Category Archives: England

Looking at the teleology of Afghan rapists in the UK

Posted on by

Although this particular video is not brand new, the case itself is very important and also very representative of policy. But what policy?

Watch the video and click through to RAIR Foundation for the article please. And do not imagine this overall thesis is limited to the UK. The entire Commonwealth uses a rhyming scheme to achieve the same end-state but through subtle variations of the same theme. The theme being of course, the desired effect of the mass importation and funding all support of the most destructive elements of the global Human population. Mark Twain once said, “History does not repeat itself. But it does rhyme”. In this particular instance, it is concurrent history. Not consecutive. The US did the same under Biden and where the left is still in control within the USA, it is still happening.

I guess we should be grateful there aren’t enough cannibals left in Fiji to make it worth flying them all over to Toronto.

The UK, in its rush to go full Soviet, is passing laws that will criminalize casual speech in a bar, and penalize bartenders and waitresses if they fail to report you for it

Posted on by

Those who have not yet read The Gulag Archipelago. and or 1984, may want to start right away.

One of the fascinating aspects of the Gulag Archipelago, is the occasional use of the word, Dialectics. At one point, in book 1, section 1, Page 100-101 it is explained that a dialectic is kind of an equivalent of a Fatwa. It is a decree of something ludicrously untrue and destructive to your person and liberties but must be obeyed. At this point, Islam, 1984 in its portrayal of communism and The Gulag Archipelago in its matter of fact description of communism as it actually operated in real time in front of the author and his witnesses, intersect perfectly.

It turns out that in that terrible year Andrei Yanuaryevich (one longs to blurt out, “Jaguaryevich”) Vyshinsky, availing himself of the most flexible dialectics (of a sort nowadays not permitted either Soviet citizens or electronic calculators, since to them yes is yes and no is no), pointed out in a report which

became famous in certain circles that it is never possible for The Interrogation mortal men to establish absolute truth, but relative truth only. He then proceeded to a further step, which jurists of the last two thousand years had not been willing to take: that the truth established by interrogation and trial could not be absolute, but only,

so to speak, relative. Therefore, when we sign a sentence ordering someone to be shot we can never be absolutely certain, but only approximately, in view of certain hypotheses, and in a certain sense, that we are punishing a guilty person.8 Thence arose the most practical conclusion: that it was useless to seek absolute evidence–for evidence is always relative-or unchallengeable

witnesses-for they can say different things at different times. The proofs of guilt were relative, approximate, and the interrogator could find them, even when there was no evidence and no witness, without leaving his office, “basing his conclusions not only on his own intellect but also on his Party sensitivity, his moral forces” (in other words, the superiority of someone who has slept well, has been well fed, and has not been beaten up)

For me at least, this compares perfectly with the part of 1984 where it is explained in Goldstein’s Book:

In philosophy, or religion, or ethics, or politics, two and two might make five, but when one was designing a gun or an aeroplane they had to make four.

 

And now in the UK, some of the most astonishing narrative enforcement measures ever in that ancient kingdom.

Having said that, as a Canadian, I have been extremely careful what I say near a waiter or waitress, because at this point the left has been so inculcated with hate, certainty and entitlement already, that while they may not as yet be able to call the police on you, what they can do to your food or drinks may be worse. So situational awareness all around please ladies and gentlemen.

England, Great Britain, the United Kingdom no longer a Western nation, or a reliable partner for Republic type nations

Posted on by

I have to say, this is one of the most depressing Tweet/News stories we have read since we became politically aware.

Full text:

BREAKING

A shame for Britain.

The UK has been excluded from Military Intelligence by the US and Israel.

Israel contacted the United States, Jordan and even Saudi and Qatar!

Says a lot that the UK is now so badly not trusted by Israel and the United States but they will put more faith in Qatar over Britain.

This, in my opinion, is probably due to the hostility David Lammy and Keir Starmer has shown, following the sanctioning of Israeli ministers over their Speech.

According to officials, this was intentional:

“We didn’t tell the British because we don’t trust them.”

They cited concerns over the UK being too quick to leak sensitive information and acting “against Israel’s interests.”

Israel views the UK as unreliable:

Senior Israeli sources described the UK as an *“unreliable partner”and claimed that recent UK actions—particularly sanctions against Israeli ministers—have strained ties.

One official said: “The British are behaving like the Europeans. We don’t share sensitive stuff with them anymore.”

UK government caught off guard and alarmed:

The British government only learned of the attack after it began, prompting a Cobra emergency meeting

Diplomats were reportedly “blindsided,” and the UK had to scramble to assess risks to nationals and diplomats in the region.

