A few items suggesting the dialectical revolutionary nature of feminism from roots to trans

1. Has Feminism been a dialectical effort from its inception? With Fourth Wave Feminism (dialectical revolutions never stand still but are always working to destroy the previous order) being the current ‘Trans-movement’?

2. Stephen Coughlin’s Marxism’s War on women

3. Let’s see. The UK Labour party is 100% a product of The Fabian Society. The Fabian Society is a communist project to destroy the UK and remake it as a communist polity through subversion as opposed to violent revolution. Hence the logo, a wolf in sheep’s clothing. Labour just ‘won’ an election and their policies and views are starting to be made known and manifested.

Important: Interview with Trevor Loudon on Russian communist philosopher and “Putin’s brain”, Alexander Dugin

A lot to say about this. First of all, it will annoy and frustrate many of our regular readers. This is not the intention. A fuller understanding of the forces at work in the world is our intention.

The RAIR article on this video can be seen here and is a solid representation of the interviewee’s meaning and intentions.

This article is our own specific examination of this material, and an attempt to put it into the greater context of the materials we use to understand the complex nature of the information battle-space which commands our attention, and forms our views of events.

A few notes in terms of Trevor’s statements on the state of the war between Russia and Ukraine: it is hard to believe that anyone that we would get to read, actually KNOWS what is taking place. This site tends to rely on this particular analyst for information on the state of the war between Russia and Ukraine as he has proven to be reliable consistently in terms of locations, wounded and dead and advancement or retreat of forces for either side of the conflict. Therefore, we tend to look at the claims of casualties in the following interview with uncertainty as to their accuracy. Not to diminish Trevor’s interview in any way whatsoever, and perhaps he does have insider knowledge on the war statistics, But that is not the focus of this piece. Alexander Dugin is, and his dialectic of MAGA Communism.

Trevor’s statement of who is best to run the world is entirely correct.

Because the USA has enjoyed total global naval dominance for some time now, the entire world has gotten richer, more peaceful and more advanced.

This is because pirates and hostile nations can no longer threaten international trade on the oceans. And where people are not doing as well as other places is usually because of the dominant philosophy of that region, and usually some form of leftism.

The problem with US global hegemony is that the USA is rapidly devolving into a communist state. And in many ways, already is.

Concerning Alexander Dugin though, this is Trevor’s direct area of expertise. And we have little doubts that he is in the bullseye on this one.

Check this Twitter thread by Stephen Coughlin on a related matter.

Full text:

There’s the old adage that you cannot tell your friend that his wife’s cheating or that his baby’s ugly and keep the friendship. The same thing for people who bit too hard and too long on favored active measures. But there you have it, actually the graphic below. It follows classic Russian Active Measures efforts. Note the four levels of activity. 1. At the top of the AM food chain is a Russian government service like the GRU or FSB. They NEVER engage in direct contact with their assets. They create the entities that do.

2. Entities like RIAC, Strategic Culture, and Global Research are sponsored and staffed by a Russian government service.

These are the entities that make contact with their operatives who are recruited because they’re disgruntled, fired, bruised egos, down on their luck, etc.

3. Then you have Russian media like RTV and Sputnik interview the operatives along favorable lines to establish them as voices.

4. And finally, you have pseudo-populists blast the disinformation into target audiences to normalize the information while sensationalizing it.

Stephen indicates above what organizations are knowingly or unknowingly enacting the, let’s call it the Dugin Dialectic, intended to mobilize the anti-woke patriots against the woke communism we are now all aware of, for the purpose of creating “a more masculine, Stalinist communism” or as it is called in the US, “MAGA Communism.” yes, all will be explained in the video. But those who follow Stephen Coughlin’s work or James Lindsay or TIK History will know that dialectics in its simplest form is about smashing together opposite concepts in order to destroy both. We see that with the Trans movement in spades. A male or female that undergoes surgery becomes a monster, not the other sex. This is the real intention. MAGA Communism can be seen the same way. A dialectic created by Dugin to destroy the MAGA movement in order to create a communist state using the people we refer to as MAGA by appealing to their contempt of, let’s call it left, or ‘woke’ communism.

To explain the terms “left communism” and “right communism,” let’s look at chapters 3 to 5 of Postmodernism Explained by Stephen Hicks. This book is available free as an audio book on YouTube fortunately. 

You can skip to this segment for a brief look at left Vs. right collectivism, although his excellent look at Nazism and the state of Germany before Hitler’s rise to power is later on in the book and is truly an excellent read/listen.

One can think of pre-WWII Germany this way.

