Dutch Left calls for an end to suicidal notion of tolerance

http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/024183.php

For years I have insisted that the resistance to the jihad and Islamic supremacism is not a Left/Right, liberal/conservative issue, but one of the defense of our common civilization — however, hardly anyone on the Left has ever demonstrated any awareness of this, perhaps because they have increasingly discarded the values of that common civilization altogether. However, harsh reality is causing some people to wake up in the Netherlands.

“From the left, a call to end the current Dutch notion of tolerance,” by John Vinocur for the International Herald Tribune, December 29 (thanks to all who sent this in):

AMSTERDAM: Two years ago, the Dutch could quietly congratulate themselves on having brought what seemed to be a fair measure of consensus and reason to the meanest intersection in their national political life: the one where integration of Muslim immigrants crossed Dutch identity.In the run-up to choosing a new government in 2006, just 24 percent of the voters considered the issue important, and only 4 percent regarded it as the election’s central theme.

What a turnabout, it seemed – and whatever the reason (spent passions, optimism, resignation?), it was a soothing respite for a country whose history of tolerance was the first in 21st-century Europe to clash with the on-street realities of its growing Muslim population.

Since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks in the United States, the Netherlands had lived through something akin to a populist revolt against accommodating Islamic immigrants led by Pim Fortuyn, who was later murdered; the assassination of the filmmaker Theo Van Gogh, accused of blasphemy by a homegrown Muslim killer; and the bitter departure from the Netherlands of Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a Somali woman who became a member of Parliament before being marked for death for her criticism of radical Islam.

Now something fairly remarkable is happening again.

Two weeks ago, the country’s biggest left-wing political grouping, the Labor Party, which has responsibility for integration as a member of the coalition government led by the Christian Democrats, issued a position paper calling for the end of the failed model of Dutch “tolerance.”

It came at the same time Nicolas Sarkozy was making a case in France for greater opportunities for minorities that also contained an admission that the French notion of equality “doesn’t work anymore.”

But there was a difference. If judged on the standard scale of caution in dealing with cultural clashes and Muslims’ obligations to their new homes in Europe, the language of the Dutch position paper and Lilianne Ploumen, Labor’s chairperson, was exceptional.

The paper said: “The mistake we can never repeat is stifling criticism of cultures and religions for reasons of tolerance.”…

 

That would be a good starting point, but the wind is still largely blowing in the opposite direction.

Read it all.

UK video on Islam in Europe. Its views of freedom of conscience and homosexuality.

This is fantastic. I am so pleased someone made this superb documentary. I will add this to the movie page of Vlad so it won’t disappear down the time line.



Geert Wilders speaks on Israel and strikes on Hamas.

I have always admired Geert Wilders. A politician who actually lowered his standard of living (living under 24/7 security by multiple guards is not an easy or luxurious way to live) in order to serve his fellow man and western liberal civilization as a whole. He often speaks of things which are true and important but place him at great personal risk and is a staunch supporter of Israel. He also made the anti Islam film ‘Fitna’ available to be seen here on Vlad.

I would also like to thank the Baron over at Gates Of Vienna for having this translated for all of us who do not speak Dutch.

Eeyore for Vlad

Tuesday, December 30, 2008

“Just Kick the Whole Lot into the Sinai”

by Baron Bodissey

Geert Wilders ventures his opinion on Israel’s “disproportionate response” in this brief article from De Telegraaf, as translated by our Flemish correspondent VH:

Wilders stands behind Israel

Geert WildersThe Hague — PVV leader Geert Wilders stands behind Israel in the conflict in the Middle East. “Violence against terror is rarely disproportionate”, he responded Sunday concerning the Israeli air strikes on the Gaza Strip.

“If we [in The Netherlands] had to deal with terrorists just across the border in Belgium or Germany, who were launching missiles at Maastricht or Breda, and broke a truce,” Wilders — if he were Minister of Defense — would have done exactly the same as Israel is doing now.

Wilders points out that the Palestinians have chosen Hamas themselves in elections. He believes that Israel has the all the right in the world to defend itself. “The cause is blind hatred. There is unfortunately no dialogue against that. If your people and country are threatened existentially and fired upon by terrorists, you shoot back.”

According to Wilders, Israel is quite right: “Just kick the whole lot into the Sinai.”

On police in Holland, Canada and frankly anywhere in the west now.

