Category Archives: Immigration issues

The emphasis of this site and this author for the past little while has been trying to make the paradigm shift that is necessary to understand events around us in one specific way. That is the undoing of the intellectual sleight of hand known as ‘Hanlon’s Razor’. This is one of the more pernicious cons, as it allows people to see the consequences of profoundly damaging policy, even right in front of you, or that affects you directly, and dismiss it as mere chance due to incompetents. You get the satisfaction of thinking you are smarter than the people creating these circumstances, but are, by the same rhetorical tactic, self paralyzed into inaction.

Hanlon’s Razor goes like this: “Never attribute to malice what can be explained by incompetence”. Or a dozen variations of the same theme. Some of them are as simple as, ‘Trudeau cannot possibly be doing what you are saying he is doing cause he is not that smart!’ This is fallacious on a couple of levels. For one, it is as already stated, a variation of Hanlon’s Razor. His intelligence is assumed to be low, therefore his policies must be well intentioned, but incompetent, The other is that great intelligence is required. But great intelligence is not a necessity at all.

Think of a 5 year old child in Peking speaking perfect Mandarin, or at least as perfect as a 5 year old would. Then think about the effort it would take us to learn Mandarin to that level if we didn’t speak a word of it now. We would have to use a lot of effort and intellect to learn it even close. So it goes with dialectical thought. It is a different system of thought, and easy if raised in it, but very difficult if not, and doubly so if you find it a repugnant way of thinking. Which it most certainly is.

Still, failure to understand the intent of the destructive policies around us and dismissing it as idiocy, (while often it may seem like a great comfort) is why no one mounts a defence. Even those who do understand the issue in depth have to be careful how to address the intent, as even those who wish to initiate a solution will swell with sanctimony and object to any solution that might actually work for failure to understand the intent of these policies. For example, people who might say that recognizing Islam as a threat doctrine, monitoring mosques, deporting any and all Muslims who preach sedition and jihad and insurrection and so on, will be met even from people who think they are on the side of the West with insults or sanctimonious defence of freedom of religion and other related but misapplied Western liberties. And just to crush this one right out of the box, The United States declared Political Shinto illegal after Pearl Harbour because, as the reasoning goes, one cannot use the Constitution to undermine the Constitution. The same is easily applied to Islam.

It is with this in mind that I post this older video from some point after Obama/Biden term 3 restarted the destruction of the US along Cloward Piven lines. The fact that Biden offered up for sale parts of the US border wall that President Trump built in his first term was more than even what is below. It was a direct insult to the American people. An act of contempt. Something we have seen from Obama/Biden numerous times now.