“The Nation of Law Must Not Be Sacrificed For the Protection of the Citizens”

Berlin-based newspaper Der Tagesspiegel runs this headline today, in an op-ed about Friday’s Supermarket attack in Hamburg:

“The Nation of Law Must Not Be Sacrificed For the Protection of the Citizens.

Germany will have to learn to live with deeds like in Hamburg.”

This display of postmodernism is so brilliant that we weren’t sure it wasn’t in fact a parody. But as Der Tagesspiegel are at the very forefront of German ‘Progressivism’, they are probably serious.

We reported on Friday’s Mujahid attack in a Hamburg Edeka supermarket here:
Hamburg Jihadi a Palestinian Refugee
and: Joint Press Conference of the Interior Senate and the Police of Hamburg.

Disney indulges in postmodern historical revisionism

This is no small thing. By caving in this manner, Disney is allowing, much like modern grade schools, that how Muslims or communists feel about an issue is much more important than how they do, or in fact what the historical facts are. This is the sort of stuff of which, had we read it in history books, we would be asking how people could have let thus happen.

 

President Trump defies postmodernism in Poland

In these selected bits adding up to three minutes, President trump, seen below next to a portrait of King Jan Sobieski the III saviour of Europe at the Gates of Vienna in 1683, manages two things.

The first is that he asked the most important question of the age, and he is the first leader of any global power to do so. “Does the West have the will to survive”?

The second, is by asking that question, makes the admission of the problem, and that problem is the postmodern effect of decaying the spirit of the people of the West.

This is a very important speech.

Quite often during the whole speech, the camera focused on one-man in the front row. He is the party leader of the current ruling party. Here he is below.

Canada’s Marxist replacement for law becomes more and more apparent and above board

Notice the language by the government bureaucrat. For those who have made it to the 90 minute mark in the very important audio-book, “Explaining Post Modernism”, his language is familiar and sinister. Quite specifically it is about using the power of the state to limit freedoms in the interests of feelings and at the expense of reason. Truth be damned. And even more dangerous is the selective enforcement used. We all know that if Muslims have a plate which is pro-sharia and one of us found it offensive it would be protected as free expression. But oppose it and its racist or hateful and it must be crushed.

Post modernism and the modern university

This post is not a quick one.

Probably its worth downloading the second video and listening to it in 45 minute increments or less. Personally, I have been through just over the first hour of the Post Modern video twice and stopped because it generated so much thought and insight and understanding that I needed to absorb it before I could move on.

Initially the plan was to post the second video once it was all digested. But this first video came to my attention and it was such a stellar example of post-modernism, and from a place once revered for its capacity for Greek thought, a veritable temple of reason, now become literally an anti-university. A temple to Focoult and all the other perverters of thought in order to turn reason against itself.

In this first video, A Harvard institute explains that we must ignore scientific and biological science of sex and sexual dimorphism and reproduction, and instead, accept that whatever people want to imagine about themselves must be the truth.

Further that any argument otherwise, is not just wrong, but actually violence.

And we all know what happens when you use violence and you aren’t a Marxist or Post Modernist.

Granted, this edict is from the office of LGBTQETC. But offices like that carry power like the political officer on a Soviet sub these days. Disagree at substantial risk to your career and even your health.

The following video is actually an audio book. Explaining Post Modernism. It is over 6 hours long.

Dr. Jordan Peterson on a couple of occasions has said this book is a mandatory read or something very much like that. In any case, he recommended it highly. As I say, I have been through the first hour twice and its a veritable insight generator for those of us who have been observing groups like ANTIFA and other left wing groups who ally themselves with Muslim groups yet claim to oppose everything Muslims do systemically.

With each minute of narrated text everything becomes a little more in focus.

Looking forward to comments on this post, even if they are not right away.