America’s Federal architecture continued to be characterized by beautiful and beloved buildings of largely, though not exclusively, classical design.  In the 1960s, the Federal Government largely replaced traditional designs for new construction with modernist and brutalist ones.  The Federal architecture that ensued, overseen by the General Services Administration (GSA), was often unpopular with Americans.  The new buildings ranged from the undistinguished to designs even GSA now admits many in the public found unappealing.  

Please read the rest at Whitehouse,gov.

Reading the order shows that the Trump administration has a very clear grasp of exactly what it is doing, and what it is fighting. This is inspiring stuff. A few more paragraphs:

(b)  “Brutalist architecture” means the style of architecture that grew out of the early 20th-century modernist movement that is characterized by a massive and block-like appearance with a rigid geometric style and large-scale use of exposed poured concrete.

(c)  “Classical architecture” means the architectural tradition derived from the forms, principles, and vocabulary of the architecture of Greek and Roman antiquity, and as later developed and expanded upon by such Renaissance architects as Alberti, Brunelleschi, Michelangelo, and Palladio; such Enlightenment masters as Robert Adam, John Soane, and Christopher Wren; such 19th-century architects as Benjamin Henry Latrobe, Robert Mills, and Thomas U. Walter; and such 20th-century practitioners as Julian Abele, Daniel Burnham, Rafael Carmoega, Charles F. McKim, John Russell Pope, Julia Morgan, and the firm of Delano and Aldrich.  Classical architecture encompasses such styles as Neoclassical, Georgian, Federal, Greek Revival, Beaux-Arts, and Art Deco.

(d)  “Deconstructivist architecture” means the style of architecture generally known as “deconstructivism” that emerged during the late 1980s and that features fragmentation, disorder, discontinuity, distortion, skewed geometry, and the appearance of instability.

Understanding that this is not trivial, nor is it a restriction on freedom of expression is critical to the survival of the republic. At a certain point, the symbols we represent an idea with, is what shapes the opinion in the minds of the people exposed to the idea. This is a large part of the leftist plan. To destroy symbols in order to destroy the ideas themselves. But also to replace the symbols with ones which give the same emotional palette to communist ideas. Just look at early Soviet art to get the picture. Nazi art as well. The dignity and beauty it stole from civilization, as well as destroyed by misrepresentation, it granted to itself.

 

 

 

Game Changing peer review on Covid vaxx contamination may mean new court cases with better outcomes: Dr. David Speicher virologist/microbiologist at Pembroke, Rally in the Valley

You may need to sit down and relax a bit for this one. Dr. Speicher has a serious speech impediment. But the importance of his work, and the importance of what he has to say makes it very worth the time and patience required.

RAIR Foundation has an excellent synopsis of this talk by Dr. Speicher in Pembroke, just this past Sunday.

In essense, David announced that a pre-print that had been widely cited in various courts showing actual DNA contamination (maybe or maybe it was deliberately put there. Hard to believe something that high tech that does that exact damage was an accident) in the ‘vaccines’, had now been peer reviewed and scheduled for publication this week.

This slam dunks all previous objections to this scientific evidence on the basis that it had not been “peer reviewed”. A frankly ludicrous criteria anyway from the point of view of actual logic. What we used to call, argumentum ad verecundiam, or deference to authority but with no real basis in logic or evidence. Mind you I get that Peer review isn’t exactly like that. But since various medical journals admitted to publishing BS reports on Hydroxychloroquine (the lancet etc.) and since several US university professors managed to get several utterly ludicrous made up papers published in peer reviewed journals just because they sprinkled them with Marxist terminology, peer review should not be the criteria. But since it is, this is big news. Please watch and share.

A couple of related items. How they fit in here, is an unfinished jigsaw puzzle.

Breaking: Independent Doctors Praise HHS for Rescinding COVID Shots Emergency Use Authorization

IMA doctors celebrate HHS and FDA’s decision to revoke emergency use authorization for COVID-19 mRNA shots, calling it the first step in reckoning with the damage caused by forced mandates.

July 18 2025:

‘NO JAB, NO JOB’: Globe & Mail enforces vaccine mandate while touting equity

And now, paediatricians are suing the CDC over childhood vaccines. Related, but not directly concerning the mRNA shots

US to make ‘de-banking’ someone for political beliefs, a crime

Which frankly, it already was. But now in Canada, it’s the rule. Surely though, there is a provision in law that makes it an offence for a bank to discriminate based on political views, especially traditional ones. But at least President Trump is re-entrenching this in law.

Spanish set Barcelona Mosque alight

This is an interesting and potentially a sea change event.

https://twitter.com/DaveAtherton20/status/1944789295996211433

The Twitter video was removed from Twitter for some reason.

No worries. Here it is with another to boot.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/g8HWU6fOFbg?feature=share

Just for balance, I have it on good authority that over SIX HUNDRED Churches have been burned to the ground since Trudeau became PM in Canada. Links to follow on that.

We have covered numerous Churches and cathedrals which have been burned to the ground in France, Germany and across Europe as well as major ones in the USA.

This is just the first time we have heard of a Mosque getting torched by some of the victims of the people who are recipients of the actions by those that are fed its hate-filled dogma 5 times a day.

When Kevin Krehan put a strip of bacon on a mosque doorknob he was sent to prison for it, where he received the death penalty. Defacto not de jure. but anyone would know a man sent to a UK prison for insulting a mosque would be killed inside. So calling it de Jure would only be 1 baby step from truth.

The state of the UK: An interview with Anne Marie Waters

We followed Anne from way back. She was one of the most courageous and determined women in the UK in terms of pushing back against the destruction of Great Britain and the West in general via Islamic migration.

