Global News fully disenfranchises all criticism of Islam

In this story about a protest at a mosque in Toronto, Global News has a misleading headline and misleading poster frame for the video.

HEADLINE: ‘Anti-Islamic’ protesters demonstrate outside Toronto mosque calling for ban on Islam

Also notice how they managed to make sure none of the signs are clear enough to read. I highly doubt the original sign is just a green rectangle with a smudge.

They make it appear that it is a story about a protest at a Toronto mosque. And the poster frame for the video shows a group of people with signs. But the article is pure, 100% condemnation of the protest and protestors and so is the video, with no footage of it, no interviews with them, and zero representation of their point of view.

Now maybe these were ugly thugs. Maybe they had a repugnant PoV. but we will never know because Global News robbed them of the chance to be seen as they are.

In the book, The Future of War, by Friedman, one of the founders of STRATFOR, the claim is made that wars happen not because people are different, but because different people are FORCED to mix.

Jordan Peterson, perhaps the most gentle and articulate man to speak on the issues of the day, predominately leftism and its full frontal assault on classical civilization, repeatedly says that when you deny people’s right to be heard, you in fact create the conditions under which violence becomes their only option.

I put it to Trudeau and Global News and all the other water carriers for the narrative that seem to have forgotten that multiculturalism also has to include our culture, and the natural right to defend it, and that diversity includes people other than muslims.

And that if violence takes place, it was a 100% predictable consequence of their policies and therefore, they bear a large degree of the responsibility for it.

 

It was Google that destroyed anonymous political dissent.

In the previous post is a video busting Facebook for its clearly Marxist ambitions as written in its manifesto. (please hear today’s Michael Savage where he discusses Zuckerberg in some detail)

However in today’s reading of Assange’s book, when Google met Wikileaks there was a disturbing revelation.

Yep. It was GOOGLE that actually came up with the totalitarian policy of all social media accounts MUST be under YOUR REAL NAME.

And this is why I was kicked off of Facebook. Because of the selective enforcement of contemporary leftist governments and supranational social media giants who have decided for the exact reasons that, at least in the US, the right to anonymous political commentary was considered essential.

From Washington’s Blog:

Anonymity is a shield from the tyranny of the majority. It thus exemplifies the purpose behind the bill of rights, and of the first amendment in particular: to protect unpopular individuals from retaliation– and their ideas from suppression– at the hand of an intolerant society.

***

Though often maligned (typically by those frustrated by an inability to engage in ad hominem attacks) anonymous speech has a long and storied history in the United States. Used by the likes of Mark Twain (aka Samuel Langhorne Clemens) [and the founding fathers in the Federalist Papers], we think ourselves in good company in using one or another nom de plume. Particularly in light of an emerging trend against vocalizing public dissent in the United States, we believe in the critical importance of anonymity and its role in dissident speech. like the Economist magazine, we also believe that keeping authorship anonymous moves the focus of discussion to the content of speech and away from the speaker- as it should be.

Selective enforcement meaning that Islamic supremacy will never be curtailed or condemned and is in fact, government subsidized and often fully funded as Trudeau spends tax dollars to build mosques across Canada.

But most certainly enforced against those who speak truthfully about Islam in a way that makes it look as it should look to all non-Muslims.

 

 

German State broadcaster, ZDF, made a video comparing Trump to Hitler 4 days after he took office

The only reason the CBC didn’t do one like this is there production values don’t come even remotely close to this. But they certainly broadcast this sentiment at every occasion.

PI News in Germany has written this article about the satire above:

ZDF looking at problems after Trump/Hitler comparison

On January 24th ZDF’s “Frontal 21” presented a typical lynch-media contribution regarding the newest bogeymen of all leftists: US president Donald Trump. But this wasn’t just one of the usual and daily hate-filled small-minded contributions that was after another hair in the soup, another wrong dance step, or another mismatched tie of the new man in the White House. No, this time the brainwash-training channel went one step further, and maybe they went one step too far. In their report “Messiah or Hitler”, which we are supposed to understand as satire, Donald Trump was put in direct comparison with Adolf Hitler.

by L.S. Gabriel

No one is laughing anymore, from the blackest of black-humored Brits to the most moronic fan of weak jokes, after an all-in-all dumb video contribution by the authors Werner Doyé and Andreas Wiemers. This irreverent piece just could not be surpassed. That’s exactly how the publisher of the Jewish Review (Jüdischer Rundschau), Dr. Rafael Korenzecher, sees it, and that’s why he not only wrote an open letter to the ZDF, but he also forwarded the report directly to the US authorities.

