Police chaplains told not to invoke name of Jesus for fear of upsetting other religions

Daily Mail:

  • Pastor Terry Sartain of Horizon Christian Fellowship said he was told not to by his superior major
  • ‘I’m very sad about it,’ he said

By Jill Reilly

PUBLISHED: 07:05 EST, 21 June 2012 | UPDATED: 07:15 EST, 21 June 2012

Changes: Pastor Terry Sartain said he was upset by the new rulesChanges: Pastor Terry Sartain said he was upset by the new rules

Volunteer chaplains in North Carolina’s Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department have been told not to use Jesus’ name in prayers at public events held on government property.

Pastor Terry Sartain of Horizon Christian Fellowship told FOX News Radio he was informed of the change by his superior major just before he was about to give a invocation at a promotion ceremony.

‘I was told chaplains can no longer invoke the name of Jesus on government property,’ Mr Sartain said.

‘[He said] if I could refrain from that during the invocation he would appreciate that.’

Mr Sartain said he was upset by the new rules.

‘I’m very sad about it,’ he continued.

‘I’m a pastor and Jesus is the only thing I have to offer to bless people — his life and his person.’

He said that he had used the name of Jesus in the past at police events and not had run into any barriers then.

 

 Click to continue:

Religious leaders furious over Norway’s proposed circumcision ban

Freethinker:

JENNY Klinge,  Norway’s Centre Party justice policy spokeswoman, has angered religious leaders by condemning the ritual circumcision of infant boys. Calling it “outdated” and “dangerous”, she called for its ban. She said:

In my view, this is a custom that we cannot accept in a modern, civilized society. Our aim is to prioritise the rights of small children. Fortunately, it has become forbidden to circumcise girls, now it’s time for boys to get the same legal protection.

Jenny Klinge says the ritual circumcision of infant boys is barbarous

She stressed that boys who have been ritually circumcised can never remove what she called “a religious marker” if they choose to convert to another religion or have no religious beliefs.

I’m not buying the argument that banning circumcision is a violation of religious freedom, because such freedom must involve being able to choose for themselves.

But she stressed that she was not opposed to circumcision in cases where it was deemed a medical necessity.

However, circumcision based on ritual and religion is actually about holding down a newborn baby boy and cutting off part of a healthy sexual organ, with all the consequences that this might have for an individual’s future health and sex life.

With this in mind, performing a circumcision on religious grounds ought to be made a criminal offence, she added.

Jan Helge Solbakk, a professor of medical ethics at Oslo University, agreed with Klinge’s criticism of the practice.

It represents an irreversible operation on a boy who is not in a position to protect himself, and as such is in breach of basic human rights.

Ervin Kohn, Chairman and Trustee of the Jewish community disagrees, saying a ban would serve as a very strong signal that the Jews are an unwanted minority in the country. He claims that 99 percent of all Jews in the world circumcise their male children.

It is the visible covenant between Abraham and God. It goes directly on religious freedom and that Norway is a tolerant society.

Kohn also points out that research has documented the health benefits of circumcision.

Click to continue:

[poll id=”16″]

U.K. SOCIAL workers want to seize a baby as soon as it is born because they are concerned about the mother’s violent links to the English Defence League.

Express.uk:

    WHY TRY TO TAKE BABY FROM EDL MOTHER BUT NOT FROM ‘TERRORISTS’?

Toni McLeod with her soldier husband Martyn Toni McLeod with her soldier husband Martyn

Sunday June 17,2012

By Ted Jeory

SOCIAL workers want to seize a baby as soon as it is born because they are concerned about the mother’s violent links to the English Defence League.

Durham County Council has told Toni McLeod she would pose a “risk of ­significant harm” to the baby. Social workers fear the child would become radicalised with EDL views and want it put up for adoption immediately.

Mrs McLeod, who is 35 weeks pregnant, is a former leading member of the EDL, in which she was notorious as “English Angel”. The 25-year-old has a string of convictions for violence, including butting and biting a police officer after an EDL march in 2010 and she has been banned from owning dogs after setting a pit bull on a former partner.

