Youtube looses USD $70,000,000,000.00

This is quite good. Tim makes some worthy points, not the least of which is the selective enforcement on what racist humour gets banned and what sticks. Family Guy for example gets away with brutal antisemitism.

I suspect though, that the reason Family guy gets away with it, is a show they did a few months ago. It was the least funny and the most poorly written one I have ever seen. Constant 4th wall breaches in order to inform us all about how horrible President Trump is, and when the main character turns to the camera and says: “This is true. He really did that!” He in fact is referring to things that are not true, and that it has been proven that President Trump did not in fact do.

This kind of crony capitalist, hack partizanship is probably why it gets its own standards on Youtube.

Once more I invite people to subscribe to our new channel subsequent to being deleted from Youtube at:

https://bit.tube/vladtepesblog

 

 

 

Chrome and Firefox both ban Dissenter plugin

I apologize that the title is nearly all in tech-speak but its important. Please watch the video, use the Brave browser and Dissenter, open an account at bit.tube (I think it may be slightly more distributed than bitchute but bitchute is also a good alternative) and if you ever meet someone who works for a tech giant, turn your back on them and explain they violated YOUR terms of service.

 

Restored: Videos showing how Islamic immigration led to a failed state in Sweden

I would like to take this opportunity to encourage everyone to subscribe to our bit.tube channel. It is a true distributed and open source social media. While it does have its limits, it is by far the closest thing to free speech left, now that so-called social media has become a form of left-wing publishing by selective enforcement and deletion against non-leftist authors.

For all of the Washington Times’ and CNN’s faults, at least they pay their writers for the fiction and invention. Facebook, Twitter and Youtube basically do the same thing by controlling what ideas are allowed and  how far they can spread.

Joining and using social media sites like Bit.tube actually is doing something about these issues. You don’t have to send money anywhere, and, although this is a little beyond my understanding, using bit.tube can actually earn you small amounts of Crypto-currency. Something called ‘tubes’. But the point is, it doesn’t cost you anything except the time to subscribe and follow. We can’t win this if people are not even willing to change platforms. Facebook is like Crack for lots of people I know. Some activists who have all their events ruined deliberately by Facebook insist on continuing to use it. This is asking to lose.

Here is one example:

During his Facebook live stream of the event, Facebook knowingly and deliberately closed down his, and everyone else’s stream that was involved with the protest.

And right while we were filming this interview, Facebook cut off access to his pages to everyone except him. His associates actually cut in during the interview to show us!

The deck is stacked, and the dice are loaded if we keep using platforms that are corrupt, fraudulent and dishonest like Facebook, Google and Twitter. We have to change our behaviour to use real peer to peer technologies. In the spirit of the kind of Samizdat we saw in the Soviet Union, non centralized information sharing is our only chance. So please click over and sign up and follow us, and Robert Spencer who is also there.

Now about Sweden:

I am frantically trying to remember which videos to restore to bit.tube because the idea of just uploading them all in order, well I would have to hire someone to do that and that’s not in the budget as I am a volunteer myself. But typically its emails or comments from you dear people that remember a video we did and request it, or casual conversations I have with people with remind me of evidence of my claims that get me searching old hard drives for them.

Today, it was about what muslim immigration did to Sweden. Here are a few examples but not the only ones by a large margin.

2016: Swedish police admit they can no longer protect women, ask them to change their behaviour for their own safety.

The New Normal in Swedish schools. A 2018 video.

2017: Police ask for help:

In fact, a massive shadow-ban, tantamount to real banning, (as happened to me)

Avi Yemeni makes the important point that what is needed, is examples of where Tommy Robinson violated T&S and show a consistent set of rules that are equally enforced. But as Youtube and Google are ideologically driven and authoritarian in an informational sense, organizations, we will not see those. They reserve the right to selectively enforce their rules and they reserve the right to not tell us they do that.

Very Soviet of them.

I notice that they shadow banned Robinson’s site in such a way that if he makes videos to explain whatever it is he wishes to discuss it cannot be found by others in any way. Ok this  interesting to me, as our channel was (nearly all) translated and subtitled news clips, occasional political comedy that was aired on TV, and some interviews with highly reputable people and our channel was removed entirely.

Why this interests me, is that had they shadow banned us, it would make little difference to us. We uploaded to Youtube in order to embed the videos to this site, Gates of Vienna, and whatever other sites found the material important. So taking it down stopped that.

Tommy’s was left up but rendered equally useless as his wasn’t for embedding but reaching out directly to the public.

This is another data point that Google isn’t interested in its own stated rules, but making sure points of view that doesn’t sit well with their board, their corporate partners or government and NGO associates like the now fully disgraced, SPLC cannot be effective.

Restoring the videos that Youtube took special exception to

In the mid February 2019 onslaught of emails from Youtube objecting to, restricting and ultimately banning videos that led to the closure of our Youtube channel, there was maybe a couple of dozen videos they decided to act on. They sent me an email about each one and what they intended to do about them. I wil, as time permits, restore all of them to Bit.tube and ultimately here, so you can all judge for yourself what the real motives of Youtube, or whatever mass reporting agency decided to invest time and effort going over years worth of videos to take the channel down.

Here is one from December 9, 2016 about the brutal rape and murder of a German girl, Maria Ladenburger, who worked with migrants in Germany.

Roving Millennial on Facebook’s fraudulent selective enforcement

They are 100% wrong about Youtube. Youtube uses different strategies for the same exact purpose as Facebook.

The dilemma of private company is not as difficult as they present either. Ask anyone if privately owned utilities like water or electric companies who are the only supplier in an area should be allowed to charge triple and provide deliberately intermittent or inferior service to black people because they are a private company, and without stating so on their contracts. Problem of private companies discriminating against non-leftists solved.

I think we can safely say now we know EXACTLY what happened here. Yellow Vest interview about Facebook failure

This was an interview with one of the Yellow vest leaders during the two day Trucker/Yellow Vest protest in Ottawa. Not only did his, and everyone else’s live stream via Facebook mysteriously shut down, but while we did the interview itself, his colleagues noticed that they could not access his FB page at all.

And now we have: