Category Archives: Stupid commie tricks

Sweden seems to use a different definition of anti-racism than, well everyone else.

Posted on by

H/t Robin S

From Friatider.se

Lena Adelsohn Liljeroth, seen right, is the Minister of Culture in Sweden.

Foto: FacebookLena Adelsohn Liljeroth, seen right, is the Minister of Culture in Sweden.

Shocking photos shows Swedish Minister of Culture celebrating with ”nig*er cake”

Publicerat den 17 april 2012 kl 07:16

STOCKHOLM (FRIA TIDER). A macabre scene took place this Saturday when the Swedish minister of culture Lena Adelsohn Liljeroth attended a tax funded party for the most powerful cultural representatives in Stockholm. The self proclamed “anti-racist” Liljeroth, who is currently in the process of banning tax support for the only nationalist newspaper in Sweden, inaugurated the festival by cutting a cake that was supposed to depict a stereotyped African woman.


Click to continue:

Frankly the issue of real concern should be how the government has decided what newspapers to subsidize or not subsidize based on their opinions. This is what the story should be about, not the shape of a cake.

If you are with the Swedish government’s policy of utter and total self destruction through ‘multiculturalism’, then you get government grants and if not, then you are ‘far right’ and you do not. This on it’s own is not the worst of it. It is likely that Sweden will adjust various rules so that no newspaper that is not friendly with the government and official government media can exist at all. The classic ‘soft totalitarianism’ we see from Canada (The CBC and it’s influence as well as immunity to laws that govern private media) and across Europe.

Eeyore for Vlad

Today must be Irrational leftism day.

Posted on by

Bill Whittle is one of my favorite human beings.

And what do you do if you are an Irrational leftist tilting at windmills and sick of having no boogiemen to fight? Why you invent them of course!

Islam Vs. Europe:

Friday, 6 April 2012


The Innsbruck mayoral elections in Austria are certainly providing for lots of drama. I’ve already reported on the furore provoked by the FPO’s election poster “Love for the homeland instead of Moroccan thieves”. Here comes some more colourful incident.

The Socialist Youth organisation JUSOS recently reported that its association building had been vandalised and set on fire. Dozens of swastikas had been daubed on the walls. A sofa had been burned while two students were sleeping nearby. It was attempted murder! Evil Nazis were poised for a comeback, it seemed, ready to take over Austria again! The media loved this story and lapped it up.

 

Click to continue:

Surgery bans elderly patient over her carbon footprint

Posted on by

And this is why one must be eternally vigilant of totalitarian leftist posing as those with rational concerns such as health or environmentalism. This is the result.

The Guardian:

 An elderly woman was ordered to find a new GP because the “carbon footprint” of her two-mile round trips to the surgery where she had been treated for 30 years was too large.

Car pollution, car emissions, carbon footprint: Council areas fail to cut carbon footprint

Greater London had the lowest carbon emissions per person, with six tonnes each Photo: GETTY

By Daily Telegraph Reporter

11:48PM BST 03 Apr 2012

Avril Mulcahy, 83, was told to address the “green travelling issues” over her journeys from her home in Westcliff-on-Sea, Essex, to the West Road Surgery. The surgery wrote to Mrs Mulcahy, telling her to register with a new GP within 28 days.

The letter said: “Our greatest concern is for your health and convenience but also taking into consideration green travelling issues. Re: Carbon footprints and winter weather conditions, we feel it would be advisable for patients to register at surgeries nearer to where they live.

“We would be very grateful if you could make the necessary arrangements to re-register at another practice.”

Mrs Mulcahy, a grandmother, believes the decision was made because she complained about a doctor.

Click to continue:

Ezra Levant on earth hour

Posted on by

Personally I think the way to beat these anti-civilization commies is to change nothing for earth hour. Ignore it. If you actually turn stuff on for that hour you are still letting them effect you in a way which is no different than actually turning the lights out and obeying these morons and hypocrites. But I understand Ezra’s point.

Pamela Geller on the double standards of the New York Times

Posted on by

We all owe Ms. Geller a debt of thanks for exposing this brutal hypocrisy by the times along with the other events she has held showing the duplicitous nature of aspects of the US political and media class.

Lancashire chip shop forced to remove ‘gaudy’ Union Jack sign

Posted on by

Click Lancashire

by Lauren Riley. Published Fri 16 Mar 2012 09:38
Lesley and Peter Salthouse have been forced to take down their Union Jack shop sign

Lesley and Peter Salthouse have been forced to take down their Union Jack shop sign

The owners of a Lancashire fish and chip shop have been forced to take down their Union Jack sign, as it was described as “gaudy” and “too busy”.