Picture a triangle that is 40 feet high and with the bottom two corners 2 mm apart. From even a short distance away, it would look like a straight line. The bottom left is Soviet or international communism. The bottom right corner is national socialism. The differences are Lilliputian to the people observing from the top of the triangle. We can call those classical liberals, or most of us reading this site. People who believe in a republic where the state power is limited and dedicated to protecting the rights of the individual. The bottom two points of the triangle are different in determining how collectivism will be sorted out and the nature of the details of how the state power will operate, (which is absolute in both cases). They called National Socialism “Right wing” because it allowed for some minimal private control of the means of production. But it was still far left by the standards of an individualist oriented person or society.

The immediate pre-Nazi years in Germany saw street battles between ANTIFA acting for the international socialists, and the Brown Shirts acting for the National Socialists. But when the Brownshirts won those battles, the ANTIFA had no problems changing uniforms and joining the Nazis as both factions wanted to destroy the individualists at the top of the triangle. Again, that is all of us reading this site, generally speaking.

Another way of looking at this triangle might be say, how Islam would view itself compared to Catholicism V Protestantism. Some of Europe’s most bitter wars was fought between these two groups yet they would seem identical in all ways that matter to Islam.

With an understanding of dialectics, Trevor’s thesis in this video makes poetic sense. Communist thought constantly creates opposing groups or uses existing groups and makes them oppose each other for the purpose of destroying the existing order (along with both groups) and moving the culture and society to the left. (Again, meaning more state control.)

To be clear, the left means more government control and power, and less individual rights, and ultimately no individualism at all. Communism will not stop until we are all dead, certainly in one way or another such as spiritually, culturally and in terms of identity, and even actually physically dead, or, we are for all intents and purposes, a kind of insect that clones itself and like aphids, is as related to all other aphids as it is to its own direct progeny, and living and believing whatever narratives the COMINTERN demands we accept that day.

The more International term for what could also be called The Dugin Dialectic, is “National Bolshevism”. What the Christchurch Mosque shooter claimed was his affiliation. And it does dovetail with the interview we did with Brad Johnson in 2019 explaining the motives the New Zealand self described National Bolshevik had when he did his attack. While Johnson focuses on his retaliatory intention against the Islamic mass murder and conquest of the Balkans, and all of his claims are clearly true, there is another layer to the Christchurch attacker’s motives. And that is his Duginist influence.

Loudon explains that the symbol of the Dugin movement is the Black Sun. The banner of National Bolshevism. This is also one of the insignias of the Nazi Ukrainian military unit, the Azov battalion, although their use of the symbol is more Nazi than Duganist one can bet, seeing as how they are fighting Russia.

Here is a section of the cover page of the Christchurch mosque shooter’s manifesto. The Black Sun is clearly at the centre of his graphic.

Screenshot

Here is the interview with Trevor Loudon on Dugin and his movement to usurp the patriot MAGA movement as an agent for communism:

 

The only other element I wanted to add to this was teh Stephen Coughlin session with Sam Dubé from a month or so ago. This is a 3 hour plus presentation by Maj. Coughlin but taken with these other materials offers a pretty large and complete tapestry of understanding of the matrix we live in now. It is we think, sufficient to see the plays as they happen and before they happen ,as opposed to stressing over apparent contradictions or inability to recognize the thing inside the wrapper because the wrapper claims to be something other than what is really inside. In other words, the names for things is generally to sell you on the thing itself, which is dialectically opposite to the name.

Think, ‘Trans-affirming care” for ‘the state plans to sterilize and neuter your child and it is a crime if you try and stop it’ as one example.

Looking forward to any thoughts and comments on this interview and thank you all for checking out this site.

Cheatle takes centre stage in at least slightly better theatre than usual

The fog of war: Trying to figure out what happened with the attempted assassination of Trump is difficult even for Senator Ron Johnson

So much that is interesting from our perspective. The thousands of people with cell phones, most of which have cameras that eclipse TV cameras of the 1960, and certainly dramatically better than the 8 mm Zapruder film camera, which was probably running at 15 FPS, actually works against finding out what happened. Its just more noise around the noise. And like the building in Minneapolis that blew up several years ago, when the DHS showed up the next day and bulldozed it down and carted it away before any investigation could be done, the FBI, formerly not able to go on the roof cause the 1/12 slope made it too dangerous, managed to get up there with a hose and wash away any evidence in case Ted Danson and the CSI might happen to show up and solve the whole case by the last commercial.

Question: Does the FBI  clean up crime scenes normally? I thought they just made crime scenes and expect their victims to clean it up. No?

Also this article by Naomi Wolf on the subject is very enjoyable.

 

 

Was the mysterious woman behind Trump with the FIRE Biden sign an FBI top brass?

UPDATE: Snopes says no. Which means very little either way. But they say it isn’t her.

Google her name and select images

The video again:

Jus6 gonna put this here. A key excerpt from Eisenhower’s 1961 farewell speech

Perhaps more directly to the point:

One way we can get a solid data point on this is if it becomes disturbingly obvious that it was her, and that she was there for nefarious reasons, and absolutely nothing is done about it whatsoever, then we know it was true. Just like the vaxx. We all know. Peer reviews, data, stats show the shots did no good and a great deal of harm, no one but no one has been taken to account, and the mandates and regs are still in place, and the people harmed remain harmed.