While many readers may be familiar with a lot of these points, some are indeed new. The fact that Great Britain now teaches a dialectical version of history in which the aboriginal Brits including the monarchs are Africans is new, but certainly consistent with the communist, ie dialectical state of which Kier Starmer is now the COMINTERN viceroy. It won’t be long till Chat GPT confirms this history, and the next generation, who will not be taught critical thinking skills or evidence based analysis, will accept it as the way it is.

As it happens, these kinds of things are showing up on my Twitter feed. But frankly evidence of the claim of the deracination of Great Britain (and the West) is hardly necessary. If it is done this way or that way, it is what is being done. And that is what matters. Essentially it would be like arguing what calibre bullets the enemy is using when they fire on you and yours, when your friends and allies still can’t accept that you are being fired upon.

Even so, this is showing up in the feed:

More: Watch the video please..

It’s is worth doing a word search on an online copy of 1984 for the term, “memory hole”. I think the really interesting bit is where he accuses his fellow Britains, or denizens of Airstrip One, of falling for a narrative that flatly contradicts the one shoved at them by the Ministry of Truth just the day before on Chocolate rations.

“…But actually, he thought as he re-adjusted the Ministry of Plenty’s
figures, it was not even forgery. It was merely the substitution of one
piece of nonsense for another. Most of the material that you were dealing
with had no connexion with anything in the real world, not even the kind of
connexion that is contained in a direct lie. Statistics were just as much
a fantasy in their original version as in their rectified version. A great
deal of the time you were expected to make them up out of your head. For
example, the Ministry of Plenty’s forecast had estimated the output of
boots for the quarter at 145 million pairs. The actual output was given as
sixty-two millions. Winston, however, in rewriting the forecast, marked
the figure down to fifty-seven millions, so as to allow for the usual claim
that the quota had been overfulfilled. In any case, sixty-two millions was
no nearer the truth than fifty-seven millions, or than 145 millions. Very
likely no boots had been produced at all. Likelier still, nobody knew
how many had been produced, much less cared. All one knew was that every
quarter astronomical numbers of boots were produced on paper, while perhaps
half the population of Oceania went barefoot. And so it was with every
class of recorded fact, great or small. Everything faded away into a
shadow-world in which, finally, even the date of the year had become
uncertain.

[…]

For the moment he had shut his ears to
the remoter noises and was listening to the stuff that streamed out of the
telescreen. It appeared that there had even been demonstrations to thank
Big Brother for raising the chocolate ration to twenty grammes a week. And
only yesterday, he reflected, it had been announced that the ration was
to be REDUCED to twenty grammes a week. Was it possible that they could
swallow that, after only twenty-four hours? Yes, they swallowed it. Parsons
swallowed it easily, with the stupidity of an animal.

We need a few million more of this guy. It is one of the few things the public can actually do that might either fix things, or force the communist revolution to move from Covert to Overt, perhaps before it is entirely ready to do so.

Article on interview at RAIR.

 

 

2014: Bill Mahar debates Charlie Rose on the nature of Islam: Reality Vs. state narratives

Bill Mahar used to also have Burka Beauty contests. Something no one would dare do now. Terrorism works. Especially when leftist governments work with the terrorists to achieve very similar goals, meaning the total suppression of individualism and freedom of speech and bodily autonomy, except wjhere it is destructive.

Whatever your views on abortion are, the fact that its a sacrament to the leftist state while refusing to take an experimental and often deadly gene therapy shot was at least crime-adjacent, suggests that the overarching principle was and remains, ‘whatever is more destructive to Western People is how it’s going to be.’

Tamara Lich speaks to supporters after conviction in court: April 5 2025 Ottawa

Tamara Lich calls herself an ordinary woman in extraordinary times. But frankly, it is extraordinary times that tests the metal of people. Sometimes it tempers them, and sometimes it melts them. Let me say that very few people could face the furnace that Tamara has faced, which includes months in an actual jail which actual violent criminals would never see the inside, and maintain a caring and sincere nature. She was indeed tempered, but not made hard except in her determination to fight injustice and tyranny.

Once, while inside the court building on the last day of the actual trial, Tamara was surrounded with media, supporters and a legal team and a woman with a disability slipped on the court building polished stone floor and fell. Although many people were much closer to her than Tamara was, she was up like a shot and deftly moved past her supporters, media and legal team to help the woman get up before people closer to the fallen woman registered what had even happened.

I mention this story as a factual account to counter much of the disinformation planted on social media intended to Impugn Tamara’s character. And there is a lot. Because Tamara has become a symbol of resistance to tyrannical government, and completely without intending to become anything like that. And the left in its very essence is about destruction of a concept via destruction of its symbols. And the effort to separate Tamara, and Chris barber for that matter, from those who see them as symbols of resistance to government tyranny is extensive. On MSM by sly use of language, and on social media by vulgar and/or direct attacks and false imputation of motives.

The details of this event are at RAIR. The two videos are below. First, a short prayer for freedom by Pastor Rob from Ottawa’s Biker’s Church. (A Church which I have been planning on writing an article on for days and hope to actually get to it this week.)

Below that, the video of Tamara’s actual talk.

Tamara Lich talk with Q&A

Please do share this with anyone who was a supporter of the Freedom Convoy, or anyone you know who was injured by the mandated mRNA injections, either by taking it, or refusing to take it and then punished by the state. This issue is far from over. Health care workers who refused the shots are still not back at their jobs, yet many have filled the positions who are from outside Canada and didn’t, for some reason, have to take the shots.