Below is a rather excellent article showing the true workings and agenda of police departments when it comes to dealing with immigrant crimes in western nations. In Canada and I believe many parts of the US the police have a term. It’s called ‘FIDO’. An acronym for ‘Fuck It And Drive On. This term is used when police see an immigrant gang committing a crime against indigenous people in Canada (in this case indigenous means white) and realize that the cost of doing what police are meant to do is too high. Likely the officers will be accused of racism so they ignore the crime in progress and face investigations and problems far in excess of what the criminals would face had they been charged. One Ottawa police officer actually killed himself when faced with these charges. This has become standard operating procedure in much of Europe and North America to the point where police are as likely to act against the victims actively as we see in Scandinavia instead of merely failing to protect victims of crime as in FIDO. Below see a story from the Netherlands showing how police lose evidence, provide bureaucratic obstacles to enforcing laws and other more pernicious means of failing to enforce the laws.

NIS News Bulletin
Leading Newspaper Involves Moroccans in Rejecting ‘their’ Crime
THE HAGUE, 13/12/08 – De Telegraaf, the country’s biggest newspaper, continues to draw attention to the problem of Moroccan teen criminals. On Friday, the newspaper chose the angle of a Moroccan entrepreneur alleging that the government is too politically correct to act against his criminal countrymen.

Jamal Jaadan (33), a Dutch-Moroccan businessman in the Amsterdam suburb of Weesp, has sounded the alarm, De Telegraaf reported. “Thirty young Moroccan delinquents are terrorising Weesp, but the politicians from the flower-power generation think that these louts can be guided back to the straight and narrow with a little pressure. And that is rubbish! Judiciary, cabinet, police: protect society from these scum,” Jaadan says in the newspaper.

De Telegraaf has been hammering away for some months about the problems caused in the cities by Moroccan teenagers. The newspaper seemed to wish to make it clear on Friday that the passivity of the government, apparently to prevent the stigmatisation of the entire Moroccan community, is also criticised by Moroccans – at least some of them.

Jaadan’s snack bar has been burgled three times this year. In one case, his entire safe was removed from the premises via the roof. In another, the snack bar was totally demolished. “No action was taken,” said Jaadan. “The police claimed they had lost the videotape showing the perpetrators. When the safe was stolen, I knew exactly where they should look for the thieves. The Moroccan community is like a village in itself. I gave the detectives the names, addresses, everything”. But the police made no efforts at all.

“At a certain point, I put one of the suspects in my car and said, listen! Everyone knows you were involved. Tell the police about it now and your sentence will be reduced. I arrived at the police station with the boy and they told me they had no time for us! Later, a statement was taken after all. But the case was closed. Lack of evidence. What sort of signal do you give these louts with this weak attitude?”

Jaadan did stress in De Telegraaf that 90 percent of the Moroccans in Weesp do not cause him complaints. “It is not a question of nuisance; that is something many youngsters cause. It is these criminals and the influence they have on the younger children. They are the ones who treat all their Moroccan friends to kebab after committing a theft. It gives them status. All these flower power politicians should realise that ‘joining in’ is something these louts have no wish to do.”

“These problems must simply be named and tackled. I do not want my children to be called Moroccan with a negative intonation right up until the next century. We are Dutch and we too are fed up with these criminals.”

Geert Wilders writes article about Mumbai. From Klien Verzet

Today Mumbai, tomorrow Amsterdam

Mumbai train attacks in 2006
Yesterday Geert Wilders (PVV) published this story (NL) in Dutch newspaper Trouw, here is my translation:

The media likes to ignore the Islamic character of Mumbai attack.

Mumbai is still burning, but the pundits and self confessed experts are arguing on TV if this is an attack by Al’Qaeda, the ISI or the Deccan Mujahideen.

But who looks at [the details of] this gruesome attack sees the contours of something bigger. According to [the Belgium] newspaper de Standaard the non-Muslims were separated from the Muslims in Hotel Oberoi. Only the kafir were shot down. In this city of millions the perpetrators directly went to a tiny Jewish center. There they, according to the Indian website Rediff News, gruesomely tortured the Jewish people before they were killed. [Also] are there many indications that the terrorist were looking for Western people, they wanted to kill them, if possible by the thousands. The only surviving terrorist now says he did a good job.

All the talk, about which organization is responsible, misses the main point: the ideology [that drives these terrorists]. It gives us the impression that if only we could stop or obstruct a certain organization, we can solve this problem. But this ignores [the fact that] jihadist constantly attack India and other countries.

Progressive Western media rather embrace meaningless terms like ‘liberation movements’ and try to ignore the Islamic character of this terror as much as possible. They rather be political correct than that they might offend somebody.

India is [just] one of the countries on the fault line of the Jihad. In ‘The Clash of Civilizations’ Samuel Huntington claims that the Islam has bloody borders: Israel, Sudan (Darfur), Kosovo, Indonesia (Aceh), Thailand and the Philippines. Where Islam is in direct contact with other civilizations, there is a constant source of tensions and often war. This is also the case in Europe. [In] a Europe that is fast Islamizing. What happened yesterday in Mumbai can happen tomorrow in Amsterdam.