Source by The Times link in comments.

Whatever people may feel about Israel, to believe that it is a good thing that Great Britain has effectively become an ally of the Iranian/Chinese nations, (yet oddly not Russia) to this extent means the deracination of the British people may have passed the tipping point.

And that the US and Israel feel the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is a more reliable and trustworthy partner than England… well so much for the “Special Relationship” to put it in the softest possible terms.

The state of the UK: An interview with Anne Marie Waters

Posted on by

We followed Anne from way back. She was one of the most courageous and determined women in the UK in terms of pushing back against the destruction of Great Britain and the West in general via Islamic migration.

While many readers may be familiar with a lot of these points, some are indeed new. The fact that Great Britain now teaches a dialectical version of history in which the aboriginal Brits including the monarchs are Africans is new, but certainly consistent with the communist, ie dialectical state of which Kier Starmer is now the COMINTERN viceroy. It won’t be long till Chat GPT confirms this history, and the next generation, who will not be taught critical thinking skills or evidence based analysis, will accept it as the way it is.

As it happens, these kinds of things are showing up on my Twitter feed. But frankly evidence of the claim of the deracination of Great Britain (and the West) is hardly necessary. If it is done this way or that way, it is what is being done. And that is what matters. Essentially it would be like arguing what calibre bullets the enemy is using when they fire on you and yours, when your friends and allies still can’t accept that you are being fired upon.

Even so, this is showing up in the feed:

More: Watch the video please..

It’s is worth doing a word search on an online copy of 1984 for the term, “memory hole”. I think the really interesting bit is where he accuses his fellow Britains, or denizens of Airstrip One, of falling for a narrative that flatly contradicts the one shoved at them by the Ministry of Truth just the day before on Chocolate rations.

“…But actually, he thought as he re-adjusted the Ministry of Plenty’s
figures, it was not even forgery. It was merely the substitution of one
piece of nonsense for another. Most of the material that you were dealing
with had no connexion with anything in the real world, not even the kind of
connexion that is contained in a direct lie. Statistics were just as much
a fantasy in their original version as in their rectified version. A great
deal of the time you were expected to make them up out of your head. For
example, the Ministry of Plenty’s forecast had estimated the output of
boots for the quarter at 145 million pairs. The actual output was given as
sixty-two millions. Winston, however, in rewriting the forecast, marked
the figure down to fifty-seven millions, so as to allow for the usual claim
that the quota had been overfulfilled. In any case, sixty-two millions was
no nearer the truth than fifty-seven millions, or than 145 millions. Very
likely no boots had been produced at all. Likelier still, nobody knew
how many had been produced, much less cared. All one knew was that every
quarter astronomical numbers of boots were produced on paper, while perhaps
half the population of Oceania went barefoot. And so it was with every
class of recorded fact, great or small. Everything faded away into a
shadow-world in which, finally, even the date of the year had become
uncertain.

[…]

For the moment he had shut his ears to
the remoter noises and was listening to the stuff that streamed out of the
telescreen. It appeared that there had even been demonstrations to thank
Big Brother for raising the chocolate ration to twenty grammes a week. And
only yesterday, he reflected, it had been announced that the ration was
to be REDUCED to twenty grammes a week. Was it possible that they could
swallow that, after only twenty-four hours? Yes, they swallowed it. Parsons
swallowed it easily, with the stupidity of an animal.

We need a few million more of this guy. It is one of the few things the public can actually do that might either fix things, or force the communist revolution to move from Covert to Overt, perhaps before it is entirely ready to do so.

Article on interview at RAIR.

 

 

UK now so Orwellian even meta data about truth too dangerous for the British to mention

Posted on by

Meta data is information about information.

For example:

A guy commits a crime, and the police suspect it was him, but don’t have a warrant to tap his phone. So they check the available meta data on his phone such as who called, when did they call, and for how long. They can’t hear the conversation, but they can know that say, his mother called at the time of the crime and he didn’t answer, when he normally always answers and they talk for over 20 minutes. But this time he didn’t pick up at all or his phone was off.

With this and similar kinds of meta data, they can get a warrant to do whatever more intrusive searches they want.

When it comes to Muslims committing acts of terrorism or major crimes, we here in Dar al Harb have learned to use meta data to know the motives and nature of these events.

Back in the early days of the jihad on us all, we would hear that a man named Mohammad or a variation of same, would say, randomly stab a bunch of people in the neck while yelling the Arabic Phrase, “Allah hu ackbar”. We were not told this was an act of Islamic jihad, but eventually even the slowest picked up on it.

