Category Archives: Totalitarianism

Samizdat: A revived Soviet information control measure, this time in the West

Posted on by

This morning I got the following material in an email from Dr. Bill Warner:

Samizdat

In the tyranny of the Soviet Union, there were books that were illegal called samizdat. In the past week, three counter Sharia groups were banned from social media. In the Soviet Union, the KGB, kicked down your door. Today the dhimmi social media billionaires kick you off the web at the request of Muslims.

Is the day coming when the only way we can communicate with each other about Islam is by newsletters? 

By non-coincidence whatsoever, yesterday I happened to notice that when I went to buy Tommy Robinson and Peter McGloughlin, I noticed that Amazon is not selling the physical book in my country. Which is Canada.

One of our German translators, Egri Nok, discovered that a book she was interested in, which is in fact the #1 selling book in Germany today, is not for sale in Germany. At least not by Amazon.

Notice the lack of a BUY button.

She also said:

“It has been erased as if it didn’t exist from the bestseller list of Der Spiegel. Even though it is the most-sold book in Germany currently.”

Interestingly, Peter McGloughlin’s other book, Easy Meat, about the giant scale Muslim child-sex-slave gangs in the UK, is also not available to buy in Canada.

Are these isolated events? or policy as the title of the post implies.

Is this a function of economics, its not worth carrying the physical book, or does this much truth violate Canada’s sharia laws disguised as ‘hate speech’?

Please send in examples of what is, and is not available. Chances are that far left wing, anti-white or anti-Western or anti-Christian material is still widely available and probably subsidized.

Ezra on the arrest of Kevin J Johnston

Posted on by

I know I posted this video at the end of the previous post. But the importance of this event, and Ezra’s analysis of it, cannot be overstated. Please watch it, and please think about it.

This twigs back to Trudeau’s Muslim head of the consular section’s meeting with the OIC a little while ago. We did an interview with Brad Johnson a few weeks ago about exactly this meeting and its meaning.

UPDATE:

Britain continues to ARREST people for RACISM for burning a BOOK because of objections to the contents

Posted on by

This is truly totalitarian. And worse as there are no clear laws on it. People are just supposed to know you can’t do this. If someone burned Mein Kampf one can be certain there would be no arrests. No trials, no jail.

From the Daily Mail:

Police have arrested two people on suspicion of racial hatred after a video appeared online showing a man burning a copy of the Koran.

The video, which MailOnline has chosen not to publish, shows a tattooed man standing in a kitchen complaining about being unable to start a fire.

Speaking into the camera, he says: ‘I’ve been trying to get my poxy fire started for half-hour wondering what s**t I can get it going with.’

Holding a paperback copy of the Koran up to the camera, he adds: ‘And then I found this.’

Two videos were posted on Facebook and YouTube on Tuesday and are still available today on various pages.

The second shows the man standing outside tearing pages from the holy book and throwing them on a bonfire.

He says to the camera: ‘And it worked, all I’ve got left is the poxy, sh***y cover and look, that’s on the fire as well.’

The Daily mail has decided not to publish the videos. They do publish videos of Muslims stabbing, shooting and blowing up people. But people burning the instruction book that tells believers to do these things, that is too much for the Daily Mail. Here they are:

South Park did a brave and creative attempt some years ago to solve problems like this. They put forth two ideas in a 1 episode series called, “Cartoon Wars” several years ago.

The two solutions were that people could all decide to draw Mohammad, the great taboo of that time, and then the thugs, bullies and muslim supremacists would know their tactics didn’t work and it would just go away. Or, everyone could bury their heads in the sand and hope the problem just kinda goes away on its own.

The people of South Park, just like the people of Canada and Great Britain, have decided on the bury the heads option.

This problem could be solved permanently and bloodlessly if a large fraction of the people of the UK filmed themselves burning Korans. Perhaps they could also burn a copy of some other book they find repugnant. Maybe a copy of one of Obama’s ‘autobiographies’. Or Rules for radicals. But the fact is, if enough people do it, they will have to make a law which is clear, and let people know they have lost their liberal democracy, or they will have to abandon the notion that the state can do forced mind control without bothering to tell people exactly what it is they are not allowed to say, think or do.

I was hoping to embed the South Park clip here, as it used to be on YT but there is nary a trace of it. Even the suggestion that people resits this totalitarian evolution is getting hard to find. But for those of you who know how to bit torrent, the 2 episode series of Cartoon wars, in fact all  4 or 5 banned episodes of South Park can be obtained. All of them I believe, deal with the child raping, mass murdering, slave raping Mohammad. Although they don’t mention that in South Park. They just deal with the concept of not being able to depict him, even if, and here quoting one of the characters in the show, Muslims are forbidden to draw him perhaps, but we, are not.

H/T M.