Continue Reading →

Gouda Holland. Church firebombed by Muslims

Regular readers of this blog may remember that the Dutch town of Gouda is the city where Buses and other city services have given up operating in due to frequent attacks on drivers, robberies and abuse at the hand of Islamic immigrants. This is what is known as the soft jihad and the creation of ‘no go zones’. Areas in a nation which become under sharia law by pushing secular and European laws out.

From Islam in Europe

Gouda: Church firebombed

Four teenagers of Moroccan origin were arrested Saturday evening for setting fire to the Vaste Burcht Reformed church in Gouda. A Molotov cocktail was thrown at the door of the church, according to the police. The bottom part of the door and the doormat were damaged.

The four Gouda residents, three aged 14 and one aged 15, are suspected of arson. The fire was reported at 5:45pm and the directions given by the reporter led to the residence of one of them, where three youth were arrested. The 15 year old suspect was arrested later that evening.

Three of the suspects spent the night in jail. They will appear in court Tuesday. A 14 year old was released after interrogation since there was no evidence of his involvement. The police is continuing with the investigation.

A spokesperson of the church said that there are often fights there but this is the first time a Molotov cocktail was thrown at them. The administrator of the church said that they had windows broken in in the past which they put down to street youth.

The parishioners were informed of the events and were told that the police and mayor are taking the case seriously.

Sources: Trouw, Telegraaf, AD (Dutch)

Keep a close eye on Holland in December

This article from gates of Vienna. A blog all should read at least twice a week. Of course in the topic I mentioned watching Holland. But the question is how. Some of you may remember how th Dutch Government actually took film away from news crews when they government issued orders to paint over a mural of an angel with the inscription “Though Shalt Not Kill” in a predominantly Islamic neighborhood after the murder of Theo Van Gogh.

The Dutch government has a policy they call ‘non escalation’. This refers to the restriction of media to events which may show Islam and Muslims in a light other than the official multiculturalist one. This makes Holland difficult to watch and you can bet the same policies are in place in most if not all Euro states where Islam exerts influence. The story below appears to have been leaked by a blogger and translated by one. Klien Verzet, an excellent blog out of Holland doesnt appear to be doing as much reporting on incidents as it once did but they where the only source on rioting not long ago by Muslims in front of a Dutch police station in Amsterdam when a police woman shot a Muslim in self defense who had stabbed three or four policepeople including the shooter.

In any case somehow, try and watch Holland for the month of December. The good Barron predicts a posseble flashpoint.

Where Does It Stop?

by Baron Bodissey

Sagunto is a regular reader and commenter from the Netherlands. Below is his translation of a recent Dutch newspaper article, followed by his commentary. The story concerns the harassment of little children during their annual St. Martin lantern parades.

First a prefatory note from Sagunto:

From the future front of the battle against Islam, the old Dutch neighbourhoods, here’s my translation of a small article from the November 7th edition of De Telegraaf, entitled “Wanneer houdt het op?” (i.e. enough is enough, when/where will it stop?)

Sint Maarten kindjesSome background: the lantern parades described in the article are based on the feast of St. Martin of Tours (we all know why Tours is an important historical place;-) celebrated by children who go door to door with self-made lanterns, singing all kinds of songs about St. Martin, in order to get candy. Halloween is sort of related to it (and is also celebrated, like a novelty, same with Santa Claus, who better not show his face before Sinterklaas has left and returned to Spain).

The translation of the article from De Telegraaf:

Even little children are no longer safe from thugs

WHERE DOES IT STOP?

The Hague — On Wednesday evening, a group of Moroccan youths completely ruined an already heavily guarded lantern parade in the Transvaal neighbourhood of The Hague. Little children were bombarded with eggs when they followed a marching band with their multi-coloured lanterns. A woman, watching the parade with her dog, was harassed while the youths tried to kick her dog. Police officers who tried to intervene were met with a barrage of projectiles. Only one of the youths (15 years old) could be apprehended after a wild chase.

Pat on the head

The organizing committee Haagse Hopjes [a traditional local sweet — translator] is more than fed up with the continuing harassment and hopes that at last something will be done against it. ‘They get away with it while the local authorities only give them an occasional slap on the wrist and a pat on their heads. But they should all be rounded up and be put away, together with their parents, in some correctional facility,’ according to a defiant staff member Joke van den Boomen.

Continue Reading →

The canary isn’t looking so well. Europe and anti semitism

Jews are the canary in the coal mine. Historically when a Jewish population is under siege, you can expect the same for other strata of the population to follow.