Then, they stopped telling is the name of the perp. If it was a Muslim name, we knew. That little bit of meta data as enough for us to have forbidden information. It was a Muslim killing random infidels as his religion commands him to do. So they stopped telling us the name, usually for several days or a week till any proper outrage had passed and there was no fear of anyone doing anything effective to stop the mass importation of Jihadis into Western nations.

They also stopped telling us that people yelled allah hu ackbar while committing these acts. Witnesses would be suppressed. Then they would start to not just lie by omission, but lie of fabrication. A dozen years or so ago, the media, facing ever more ludicrous rules from communist organizations like the National Union of Journalists, would create special rules for reporting on what they called “minorities”. Which seldom means minorities, but always means anyone but a white male had to be ‘protected’ such that people might not form a negative opinion about a hostile group before that group was too powerful to control us all. So they started claiming that the jihadi was mentally ill. They would report that the attacker, who usually followed koranic instructions for killing infidels to the letter was mentally ill before they even claimed to know his name. So somehow, they got his medical records unsealed within an hour and without even knowing who it was.

At that point they didn’t care that we knew they were lying to us. There was bugger all we could do about it.

Nonetheless, those of us who cared to know the truth carried on, interpreting meta data into reality as we could. When we heard a nameless person entered a church and cut the head off of a priest for instance, and wrote something in a foreign language, we knew it was a Muslim waging jihad against the infidel in the land of the infidels.

The next big squeeze on what we could know and say came when a Muslim waging jihad on the infidel stabbed something like 11 little girls at a Taylor Swift dance party killing three of them in Southport England. The lies of omissions started. He was a good boy from somewhere in Wales.People who correctly said it was an act of Islamic jihad found themselves sentenced to a year and a half in prison. The public got the message. We cannot interpret the meta data of Islamic jihad as such, or we will be destroyed.

Please watch the whole video below, produced by a regular fellow in the UK trying to describe what is obviously an act of jihad where a nurse was stabbed so badly she is described as having life changing injuries.

This the scariest video out of the UK in many ways. The fact that the public is now so Orwelled, for lack of a better term, that they know they may not speak aloud the truth if it contradicts state narratives, and narratives who’s intent is to destroy every aspect of them, is horrifying.

“The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” -George Orwell. 1984

 

Did Western Governments import Muslims to our countries to act as muscle against us when the government started to show its communist hand?

Posted on by

Let’s start with the theory as Stephen Coughlin explains it from a historical context:

I think we have seen in modern history how tyrants will import or ally with enemies of the people to quell the people. Anyone who has not seen the movie, Cromwell, about. how a real British Patriot, Oliver Cromwell, created an army of people to depose a tyrannical King, Charles the 1st. Charles, when he got wind of how unpopular his increasingly tyrannical measures were, decided to import entire foreign armies that up to then had been enemies of England. At that time, specifically the Scots and the Irish, because they where Roman Catholic and loyal to the Pope and Rome, and England was Protestant and the actual government where puritans.

When it was learned that Charles the 1st had called for the Scots and Irish to invade to fight the people of England, the uprising began and Charles was arrested and decapitated. So the practice of using foreigners to quell one’s own people by tyrants is time honoured.

Meanwhile, now in the UK:

https://twitter.com/Dayanneaci/status/1819779439699406955?t=Mez7CnHTR2vU71OjEwPAPQ&s=19

Muslims stabbing people in UK. But that is hardly news, is it? A British person putting a strip of bacon on a mosque doorknob, that gets the death penalty.

https://twitter.com/KosherCockney/status/1819780463738957978?t=Gs_ptmmAL_QNIhYTkQX4og&s=19

https://twitter.com/NiohBerg/status/1819751910162702475?t=J8TnDNR6HkgLH79gYdtXjQ&s=19

Those who have not seen the movie, Cromwell, may want to watch it now and look for parallels, if not actual inspiration and ideas for today.

There is a follow up movie that starts roughly where Cromwell ends called, To kill a King. I think I’ll try and watch that this weekend.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Eye witness to stabber of children in Southport: “I’m thinkin things I can’t say on Sky News right now”

Posted on by

So eye witness, no description of the stabber, but he knows he can’t give a description on TV. So that’s pretty much proof it was a Muslim

Comments on YouTube are turned off. In a communist country like the UK, also a strong indicator that the truth is not legal to say.

