Curiously incompetent Press Secretary to majorly demented US president-usurper, Joe Biden
Meanwhile, in Canada, the law seems curiously flexible and can also be directed against people trying to actually obey the law. Just like above.
Category Archives: Corrupt Canadian Leftists
VERY Important update on the Helen Grus hearings
The Helen Grus hearings are near the end of their 3rd week and show no sign of being done by Friday.
We have covered this important and highly representative event in terms of the state of civilization since the start. Anyone unfamiliar with the affair can go to RAIR Foundation and read the entire series of events and interviews. And if you don’t know about it, please do. This is not a trivial event. This is indicative of the extent to which truth is now a crime where it contradicts or represents a threat to government policy. Especially policy which is clearly intended to denude the public of all and any individual rights.
We spoke with Donald Best yesterday right before the SHTF and he gave us an update up to that point:
But then it happened. A senior officer at the Ottawa Police sent a threatening email to Helen right before she was to testify in her own defence:
So we rushed out to the building where the hearing is taking place to get a first hand account of exactly what took place yesterday:
Please do dial up the quality of the video with the little gear at bottom right of the play window for best viewing, and please do click through to RAIR for a written description of these events and a comprehensive history of the hearings.
We will have a lot more to say on this tomorrow. For now, it is critical for people to know what our police services are doing not to protect the public, but to actually protect a narrative that is killing vast numbers of the public. And CBC was an essential weapon in this chain.
UPDATE January 11 PM:
Recent interview with Det. (Ret.) on Helen Grus trial
Although this interview was recorded last Sunday, it is the latest info on the very important trial/hearing of Ottawa Police Detective, Helen Grus. This hearing will determine if policing will go forward dialectically, in this case meaning to advance the power and ideology of the state at the expense of the truth and the facts, or if policy and results will be determined after a proper objective investigation to determine the facts and the truth.
This is not a small thing.
Those not familiar with the case, please click through to RAIR to read the whole story so far as we have covered it from the start. The hearing will resume in January when a verdict is expected. I do not think the bookies are offering decent odds on a not guilty, specifically because it is so obvious she is not guilty. And because the trial procedure is so flawed, and even corrupted from a jurisprudence point of view, it would have been thrown out before it began.
Organizer of Million Person March set for Wed. Sept 20th, responds to ‘leaked’ video by govt and union leaders planning to interfere with it
First, the response from the organizer of the planned Canada-Wide march against SOGI:
This is the video I believe he was responding to. We posted it here a few days ago as well.
For those of you who do not get how leftists perpetually use the politics of victimhood to in fact be the oppressor, and work three shifts to destroy every aspect of what is important to the rest of us, right down to the last brick and mortar of our reality, please watch these two videos on formal leftist semantic weaponry. Regulars to this site will have already seen them. On Marcuse’s repressive tolerance, and how truth becomes hate speech.
Repressive tolerance in under 3 minutes:
How truth becomes hate speech
In the Union leader’s and other associated Marxist Leninists at the secret Zoom near the top, it is fascinating to hear the attempt to conflate “Islamophobia” with “transphobia, which is of course the narrative attack vector, as well as mitigate the fact tt is a Muslim who you see in the top video who organized this and announced it at a nearly all Muslim protest of SOGI at the Catholic School board!
Related: Toronto Security Meeting:
We spoke with Jeff in June of 2022:
Counter-demo ad:
On the railroading of Ottawa Police Detective Helen Grus for attempting to solve the cause of deaths of 9 infants
*Prescript: One may find it very interesting, that exactly like the Muslim protests at Parliament Hill, The Ottawa District School Board and the Ottawa Catholic School Board, there was zero media or counter-protest at this hearing. Normally there would be both at anything this important or potentially significant to the side of personal liberty and rights. But the government-media complex, which clearly includes groups like ANTIFA, especially as the leaders are often civil service union leaders and even mark their protests and actions with flags of the union itself, recognize that having media like CBC etc. there, means more harm to their purpose than pretending these events never happened, or making people aware of the nature of the events. This should be factored in to anyone’s thinking on this issue.
In January of 2022, Ottawa Police Detective, Helen Grus, noticed a cluster of infant deaths. Nine to be exact, all at around the same time.
As a police detective who’s specific area of investigation was as a member of Ottawa’s Sexual Assault and Child Abuse squad. SACA It was perfectly within her jurisdiction to examine this curious cluster of nine infant deaths, all within a short time.
In September of 2021, when the Vaxx mandates had just begun, Detective Grus wrote a letter to the Chief of Police asking if the Police force would be held liable for any vaxx injuries as a result of the mandates. This most likely is when the force began to target her.