Lesley Salthouse and her husband Peter, who have run Naze Lane Chippy in Freckleton for almost 25 years, were told the sign was not in keeping with the village.

The sign has a simple Union Jack flag in the middle, with two St George’s flags on either side.

The couple lodged a planning applicaton after a single complaint trigged the council to take action, but it was denied.

They then took their case to the planning inspectorate in Bristol, but they were again rejected.

Lesley, 53, was furious at the decision and said: “We are an English fish and chip shop, yet we cannot even use our own flag to celebrate that.

“There is nothing more traditional than a Union Jack flag and our patron saint of England is St George so why not have that flag on either side of our sign?

“If you go to Spain or Portugal you see their national flag in so many bars and restaurants.

“You see more national flags abroad than in our own country, which I think is really sad.”

Freckleton Parish Council approved the planning application, but it was Fylde Borough Council that denied it on the basis that the design was “oversized and gaudy with too many angles, triangles and colour”.

Click to continue:

Jury at Isleworth Crown Court decide that Muslims bashing up white girls is perfectly fine

Posted on by

From Casuals United:

Watch the video below. The two Muslim brothers Mohamed El Togby and Abdul El Togby, who BOTH punched little Vicky in the face, leaving her needing stitches, were cleared by a jury, of which half the people on it shared the attackers religion, and the others were old people. In the video at around 6:39, one of them walks over and while he could have punched anyone he wanted, he is seen to deliberately target Vicky, who is about 6 stone soaking wet. They claimed they were provoked, and this video was not allowed to be seen by the jury, only the official CCTV. No doubt the Muslims on the jury were of the opinion that she was only a “Kuffar bitch” anyway and shouldnt have been out in public not covered up, so deserved it, and the others on the jury took into account that fact that this sort of violence against women is an acceptable part of their culture. Every time there have been incidents involving EDL and Muslims at or near demos, they have shown time and time again that they will happily assault women. I was nearly attacked at Hyde. These people have zero respect for women, especially not white ones. Ive seen Commies laughing about this on Twitter. Nice. Just goes to show the sort of scum they are.

Watch the video and judge for yourself whether he deliberately hits a woman. Those non muslims on the jury should hang their heads in shame.

Note from Vladtepesblog:

The person who uploaded the video disabled embedding. However here is a link that should take you to 6 minutes into the video where a lot of mutual provocation occurs. None of it justifies what happens to the young woman however.

The two links in the article itself above should take you to the start of the video.

Eeyore

Christians have no right to wear cross at work, says Government

Posted on by

The Telegraph:

 Christians do not have a right to wear a cross or crucifix openly at work, the Government is to argue in a landmark court case.

Christians have no right to wear cross at work, says Government

The Government has refused to say that Christians have a right to display the symbol of their faith at work Photo: PA

By , Home Affairs Correspondent

9:00PM GMT 10 Mar 2012

In a highly significant move, ministers will fight a case at the European Court of Human Rights in which two British women will seek to establish their right to display the cross.

It is the first time that the Government has been forced to state whether it backs the right of Christians to wear the symbol at work.

A document seen by The Sunday Telegraph discloses that ministers will argue that because it is not a “requirement” of the Christian faith, employers can ban the wearing of the cross and sack workers who insist on doing so.

The Government’s position received an angry response last night from prominent figures including Lord Carey, the former Archbishop of Canterbury.

He accused ministers and the courts of “dictating” to Christians and said it was another example of Christianity becoming sidelined in official life.

The Government’s refusal to say that Christians have a right to display the symbol of their faith at work emerged after its plans to legalise same-sex marriages were attacked by the leaders of the Roman Catholic Church in Britain.

A poll commissioned by The Sunday Telegraph shows that the country is split on the issue.

Overall, 45 per cent of voters support moves to allow gay marriage, with 36 per cent against, while 19 per cent say they do not know.

However, the Prime Minister is out of step with his own party.

Exactly half of Conservative voters oppose same-sex marriage in principle and only 35 per cent back it.

There is no public appetite to change the law urgently, with more than three quarters of people polled saying it was wrong to fast-track the plan before 2015 and only 14 per cent saying it was right.

The Strasbourg case hinges on whether human rights laws protect the right to wear a cross or crucifix at work under Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

It states: “Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief, in worship, teaching, practice and observance.”

The Christian women bringing the case, Nadia Eweida and Shirley Chaplin, claim that they were discriminated against when their employers barred them from wearing the symbols.

They want the European Court to rule that this breached their human right to manifest their religion. Continue Reading →

England, totalitarianism, freedom of speech, selective enforcement and relative sentencing

Posted on by

This article is already published here on Vlad but the comments are what is really interesting. Please click down to the comments and read, and if you have not yet read the article here it is again.