Europe’s new antisemitism fueled mostly by Islamic immigrants but gleefully supported by Europe’s leftists (as usual) is at such high gear that a film was made of it recently, The Monster among Us.

A few years ago, Israel sent a couple of jumbo jets to evacuate Jewish citizens from France.

Now we see Holland’s police force refusing to take complaints from a Jewish man who was beaten by two Muslim Moroccans claiming everyone on the force was dealing with an armed robbery. Holland, recently a land famous for its libertarian tolerance seems to have forgotten its own slightly less recent past.

For the full story on this please see the excellent blog, Klein Verzet

While I realize that this may be an isolated incident and perhaps it will do more harm than good to focus on it, I must ask this all important question. Perhaps its the one that most seriously shapes history.

“When does a series of ‘isolated events’ become recognized as policy?”

Eeyore for Vlad

Geert Wilders on CBN. He explains the facts very well

This piece on geert is quite interesting. The Dutch Government on the one hand now has to admit the threat from Islamic terrorists is real and serious. This is a massive step forwards for Holland in terms of any mid to long term survival as a Dutch nation. What is disturbing is how they blame that threat on Geert for his warnings to the Dutch of that same threat.

Im sure that there where Jews who blamed other jews for the Nazis for failing to clean the streets hard enough with toothbrushes and other indignities. But the facts remain. The Nazis where the threat not the Jews and the Muslims are the threat to Holland not the Dutch.

Geert also makes the clear distinction between culture and race. A distinction which the post modern mentality of moral and cultural relativism seeks to destroy. This distinction dear reader, is everything.

A collection of worthy links. Oct 9 2008

In this article, an attempt is made to determine why so many Dutch people are permanently leaving Holland. I believe the correct questions where not asked. As the emmigration from the Netherlands is economically counter intuitive, the wealthy and educated are leaving, it’s a safe guess that Hollands ‘multi cultural’ policies are probably more to blame. Multi cultural of course means giving rights to some by taking them away from others. In this case the indigenous Dutch.

At least one US publisher has the stones to publish that book on Mohamed and Aisha his 6 year old wife ‘consummated’ when she was 9. No idea if the book is any good, chances are poor for that. But the fact that publishers have turned it down out of fear is unacceptable. The fear was real though as a British publisher who took on the book did have his home office firebombed.

More on the civil war in Denmark, Hells Angels Vs. immigrant gangs

Muslims grab and beat women in Sudan for wearing pants. Some grabbed from Church. Just in case any of you thought Islamic brutality and ethnic cleansing of non muslims in ‘dar al Islam’ are isolated incidents, this sort of thing is common as dirt.

Special thanks as always to The Religion of Peace and Gates of Vienna. Tireless workers against a cowed and directed media to let people know what is actually going on and who is doing it and why.

Speech by Geert Wilders. This is tomorrow’s newspaper today.

Geert tells it as it is in Europe and will be tomorrow in North America. I would call this urgent reading. For Geert’s movie Fitna you can see the original here

Europe’s Last Stand

By Geert Wilders
FrontPageMagazine.com | Wednesday, October 08, 2008

Below is a speech by Geert Wilders, chairman of “Party for Freedom” in the Netherlands. The speech was sponsored by the Hudson Institute, delivered at the Four Seasons, New York, on September 25 2008 and announced the upcoming “Facing Jihad Conference” in Jerusalem. –The Editors

Dear friends,

Thank you very much for inviting me. Great to be at the Four Seasons. I come from a country that has one season only: a rainy season that starts January 1st and ends December 31st. When we have three sunny days in a row, the government declares a national emergency. So Four Seasons, that’s new to me.

It’s great to be in New York. When I see the skyscrapers and office buildings, I think of what Ayn Rand said: “The sky over New York and the will of man made visible.” Of course, without the Dutch you would have been nowhere, still figuring out how to buy this island from the Indians. But we are glad we did it for you. And, frankly, you did a far better job than we possibly could have done.

I come to America with a mission. All is not well in the Old World. There is a tremendous danger looming, and it is very difficult to be optimistic. We might be in the final stages of the Islamization of Europe. This is not only a clear and present danger to the future of Europe itself; it is a threat to America and the sheer survival of the West. The danger I see looming is the scenario of America as the last man standing. The United States as the last bastion of Western civilization, facing an Islamic Europe. In a generation or two, the US will ask itself: who lost Europe? Patriots from around Europe risk their lives every day to prevent precisely this scenario form becoming a reality.

My short lecture consists of 4 parts: first, I will describe the situation on the ground in Europe. Then, I will say a few things about Islam. Thirdly, if you are still here, I will talk a little bit about the movie you just saw. To close I will tell you about a meeting in Jerusalem.