When Detective Grus noticed the cluster of baby deaths, she contacted the parents to ask for mRNA injection status, as it had come to her attention at that point based on Pfizer data, that nursing mothers could pass on large volumes of spike protein with their milk, and this could have lethal consequences for their children.
At this point, the police launched an investigation of her, including illegal communications surveillance, which go far beyond the old fashioned “wire tap” and included all the electronic communications of Detective Grus and even members of her family.
Today, her hearings began at an Ottawa Police Station hearing room in the West end of the City.
Below, is an interview with a retired Toronto Police Detective, Donald Best, who has followed the Helen Grus story from the very beginning in great detail at his site, Donaldbest.ca
It was taken on August 14th, 2023 minutes before the trial of Detective Grus began:
As Helen entered the Kanata Police Station, a group of her supporters asked her to allow them to have a prayer session on her behalf:
The trial is expected to last until Friday this week at least. And the results will say a great deal about what is, and what is not permitted to be investigated by authorities in Canada, and likely across North America. This is a very important trial, and is about a great deal more than one officer. This is about the very legality of the truth, even when it comes to the killing of children.
For those interested, below is a much longer interview with Detective Best from a few days ago before the trial started. We intend to keep you all updated as the week goes on with what is taking place.
UPDATE 1 for Tuesday Aug. 15 2023 from a friend inside the court room:
Day 2, 15th Aug, Officer Helen Grus investigation, notes from SM
Srgt Guy is called in to be cross examined by defense
– Srgt Guy forwarded the disciplinary case against Grus
– he said – that members of the SACA team approached him that Grus comments/discussions at work about covid were disruptive – that Grus contacted the coroner about a baby death that she was not the lead officer on but no evidence presented – no complaints from victim/families about Grus
– he became very. very beet red in his whole face as defense kept questioning
– became very heated when defense kept asking Guy ‘ Can an officer view RMS of victims and witnesses then not contact victim/witness? Yes or No? ‘
– Guy refused to answer- Guy was ordered to leave room
– Defense – try to establish what it means ” Grus accessed files she had no business accessesing ” , that was Guy’s statement
– asked ‘ were you aware of increase in infant deaths ‘
– Srgt Guy answered “No” but email was read that shows there was discussion
– (me, Stephanie) I don’t understand why Srgt Guy kept saying he wanted to be careful about “scaring people ” , what people? we are talking about private in-house police discussions? scare other officers? this did not make sense to me that he would say that so many times
– established by Srgt Guy reading his own job review of Grus that she was an outstanding officer who met and exceeded expectations (before this covid thing)
Srgt Guy had entered in investigation about Grus that she was talking in office about her children’s hockey playing and that she would lie or find some loophole to be able to let them play, BUT when defense wanted to ask him if he had evidence about her lying, well things got very heated yet again and prosecution called foul (me, Stephanie, if you enter a sworn statement, why can’t it be questioned by defense?)
“I want to be very clear, every govt since Mulroney to Trudeau has been infiltrated by the Chinese, and all were made aware”
Lawyer for Whistleblowers, Warner Mendenhall explains the risks as well as reveals some of what he has learned from Big Pharma employees
Story details at RAIR Foundation USA
LIVE CPSO council!
Trudeau calls Canadian intel service “Racist” for materials that may indicate the Chinese communists bought Trudeau and influenced the election
It looks like Trudeau has made the same mistake that Trump, Nixon and Eisenhower all did, except backwards. Nixon and Co. wanted to expose the corruption and excessive power and deception of the alphabet agencies in the US. As a consequence, they destroyed those presidents and even their legacy. In Nixon’s case, the most popular president in US history was taken down by a senior exec at the FBI because he got passed up for promotion. Eisenhower made a very famous speech which included a segment on the Industrial Military complex, and how it was a threat to democracy. Everyone needs to watch this segment till they fully understand it. But Eisenhower was smart enough to wait till he left office to deliver it. Trump? Well they fabricated nonsense about Russian collusion and then took over social media and screwed him over there and stole the 2020 election from him.
In Trudeau’s case its the opposite. He is using a weak and tiresome critical-theory/Discourse theory attack on CSIS because they pointed out the corruption of the PM. They noted correctly that China exerts undue influence, and may have played a part in Trudeau’s election ‘victories’. Let’s hope it has the same outcome. It typically goes badly for a politician when he takes on that kind of power.