Media is still gunning for medical professionals who actually told their best truths from their knowledge and experience about the vaxx and Covid in general.

So that is one way to get a better idea of what happened to Trump. Nothing happens to the people behind the event, but great harm befalls the people who are targeted by it. Rule of law is barely even a memory at this point.

 

Letter from Senator Josh Hawley on the assassination attempt on Trump and profound irregularities on security (Whistleblowers)

Well doesn’t this seem to explain a few things with a Senatorial stamp on it to boot

 

Just 2 items for today: The attempt on Trump and revisiting the German raid on a magazine and its principles: Links 1 for July 17, 2024

1. Whatever the narrative attacks surrounding the assassination attempt are, and the rapidly liquifying reality on the issue around it, this here is messed up. Even if she is lying, it’s messed up. If this is a systemic failure to due to DEI, it is messed up.

Someone got the memo it seems. Have a look at Trump’s new security team.

We really are in the fog of war here. CBS News, a source just as untrustworthy as the rest, even when they do appear to be contradicting a state narrative, has this headline and story:

Sniper took picture of Trump rally shooter, saw him use rangefinder before assassination attempt, source says

A sniper from a local tactical team deployed to assist the U.S. Secret Service at former President Donald Trump’s rally on Saturday took a picture of the gunman and saw him looking through a rangefinder minutes before he tried to assassinate the former president, a local law enforcement officer with direct knowledge of the events told CBS News. 

The sniper was one of three snipers, members of local tactical teams, who were stationed inside the building that the shooter used in the attack, the officer said. The operations plan had them stationed inside, looking out windows toward the rally, scanning the crowd. The details about the three snipers were first reported by the local news outlet BeaverCountian.com.  

One sniper inside spotted the gunman, Thomas Matthew Crooks, outside and looking up at the roof, observing the building and disappearing, according to the officer who spoke to CBS News. The sniper observed Crooks as he returned to the building, sat down and looked at his phone. At that point, one of the local snipers took a picture of Crooks. Next, the local sniper observed Crooks looking through a rangefinder, an instrument routinely used by marksmen to determine the distance of a target, and he immediately radioed to the command post, according to the local law enforcement officer. The local sniper also attempted to send the photo of the gunman up the chain of command.

Ok then.

2. Yesterday a link was posted here to a major story. It should have been fleshed out more. The German government went full commie/Nazi on the publishers of a ‘AfD adjacent” magazine, arrested its editors and confiscated their property and froze bank accounts. This would almost certainly be for disagreeing with the German government’s prime dialectic destruction of Germany through mass immigraiton, which is also the prime tool of every other Western government, which is why they hide it, lie about it, and criminalize all opposition to it as racist etc. Canada is passing two new laws that will have the same effect. Bills C-63 and C-637, both of which, the lawyer John Carpay came to Ottawa to speak on in the early spring. Those videos are below:

No one needs to be told that both the US and Canada have megaplans to destroy by dilution the cultures, history, ethnic mix and laws of our continent by mass migration. Canada even has a name for it. The Century Initiative. Below are three videos from the annual planning committee of the CI in which they explain how they are creating 15 minute cities to make life much harder (but you will be able to look into the dry cleaner’s window from the sidewalk better than now for some reason). But…

It may not be commonly known just how hard our governments try to hide it. At Roxham Road, a border street between Quebec and the US, they built a structure to hide the point where all the illegals cross into Canada from the USA. They take them on busses to Montreal and wherever. They hide them from the public. They make it difficult for people with cameras to get close to the action to show the RCMP being reduced to bell hops bringing luggage for illegals onto busses etc.

Then there is this:

Ireland:

I wish Ezra wouldn’t call it a “refugee camp”. There isn’t a single refugee among them. Not ONE as no neighbouring country to Ireland has conditions which make it a place from which those travelers would be refugees.

I think this is enough for one post.

Thank you all for checking out this site and its views.

James Lindsay: On Canadian communism, it’s history, it’s language and how it is being enacted today

Remember, if you think this doesn’t affect you in some other country, the same things are happening there with language designed for you to accept it. Or if not accept, find it difficult to fight against.

Please consider reading this essay on the history of Canadian communist prime ministers also.

This is critical information if you wish to understand how we got to this point.