The Europe you know is changing. You have probably seen the landmarks: the Eiffel Tower, Trafalgar Square, Rome’s ancient buildings and maybe the canals of Amsterdam. They are still there. And they still look very much the same as they did a hundred years ago.

But in all of these cities, sometimes a few blocks away from your tourist destination, there is another world, a world very few visitors see – and one that does not appear in your tourist guidebook. It is the world of the parallel society created by Muslim mass-migration.

All throughout Europe a new reality is rising: entire Muslim neighbourhoods where very few indigenous people reside or are even seen. And if they are, they might regret it. This goes for the police as well. It’s the world of head scarves, where women walk around in figureless tents, with baby strollers and a group of children. Their husbands, or slaveholders if you prefer, walk three steps ahead. Mosques stand on many street corners. The shops have signs you and I cannot read. You will be hard-pressed to find any economic activity. These are Muslim ghettos controlled by religious fanatics. These are Muslim neighbourhoods, and they are mushrooming in every city across Europe. These are the building-blocks for territorial control of increasingly larger portions of Europe, street by street, neighbourhood by neighbourhood, city by city.

There are now thousands of mosques throughout Europe. With larger congregations than there are in churches. And in every European city there are plans to build super-mosques that will dwarf every church in the region. Clearly, the signal is: we rule.

Many European cities are already one-quarter Muslim: just take Amsterdam, Marseille and Malmo in Sweden. In many cities the majority of the under-18 population is Muslim. Paris is now surrounded by a ring of Muslim neighbourhoods. Mohammed is the most popular name among boys in many cities. In some elementary schools in Amsterdam the farm can no longer be mentioned, because that would also mean mentioning the pig, and that would be an insult to Muslims. Many state schools in Belgium and Denmark only serve halal food to all pupils. In once-tolerant Amsterdam gays are beaten up almost exclusively by Muslims. Non-Muslim women routinely hear “whore, whore.” Satellite dishes are not pointed to local TV stations, but to stations in the country of origin. In France, school teachers are advised to avoid authors deemed offensive to Muslims, including Voltaire and Diderot; the same is increasingly true of Darwin. The history of the Holocaust can, in many cases, no longer be taught because of Muslim sensitivity. In England, Sharia courts are now officially part of the British legal system. Many neighbourhoods in France are no-go areas for women without head scarves. Last week, a man almost died after being beaten up by Muslims in Brussels, because he was drinking during the Ramadan. Jews are fleeing France in record numbers, on the run for the worst wave of anti-Semitism since World War II. French is now commonly spoken on the streets of Tel Aviv and Netanya, Israel. I could go on forever with stories like this. Stories about Islamization.

A total of fifty-four million Muslims now live in Europe. San Diego University recently calculated that a staggering 25 percent of the population in Europe will be Muslim just 12 years from now. Bernhard Lewis has predicted a Muslim majority by the end of this century.

Now these are just numbers. And the numbers would not be threatening if the Muslim-immigrants had a strong desire to assimilate. But there are few signs of that. The Pew Research Center reported that half of French Muslims see their loyalty to Islam as greater than their loyalty to France. One-third of French Muslims do not object to suicide attacks. The British Centre for Social Cohesion reported that one-third of British Muslim students are in favour of a worldwide caliphate. A Dutch study reported that half of Dutch Muslims admit they “understand” the 9/11 attacks.

Muslims demand what they call “respect.” And this is how we give them respect. Our elites are willing to give in – to give up. In my own country we have gone from calls by one cabinet member to turn Muslim holidays into official state holidays, to statements by another cabinet member, that Islam is part of Dutch culture, to an affirmation by the Christian-Democratic attorney general that he is willing to accept Sharia in the Netherlands if there is a Muslim majority. We have cabinet members with passports from Morocco and Turkey.

Muslim demands are supported by unlawful behaviour, ranging from petty crimes and random violence – for example, against ambulance workers and bus drivers, to small-scale riots. Paris has seen its uprising in the low-income suburbs, the banlieus. Some prefer to see these as isolated incidents, but I call it a Muslim Intifada. I call the perpetrators “settlers,” because that is what they are. They do not come to integrate into our societies; they come to integrate our society into their Dar-al-Islam. Therefore, they are settlers.

Much of this street violence I mention is directed exclusively against non-Muslims, forcing many native people to leave their neighborhoods, their cities, their countries.

Politicians shy away from taking a stand against this creeping Sharia. They believe in the equality of all cultures. Moreover, on a mundane level, Muslims are now a swing vote not to be ignored.

Our many problems with Islam cannot be explained by poverty, repression or the European colonial past, as the Left claims. Nor does it have anything to do with Palestinians or American troops in Iraq. The problem is Islam itself.