 Korenzecher wrote:

Open letter to Herr Kurt Beck, chairman of board of directors of the ZDF

Dear Herr Beck,

Allow us to forewarn you that we deem your contribution on ZDF’s “Frontal 21” from January 24th, 2017, about the newly elected US president Donald J. Trump as defamatory.

With suggestively trimmed video material and accompanying words the entire program about the President of our most important ally and the most important Western democracy was manipulated to produce a prima facie resemblance to Adolf Hitler.

This is not only against the law and extremely defamatory, but it also trivializes the historical assessment of the unprecedented crimes committed by this German war criminal and those responsible for the murder of six million Jews.

We are bringing this incident to your attention because we assume that you missed the broadcast of this deliberately false narration, and that therefore no action has been taken in the exercise of your political and ethical responsibility regarding to the content of broadcasts of this institution of the public broadcasting corporation.

With all due respect for the absolutely indispensable democratic bestowal of freedom of the press, we are of the conviction that the irresponsible propagation of historical falsehoods and defamatory content should not be part of the contributions of the public broadcasting corporation ZDF. We therefore await an appropriate and suitable initiation of a public rectification of this scandalous issue, and we expect a long-term guarantee that a repeat of such incidents in the future will be efficiently prevented.

As a matter of form, allow us to point out that we have forwarded the information about this outrageous behavior of the “Frontal 21” editors to the appropriate US authorities, and have therefore made it possible on their part to consider the potential for an initiation of criminal procedures against the responsible parties.

With greatest respect,

Dr. Rafael Korenzecher

Publisher, Jewish Review and Evrejskaja Panorama


My guess is they will take the CBC approach. Wait a few days till 99% of the impact of it is made, then take it down with a note from some kind of ombudsman which no one will see and fewer will understand as being meaningful.

 

Euronews, the KING of Fake news, does article about how if you don’t support the narrative, you could be punished

This website has busted Euronews several times for deliberately and knowingly falsifying news to suit the leftist EU (who funds it) agenda.

My favourite example is here below. But searching this site for Euronews will bring several more.

Far left wing EU propaganda outlet, Euronews, reports on Israel’s agreement with Trump policies

Notice how they say, “Israel’s self proclaimed capitol, Jerusalem”.

Is there a nation on Earth who’s capitol city is not self proclaimed? Do they posit that a true capitol is ordained by God? If that is the contrast I suggest they read the Old Testament in which, Jerusalem as the centre of life of the Jewish people, is mentioned something like 1200 times.

jerusalem 623 141 192  

956

 

The above table is a cell from Art of the Bible

 

“Dom Two Lips” exposes the MSM as all fake news except FOX, and who is being pardoned?

1, Second oddest interview this week!

(The only thing I wish Tucker realized earlier, is that the guy was not a real phoney but a fake phoney. Which makes all the difference in the world.)

2. Is there a pattern to who Obama is pardoning?

2a. OBAMA PARDONS CARTWRIGHT, SOURCE OF STUXNET VIRUS LEAK

US President Barack Obama pardoned 64 people and commuted sentences for an additional 209 on Wednesday, among them retired Marine Corps four star general James Cartwright, the alleged source of leaked information to the press detailing a cyber attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities in 2010.

2b. Barack Obama commutes Chelsea Manning’s 35-year prison sentence for WikiLeaks files meaning she will walk free in May

President Barack Obama has commuted a 35-year prison sentence of Chelsea Manning, the soldier who leaked thousands of secret documents to Wikileaks in 2010, setting her on track for release in May.

Wikileaks said last week that Julian Assange, site’s publisher, would agree to extradition to the US if Ms Manning were freed. It is unclear if Mr Assange, the subject of an espionage investigation, will follow through, though a member of his legal team said he stands by his statements.