 

Sandra Solomon assaulted by ANTIFA in Winnipeg, arrests made

Posted on by

Details here:

A good friend of this site suggested using the title: “White men attack Muslim woman”, or, if that was too off the mark, “White men beat Arab women” and that would satisfy the full-on identity politics aspects of it.

Brilliant idea, and funny. But one is reluctant to go down that road even for the laugh. ANTIFA is nearly 100% white males with a smattering of women for the thugs to hide behind when they attack people they don’t like with bike locks etc. But the problem as we all know is not that they are white males. Its that they are various flavours of post-modernists ranging from classic Soviet commies to essentially Nazi brown shirts, and all the types of post-modernists that agree that violent revolution is what is needed to take down classical liberalism. The one true enemy they are certain of.

Sandra is an ex-Muslim and an Arab. But they attacked her because she stands against the narrative. She wants to blunt the best weapon the leftists have against us. Islam. And they won’t stand for that.

Even so, it was too funny an idea to leave alone entirely so I had to at least include it in the post. And we all do know by now, if the CBC was writing it up, they would most certainly do a spin like that if they thought they could get away with it.

Video of police busting party for unapproved song on Youtube playlist

Posted on by

This is also rumoured to be the song that was playing.

I have a request for the readers of this site please.

As much as the event depicted in the top video, showing multiple police busting a British yard party for playing an unapproved song infuriates me, and should infuriate anyone with even the dimmest recollection of what personal liberty means, what infuriates me more is the submission shown to the police by people at a private party who had done nothing wrong whatsoever.

We need a new word which is the equivalent of dhimmitude, but refers to submission to post modern/Marxist authority. We need to name it so we can shame it and stop people from showing it.

People faced with authority on their own property for playing an “unapproved song” should  say to that authority, “This is my property and Ill play what ever song I want. Now get a warrant, arrest me, or get off my property”.

We must learn to show defiance. It is justified, it is our legal right, and much more importantly, it is our inherent right and obligation to show defiance to totalitarian and irrational authority.

If anyone knows of a word, perhaps a Russian or Polish or Czech word for showing obsequious submission to communist authority we could start with that. If not, lets make one up.

 

1956 interview with the author of Brave New World, Aldous Huxley

Posted on by

A minor proof that he was right, is that you cannot show people on TV smoking anymore. In fact I suspect this was cropped to get rid of the cigarettes at least one of them was smoking during the interview.

BREAKING; Tim Burton of IAW radio and candidate for Liberty GB, send to Wandsworth Prison for 12 weeks

Posted on by

This just happened.

Tim Burton, a very well educated man on Islam and its effects on the West, has just been sentenced to 12 weeks at Wandsworth Prison in the UK and led straight from court to jail.

This officially makes disparaging Islam to a Muslim as a serious criminal offence in the UK.

Tim and I would share a 2 hour monthly radio spot with Key Fritzy on the last Tuesday of every month at this Blogtalk radio program.

More info as available. Also will update with specifics of the charge.

As stated here before, the communications between Mr. Burton and the man who charged him showed questionable judgement, but in no way shape or form constituted what a liberal democracy could call a crime. Certainly not one deserving of prison.

Here is a link to one of the shows Tim, Kel & I did some time ago. If you dig around in the link above, you can find others.

 

Some thoughts about personal security. Just because “its 2017”

Posted on by

Canada, federally and provincially, is in the process of passing multiple draconian, Marxist and totalitarian bits of legislation, each of which will end democracy and rule of law. In fact, will end Greek thought as a legal means of making personal determinations.

Below, a small excerpt from Ontario bill 89, which is being interpreted, in our view correctly, to mean that if your child wants to wear a dress and you say no, the child can and may be taken by the state and raised by the state till its somewhere between 16 and 18 years old.

“Significant changes are made to terminology.  The terms society ward and Crown ward are no longer used.  Instead, the new Act refers to children who are in interim society care or extended society care.  The new Act also does not refer to children being abandoned or to runaways.

The age of protection is increased to include 16 and 17 year olds:  societies may now apprehend and bring into care children aged 16 and 17.  Under the current Act, children may only be apprehended and brought into care until they turn 16 (although children subject to a protection order before they turn 16 may continue to receive protection services until they are 18).  As part of this change, the definition of a child being in need of protection in the new Act now specifies that a 16 or 17 year old is in need of protection in circumstances or conditions that may be prescribed by regulation.  A new authority to enter into agreements with 16 and 17 year olds in need of protection is included in this Part.

The matters to be considered in determining the best interests of a child are changed.  The current Act incudes the child’s views and wishes, if they can be reasonably ascertained; the new Act also includes the child’s views and wishes, and specifies that they are to be given due weight in accordance with the child’s age and maturity.  The current Act includes the child’s cultural background; the new Act includes the child’s cultural and linguistic heritage.  The religious faith in which the child is being raised is deleted as a matter to be considered.  Added is the child’s race, ancestry, place of origin, colour, ethnic origin, citizenship, family diversity, disability, creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression.  The provision in the current Act that the best interests of an Indian or native child (referred to in the new Act as a First Nations, Inuk or Métis child) be determined by taking into consideration the importance of preserving the child’s cultural identity is expanded to also require taking into consideration the importance of the child’s connection to community.