Allow me to give you a brief Islam 101. The first thing you need to know about Islam is the importance of the book of the Quran. The Quran is Allah’s personal word, revealed by an angel to Mohammed, the prophet. This is where the trouble starts. Every word in the Quran is Allah’s word and therefore not open to discussion or interpretation. It is valid for every Muslim and for all times. Therefore, there is no such a thing as moderate Islam. Sure, there are a lot of moderate Muslims. But a moderate Islam is non-existent.

The Quran calls for hatred, violence, submission, murder, and terrorism. The Quran calls for Muslims to kill non-Muslims, to terrorize non-Muslims and to fulfil their duty to wage war: violent jihad. Jihad is a duty for every Muslim; Islam is to rule the world – by the sword. The Quran is clearly anti-Semitic, describing Jews as monkeys and pigs.

The second thing you need to know is the importance of Mohammed, the prophet. His behaviour is an example to all Muslims and cannot be criticized. Now, if Mohammed had been a man of peace, let us say like Ghandi and Mother Theresa wrapped in one, there would be no problem. But Mohammed was a warlord, a mass murderer, a paedophile, and had several marriages – at the same time. Islamic tradition tells us how he fought in battles, how he had his enemies murdered and even had prisoners of war executed. Mohammed himself slaughtered the Jewish tribe of Banu Qurayza. He advised on matters of slavery, but never advised to liberate slaves. Islam has no other morality than the advancement of Islam. If it is good for Islam, it is good. If it is bad for Islam, it is bad. There is no gray area or other side.

Quran as Allah’s own word and Mohammed as the perfect man are the two most important facets of Islam. Let no one fool you about Islam being a religion. Sure, it has a god, and a here-after, and 72 virgins. But in its essence, Islam is a political ideology. It is a system that lays down detailed rules for society and the life of every person. Islam wants to dictate every aspect of life. Islam means “submission.” Islam is not compatible with freedom and democracy, because what it strives for is Sharia. If you want to compare Islam to anything, compare it to Communism or national-socialism, these are all totalitarian ideologies.

This is what you need to know about Islam, in order to understand what is going on in Europe. For millions of Muslims, the Quran and the live of Mohammed are not 14 centuries old, but are an everyday reality, an ideal, that guides every aspect of their lives. Now you know why Winston Churchill called Islam “the most retrograde force in the world,” and why he compared Mein Kampf to the Quran.

Which brings me to my movie, “Fitna.” I am a lawmaker, and not a movie maker. But I felt I had the moral duty to educate about Islam. The duty to make clear that the Quran stands at the heart of what some people call terrorism, but is in reality jihad. I wanted to show that the problems of Islam are at the core of Islam, and do not belong to its fringes.

Now, from the day the plan for my movie was made public, it caused quite a stir, in the Netherlands and throughout Europe. First, there was a political storm, with government leaders across the continent in sheer panic. The Netherlands was put under a heightened terror alert, because of possible attacks or a revolt by our Muslim population. The Dutch branch of the Islamic organisation Hizb ut-Tahrir declared that the Netherlands was due for an attack.

Internationally, there was a series of incidents. The Taliban threatened to organize additional attacks against Dutch troops in Afghanistan, and a website linked to Al Qaeda published the message that I ought to be killed, while various muftis in the Middle East stated that I would be responsible for all the bloodshed after the screening of the movie. In Afghanistan and Pakistan, the Dutch flag was burned on several occasions. Dolls representing me were also burned. The Indonesian President announced that I will never be admitted into Indonesia again, while the UN Secretary General and the European Union issued cowardly statements in the same vein as those made by the Dutch Government. I could go on and on. It was an absolute disgrace, a sell-out.

A plethora of legal troubles also followed, and have not ended yet. Currently the state of Jordan is litigating against me. Only last week there were renewed security agency reports about a heightened terror alert for the Netherlands because of “Fitna.”

Now, I would like to say a few things about Israel, because, very soon, we will get together in its capital. The best way for a politician in Europe to lose votes is to say something positive about Israel. The public has wholeheartedly accepted the Palestinian narrative, and sees Israel as the aggressor. I, however, will continue to speak up for Israel. I see defending Israel as a matter of principle. I have lived in this country and visited it dozens of times. I support Israel. First, because it is the Jewish homeland after two thousand years of exile up to and including Auschwitz, second because it is a democracy, and third because Israel is our first line of defense.

Samuel Huntington writes it so aptly: “Islam has bloody borders.” Israel is located precisely on that border. This tiny country is situated on the fault line of jihad, frustrating Islam’s territorial advance. Israel is facing the front lines of jihad, like Kashmir, Kosovo, the Philippines, Southern Thailand, Darfur in Sudan, Lebanon, and Aceh in Indonesia. Israel is simply in the way. The same way West-Berlin was during the Cold War.

