Category Archives: United Nations

WHO is WHO

Posted on by

1. Nikki Haley

2. Demand grows for resignation of the head of WHO

(Nations should just be abandoning the UN altogether and not worry about the various corrupt orgs within it)

3. Dr. Fauci Confirms His Friendship with WHO Director General Dr. Tedros, Both Are Connected to the Clinton Foundation in Ethiopia

Yesterday, Dr. Anthony Fauci announced that he’s been friends with the World Health Organization (WHO)’s Director General, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.  This announcement connected Dr. Fauci to the Clinton Foundation and the terrorist connected WHO leader.

 

Dr. Anthony Fauci yesterday stood up for the WHO Director General.  Dr Fauci said he has known the current WHO director for years, Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, including when he was serving in Ethiopia.  There are several reports that Ghebreyesus was abusing his office in Ethiopia at the time.

4. The WHO and China: Dereliction of Duty

[…] The WHO Director-General (DG) Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus has been an outspoken advocate for the Chinese government’s COVID-19 response. On January 28, Tedros met with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing. Following the meeting, Tedros commended China for “setting a new standard for outbreak control” and praised the country’s top leadership for its “openness to sharing information” with the WHO and other countries.

 

Yet in Wuhan, the epicenter of the COVID-19 outbreak, Chinese officials were busy arresting and punishing citizens for “spreading rumors” about the disease, while online censors controlled the flow of information. Despite growing evidence of China’s mishandling of the outbreak and rising domestic Chinese outrage over the government’s censorship, Tedros remains unmoved. On February 20 at the Munich Security Conference, Tedros doubled down on his praise for China stating that “China has bought the world time.”

5. Tedros Adhanom facing calls to resign as Ethiopians question if it makes sense

2017: Tedros Adhanom, first African to lead the World Health Organization (WHO), is facing calls to resign over his decision to make Zimbabwe president, Robert Mugabe, WHO goodwill ambassador for communicable disease in Africa, which is already rescinded.

 

It was at a conference at Uruguay last week that Tedros Adhanom, as cited by The Daily Mail, announced ‘I am honoured to be joined by President Mugabe, of Zimbabwe, a country that places universal health coverage and health promotion at the centre of its policies to provide healthcare to all.’

6. For Opponents, WHO Director General Nominee Tedros Adhanom Represents Ethiopia’s Repressive Government

Some Ethiopians are fiercely campaigning against Tedros Adhanom, Ethiopia’s candidate to replace Margaret Chan Fung Fu-chun, as director general of World Health Organization, just a few weeks before member states are set to vote on the final three candidates.

 

Tedros, a former Ethiopian foreign and health minister, along with Pakistan’s Sania Nishtar and the UK’s David Nabarro are the three director-general nominees who made the cut from a larger pool of candidates in January.

 

Tedros, who is running a well-funded campaign, is considered as a prime contender in the race. His candidacy was endorsed by the African Union, and just last week he picked up an endorsement of Andrew Mitchell, the UK’s former international development secretary.

However, he is facing unrelenting opposition from his own citizens.

The current leader of the World Health organization has a background as a Marxist Leninist violent revolutionary and has a current net worth rumoured to be in the billions. He was leader or affiliated with both of the orgs below, both linked in the Wikipedia above

Thank you Richard, Yucki, Malca, C., and others who sent in materials enlightening us all to the fact that the head of WHO is in fact a violent communist revolutionary and now perhaps, destroyer of worlds.

UN Religion Expert Wants World Religions to Bow to UN Ideology

Posted on by

Add this story to the video below and one begins to formulate dark suspicions…

From CBN.Com

A United Nations “special expert on freedom of religion” says its time for the world’s leading religions to submit to the authority of the UN and its human rights bodies, even though critics say those bodies are laced with fringe, leftist views.

 

It’s all about who should have the final say on issues of law and policy, and the  UN expert is saying the UN’s ideas should override the beliefs of mainstream religions.

 

The Center for Family and Human Rights (C-Fam) reports Ahmed Shaheed, who is the UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief, wrote about how religion and gender equality have reached a clash point in his annual report. Download the report here. 

 

“I firmly reject any claim that religious beliefs can be invoked as a legitimate ‘justification’ for violence or discrimination against women, girls or LGBT+ people,” said Shaheed. To be clear though, mainstream Christianity doesn’t call for violence or discrimination anyone, even though some opponents of orthodox Christian belief have tried to characterize it that way.

 

Shaheed then tries to flip the “freedom of religion” upside down saying “the right to freedom of religion protects individuals and not religions as such.” 

This all sounds pretty good so far. But then, that is how anti-freedom rhetoric is usually framed when leftists do not have a monopoly on force. The thing is, the UN’s track record is all about protecting Islam and destroying Christianity, Judaism and all other religious schools of thought by its actions and policies.

This Source has a better article on the same issue here.

And then you look at actual UN policy on freedom of speech:

Then of course, there is the UN Compact on Migration and its included rules on reporting related events:

Here are a few vestigial freedom minded people within the EU discussing the UN migration compact

Interesting how reportage of global negation of all cultures must be reported on positively much like how a father is not allowed to speak in a critical manner of how the state is sterilizing and mutilating his daughter in the name of LGBT rights.

Coincidence?

Unlikely.