However, her cause has been taken up by Lib Dem MP John Hemming who, despite his loathing for the EDL, raised it in the Commons. He contrasts her treatment with that of the extremist Islamic cleric Abu Qatada, who was allowed to remain with his ­children when he was briefly remanded on bail earlier this year as the Government tries to deport him.

 

ì
The thought police have decided to remove her child because of what she might say
î

 

He said: “It raises a curious question as to why Abu Qatada is allowed to radicalise his children but the state won’t take the chance of allowing Toni McLeod to look after her baby in case she says something social workers won’t like.

“I am very strongly opposed to the EDL, which I believe to be a racist organisation, but I do not think we should remove all of the children of the people who go on their demonstrations, however misguided they may be.”

Mrs McLeod has posted racist abuse on social networking sites but denies being racist. She claims she is no longer active with the EDL and has never been charged with violence against children.

Social workers have told her husband Martyn he would be unable to care for his child because he is a full-time soldier just back from Afghanistan.

Click to continue:

Is it my imagination? Or is this unusual?

Someone needs to do a real study on this. In less than 24 hours after this awful triple murder, the suspect was named, his picture shown, and his car described including the licence plate number. This person is white with a classic Anglo name. It seems to me when the Toronto Eatons centre shooter, of whom there was numerous videos taken at the time, was not identified even though the police knew who he was immediately, as he was in fact already in a prison half-way house on other sexual assault charges.

Someone really should do a real study on this. It certainly appears there is a strong racial and cultural bias in the way criminals are presented by Canada’s media and police forces.

Once more, Anti-Israel people infiltrate the gay pride march in Toronto

I changed the title of this post because, as it was rightly pointed out to me, the salient point about these people, ‘Queers against Israeli Apartheid’ or something very much like that, is not that they are gay. It is that they hate the state of Israel. Clearly Israel is by light years more friendly to homosexuals than any of its Muslim neighbors. It is most likely that leftists and Islamic influence operations have arranged this group in order to take the highly fashionable gay pride march and turn it into something quite different.

Apologies to any and all who were offended. It cannot be denied that many gay organizations are far left leaning and therefore will not adjust policies to be less hostile to Israel etc. even though it is in the interest of genuine gay rights. (Ottawa’s Capital Extra newspaper for example) but this again has little to do with the gay community, or gay people as a whole, each of which I am confident, have the same agency to form their own opinions as diverse as any other segment of the population, other than those defined by beliefs.

Gay people are not a faith or political group. They are a sexual orientation. But there are certainly those who would like to hijack those voices and make it one.

Ezra Levant being censored by hidden and unaccountable overlords

I love my country. Canada is an amazing place with an amazing people in many ways, and no, not just because the entire East coast could be the Shire, and the population, Hobbits.

But that also.

However in some ways, we really are a third world toilet. Ezra Levant was the leading edge of the now-successful assault on the so-called, ‘Human Rights Commissions’ which in fact suppressed basic human rights for their own financial gain and the advancement of their personal politics. The commissions still exist, but at least Ezra caused them to have an incisor or two removed. Hopefully without anesthetic.

Now, Ezra is taking on the long-overdue battle with other hidden, patronage-appointed boards who regulate secretly what we may or may not hear on broadcast TV.

No wonder everyone is turning to the internet.

Lets hope he wins this battle, then takes the CRTC to the veterinarian, if you know what I mean, and has an organ removed from them they should never have had in the first place.

Thank you Ezra. You have, and continue to do more for freedom and individual liberty in Canada than possibly any other single person in our history.

No jail for any of those throwing eggs and disrupting Lars Vilks lecture

Translation: Michael Laudahn with many thanks

From AVPixlat:

MOSLEM VIOLENCE: None of the moslems who, screeching Allahu Akbar, threw eggs at the lecturer in february this year at a lecture held by artist Lars Vilks, will be held responsible for their crime. Despite the fact that the events are documented on film, police have managed to pick one single suspected individual only, and moreover only for having shouted and gesticulated at the artist.  