The war against Israel is not a war against Israel. It is a war against the West. It is jihad. Israel is simply receiving the blows that are meant for all of us. If there would have been no Israel, Islamic imperialism would have found other venues to release its energy and its desire for conquest. Thanks to Israeli parents who send their children to the army and lay awake at night, parents in Europe and America can sleep well and dream, unaware of the dangers looming.

Many in Europe argue in favor of abandoning Israel in order to address the grievances of our Muslim minorities. But if Israel were, God forbid, to go down, it would not bring any solace to the West. It would not mean our Muslim minorities would all of a sudden change their behaviour, and accept our values. On the contrary, the end of Israel would give enormous encouragement to the forces of Islam. They would, and rightly so, see the demise of Israel as proof that the West is weak, and doomed. The end of Israel would not mean the end of our problems with Islam, but only the beginning. It would mean the start of the final battle for world domination. If they can get Israel, they can get everything. Therefore, it is not that the West has a stake in Israel. It is Israel.

It is very difficult to be an optimist in the face of the growing Islamization of Europe. All the tides are against us. On all fronts we are losing. Demographically the momentum is with Islam. Muslim immigration is even a source of pride within ruling liberal parties. Academia, the arts, the media, trade unions, the churches, the business world, the entire political establishment have all converted to the suicidal theory of multiculturalism. So-called journalists volunteer to label any and all critics of Islamization as “right-wing extremists” or “racists.” The entire establishment has sided with our enemy. Leftists, liberals and Christian-Democrats are now all in bed with Islam.

This is the most painful thing to see: the betrayal by our elites. At this moment in Europe’s history, our elites are supposed to lead us, to stand up for centuries of civilization – to defend our heritage. To honour our eternal Judeo-Christian values that made Europe what it is today. But there are very few signs of hope to be seen at the governmental level. Sarkozy, Merkel, Brown, Berlusconi; in private, they probably know how grave the situation is. But when the little red light goes on, they stare into the camera and tell us that Islam is a religion of peace, and we should all try to get along nicely and sing Kumbaya. They willingly participate in, what President Reagan so aptly called: “the betrayal of our past, the squandering of our freedom.”

If there is hope in Europe, it comes from the people, not from the elites. Change can only come from a grass-roots level. It has to come from the citizens themselves. Yet these patriots will have to take on the entire political, legal and media establishment.

Over the past years there have been some small, but encouraging, signs of a rebirth of the original European spirit. Maybe the elites turn their backs on freedom, the public does not. In my country, the Netherlands, 60 percent of the population now sees the mass immigration of Muslims as the number one policy mistake since World War II. And another 60 percent sees Islam as the biggest threat to our national identity. I don’t think the public opinion in Holland is very different from other European countries.

Patriotic parties that oppose jihad are growing, against all odds. My own party debuted two years ago, with five percent of the vote. Now it stands at ten percent in the polls. The same is true of all similarly-minded parties in Europe. They are gaining a foothold in the political arena, one voter at a time.

Now, for the first time, these patriotic parties will come together and exchange experiences. It may be the start of something big, something that might change the map of Europe for decades to come. It might also be Europe’s last chance.

This December a conference will take place in Jerusalem. Thanks to Professor Aryeh Eldad, a member of Knesset, we will be able to watch “Fitna” in the Knesset building and discuss the jihad. We are organizing this event in Israel to emphasize the fact that we are all in the same boat together, and that Israel is part of our common heritage. Those attending will be a select audience. No racist organizations will be allowed. And we will only admit parties that are solidly democratic.

This conference will be the start of an Alliance of European patriots. This Alliance will serve as the backbone for all organizations and political parties that oppose jihad and Islamization. For this Alliance I seek your support.

This endeavor may be crucial to America and to the West. America may hold fast to the dream that, thanks to its location, it is safe from jihad and Sharia. But seven years ago to the day, there was still smoke rising from ground zero, following the attacks that forever shattered that dream. Yet there is a danger even greater than terrorist attacks, the scenario of America as the last man standing. The lights may go out in Europe faster than you can imagine. An Islamic Europe means a Europe without freedom and democracy, an economic wasteland, an intellectual nightmare, and a loss of military might for America – as its allies will turn into enemies, enemies with atomic bombs. With an Islamic Europe, it would be up to America alone to preserve the heritage of Rome, Athens and Jerusalem.