Thank you Seneca the Elder, M., Wrath of Khan, and all and more European videos in the works.

This would be a great post to add comments on other people pardoned by Obama, whether it fits the anti-American and anti-Israel pattern or not. It would be interesting to see if there is a pattern. I suspect it would be fitting with his Marxist narrative. But lets see.

 

Some examples of how Marxism has been implemented in the West over democracy and rule of law

Most of us are keenly aware of how Geert Wilders, the leader of the Dutch opposition party, the PVV, and would be the hands down winner of a federal election if it were to happen now, was convicted of a hate crime for suggesting that immigration should be adjusted away From the current European policies which reflect the axioms of International Socialism, AKA communism.

He suggested to a friendly audience that if he were Prime Minister, there would be less Moroccans immigrating to the Netherlands, as they are the most criminal and antisocial group of people in the Netherlands.

This is fact that is well known to pretty much everyone in the Netherlands.

It is the actual job description of an opposition party in a democracy, to oppose government policies that are ineffective, against the national interests, and or born by corruption, and implement when possible other policies which will be in the national interest and to use science and reason, Greek thought, in order to determine which is which. So The Rt. Hon, member of the Dutch Parliament, Geert Wilders, was convicted for doing exactly what his job is, because his policy is a deterrent to the ultimate goal of the destruction of the nation-state and the transformation to a communist West. And probably world.

And now we have what happened to British Home Secretary,Amber Rudd. Not as dramatic, but every bit the same in application of principles of cultural Marxism over reason and rule of law.

And now a mayor of Weert, a Dutch city, may face criminal charges for trying to implement a curfew for illegal migrants on New Years Eve in the Netherlands.

He may face criminal charges, for suggesting on one night, where it is well known that muslim illegal migrants commit organized mass crimes against European women in many countries and many cities, people who should not be in Europe in the first place, who are criminal merely for being where they are, should not have free run of the streets on one night, and the night where massive amounts of crimes by illegal migrants are known to be taking place.

Jos Heijmans, the Mayor of Weert, a city in the South of the Netherlands, issued the emergency decree forcing all asylum seekers to stay inside the compound of the local asylum centre as he feared a group of 26 North Africans would run amok during New Year’s Eve celebrations.

Now a union that represents people convicted of crimes has filed a criminal complaint against the mayor.

The Union of Lawbreakers’ secretary Christiaan Bekema said: “We are talking about an illegal restraint order.”

He said that if the judge agreed with the measure being disproportionate, the asylum-seekers could seek compensation.

The Centre for Public Order and Safety, a research institute of the University of Groningen in north-eastern Holland, deemed the restraining order illegal and stated that only a judge could issue it, not city authorities.

 

In fact the lesson here is twofold. Clearly Marxism is being used to bring down the temple of classical civilization. And it is using its favourite tool, selective enforcement.

The way it works is, rule of law is used selectively to advantage Muslims and Marxists, and where rule of law goes against those interests, they use Marxist base logic to allow and enforce that.

But the other lesson, while related, is at least as important.

And that is the idea that using a law and order solution to what is a military problem is a formula for the loss of everything we have.

If you hold that idea as a kind of template through which to view much of the news, it will become clear how that works.

Eeyore for VladTepesBlog.

Canada wins race with Obama’s America for most Marxist state

From Breitbart:

Canadian Organization Asks City’s Residents To Register As Non-Racist

(At this point its extremely important to understand that the Neo-Marxists/Alt left etc. will start out with a definition of something that everyone can live with, then pile it up with stuff until it is fully Soviet compliant. The easiest example is conflating criticism of Islam with racial hatred. As this will be a guaranteed aspect of racism, smart people will likely not sign this ideological declaration of submission to Marxism and Islam, and therefore see their futures altered)

The Sault Ste. Marie and Area Local Immigration Partnership (LIP), a Canadian immigration and “anti-racist” organization, is asking residents of the city to sign a pledge to prove they aren’t racist.
Local news syndicate SooToday, first announced the pledge yesterday in an article titled “Here’s your chance to register as a certified non-racist.”

“By taking this online pledge, supporters are making a personal commitment to understand, stand against, and act to eliminate racism and discrimination.