The authority for societies to enter into voluntary agreements with persons unable to temporarily care for their children and with young persons is moved from Part II (Voluntary Access to Services) of the current Act to Part V of the new Act.  Temporary care agreements may be entered into with respect to children of any age and are no longer restricted to children younger than 16.  The authority to enter into special needs agreements is not included in the new Act.”

It is likely that if Canada has become Marxist enough to pass this bill (notice all the exemptions for non-White non Western peoples) then its Marxist enough to criminalize opposition to it in any meaningful way. Certainly if not criminalize, to marginalize, publicly humiliate and disenfranchise. As Hillary Clinton said she would do as a way of sneaking UN resolution 16/18 in light of the US 1st amendment.

Canada’s federal M103 certainly destined to become an actual law criminalizing criticism of Islam, and what else could it possibly ever be by the admission of the people who want it, and other tactics in the cauldron like E-411 are powerful indicators that the days of democracy and Greek thought, The Enlightenment, are certainly over. At least in Canada and probably in much of Western Europe. Only in the US is there any pushback in favour of people’s actual rule of themselves via constitutional law. Something Canada has only in name.

To the point:

Some years ago I had a conversation with two security experts. One was American, a lawyer and had considerable experience with the various security apparatus of the USA. The other, a top level computer security person with powerful credentials and more importantly, a practical record of accomplishment in the security field which adds more weight in some ways than many academics in the field for this article.

The discussion was. on the pros and cons of using an encrypted messaging/calling application like Signal on your phone. Signal has been in the news recently because Obama appointees and hires in the usual departments of the deconstruction of America brick by brick like ‘climate change’ and so on, have been installing it to hide their activities  from President Trump, who is less enthusiastic about their mission to destroy industrial society in the USA.

The opinions on using encrypted or hidden comms went like this:

US Security expert:

can likely monitor any communications you have no matter how. One shouldn’t bother to use Signal or other programs like that if you genuinely want your communications to be private.

However you SHOULD use encryption, Signal or otherwise. The reason being that the NSA and similar agencies use the flimsy and thin excuse that they merely gather all signals out there in the aether because they are out there to grab and look at them cause they are just floating by. If you encrypt your communications you are at least demanding your legal 4th amendment rights*  to privacy.

So while the NSA is still reading your private communications and violating your right to privacy wholesale and often for trivial purposes (*2) using encryption means they have to actually go to a judge to get a warrant to violate your rights before they can actually use that information to act against you, as you asserted your rights by attempting to make your communications private.

Canadian security expert:

Signal is an open source PGP based encryption program which would take the entire computing power of ALL NSA COMPUTERS to crack even one text message several years to do. So use it. Your comms will be safe.

ME:

Any google device is spying on you. Google has become Orwell Meets Kafka meets Hillary Clinton.  If you use a google device, you have no privacy in almost any way. Google submits to data requests from the NSA without warrants. So you have no protection under US constitutional laws. And the chances are that google devices can read your texts before they are encrypted, and the other side’s messages after they are decrypted.

Social media? Forget about it. You may as well call the police and read your posts yourself. Which will at least annoy them as they prefer to get it illegally cause its easier to sort that way.

We have already seen in 2016 how authorities, police in fact, went to people’s homes and warned or arrested people in Belgium, Denmark, the Netherlands and Germany just for posting on their own social media accounts things which opposed government policy on mass immigration and the destruction of their civilizations and cultures.

This is days away in Canada.

Just having an opinion contrary to government policy is now known by authorities that have no business knowing it, and acted upon in ways ranging from actual arrest to firing to public humiliation.

Apple make a big splash last year about protecting the data on their devices from US authorities. The story was amazingly fishy. I do not believe a word of it.

By the way Canadians, Canada has a nearly identical well funded agency to the NSA, and we don’t even have a 4th amendment or anything nearly as useful as that. Just in case you thought you could sigh with relief.

If you want privacy, write a letter, hand deliver it, and then burn it after you show it to them.

But definitely use Signal or a similar app. At least then you force them to at least pretend to obey the law. The American expert makes the point. At least take your right to privacy. Make them prove that they had a probable cause to Big Brother you.

For technically minded people, you may find this a worthy Sunday afternoon project:

Thank you for everything ML.

Eeyore for VladTepesBlog

*(in the USA Canadians may or may not have anything like that as our constitution is nearly incomprehensible)

*2 NSA employees were caught spying on lovers to check for sexual fidelity