 

A couple of videos that when taken together offer some seeds for thought on a potential conspiracy around the Trump Assassination Attempt

This event has consumed the news cycle and rightly so. This site has always tried to keep its eyes at the 6:00 though, since sometimes that is where the real action is. For the moment, we’ll do another post on this event as much as we all want it behind us. One concerning thing is that Trump, in the wake of this brush with death, has apparently scrapped his entire campaign speeches for the conference this week and is taking a much different approach of reconciliation etc. This could be good, but I doubt it. This event happened in no small part because of endless lies and violent and hateful rhetoric by the left and Democrat party members. Hell even CTV News in Canada reports that Russia believes the attempt was due to Biden admin’s creating an atmosphere for the attack. (Which makes me think maybe Russia did it if CTV says it was Biden) By now we have all seen the videos of the more-than-innuendo that they wish harm to come upon Trump. His speech should be about that. But it will now apparently be about why can’t we all just get along. We should know today.

Meanwhile, a military sniper with a distinguished record if he is to be taken at his word:

UPDATE: I think this is the same guy. If it is, it means the Daily Mail vetted him and he is who he says he is.

And this is a video that is hard to dismiss. If you think of the woman as signalling the sniper to take the shot when she raises her Biden sign, and then gets ready to film, it all makes sense.

Another video of a curious crowd looking at a man on a roof with a rifle pointing towards President Trump. Which adds a little to the video above maybe.

Newest information and best guesses concerning the attempted assassination of President Trump yesterday on July 13

Additional materials and updates will be in the comments of this post. Updating posts takes too long to propagate.

From The Conservative Treehouse: 

According to the New York Post, the assassin who tried to kill President Donald J Trump was Thomas Matthew Crooks, age 20 from Bethel Park, Pennsylvania.

Photo apparently taken of him before the shot

The FBI Pittsburg field office is in charge of the investigation.  However, as with all high-profile domestic terror attacks, shootings and killings that directly impact the “peace and tranquility” we can expect the DOJ-CRS to take over the information pipeline.

The FBI is officially calling the shooting an “attempted assassination attempt.  The motive is undetermined.

(New York Post) – The gunman who attempted to assassinate former President Donald Trump Saturday was identified as 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks, sources told The Post.

Crooks, of Bethel Park, Pa., squeezed off shots — one of which grazed Trump in the ear — at an outdoor rally in Butler, just outside Pittsburgh. Sources said Crooks was was planted on a roof of a manufacturing plant more than 130 yards away from the stage at Butler Farm Show grounds. (read more)

The following will be the prevailing opinion by noon:

Further down that thread:

I’m a trained sniper as well. I was the sniper on a BOP SORT team for years. Part of your job is looking through your rifle scope for would be threats to your team. How the hell did they not see a perp on a roof that was a few hundred feet away from the venue? I mean supposedly those same snipers were the ones who took him out, so why did he get shots fired off to begin with?!

A comment last night from someone who is known to us, and is a competitive rifle markswoman:

As a person who has recently entered precision shooting, civilians do not understand it looks hours and hours of training, even years and 1000 of rounds down the range to shoot like this to even get close to a human head. There is NO way a commie mentally unstable clown could have done this even with the most expensive equipment out there. This is some type of highly trained person. PERIOD.

Unstable is a questionable attribute in this context. But certainly the person can not be totally undisciplined.

Some of these people do have something in common though. There will be an interview published within the next few days hopefully with an expert on a very specific strategic targeting US patriots to get them to act in a manner that will start a US civil war. And there are several countries that would find that of tremendous value to them. Countries who for example, are currently under fire from US weapons and weapons platforms, if we were to go to motives. It would certainly be a viable theory as to what could be behind this assassination attempt. It was in fact the same philosophy and actors behind the Christchurch Mosque shooting. But it requires a more complete understanding than I can give it here to be even worthy of consideration. So let’s call this foreshadowing rather than explanation. When we add in the contents of this interview with what we know of the Hegelian weaponry of dialectics, it falls together very neatly.

But again, this goes to motive. Who actually did it and their own reasoning we may never know. People’s objections to the handling of this event are noteworthy. Even if they don’t speak to the grand design. And sometimes there isn’t one. But it is difficult to look at an event like that without considering what the obvious and most likely consequences of that event would be one move ahead at least. And I think we all know what that move would be. And it would likely make the riots of 2020 by the Democrat sponsored ANTIFA/BLM revolutionaries seem like nothing in comparison.

This is an interesting photo. It was a very bright day, so the fellow would have used a high shutter speed. Not enough of an expert to say this is real, but I suppose it could be. Within the red oval there is a line which the Tweet claims is the bullet. It would look like a line as it would be a point moving as far as it did from the time the shutter opened to where it closed, which likely was around 1/2500th of a second.

Right after this event, the crowd acted properly towards media present. Because no matter what the back story is on this, deliberately false reporting, or what we call here, a mass line Maoist narrative attack on president Trump is without question an enormous part of the impetus of this attempt on his life, if not the actual motivation of the shooter. The Media itself has become a weapon against our peoples and nations. In Canada, the CBC is a stellar example of that.

The following is the newest photo alleged to be of the shooter at this time. Note this time they didn’t wait for him to go to a movie and get arrested after.