Justin Trudeau said Monday that asking questions about MPs being influenced by China is racist and that security agencies don’t get to decide who runs in elections. Trudeau was responding to the latest bombshell allegations that China has interfered in Canada’s last two elections, including to help the Liberal Party win.
This is good:
We can now know that Doug Ford is another corrupt and dangerous Viceroy for the Communists. Chinese or otherwise. Trudeau hid his dialectic a little though in this. But the impression created was clear. Point out Chinese influence in his power base, and you are an anti-Asian racist, just as if you pointed out that yeah, the virus came from the Wuhan lab and we KNOW it was released to the west on purpose, because countless planeloads of people infected with legacy Covid19 went from Wuhan to the West spreading it, while domestic flights within China were all halted at the same time out of Wuhan.
The Globe and Mail is coming out with damaging material against Trudeau. Ok then.
A tutorial showing how the government of Canada lies about the safety of the vaxx by misrepresenting real numbers
This is not easy to follow. Hopefully I will get a chance to do an interview with an involved party at some point soon. But the bottom line here is that the government of Canada included statistics on hospitalizations, sickness and death from the time the gene-therapy were announced, but well before they were available and way before any reasonable fraction of the country had actually had two or more doses. And if we use Pfizer rules, two doses plus two weeks! Remember? You could not count yourself as “vaccinated” till 14 days after the second shot.
This means that all hospitalizations and deaths for a long period were counted as unvaccinated, and added to the numbers till now.
Think of it like trying to get a percentage of the number of people in the world who believe in Jesus but you start counting in 2000 BC and then announce the percentage of people today who believe in Jesus including the 2000 years before he existed, and of course, the centuries before Christianity spread across the world. That is the con as it was done in Canada. Similarly in all Western countries no doubt.
So if you look at a three month period after a lot of Canadians had two or more shots, you get a VERY different picture. This video shows you how you yourself can actually make the data show you the truth about the safety of the various gene therapy shots using the exact same numbers the government uses.
You may have to pause and think or pause and do the actions this demonstrates yourself.
Any questions, please leave them in the comments. Hopefully we can ask them directly to the person who made the graph, or a statistician who understands this work and can speak to it.
The CPSO has investigated itself and found itself not guilty
A few months ago, some readers of this web site might remember that we posted a live broadcast of a lawyer representing three doctors against the now fully captured, “College of Surgeons and Physicians of Ontario”.
The college made a link to the Zoom available but got so overwhelmed with requests for it that they put it on YouTube with strict instructions that no one should record or republish it yada yada wuzza wuzza.
Hopefully someone outside Ontario has it and will post it for the world to see how the three doctors had a slam-dunk case against the college, yet now today, this judgement came in from them.
In part:
THE ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE PHYSICIANS
[7] Broadly speaking, the three physicians take issue with some of the public health measures relating to COVID-19 such as vaccination and treatment.
[9] The College alleges that Dr. Trozzi committed professional misconduct by making misleading, incorrect or inflammatory statements about vaccinations, treatments and public health measures concerning COVID-19 through his email and online communications about the pandemic.
[10] In Dr. Phillips’ case, the allegations of professional misconduct include making misleading, incorrect or inflammatory statements about vaccinations, treatments and public health measures for COVID-19; disclosing information from a College investigation, including posting such information online and failing to remove it when requested; and failing to cooperate with College investigations. The College alleges that he failed to maintain the standard of practice of the profession and engaged in disgraceful, dishonourable and unprofessional conduct in different aspects of his treatment of patients and public health reporting, that he engaged in unprofessional conduct and communications at his hospital workplace and also breached terms, conditions and limitations on his certificate of registration.
[11] The College alleges that Dr. Luchkiw committed professional misconduct by failing to cooperate with College investigations relating to her infection control practices, communications about COVID-19 and issuance of vaccine exemptions.
Then skipping forward a lot:
[36] Justice Morgan stated:
[1] The three Respondents in this set of Applications are physicians who believe that vaccinations are a misguided and ineffective way to address the ongoing health issues caused by COVID-19. Although the specifics of each of their cases differ somewhat, they are each under investigation by the Applicant for their conduct and practices in acting on this belief.
[2] None of the Respondents [is] prepared to cooperate in the usual way with the Applicant’s investigation. They are each of the view that the investigation and the disclosure and production requirements that accompany an investigation amount to an abuse of the regulator’s power….
