Category Archives: Selective enforcement
A few more data points. England, justice and islam
I posted an article yesterday with a story about a couple of people who baconated a mosque and got a year in jail for their efforts even though the only damage done was one offended janitor. And as he was a muslim, we can never know exactly how offended he really was as they just don’t make instruments that sensitive at the current state of technology. (Look for a new iPhone app and sensor coming out with the iPhone 9)
Since I wrote that article a few more data points have come in. I thought it would be a worthy public service to anyone who is considering visiting the newly minted sharia state of Anglostan to let them know what they can actually expect from the judicial system, rather than what they might fondly remember as the former basis of the British judicial system, clearly no longer in effect. It is my deep hope that the good folks at Liberty GB will actually embark on a proper study of comparative sentencing, as this is more than a matter of curiosity, it is a matter of central dogma of the state itself. But until they do, and until they publish their results, here are a few interesting cases from memory and with the help of Liberty GB’s Tim Burton.
1. Muslim girls kick the crap out of a white British girl calling her racist epithets such as “White slag” and worse, are let go scot free by a judge who determined that because in theory muslims aren’t supposed to drink, that these girls therefore must not be used to drinking, and therefore this behaviour was the consequence of drinking while muslim. Or or something very much to that effect.
2. This link is a kind of analysis of this issue as well, but details several very similar ‘crimes’ and punishments depending on the religion of the perpetrator. It is worth popping over and having a look. Below, the immediately relevant bit however:
(Part of the trick to unfairly jailing those who are against Islamic manifest destiny appears to be labeling them as racist. Adding a thought crime to the actual victimless actions seems to be enough to allow this kind of skewed sentencing it seems)
4. Lord Ahmed jailed for sending texts while driving before fatal crash
This guy actually killed someone while driving, apparently while texting someone. He was sentenced to 12 WEEKS in jail and told he would serve 6 weeks of them in custody, the rest at home. Subsequent to that he railed that it was a Jewish conspiracy that he was sentenced to any time at all. I’m not sure how much remorse he felt for the kafir he killed though. But to be entirely fair, its quite possible that in this instance it is not favoring muslims so much as its a classic example of both British and Canadian political class elitism. Say what you want about the USA but at any given time they have over 100 elected representatives in jail for committing crimes while Canada, far more corrupt than the US is, never has any politicos been put in custody at all and as far as I know never even had to give back stolen money. So it could be just that at work in Lord Ahmed’s case.
But I doubt it. Lord Ahmed served only 16 days of his sentence behind bars. His victim as far as I have been able to determine, is still dead.
5. Man fined for East End anti-gay stickers
An 18-year-old Muslim man has been fined for posting homophobic stickers around London’s East End.
Mohammed Hasnath, 18, of Leamouth, Tower Hamlets, was arrested last month at his homeand represented himself in court today. He pleaded guilty to the offence and was fined £100 plus £85 costs and a £15 victim surcharge.
To be clear, a muslim who put up posters claiming that no homosexuals are allowed in this area, and which has a pretty open subtext, no actually direct text suggesting punishment for being homosexual, and if one reads the islamic punishment for homosexuality, its in fact death. This guy got a £200.00 fine. He was making a general threat to punish people, possibly with death, for being gay, which is something which is not only legal in England but more and more looks like its mandatory.
Meanwhile, 2 people, a teenager and a man in his 30s are going to do a year in jail for offending a muslim at a mosque with a couple of strips of bacon.
If you are planning to visit Europe may I suggest Bulgaria, The Czech republic or Denmark? As far as I can tell, those nations still have remnants of the enlightenment and may allow you to enjoy basic individual liberties and get home without a criminal record.
Thank you Tim Burton of Liberty GB for the help on this as well as James from the comments and ML on the original post.
Eeyore for Vlad
Post script: Fines for egg-throwing students who screamed ‘oi, Jews’
In the dock at Willesden Magistrates Court were Mohammed Khalfia and Mohammed Jawad, both from Wembley, Haider Al-Fardan from Kingsbury and Aimen Mohamed from Colindale.
[…] the court heard from two Jewish women and a 14-year-old boy who said they had been targeted and that the accused had shouted “Oi, Jews,” and “f***ing Jews” as they hurled the eggs.
Ezra Levant: THE REAL BIGOTS
Austrian TV presenter calls Geert Wilders a “Nazi“
Was it just a slip of the tongue, or was it an intentional defamation of Geert Wilders?