Breitbart appears to have sourced the claim that Biden instructed principle people to “Put Trump in the Bullseye”. Who talks like that? This is not normal political speech.

President Joe Biden reportedly told donors on a phone call on Monday that it was “time to put” former President Donald Trump “in the bullseye.”

“Biden told donors on a private call this afternoon: ‘It’s time to put Trump in the bullseye,’” Kenneth P. Vogel, a reporter with the New York Times, wrote in a post on Monday.

Who is the head of the Secret Service who is responsible for Trump’s protection?

Photo with speculation that another shot may have hit his bullet proof vest

Emergency Room Doctor speaks on his experience trying to save the life of the man who did get killed as a result of the assassination attempt.

Dunno about this one. How do we know he was watching the sniper? Top video is interesting though. It appears to be the roof sniper after being shot. The same person many were pointing at and telling authorities he was there and should be dealt with.

Elon Musk asks the obvious question:

Updates to follow.

Had to add this here. The rest are all in the comments.

President Trump may have been shot at a rally LIVE STREAMS

Please click through to read the thread on the TweetX above

UPDATE and opinion from Sonia Bailley

Let’s see, the Secret Service knew there was a guy on the rooftop, because an attendee outside the security perimeter told the BBC in an interview with them, that he tried to warn the Secret Service by pointing to the rooftop which had direct line of site to Trump, which oddly enough, had no protection. Who runs the Secret Service? Homeland Security. Who runs Homeland Security? Alejandro Mayorka. Trump got shot as he spoke about the influx of illegal immigrants under Biden. I wouldn’t put anything past Obama & Obiden and all the people they brought into their administration.

Witness from front row:

Rumour is the shooter is top shelf ANTIFA UPDATE The photo below is not the shooter apparently. There are new photos of another suspect that more closely resembles the man seen and photographed lying on the roof with a rifle

https://twitter.com/AdelleNaz/status/1812266490667889134

Screenshot

Screenshot

Screenshot

Will try and post what I can of that

PLEASE read the comments for the latest updates. Our excellent readers here at Vlad are starting to leave reliable source updates

Better:

Comment:
https://x.com/secretsvcspox

https://twitter.com/alphafox78/status/1812270158708343195?s=43

This is maybe something we need to be aware of

 

Secret Service spokesman Anthony Guglielmi said in an official statement. “The Secret Service has implemented protective measures and the former President is safe. This is now an active Secret Service investigation, and further information will be released when available.”

The shooter who tried to assassinate Trump is now dead, the Atlantic first reported. https://www.nationalreview.com/news/trump-escorted-off-stage-after-shots-fired-at-pennsylvania-rally/

This may be the end of any potential political solution

https://twitter.com/saras76/status/1812249963138601239?t=pK1_iX0JiwJbpi94PchWRA&s=19

Update on the Helen Grus hearings that concluded at the end of May, 2024

Please read the whole Helen Grus coverage we have so far at RAIR Foundation at this link.

VERY sorry to all that this story is so late in coming. The good news, such as it is, is that the hearings which were supposed to have concluded in the last round, have been extended into what looks like next year. According to the OPS website, January 6-10 & 14-17, 2025 in fact. The purpose is most likely to hurt Helen who has to pay her own legal fees, as opposed to an increasingly dialectical state which invents the resources it needs to prosecute anyone who challenges state narratives. And that of course is Helen’s real crime. Not even that she challenged it so much as she dared consider a possibility which challenged the state narrative on the mRNA shots from a position of state authority and that. will. not. do.

Below please find the story that was written some weeks ago at the conclusion of the most recent set of hearings of Detective Helen Grus which was in May 27-31.

—–

In what was supposed to be the final week of the Helen Grus hearings, more astonishing tactics were rolled out against the defendant, Ottawa Police detective, Helen Grus.

At one point, the prosecution suggested that the hearing would be better served if they continued without her lawyer in the room. In fact they also locked all media out at one point during the week. Please see this Tweet from journalist, Jason Lavigne who attended the hearings all week:

The process itself is so clearly flawed that frustration was evident on the faces of the people in the hearing room, which iwas well attended by journalists from The Rebel, Robert Kraychik, Jason Lavigne, and a writer from True North.

RAIR Foundation attended some of the sessions during what was to be the final week of hearings, but will now reconvene in December of this year for yet another week.

We caught up to Jason Lavigne on the opening day of the hearings this past week on May 27th. The following interview was done at the lunch break, which the hearings officer mysteriously decided would be the point at which they would adjourn for the day.

 

Jason explains how the prosecution kept the process contentious by arguing Helen’s right to examine her own notes from the dates where she was alleged to be insubordinate.

Much of the testimony on the 28th dealt with how Helen was treated because she did not wish to disclose her vaccine status.