It was a lecture held at Karlstad university on 21 february which was invaded by some 15 aggressive moslems, who caused such a brouhaha that the lecture had to be called off. Eggs carried by them were thrown at Lars Vilks, who however had been through worse episodes and turned the attack against the authors by drawing one of them on one of the eggs which hadn’t broken. However, if police hadn’t intervened, there would have been a big risk that Vilks would have ended up really bad, because there actually is a death fatwa against him among moslems. 

The investigation had been limited to the delict called disturbing a general assembly, and which usually only leads to a fine. However, police don’t even see themselves able to prove this small delict in one single case. Still the investigation has been passed on to the prosecutor, in order to judge if the lawsuit should be pressed forward. This should, however, rather be seen as a formality, before the case will be archived. 



(Invoking http://www.nwt.se/karlstad/article1120455.ece )



————–



See the event at


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7VCKQ96LmVw


 

 

Obama admin, religion, and selective enforcement.

Here are two interesting stories about the Obama administration and its effect on religion:

1. The Catholic Church

Bishops prepare Catholics for civil disobedience

Bishops prepare Catholics for civil disobedience

Archbishop Timothy Dolan of New York, president of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, is heading up a campaign of civil disobedience on a scale not seen since the civil rights era to openly defy Obamacare mandates. Photo Credit:AP

The United States Catholic bishops are readying American Catholics for what may be the largest campaign of civil disobedience since the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960’s.

In addition to 12 lawsuits against the Obama Administration including 46 plaintiffs from dioceses, hospitals and universities, the US Catholic bishops will urge Catholics to openly defy the Obama HHS Mandate. …

The USCCB has organized a two-week campaign called the Fortnight for Freedom, which will extend from June 21st through July 4th to raise awareness about the threats to rights of conscience posed by the HHS mandate. On August 1st, the mandate is scheduled to go into effect.

Related:

Catholic bishops sound battle cry for religious liberty

Rep.: Contraceptives mandate is largest federal intrusion ever

FLOTUS: ‘We made history’ with free contraception

Georgetown law student bemoans high cost of contraceptives
Read the original article at LifeNews.com

2. The role of Islam:

6 New York cops claim they were demoted for being Republicans

FOX News:

LONG BEACH, N.Y. –  Six Long Island cops claim they were targeted by their commissioner for supporting Republican Party candidates in local elections last year.

Long Beach Police Commissioner Michael Tangney, a longtime Democrat, demoted the cops, cut their overtime, switched them to midnight shifts and even filed false internal charges against them for “political payback,” the veteran officers claim in a $39 million lawsuit.

Click to continue:

Black murderer-canibal from Kenya, grows white hands and arms!

This must be the 30th odd case of Michael Jackson syndrome on MSM in the US in the last little while.

The story is about a Kenyan immigrant pictured here although with oddly pale appendages compared to the head and face.

Kenyan canibal

Kenyan Canibal

From CBS:

 

Liberty Lost:

Written by: Diana West

Thursday, May 31, 2012 5:18 PM 

This week’s syndicated column:

Back in 2001, Britain’s political parties signed a fantastic pledge. They agreed to say nothing to “stir up racial or religious hatred, or lead to prejudice on grounds of race, nationality or religion.”

This gag order did more than keep the parties polite. Vital issues – from massive immigration and multiculturalism to their eradicating effects on British civilization – were officially banned. Thus, such concerns became impermissible thoughts. Not that such issues weren’t already thoughtcrime, as George Orwell would have put it. But this unprecedented pledge turned “violators” into political lepers.

I thought of that elite code of cowardice this week when a London judge sentenced a 42-year-old British secretary named Jacqueline Woodhouse to 21 weeks in jail. Her crime? An expletive-laden rant about immigration, multiculturalism and the disappearance of British civilization. Not in so many words. But that was the unmistakable gist of Woodhouse’s commentary one January night on the London Underground.

This same week, another London judge ordered two black girls, 18 and 19, to perform community service after a savage physical attack on two white legal secretaries. “I am satisfied what you both did, you did that night because you were fueled by alcohol,” Judge Stephen Kramer said, as though tut-tutting a child’s unknowing apple theft.