On May 22nd, presenter of Austrian’s TV channel “Plus 4”, Norbert Oberhauser (picture), called Geert Wilders and other EU-sceptic politicians “National Socialists” or briefly “Nazis” on his show “Guten Abend Österreich” (Good evening Austria).
It is just unacceptable to defame the famous Dutch politician and leader of the Party for Freedom (PVV), Geert Wilders, as a National Socialist, since he is known as a great friend of Israel. If you disagree with Mr Norbert Oberhauser, you can contact Plus 4 TV:
PULS 4 TV GmbH & Co KG
Chief executive: Markus Breitenecker
(responsible for content)
Maria Jacobi Gasse 1
A-1030 Wien
phone: + 43/1/999 88 – 0
fax: + 43/1/999 88 – 8888
Source: PI-News
[Article and translation by Carpe Diem. I would like to add, that Geert Wilders falls politically into the category of classical liberal and would have been called a pinko commie’ by much of the US mainstream of the 1950s for his defense of gay rights and Jewish people. To call him a Nazi is the height of deception. Eeyore]
UPDATE on murder of 4 people at Jewish Museum in Brussels.
Don’t even bother. They have a man in custody, they have video footage of the attack. They are looking for a second suspect but as usual there is no description of the killers nor does anyone even ask who they are or what they looked like. For all we know the second killer, who soon I wager they will announce never existed as that seems to be the pattern, is on his way to kill more people somewhere else but no one can defend themselves as they have no idea who to look out for.
What exactly has happened to the world when people are no longer entitled to the basic information they need to survive and the media will not even ask? The BBC doesn’t even bother to mention that the person is thought to be of terrestrial origins for that matter. All the media acts like the information is irrelevant. This link is from 8 minutes ago and I have no idea why the BBC even bothered to issue this update when there is no actual new information in it. Just the illusion that they are informing us.
Journalism now leftist-Islamic propaganda in the UK
Check out this article from the Birmingham Mail.
The actual event is that someone drove a car at speed into a crowd of 14 men, apparently targeting them all because they belonged to the EDL but doing a lot of physical harm to one man who is the leader of the Sikh division of the English Defense League.If you read the article however, the entire thing is vilification of the EDL with barely a word about the serious crime that was committed, the attempted murder or injury of 14 people because the driver or whoever he represents does not agree with the message of the EDL.
In the article, it goes on to vilify the EDL thusly: “The EDL play on the historical animosity that exists between some sections of the Sikh and Muslim community”. The article drips with contempt for the EDL at this point.
However it utterly fails to explain why that ‘historical animosity’ exists. I suspect it has something to do with the Islamic attempts to exterminate Hindus and Sikhs from the face of the earth on numerous occasions. But I would have to look that up to be sure. Something about General Tamerlan perhaps.
The article continues: “No doubt the EDL will use this incident to portray themselves as victims.”
If having a car drive into your group as an attempt to kill or maim you does not make you a victim then the UK has moved from Orwellian to Kafkaesque. Do the authors of this leftist propaganda rag not understand that once they create this kind of targeted attack form of journalism that it can and will be pointed at them as soon as the right variable changes? Ownership, person who funds it, government etc? This kind of ‘reporting’ is an atrocity and a crime on the public no matter who it favors. Human beings, and dogs for that matter, make choices based on available information. When you deceive them, you rob them of the right of free will.
Two men have already been arrested, but not named, that allegedly drove the vehicle. Is it because UK law forbids naming a suspect until formally arraigned? Doubtful as non-Muslims are outed by the press the moment they are suspected if memory serves. Or is it because if the two are muslims it changes the equation of the slant this article shows. Either way, the people of the free world would do well to start learning the basics of determining what and what does not constitute information.
H/T EDL Buck
Jack Buckby interview part II
Interview with former Poli-sci student from University of Liverpool, Jack Buckby
This is part I of what will likely be a 3 part interview. It gets quite interesting. I hope to have the rest of it done within a day or so. Thank you Jack for taking the time with me to do this and best of luck to the Liberty Great Britain. The natural home it seems, for law abiding indigenous English people who have been grotesquely abused and selectively enforced against for believing in themselves, their own culture, their own history and a right to preserve it in the country which they built.
Muslim business owner in Quebec feels that Quebec city is “Too white and too Catholic” for his business model.