Also I suspect few if any of these people voted for the new PM who managed to turn the mass murder of children into a photo op for himself while doing nothing to restore rights to people to speak the truth, or stop mass immigration into the UK

 

More from today’s antisemitic march in London

Posted on by

1. Muslim thinks Hitler knew how to deal with the Jews

2. Khybar Khybar yada yada hud

3. Now in Waterloo Station

4. British politicians reap what they have sewn

5. Oops

6. Piers Corbyn seems to be as bad as his brother after all?

7. Very interesting photo from the UK today

Check Hurry up Harry’s Twitter feed for more.

Also Tommy Robinson New Era

Check out the responses to the ludicrous and dialectically opposite to the truth, statement by the police

It’s the replies you want to read.

 

Tommy Robinson film: Silenced

Posted on by

Apparently they are trying to jail Tommy Robinson again for this film. Last time they jailed him, they had him one floor below Julian Assange. If they were trying to send a message, it worked.

twitter @GenFlynn

This film “SILENCED” by Tommy Robinson, was banned in the UK. Shame on those people and institutions for censoring the truth.

I had the privilege of watching this exceptional story.

It will anger, educate, and then inspire.

Robinson is an action oriented, truth seeking, fiercely independent journalist who has courageously reported on issues that affect not only the British people, but people all over the world who’s voices have been banned by their own governments.

This story could become anyone of us or our families here in America given the direction our government has taken.

Stand up, step up and speak up—local action = national impact.

https://twitter.com/GenFlynn/status/1662119553294368769
======================================
twitter @FilmSilenced

A British High Court issued an order prohibiting the public release of Tommy Robinson’s film Silenced.

Now that it has been leaked online, Tommy faces 2 years in prison.

Once you watch it, you’ll know why they wanted it SILENCED.

https://twitter.com/FilmSilenced/status/1661922338886090753

===================================
RUMBLE – Silenced – A BANNED Documentary by Tommy Robinson

( 1 hour 32 min )

“Silenced” is a leaked documentary originally made by Tommy Robinson. In the film, he uncovers an unholy alliance between the government and the media as well as the unbelievable lengths they will go to silence the truth.

A judge of the high court has threatened to send Tommy to prison if he released this documentary to the public. That is where we come in! Leaked to us by an unknown source, it is our duty to share this story with the world.

https://rumble.com/v2q1fhk-silenced-a-banned-documentary-by-tommy-robinson.html
=========================================

 

On Western leaders dismantling our polities

Posted on by

First, please pay attention to this excellent video by Neil Oliver

Then consider what Trudeau said, out loud, on at least two occasions. First to the New York Times:

And then what he said on as TV show in Quebec before he was even elected PM in 2006. I still want to know what book he is talking about. I bet it was Klaus Schwabb’s. Still looking for this whole show. All we can tell is the interviewer is named Seamus, and it was in 2006. Here is a reference to what he said, but not when and where he said it or with who. Quite odd.

UPDATE: Reader, PePi found this!

The book was: Citizen of the World: The Life of Pierre Elliott Trudeau which is about Trudeau’s gloabalist crap
The eldest son of former prime minister Pierre Trudeau is belittling nationalism as an “old idea from the 19th century” that is not relevant to today’s Quebec.

“Nationalism is based on a smallness of thought,” Justin Trudeau said in an interview broadcast on CTV’s Canada AM on Thursday.
“(It) builds up barriers between peoples, that has nothing to do with the Canada we should be building.”
He was being interviewed about a new book about his father titled Citizen of the World: The Life of Pierre Elliott Trudeau.
Although for the most part Mr. Trudeau talked about the book written by history professor John English, he digressed into the debate on Quebec’s place in Canada that erupted last weekend when Liberal leadership front runner Michael Ignatieff supported the idea of recognizing Quebec as a nation.
“I’m supposed to be, sort of quiet on this,” an almost sheepish Mr. Trudeau said.
Mr. Trudeau didn’t directly mention the debate in the party his father led for nearly two decades, but he appeared to think the nation issue was not a good one to get tied up in.
“Unfortunately, some people these days are wrapped up in this idea of nation for Quebec, which stands against everything my father ever believed,” Mr. Trudeau said. “We need to start looking forward.”
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/trudeau-says-quebec-nationalism-an-old-idea/article1108846/

Muslim violence against British Hindu community post 3

Posted on by

This is not going away anytime soon it seems. We had a very interesting comment at Vlad this morning about this. It is notable, the commenter observed, that the police don’t feel the need to wear full riot gear the way they do whenever there is a protest against leftist policies at all. I guess it is now all optics and not reality. Or as so many brilliant people observe, “with the left, the point is never the point. The revolution is always the point”. That plus Peterson’s observation this morning that in an authoritarian state, everyone has to lie about everything all the time. I see that bearing out in my own city more and more often, and more and more by design.