Click to continue:

Were they really 91 Palestinian ‘militants’ – or 91 dead terrorists?

by J-Practical, May 30, 2012

#2 Egged bus Israel

A recent CBC.ca report “Israel returns remains of 91 Palestinian militants” is a

fascinating study of bizarre journalistic behaviours and standards.

In fact, this short and sweet little tidbit is more interesting in what it fails to report than what it actually reports. The story was originally written by the Associated Press, but was heavily edited by the CBC before being posted on the CBC.ca site.

Who were these 91 people?

Today’s journalists call people who commit terrorist actions ‘militants’. It’s supposed to be ‘fair’ journalistic practice. In this case, it’s also a nice vague term for these people who indiscriminately murdered civilians for political purposes.

Initially, neither AP nor CBC.ca bothered to tell us what these 91 people did that caused their death, beyond a single sentence (“All 91 were killed over the past decades while carrying out suicide bombings or other attacks on Israeli targets”). That sentence came from ‘Palestinian officials’. It makes it sound like the ‘militants’ died attacking Israel Defense Force military positions. The CBC later updated the story to provide some details, but still held back reporting that these 91 ‘militants’ include suicide bombers who carried out the 2003 attacks on the No. 2 bus and at Cafe Hillel in Jerusalem, the 1996 suicide bombing of a hitchhiking post in Ashkelon, two buses in Beersheba in 2004, and the Savoy Hotel attack in Tel Aviv in 1975. In other words, they killed indiscriminately, focusing on civilian ‘soft targets’.

Thousands of Israelis died, or were maimed by the barbaric attacks, carried out by these Palestinian ‘militants’. These 91 ‘militants’ performed violence against Israeli civilians, that is as barbaric and shocking as the violence reported yesterday in Houla Syria.

Where are the Victims in this Report?

The CBC and AP dropped any pretense of fairness and balance in reporting this story. The Palestinian side is over-reported, and the Israeli side under-reported. The human interest side of the story ends with the Palestinian families. There is no human interest reporting of the Israeli side at all.

Neither AP nor CBC hints that each one of these ‘militant’ remains is associated with dead Israeli civilians whose families who also mourn them. The Palestinian families of the ‘militants’ (i.e., the families of the killers) are interviewed and presented for the readers’ empathy, but no Israeli victim families were interviewed.

Similarly, neither report even mentioned that there exists an Israeli organization called the Almagor Terror Victims Association, which expressed strong reservations about returning the remains (among which was that the concern that the PA would use this as an opportunity to glorify the terrorists and terrorism). This additional information was available from many credible Israeli news sources (which the CBC has used in the past), but the CBC chose to ignore the Israeli side instead.

Imagine reading a news report about Paul Bernardo, which featured interviews with his tearful family, but nobody mentioned his victims or talked to their families. Wouldn’t that look strange? Wouldn’t it leave a bad taste in your mouth?

Pomp and Ceremony

The CBC described the Palestinian families waiting to receive the remains. In a twist of sheer weirdness, they initially reported it just like they report the return of slain Canadian soldiers from Afghanistan (right down to the description of “Palestinian government ceremonies honouring the dead militants”).

But five hours later, they posted the parts of the AP report that they’d initially withheld – the parts that explicitly described how many Israelis were killed by each interviewee’s dead ‘militant’.

Why did it take 5 hours for the CBC to post the only thing kept this Palestinian ceremony from looking like a Canadian Ramp Ceremony?

Glorifying Palestinian Terrorism – the Allowable Crime Continue Reading →

BBC cracks, finally uses the word ‘Muslim’ to describe Islamic motivated crime

Of course, it is because Muslims finally raped a non-white woman from a community willing to actually act on it. Much harder to call a large group of Sikh’s marching to the police station in horror because of a rape of one of their owns racist than it is the indigenous British. The usual tactic of the repugnant and selective BBC

I did my own treatment of this video here:

David Menzies at Sun does something I always wanted to do. Test the double standard directly.

There is one thing that bugs me about this clip however. Mr. Menzies says to the security guard that koran or Islamic law or whatever doesn’t actually require face veiling. I would answer:

“Who gives a shit”. What matters is Canadian law and nothing else. To even start considering sharia, even when you think it is on your side, is a well greased slippery slope to dhimmitude.