 

At this point of the hearings, we are at least getting to the meat of the matter. That Helen had reasons to suspect a potential connection between the unprecedented 7 deaths of breastfeeding babies over a couple of weeks, and the mRNA injection status of the mothers.

Whatever the actual charges against Detective Grus actually are, it appears to be about punishing anyone in a position of authority for daring to question the safety of the vaccines.

There was a great deal of support for Helen at the Hearings including a woman pictured above, who some weeks before, had arranged a small protest on Parliament Hill to get signatures and statements of support for Helen.

She came to the hearings on May 27th to deliver the paper flowers, cards, statements and signatures she has been collecting for weeks now on behalf of Detective Grus.

Below, the presentation at the hearings for Helen on Monday the 27th.

RAIR Foundation went to Parliament on May 13th, Mother’s Day, and spoke with Meela, who organized the tribute on May 13th about why she created this initiative on behalf of Helen Grus.

Below, The Rebel’s Robert Kraychik offers an update on the hearings on the same day and includes some background on Helen, what her responsibilities with the police actually are, and why the charges make little sense.

Robert also details the curious choice of a hearings officer who has zero legal training, as well as a speech problem, which Robert likens to “hiring a midget to play in the NBA.”

As the hearings against Helen continue, one cannot help but wonder if the real purpose of them is that political authorities feel that should the public get wind of the idea that what were tantamount to mandatory experimental injections caused the deaths of babies, it could go very, very badly for them.

Why Trudeau must stay in power till the next election

In both Canada and the USA there is a very serious danger of the staggeringly destructive leaders of both countries being replaced in time for the next election.

In the USA, this would be bad because millions have now reconciled themselves to voting for Donald Trump from the Democrat camp despite 8 years of lies and slander against him, because Joe Biden is now clearly visible as a disaster and unfit for purpose. This means that Trump wouldn’t just win, he would have a mandate. If they put in someone like Gavin Newsom, Trump could still win, but the victory would be a lot smaller. And Newsome is America’s Mark Carney. A communist ready to deconstruct the country and lower the standard of living while destroying the environment all while claiming to improve both.

There are increasingly loud noises about replacing Le Petit Dauphin in Canada as well. And the most likely repalcement is former governor of The Bank of Canada as well as the Bank of England, Mark Carney. I think that is a first ever. Much like Chrystia Freeland is the first person to be Deputy PM, Finance Minister and all while sitting on the Board of the WEF.

The good news is, if they replace Trudeau with Freeland, which would be the expected replacement based on the pecking order, she would likely lose as badly as Trudeau would. So fair enough. But if they put someone like Carney in, who says in his own book, ‘Values’ that he intends to make Canadian’s lives worse and that his role models are Marx, Engles and LENIN, his chances of winning with low information  voters is probably quite high.

If they install Carney, the brainwashed masses who think Poilievre is all the nasty words the left use to cancel people, exactly as they did to Trump (and are trying on Netenyahu, Orban, the AfD and any counter-revolutionary leader or party) Carney might win.

Carney uses the climate scam to frighten people into supporting his efforts to obliterate Canadian industry with claims that AI server farms are screaming for, DEMANDING clean energy. He has said this on multiple occasions on and off camera.

At a guess, here is how I think that scam works:

High tech company: Our server farms and processing cloud farms need a massive great amount of power to run, but Canada’s regulations on CO2 emissions, Carbon taxes and seeming prohibition on nuclear power make it impossible for us to operate in Canada

Mark Carney: No worries, we are working on ‘green energy’ which will make all the power you need from unicorn exhaust and prayers from all the little muslim children

High Tech: OK! Super! Give it to us now and in boatloads!

Then Carney on his speaking tour explains how all these companies are demanding a certain kind of electric power, instead of, you know, electric power. Like everyone else in the world who do not give a damn how the electricity is generated so long as it’s reliable and affordable.

On this site we frequently point at the clear most destructive threat to Canada. The utter destruction of the nation as a people, a culture, a shared history, as origins, as law by dilution through rapid immigration via a government but not government program called, ‘The Century Initiative’.

Of course the obvious issue here is that each person brought to Canada from a hot country, which is where all these people come from as no one wants to move to Canada from Norway or Bulgaria anymore, multiples their ‘carbon footprint’ by a factor of FOUR!

Now it is ludicrous to think that the federal government doesn’t know this. And as an aside, I thought Trump’s handling of the trick question about global warming last night was simply as good as it could possibly be. He answered the question about the ‘Climate Crisis’ with  real environmental issues and refused to take the bait on the dialectical line of effort against the West, the Global Warming attack. They launched BS and he came back with yes, we want clean air and clean water.

Back to Trudeau. Given that the fed guv clearly knows it takes more energy to live in Canada than in a hot country by 4X, this means they also know Global Warming is a crock. They have to know it. There is no reconciling these two facts. Either the world is facing an existential threat to all life from Global Warming caused by man made CO2 pumped into the air, or it isn’t. And if it is, bringing the population of Canada up to 100,000,000 people, immigrating almost entirely from hot countries can only be a very very bad thing.