[5] In the words of the formal Appointment of Investigator documentation, the inquiries were to examine each of the Respondents’ practices “including in relation to COVID-19 and [his or her] completion of medical exemptions for COVID-19 vaccinations and diagnostic testing”. For the Respondent, Patrick Brian Phillips, the Applicant had an additional concern regarding his use of online websites and social media to disseminate what the Applicant characterized as misleading health information about COVID-19, as well as his posting on social media, copies of what were supposed to be confidential communications from the Applicant. The Appointment of Investigator in respect of Dr. Phillips mandated the investigator to investigate his medical practice “including in relation to communications and conduct relating to the COVID-19 pandemic”.
…
[23] The record demonstrates through correspondence and other statements that the Respondents have no intent to provide the requested documents or to otherwise cooperate with the investigator. Their communications to the Applicant indicate that they are not prepared to respond to the matters that the investigator is investigating.
[29] The Respondents are all in continual breach of their obligations under the Code. They have put forward no reason for their refusal to comply with their obligations in this regard, except to reiterate their objection to vaccines. As indicated, what the investigator seeks is production of records; the investigation does not seek to compel vaccinations or any other specific medical treatment. Accordingly, the Respondents’ position is unresponsive to the investigator’s request and their argument about the efficacy or inefficacy of COVID vaccines is a non-sequitur.
Not being a lawyer or a doctor, or even having read this whole judgement, it sure looks on the surface that the deal is:
Doctors, who acted on their best medical judgement and attempted to dissuade people from taking an experimental and mostly untested new technology (possibly made by DoD as a military countermeasure and not actually developed by a drug company at all) are guilty of not doing what government and its agents, like the CPSO, tell them to do.
This means the official transformation of medicine from a science into a corporate practice where all practices are diktats from the top. Remember that old saying that we should all always get a second opinion? Doctors aren’t allowed to have opinions now. They have to follow instructions from government. And these doctors did not. And so they are guilty of something or other. Their patients who did not take the vaxx, are likely fine. We know now that they are less likely to catch Covid and certainly less likely to have a serious case and less likely to die of it than those who took lots of shots and certainly, infinitely less likely to suffer side effects and adverse reactions than those who took any number of shots.
So win-win for everyone who avoided the accursed Witches’ brew.
Meanwhile, back at the college:
Christine speaks on her documentary about the “People’s Commission on the Occupation”
Last week, we posted a short documentary about a far left extremist attempt to smear the Freedom Convoy, and for less than noble reasons. After its release, the main creator of the short documentary, Christine, was asked to be a guest on a lengthy, but very interesting analysis of both the documentary itself, but also the “People’s Commission” as well as the real commission on the Emergency use act.
Below, the new interview by Maverick news with Christine. About an hour in personally, so far it is really very good and very interesting.
LIVESTREAM Ontario College tribunal hearing 9:00 AM ET Nov 23 2022
Canada is very close to taking control of private citizen’s right to speech on the Internet via C-11 WATCH
The “Heritage” minister in that NewSpeak way, is testifying before the Senate Committee tomorrow, November 22, 2022. Please reach out and do what you can to stop this Orwellian government crushing of the most basic of all rights and freedoms.
From the Press Release:
Heritage Minister Pablo Rodriguez will testify tomorrow before the Senate on #billc11. He has said repeatedly that User Generated Content and Digital First Creators are exempt from the bill. That is not true, as confirmed by experts, and the Chair of the CRTC himself. Please watch, share the tweet and video below to let him know there is still time to #Fix c11 .
Raging Dissident, Jeremy MacKenzie testimony from EMA hearings of November 4th, 2022
For those who don’t know, Jeremy used to have a great podcast as The Raging Dissident, I think principally on Bitchute, or people moved his videos there, in which he ranted very entertainingly about the state of Canada. After the Freedom Convoy they Jan 6ed him. They accused him of terrorism for making up a meme. A joke country called “Diagalon” because it would have diagonal borders from Alaska through Canada to Texas and would be for the freedom minded.
The VP was a cocaine addicted space traveling goat.
He has been held in prison for months now with no trial. I am told by one of his followers that he has spent a large amount of time in solitary confinement. This actually is torture and is used as such in prisons for prisoners who are a real threat to safety to others. But more recently, a tool to be used to break political prisoners. They had Tommy Robinson in solitary for a lot of his sentence.
The following is his compelled appearance at Canada’s version of the January 6th hearings, except it is staged as an attempt to find out if Trudeau was justified in using the Emergency Measures Act to send state thugs to smash heads at the Freedom Convoy. Of course, in order to do that, you have to in reality, put everyone involved in any way on trial to show it was necessary. See how that works?
This video takes them right to the break where his testimony ends.
Jeremy MacKenzie is testifying from prison.