Anyone want to bet on whether or not one of the various ‘Canadian Human Rights Commissions’ will take this guy on?
It doesn’t take a lot of imagination to figure out what would happen to a white Christian who said something similar about a black muslim area.
Thanks Oz-Rita and Bear for the translation on this one.
Eric Brazau, 9 months in Jail, Ezra Levant and freedom of speech.
I watched Ezra’s video again and added subtitles to it for a few reasons, not the least of which is there is a lot of fast talking and talking over each other, as well as it created a text file that people who speak other languages may want to use should they feel this is important enough to translate and title in other languages.
The Baron over at Gates has done some research, and Steve V was kind enough to send in this video and additional material as well. The video below seems to be the thing that got Mr. Brazau in trouble.
Steve suggests that it could have been the woman at 7 minutes in who took Mr. Brazau out of context, quite possibly deliberately, in order to get him arrested. I wouldn’t doubt it only because if there is one thing Canada sells at a steep discount, its surplus sanctimony.
However, in all fairness, Mr. Brazau seems to have a fairly colorful history
This does not however, nor should it have any bearing on his trial and consequences for this event. But one cannot but help to wonder if it did anyway.
Thanks GoV, and Steve V
Ezra Levant and a law expert discuss the 9 month sentence given to Eric Brazau for speaking factually about Islam
H/T M
Compare and contrast 2 reports on same story. Newfoundland, a Saudi father’s tales
Yesterday in the first multi post of the day I posted a story at item 3 where I was not clear enough on what the issue actually was. So I am going to try and lay it out a little better here.
On March 24 (give or take 24 hours) A Canadian TV station broadcast a very specific story about how a Saudi man attempted to choke his daughter for marrying a non-muslim man in an honour crime, as they call it.
On March 26, CTV broadcast the results of a brief trial in which the father was expelled from Canada for his actions but the story was very fundamentally changed. Also the first video, which I had downloaded, had been deleted from YT leaving the usual message of:
“This video was removed by the user”
Now often YT will remove a video and leave that message as I recall, but either way, the original story had been sanitized from the net and there is pretty much no history of it that can be found on the original channel’s webpage either, although it does say something about religion.
Below is both videos, the first from NTV and the second from CTV.
Very important questions need to be asked here and answered.
I hope this is a little clearer than yesterday’s post.
North Korea. You never see demonstrations on campus about genuine fascism do you?
Germany: Unprecedented Series of Violence against Christian Symbols
Article and translation of materials in video and article by Carpe Diem.
Burned crosses, smashed statues – there have been 26 cases reported since September. The German Muensterland region faces a series of violence against Christian symbols that is without precedent in history. Having even climbed over high fences with sharp spikes, offenders acted with complete determination. National media haven’t reported about the incidents so far. Only the local television channel has made it the “topic of the day”. These attacks stand in a line with the recent Allahu akbar-graffiti at four German churches. Fortunately, police was able to get hold of the offender of the islamic graffiti, a Muslim asylum seeker from Jordan. So, unsurprisingly police in Muensterland has said that the attacks there are presumably religiously motivated. Anything more would have probably been “islamophobic”.
By way of comparison, if you remember when five pig heads were found recently on a future building site of a mosque in Leipzig? Member of Parliament Sigmar Gabriel called it an “attack on society”. Guess what he said about the 27 cases of desecration in Muensterland. You’re right – nothing.
A man in the UK speaks his mind about islam. Expect some prison time.
This story I think will be revealing of the new Kafka’esque UK than most similar stories in the past. In this video below, we do not know what his provocation was. All we know is, he had negative things to say about islam and affirmed his own Christian membership. For this, he is wanted by police, presumably for ‘racism’. What happens to him should be a klaxon to all free minded people in the UK. Is the government there your representative or your overt enemy, seeking to divide and conquer you on ideological grounds.
This bears close scrutiny.
News link to story on this here.
Police are appealing for information about a racist tirade that was unleashed on a route 104 bus between Stratford and Manor Park Station.
A man was filmed by a member of the public making a string of offensive comments about Islam.
Thank you Golem Bar for this story. Thanks to an indigenous British person, I was able to subtitle this video for clarity.
For reasons I do not understand, my editor insists on doubling the last 2 segments of this video. Once you get to the end of the first CFTCJ you can close it. I have no idea why it did it or continues to do it.