Claim: Greeks detain UNHCR and other COMINTERN agents for misinformation and anti-Greek propaganda (Updating)

Posted on by

1. This is stellar news if true. It means real countries have HAD it with the UN, and are starting to tell them to get the hell away and stop interfering. If anyone can find links to news sites on this, please post in comments:

(Click over and read the whole thread its awesome)

https://twitter.com/Holbornlolz/status/1234214501668487171

https://twitter.com/i/status/1234157643616440321

It looks like people have had it with the UN and phoney NGOs that are destroying Europe to build another Soviet like state except with more muslims.

Machine translation:

Attack on nGO members in the port of Thermi on. They threw their camers overboard.

The claim is that the UNHCR HQ was set on fire. Let’s hope this is true.

https://twitter.com/Sotiridimp/status/1234211008278941698

Canada, Pakistan, and the United (Islamic-socialist) nations

Posted on by

https://twitter.com/apparentlysidi/status/1196458771821875217

“Elections”, as Obama so famously said, “have consequences.” And this is just one of the consequences of reelecting Trudeau.

2013 interview with the head of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) on the implementation of UN Res. 16/18

Posted on by

We are restoring this because of its terrible importance. Many people, most in fact, do not know about 16/18 or its importance, and would likely think you unwell or dishonest if you tried to explain it to them.

Here it is from the head of the OIC himself, Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, who is more clear than most of our own leaders on the intention of 16/18.

Please note that it has now been thoroughly established that the attack on the US Embassy in Libya was a well planned terrorist attack by Islamic groups and had nothing whatsoever to do with the short and badly made Youtube film on the life of Mohammad mentioned in the video. In fact, that video only had 13 views at the time that the attack happened, which leads many to suspect that the Obama/Clinton admin had created the film as kind of false Cases Belli for this event or one like it. Possibly to advance the implementation of Islamic blasphemy laws within the USA.

Subsequent to this, we have seen Canadian Parliamentary motion M103 be adopted and financed, and many other nations around the world, including Austria and the EU adopt saleable laws which clearly are meant to conform to UN 16/18, although typically renamed into something that the locals can accept.

Direct link:

https://d.tube/v/vladtepesblog/QmekS9GnrR3N5jC8Pzj2jSRWJLEuEozUPa8mDWQWSxVN67

From EW:

United Nations, Thought Police!

Posted on by

I don’t remember voting for any of these guys. Does anyone remember ever giving these guys this kind of power via democratic means?

The whole original is here if anyone wants it.

I would enjoy seeing in the comments, the staggering number of Islamic acts of mass murder in the name of jihad that he avoided mentioning in his little list of things caused by ‘hate speech.’

 

Appeal granted on what is a blasphemy conviction in Oz

Posted on by

This is very important. This is the FIRST TIME a court official has publicly stated that (in this case) Australia’s law under which his client had been convicted, was a consequence of UN resolution 16/18!

We have been writing about this for years and years here. But this brings it to a new level.

H/T Malevolent Pixie

H/T EB.

Bolsonaro: The explanation to the action in under 20 days

Posted on by

Brazilian President Bolsonaro on December 18th explaining his views on the UN Migration Pact, or as it should be known, the destruction of the Nation-State suicide pact, and how this kind of immigration has impacted France.

Yesterday’s video on the official announcement of Brazil quitting the pact. President Bolsonaro really does travel at three times the speed of Trump!

Brazil: Future chancellor says Brazil will leave Global Migration Compact

Posted on by

An original translation by Jose Atento, from Blog Lei Islâmica em Ação

From this Portuguese language news site:

Ambassador Ernesto Araújo, who has been confirmed to take over the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, said today [December 10] in social media that the government of President-elect Jair Bolsonaro will disassociate the country from the Global Migration Compact. According to him, immigration should be treated according to “the reality and sovereignty of each country”.

“The Bolsonaro government will dissociate itself from the Global Migration Pact that is being launched in Marrakesh, an inadequate instrument to deal with the problem. Immigration should not be treated as a global issue, but rather according to the reality and sovereignty of each country,” the future chancellor said in his Twitter account.

The UN Global Compact for a Safe, Ordained and Regular Migration was approved today by representatives of more than 150 countries at the intergovernmental conference of the organization in the Moroccan city.

Speaking at the conference, UN Secretary-General António Guterres drew attention to “the sovereign right of states to determine their migration policies and their prerogative to govern migration within their jurisdiction, in accordance with international law,” insisted the Secretary-General.

Regulatory mark

On previous occasions, the future chancellor had mentioned how the Brazilian government intends to deal with the migratory flow. According to him, the country will seek to accommodate immigrants by establishing a regulatory framework compatible with national reality.

“Brazil will seek a regulatory framework compatible with the national reality and with the well-being of Brazilians and foreigners. In the case of Venezuelans fleeing the [President Nicolás] Maduro regime, we will continue to welcome them, but the fundamental thing is to work for the restoration of democracy in Venezuela.”

The ambassador added that immigrants are welcome in Brazil and will not be discriminated against. However, he defended the definition of criteria to guarantee safety to all. He did not elaborate on those criteria.

“Immigration is welcome, but it should not be indiscriminate. There must be criteria to ensure the safety of both migrants and citizens in the destination country. Immigration must be at the service of the individual’s interests and the cohesion of each society.”