Dear friends, liberty is the most precious of gifts. My generation never had to fight for this freedom; it was offered to us on a silver platter by people who fought for it with their lives. All throughout Europe American cemeteries remind us of the young boys who never made it home, and whose memory we cherish. My generation does not own this freedom; we are merely its custodians. We can only hand over this hard won liberty to Europe’s children in the same state in which it was offered to us. We cannot strike a deal with mullahs and imams. Future generations would never forgive us. We cannot squander our liberties. We simply do not have the right to do so.

This is not the first time our civilization is under threat. We have seen dangers before. We have been betrayed by our elites before. They have sided with our enemies before. And yet, then, freedom prevailed.

These are not times in which to take lessons from appeasement, capitulation, giving away, giving up or giving in. These are not times in which to draw lessons from Mr. Chamberlain. These are times calling us to draw lessons from Mr. Churchill and the words he spoke in 1942:

“Never give in, never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small, large or petty, never give in except to convictions of honour and good sense. Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy.”

To watch “Fitna,” click here.

Fjordman on Holland

If you read nothing else today do read this. Lifted from The Gates Of Vienna

Eeyore for Vlad
The noted blogger Fjordman is filing this report via Gates of Vienna.
For a complete Fjordman blogography, see The Fjordman Files. There is also a multi-index listing here.


Map of the NetherlandsLet us consider the case of the Netherlands. Islamic practices there gain more and more public acceptance. There is talk of making Islamic holidays public holidays because Holland is a “Judeo-Christian-Islamic” society, whatever that is. There are plans for a Muslim-only hospital, and former Justice Minister Piet Hein Donner stated that the Dutch should give Muslims more freedoms to behave according to their traditions: “For me it is clear: if two-thirds of the Dutch population should want to introduce the Sharia tomorrow, then the possibility should exist,” according to him. “It would be a disgrace to say: ‘That is not allowed!’“

The idea is by no means far-fetched. Unofficial sharia courts have been operating for years in major European cities and gradually gain official acceptance. In September 2008 it was made known that British authorities will formally accept rulings of sharia courts on certain matters. This means that Britain has not just culturally but also legally surrendered to its new Muslim masters. The political elites will put up no resistance whatsoever to continued Islamization.

Britain is one of the worst countries in the Western world, which says a lot given how bad many others are, but it belongs to a growing group of nations where the authorities have more or less surrendered to Islamic rule, openly promote Islamic “culture”, and harass those who resist. One could add Sweden, the Netherlands, Belgium, and probably France to the list, which keeps growing. Norway, Spain, Austria, Germany and others are not far behind.

The Netherlands, which for centuries was a haven for those seeking more freedom of thought, is becoming an increasingly totalitarian society as a direct result of mass immigration in general and Muslim immigration in particular. This is the reason why the insightful Hans Janssen, Professor of Modern Islamic Ideology at Utrecht University, stated that a peaceful society that wishes to remain existent “will have to find a way to defend itself through non-peaceful means from people who are not peaceful.” According to Jansen, Muslim fundamentalists frequently make threats, but Dutch media remain silent about them.

Continue Reading →

Leftists and Islam team up to make Holland a totalitarian state

Recently in a televised session of the Dutch parliament the plug was pulled on state TV to prevent Geert wilders, leader of the peoples freedom party in the Netherlands from giving his say about the years government policies.

The fact that leftist bureaucrats use their positions at government orgs. like TV stations to create real power for themselves and therby take it away from elected representatives and therefore the people is a much more serious thing than this may appear on the surface. One has to wonder how often this happens here in Canada. I suspect its so much the norm at the CBC that the plug doesnt have to get pulled. A thing the left doesn’t like never makes it to air or is so badly mangled as to make any opposing voice seem fanatical or insane.

Perhaps some Dutch speaking reader of this blog would be kind enough to translate as much of this speech as did make TV for us so we know what at least prompted Dutch State TV to cause a mysterious technical problem that was solved the second Geert Wilders was finished speaking?

Here is the text from Dutch blog, Klein Verzet (little resistance) out of Holland

Continue Reading →

Ayaan Hirsi Alli on Canadian TV show with Avi Lewis

I thought I had put this video up when it was more current and apparently I did not. I do feel it needs to be seen though for two reasons. The first of which, is Ayaan’s amazing story about oppression of women in Islam and the second of which is a clear demonstration of how absolutely hypocritical the Canadian leftist media is when of of their darlings, womens and gay rights, runs right over a more sacred leftist tar baby, hatred of the US and anything conservative or traditionally liberal and individualist. Avi Lewis attempts to destroy Ayaan Alli who knows more about Islam and women than he can ever know by attacking her for defending the USA. I fyou have not seen this video, its a must see to get a sense of where Canada is at.
Its also worth knowing that Avi Lewis, the host of this show who is so rabidly anti western he left and went to work for Al Jazeera last I checked.
Continue Reading →