So the purpose of mass migration, like the purpose of the Global Warming Consensus, (please consider watching the linked video on the nature of the term, consensus as the left applies it) has to be destruction of Canada, and more broadly the West and Western civilization overall. In fact it is the most serious threat to Canada as it has always been. As a nation state. And Trudeau himself explained that he thought the Nation State is a very old idea and he wanted to move past it in an interview on Quebec TV in 2006.

In his first interview after being elected, he told the NYT he looked forward to being the Prime Minister of the first Post national State.

 

And now for the main event:

Mark Carney was the guest, I guess you could say the Keynote Speaker at this year’s Century Initiative webcast at 10:00 June 7, 2024. So earlier this month.

You can practically smell the sulphur

We need Trudeau and Biden to stay right where they are if we have any hope of restoring a republic like government and state if there is a political solution still possible at all.

Tommy Robinson Arrested in Alberta

More here

Just a little thing about a totally unrelated story. Just cause you know, the post is open and I’m too lazy to start another one…

RCMP chief says he hopes MPs don’t name politicians accused of aiding foreign powers in the House

[WARNING: Link is from CBC]

MPs enjoy parliamentary privilege in House of Commons, including freedom from arrest

The head of the RCMP says he’s uneasy with the idea that politicians could use their parliamentary privilege to name colleagues accused of aiding foreign powers.

Earlier this month, the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians (NSICOP), a cross-party committee of MPs and senators with top security clearances, released a heavily redacted document alleging — based on intelligence reports — that some parliamentarians have been “semi-witting or witting” participants in the efforts of foreign states to interfere in Canadian politics.

The RCMP has said anyone who leaks classified intelligence could be charged under Canada’s secrets law. The Liberal government has still faced pressure from the Conservatives and others to release the names of those cited in the report on the floor of the House of Commons, where MPs enjoy parliamentary privilege protecting them from arrest.

It’s not a scenario that RCMP Commissioner Mike Duheme wants to think about.

 

 

New information on White House censorship of vaxx critics

“First amendment? First amendment! We don’t need no stinkin first amendment!!”

Before Alex Berenson’s post, maybe a look at some of the damage and suffering cause by the White House by censoring people’s ability to look at information critical of the damned mRNA/DNA vaccines.

https://twitter.com/vaxcasualty/status/1805359701758296430

 

Full text of the Tweet below in case he gets censored again. Please click through and retweet it if you have an account on TwitterX.

THE PFIZER/WHITE HOUSE FILES
In July 2021, a senior Pfizer board member secretly began working with a Biden Administration operative to suppress criticism of Covid vaccines on X, newly released internal documents from X show.
Top officials at Twitter (now X) viewed the men – Dr. Scott Gottlieb, the Pfizer director, and Andy Slavitt, the operative, who had officially left a senior White House post just weeks before – as speaking for the administration in their censorship demands, the documents show.
The new documents raise constitutional and legal concerns about the Biden Administration’s social media censorship efforts, as well as Pfizer’s role in banning criticism of a product that made up almost half its sales in 2021.
Within days, the Supreme Court is expected to decide Murthy v Missouri, a landmark lawsuit over the administration’s efforts to control debate on social media.
The new documents provide crucial perspective on the Missouri case, showing how far would-be censors went in 2021 to prop up public confidence in the Covid jabs. The documents also show the power the White House had over Twitter, which badly wanted to avoid a confrontation with it.
At the time, the Biden Administration was threatening to “review” a federal law commonly called Section 230, because it was angry social media companies were allowing Covid vaccine skepticism.
Section 230 was crucial to those companies for the near-total immunity it gave them against lawsuits from users. Twitter took threats to it seriously. “We will always be proactive and vigilant about protecting 230,” Lauren Culbertson, the company’s then-head of United States public policy, wrote on July 22, 2021.

None of these internal documents has been previously released.
They are part of a tranche of censorship-related material X is making available to me following searches of its internal archives.
Lawyers for X are reviewing the documents before releasing them. But so far only one document they have provided – an email from Jim Baker, Twitter’s then-deputy general counsel – contains any redactions.
In addition, no one at X, including Elon Musk, asked for or placed any restrictions on or had any input into the writing of this article. (Lawyers for X did ask to review it after writing but before publication, to be sure the names of junior employees or their email addresses were not included. Their review did not result in any changes.)