“It only takes a few seconds to go online and fill out the form. When you click submit, your pledge is added to a running count of those who’ve also taken the pledge. There are so many different cultures in Canada; we face the challenges of acceptance and inclusion every day,” states Danny Krmpotich, Program Coordinator – Local Immigration Partnership.”

Please click through to BB.Com for the rest of this item.

Several attacks, probably bbs muslims, Marxist US media focus on “Islam-o-phobia”

1, Man yelling Ally ally Akbar (more or less) carrying gasoline and gunpowder fires shots in a supermarket till he runs out of ammo.

2. Toxic gas pumped into German public school

Germany Hamburg gas attack Reinbeker Weg schoolTWITTER

A mass evacuation is underway after a terrifying gas attack at a German school

Emergency services and specialist environmental experts raced to the scene after what is believed to be pepper spray was pumped into the gymnasium at the Reinbeker Weg School in Hamburg.

More than 30 students reported having trouble breathing as the debilitating gas also left them unable to see properly.

The fire brigade arrived with several rescue vehicles and emergency doctors, some wearing bio-hazard suits, and rushed students away from the scene.

3. But to the legacy media in the US the real problem is that people fear muslims.

4. Could this be why the media in the US has given away their rational thought and adopted a Cold-war Pravda like mentality?

Editor’s note: The express mistakenly translates “Allah hu ackbbar” as “God is great”.

In fact it translates as Allah is more powerful than (your) god. This is a more important distinction than many might imagine at first blush. Translating Allah as God is an obscenity, even if both entities are purely fictional, in exactly the same way as translating Superman as Sponge bob Square pants would be.

The followers of each, should they be dedicated believers, would have dramatically different attributes, and therefore, genuinely very different effects on their environments. Religious muslims agree, and in some muslim countries there are laws against non-muslim churches using the word “allah” to denote a Christian God. This is a law Christians should be grateful for.

Jesus as an avatar of the Jewish God, was not a mass murdering, slave raiding, mass raping genocidal maniac who conquered vast swaths of the Earth. Mohammad, as the solitary spokesman for “Allah”, was all of those things and more, and all of them bad, even by objective standards where those standards have to do with the well being of general populations and cooperative civilization and advancement.

Interview with Al Assad: “If you want truth, look to alternative media”

 Check the comments at The Rebel for this video. Especially one by Bravo Zulu.

(We posted the Sunni muslim terrorist video of chem-weapons test on rabbits, then its use on Syrian civilians, when it happened, here at Vlad. This was before Obama and his propaganda team reversed the agency)

BBC does a lot of fake news as well.

Lets have a look at what the BBC says about what the Islamic jihadi who killed the Russian Ambassador and what he said during the attack:

And now, lets look at what he actually said. I have had this personally checked by three translators. The killer spoke in both Turkish and Arabic but the subtitles on this video are correct.

FOX does point this out:

Euronews is what it looks like. Fake news with a leftist-Islamic agenda

Quite frequently here at Vlad, we point out how Euro-News appears to be a Soros type propaganda outlet, outright faking and misrepresenting events to a clearly leftist and pro-Islamic agenda.

One of my favourite examples, but by no means the only one, is this example of how they totally misrepresented the Pope’s visit to CAR.

Our original post on this event.

This post is on how Euronews misrepresented the Hungarian referendum.

Now some interesting news on how their own staff journalists are explaining Euronews.

Euronews, a rolling news channel partly funded by the European Union, has been accused of broadcasting “sponsored” propaganda for oppressive regimes.

Journalists at the channel, which receives a third of its funding from the EU, have backed a no-confidence motion against their management, accusing the station of “flagrant violation of journalistic ethics”.

The Sunday Telegraphreports that states such as Saudi Arabia, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan have paid the news channel to send teams to produce short profiles of their countries that are notably free from any criticism of the governments.

Some journalists have even accused the channel of failing to criticise the Turkish government after the failed coup there this year.

Workers staged a one-day strike after passing the no-confidence motion, in the same week it emerged U.S. broadcaster NBC was in negotiation to buy a stake of up to 30 per cent in the channel.

Partly funded by the EU. That explains a great deal.

H/T M.