1. The mosque in Regina Sask. will now start to play the call to Prayer. No idea from this news report how often or how loud. But we know for a fact this is an incremental jihad. It will end with 5X a day and as loud as they can.
2. The New Canadian Dream is to leave Canada. But fewer and fewer will be able to afford it as the new Iron Curtain is constructed. This curtain will be digital in several ways. CBDCs will ensure that your lifetime of accumulated wealth will not operate past whatever border they set for it. If you are a failure as a Comrade, then maybe just past your home to the nearest state approved grocer. Certainly not outside the borders to anywhere more free. Wherever that may happen to be. Speculating of course, But we saw the right of exit, the most fundamental and ultimate proof of a free society vanish in Canada and elsewhere during Covid. Covid was the great trial balloon of communism. Was Covid an excuse created to allow the fundamentals of totalitarianism to be implemented in Western countries without too much pushback? This question explains pretty much everything. The illegal use of state power in Canada during the Freedom Convoy from the Emergency Measures to the hacking of Give Send Go and use of that information to seize bank accounts and set ANTIFA, the proxy army for the communist governments against those who contributed to it, to the “Vaccine Passports” for which we now know the state KNEW was a dangerous and ineffective substance. Fauci’s behaviour start to finish as well. As a partial aside, in RFK Jr’s book, The Real Anthony Fauci, he presents solid evidence that Fauci was working from a Marxist playbook. <— That’s the link to the post we did back in January of 2022.
So the what which Canada will deploy and the why is pretty clear. What is still foggy is the how.
Watching the video above, it’s extremely important to consider the who, that is leaving rather than the mere raw numbers. Canada’s balance of creators of wealth vs. consumers is so out of balance that one has to calculate the equation based on that. It is a safe guess that all who are leaving are in fact, producers of wealth. Those that stay are more likely part of the Coward Piven mass replacement migration we see across Canada. For that matter, across the West overall. They come to Canada, get more money per month than the average blue collar worker and do not produce anything of value.(The government of Canada lies about this by falsely conflating mere population with GDP and growth as if the raw number of people translates into state power. Pakistan and many African countries are solid evidence they do not.) So each person who leaves that is a contributor to the nation, most would say tax payers but that equation probably doesn’t mean anything anymore, but people who produce actual wealth or value represents AT LEAST an equal number of people who do not. Probably a lot more. So one function adult with skills and a producer who leaves has to be balanced against unskilled immigrants who live off of state funds, young children, older Canadians who can’t or don’t want to work anymore, the unemployed, the insane, and those legacy Canadians on state benefits such as welfare, UIC and disability. So it is at bare minimum a 1:1 ratio. This means that the people leaving has a much bigger impact on the remainder than the raw numbers would imply.
During the reign of PM Jean Chretien, a reporter once asked him about the Brain Drain that his policies caused. His reply was “Dey can be replaced by Haitian Cab Dri-vers la.!” Mark Steyn in a National Post article responded to him with, “No they cannot”. I’ll leave it up to the reader to decide who was right.
3. Yesterday Andrew Bostom brought to my attention a scene in a 1981 movie, Reds. In it, there are two scenes that follow each other closely, where communist go to the Middle East and start preaching the gospel according to Marx and Lenin and are met with massive crowds chanting “Jihad! Jihad! Jihad!” In the second of those, when the American communist asked his interpreter why they were doing that, he replied, “They are agreeing with you that it is time to wage Holy War against the infidels of the West for Islam” or something nearly exactly like that. It’s a movie of course, but it is supposed to be a movie based on real events and certainly of real people. The film itself is interspersed with witnesses to these events and people who knew the main players. It is though, a pretty essential bit of historical inevitability. The communists have consistently provided the vehicle within which, Muslims manage to destroy entire countries and kill millions of people under Sharia based rule sets, as opposed to the Millions of people communism kills under dialectical rule sets. I guess the only ointment in the jar of flies is that the Islamic rules are more consistent, less arbitrary and more predictable than the Communist ones where people are made examples of without any kind of rational reason for their arrest or imprisonment while Muslims have to accuse them of something anti-Islamic then punish or kill them as examples without any kind of proofs. Wait, did I say there was a difference? I guess in the words used. Canada, Germany, France, Ireland will learn the lesson of Iran.
Copyright © Paramount Pictures.
This short excerpt is used under the fair use doctrine (U.S.) and fair dealing provisions (Canada) solely for non-commercial educational purposes of criticism and historical commentary.
4. I did not cherry-pick this item as an illustration of what is said in item 3. It is that what I said in item 3 is becoming self evident to the point where it takes a certain amount of effort not to see it.
Following this chain of thought, another famous movie clip comes to mind.
in the important movie, Cabaret, there is a scene where the Hitler Youth stand up and start singing “Tomorrow belongs to Me. Then the Nazi skeptic asks a supporter, “Do you still think you can control them?”
I think that is a question the Canadian communist leaders may be starting to ask themselves.
5. Men who identify as women are now counted as women when dealing with crime stats. This is of course to help obliterate reality and allow the state to describe it as they need to at any given moment for any given reason, all of which is to destroy the rights and existence of the individual and make a God like state. Now of course, this counts as a “Canadian” truck driver.
Thank you all for checking out this site.
For those interested in the testimony at the Aug. 4 Planing commission on the construction of a mosque, please check Amy Mek @AmyMek X feed. I will try and post some of them here over time, but you can get a large dose of goodness at that feed on X.
Today, I encountered an issue at the local CVS pharmacy having to do with translation and interpreting. The man in front of me was evidently picking up a prescription for a controlled substance for the first time: he had to show his drivers license and sign something and be counseled by the pharmacist. She brought over a staff member to repeat the instructions in Spanish, which were, “This medicine can make you drowsy; take it at night and before bedtime.”
The tech then told the man in Spanish that the medicine could make him tired and that he should take it at night.
I was upset enough to say to the pharmacist that the lack of proper translation meant that the customer might drive after taking the medicine at night. The pharmacist’s only response was that the tech speaks Spanish.
Clearly, there was no way to check.for understanding. It is the pharmacist’s job (probably in every US state), not a tech’s job, to explain Rx details for a newly-obtained controlled substance to a patient. I would rather pay more and hear a professional service give directions than see a man who might drive after taking a painkiller etc. for the first time.
I would appreciate any comments here that can delve into why this upset me so: no accountability, a breach of medical standard of care to have someone untrained in medical translation; my compulsion to step in to alleviate what I perceived as a situation that threatens public and personal safety; the apparent apathy of the pharmacist; my own medical training and compulsive need to adhere to it; the lack of written directions in Spanish that the tech or pharmacist could have read aloud; the spate of crashes, as reported here, when vehicles are driven by non-English speakers, …?