The censorship conspiracy by Slavitt and Gottlieb targeted me personally.
I am not named in any of the new documents provided so far. Slavitt and Gottlieb used careful – almost coded – language in their outreach to Twitter on July 18 and 19, 2021. They did initially not refer to any particular censorship targets by name. But emails and other internal Twitter documents that have already been released show I was a top target of both men.
I intend to use the newly released documents to amend Berenson v Biden, my complaint against Slavitt, Gottlieb, Pfizer chairman Dr. Albert Bourla, and the Biden Administration for conspiring to force Twitter to ban me in 2021. Gottlieb’s lawyers previously argued I had not alleged Gottlieb had had any contact with Twitter officials before August 2021. The documents show otherwise.
In fact, Slavitt introduced Gottlieb to Todd O’Boyle – a senior Twitter lobbyist who handled most of the company’s interactions with the White House – by email on Sunday, July 18, 2021. Slavitt, a longtime Democratic operative, had served as senior advisor to the Biden administration’s Covid response team.
“I wonder if you would be open to a 20 minute call with Scott Gottlieb and me about a policy matter,” Slavitt wrote. Slavitt referred to Gottlieb as “FDA commissioner under Trump” and failed to mention his role on Pfizer’s board.
Although he had officially left the Biden Administration weeks before, Slavitt’s email signature also contained his White House email address, asking that “Government Email” be sent there.

Slavitt’s outreach to O’Boyle came as the public debate over the Covid mRNA jabs was intensifying. The jabs, which had appeared very protective against Covid in the spring, were abruptly losing their effectiveness, causing the Biden Administration to consider encouraging Americans to receive a third “booster” shot.
The White House knew boosters – and potential vaccine mandates – would be controversial. As it tried to keep public confidence in the shots high, the administration escalated its attacks on Covid jab skeptics and on the social media platforms that gave them their biggest audiences.
Only two days before Slavitt’s email, on Friday, July 16, President Biden had said social media companies were “killing people” when they allowed vaccine skepticism. The firestorm that followed was mostly publicly directed at Facebook. But the new documents show that top officials at Twitter wanted to avoid similar criticism – or put Twitter’s Section 230 protection at risk.
On Monday, July 19, Gottlieb followed up by emailing O’Boyle directly, complaining about “false narratives on key public health issues” on Twitter.
Gottlieb told O’Boyle Twitter had an “affirmative obligation” to muzzle large accounts that made posts that concerned him. Gottlieb did not mention that he served on the board of a company that stood to make billions of dollars from the federal government if the Biden Administration rolled out booster shots and or jab mandates.
O’Boyle had already responded to Slavitt, offering to set up a conference call with the men that afternoon. “I’d be glad to speak with you and Scott,” he wrote Slavitt.

Note that O’Boyle’s response is time-stamped with a “UTC” code – he actually sent it at 9:22 a.m. Eastern time Monday morning, about 90 minutes before Gottlieb first emailed him.

O’Boyle also forwarded Gottlieb’s email to Culbertson, the head of Twitter’s United States public policy.
In turn, Culbertson sent it to even more senior officials with a comment indicating she viewed the email from Pfizer board member Gottlieb as directly related to the White House’s pressure campaign against vaccine skeptics. While the administration was angriest at Facebook, Twitter “could be next” and needed to “keep up the responsiveness,” she wrote.

Gottlieb increased the pressure on O’Boyle later in the week, after O’Boyle – apparently accidentally – failed to set up their promised conference call. Gottlieb, a regular panelist on Sunday morning political talk shows, wrote O’Boyle on Friday that he would be discussing the issue “on TV this weekend and wanted to just see if you still wanted to connect so I may have the benefit of your views.”
Within minutes, O’Boyle sent his “sincerest apologies” to the Pfizer board member and said he was “absolutely available.”
At the time, I was arguably the most prominent Covid vaccine skeptic on Twitter.
Slavitt had targeted my removal at least as early as April 2021, when he and Rob Flaherty, another White House official, met with Twitter and asked a “really tough question” about why the company had not suspended my account. I was also a sharp public critic of both Gottlieb and Slavitt.
But Jack Dorsey, Twitter’s chief executive, supported me internally, and the company initially refused to ban me. By the summer, however, the Biden administration’s attitude towards vaccine skeptics had hardened. Meanwhile, Dorsey’s position at Twitter was increasingly tenuous; he would step down as chief executive in November.
Other Twitter officials did not appear to view the free speech rights of their users as a crucial issue in the same way as either Dorsey or Facebook’s top executives did.
In a note to other top Twitter lawyers and policy executives on July 19, Jim Baker, Twitter’s deputy general counsel, wrote only that “we have to be very thoughtful about how we interact with the government and what we say about it in communications with the USG [United States Government].”
So the White House censorship campaign came at a time when Twitter’s users were more vulnerable than they had ever been.
And it succeeded. In a matter of months, it forced Twitter, which had once called itself “the free speech wing of the free speech party,” to become willing to ban anyone – including me – who questioned the efficacy or risks of the Covid jabs.

Note: as X releases more documents to me about Gottlieb, Slavitt, and the 2021 censorship campaign, I will write more articles.