Warning: this video contains scenes of some fairly brutal things. But not seeing them doesn’t make them not have happened.
Category Archives: Sharia Law
U.N. and the end to free speech. What ever happened to actual human rights?
I have covered this before but I don’t think it can be overstated how dangerous the UN now that this unelected bloated bureaucracy has been pretty much bought off by the OIC (Organization of Islamic Councils) is to the essential freedoms that created the matrix around which our secular and liberal democracies where formed.
The fact that the UN and for that matter, the EU are passing, have passed and are feverishly working on laws that would make criticism of any irrational religious authority a crime is at best begging for a return to the worst parts of the middle ages and more likely utter cultural and even historical suicide. How can you commit historical suicide? watch the Muslims in Gaza and the west bank dig up relics of ancient Israel and destroy them so that any evidence that Jews lived there will be utterly erased and you will know.
Here is another gem on the matter of free speech, and the UN
United Nations Assaults Free Speech – Moves To Protect Islam
July 31, 2008 – The United Nations Human Rights Council (HRC) is an Islam-Marxist-dominated entity that is working to criminalize or suppress any public criticism of Islam around the world.
In a recently-concluded session, the Council ruled that any criticism of Islam in the Council proceedings was to be off limits. This decision resulted from the attempts by David Littman who testified on behalf of the Association for World Education and the International Human and Ethical Union.
Littman criticized the Islamic practices of female genital mutilation, stoning for adultery, and child marriages permitted under Islamic Shariah law. His attempts to talk were repeatedly interrupted by the representatives from Egyptian, Pakistan, and Iran. Videos of this debate were provided by U.N. Watch, a Geneva-based human rights group. A transcript is also available on the U.N. Watch site.
Islamists demanded that Littman not be permitted to speak – and the President of the Human Rights Council, Doru Romulus Costea of Romania, eventually ruled: “Statements should refrain from making judgments or evaluations of a particular religion. . . I can promise that at the next evaluation of a religious creed, law, or document, I will interrupt the speaker and we’ll go on to the next one.”
The Pakistani representative protested the statement by Littman. He told the Council:
Mr. President, the voices which we hear in this council and the issues they raise are not unfamiliar. There is an agenda behind it, and you have already given a ruling on the discussion of Shariah law in this council. We have strong objections on any discussion, any direct or indirect discussion, any out of context, selective discussion on the Shariah law in this council. I would request the president to exercise his judgment and authority and request the speaker not to touch the issues which have already been deemed barred from discussion in this council. Thank you very much.
Washington D.C. Muslims attack gay men. Dog bites man.
“If you where in my country, you would be stoned to death”
UK public school now has all Halal food. whether you are Muslim or not.
For the love of freedom people fight back. What is wrong with the UK? Let’s make something perfectly clear. Tolerance means to ALLOW people with arbitrary differences to have them when its not to inconvenient to the majority. It does NOT mean submitting to the whims of the religious or the intolerant. If I had a child there I would send him to school covered in bacon fat. Let’s see how tolerant the rest are for a change. As if we didn’t know already.
Primary school to serve pupils halal meat whether they’re Muslim or not
By Daily Mail Reporter
Last updated at 12:24 PM on 10th October 2008
All pupils at a primary school face being served halal meat at lunchtime whether they are Muslim or not, it emerged today.
Dale Primary, which has a large proportion of Asians among its 550 pupils, is consulting parents about the controversial move.
Under the plans pupils would only be offered Islamic-approved meals on days when meat is on the menu to ‘avoid cross-contamination’.

No choice: Dale Primary want to serve halal meat alone to avoid ‘contamination’
For meat to be classified halal, a Muslim must have slaughtered the animal from which it came by a single cut to the throat and without stunning it first.
A prayer, including the words ‘Allah is great’, is said while single cut to the throat all the blood is drained.
The school, Derby’s biggest primary, provides its own catering after opting out of the city council system.
Head teacher Linda Sullivan has written to parents, carers and staff asking them if the school should offer halal meat to pupils.
Governors will consider the response before deciding whether to implement the plan.
A school spokeswoman said: ‘The governors want to know if there is a strong demand as one or two parents have mentioned serving halal meat.
Video of Muslim women’s rights activist. We need a few million more of her.
Bahraini Women’s rights activist Ghada Jamshir on abuse of women in Islam Koran and practice.
Speech by Geert Wilders. This is tomorrow’s newspaper today.
Geert tells it as it is in Europe and will be tomorrow in North America. I would call this urgent reading. For Geert’s movie Fitna you can see the original here
| Europe’s Last Stand |
By Geert Wilders
FrontPageMagazine.com | Wednesday, October 08, 2008
Dear friends,
Thank you very much for inviting me. Great to be at the Four Seasons. I come from a country that has one season only: a rainy season that starts January 1st and ends December 31st. When we have three sunny days in a row, the government declares a national emergency. So Four Seasons, that’s new to me.
It’s great to be in New York. When I see the skyscrapers and office buildings, I think of what Ayn Rand said: “The sky over New York and the will of man made visible.” Of course, without the Dutch you would have been nowhere, still figuring out how to buy this island from the Indians. But we are glad we did it for you. And, frankly, you did a far better job than we possibly could have done.
I come to America with a mission. All is not well in the Old World. There is a tremendous danger looming, and it is very difficult to be optimistic. We might be in the final stages of the Islamization of Europe. This is not only a clear and present danger to the future of Europe itself; it is a threat to America and the sheer survival of the West. The danger I see looming is the scenario of America as the last man standing. The United States as the last bastion of Western civilization, facing an Islamic Europe. In a generation or two, the US will ask itself: who lost Europe? Patriots from around Europe risk their lives every day to prevent precisely this scenario form becoming a reality.
My short lecture consists of 4 parts: first, I will describe the situation on the ground in Europe. Then, I will say a few things about Islam. Thirdly, if you are still here, I will talk a little bit about the movie you just saw. To close I will tell you about a meeting in Jerusalem.
The Europe you know is changing. You have probably seen the landmarks: the Eiffel Tower, Trafalgar Square, Rome’s ancient buildings and maybe the canals of Amsterdam. They are still there. And they still look very much the same as they did a hundred years ago.
But in all of these cities, sometimes a few blocks away from your tourist destination, there is another world, a world very few visitors see – and one that does not appear in your tourist guidebook. It is the world of the parallel society created by Muslim mass-migration.
All throughout Europe a new reality is rising: entire Muslim neighbourhoods where very few indigenous people reside or are even seen. And if they are, they might regret it. This goes for the police as well. It’s the world of head scarves, where women walk around in figureless tents, with baby strollers and a group of children. Their husbands, or slaveholders if you prefer, walk three steps ahead. Mosques stand on many street corners. The shops have signs you and I cannot read. You will be hard-pressed to find any economic activity. These are Muslim ghettos controlled by religious fanatics. These are Muslim neighbourhoods, and they are mushrooming in every city across Europe. These are the building-blocks for territorial control of increasingly larger portions of Europe, street by street, neighbourhood by neighbourhood, city by city.
There are now thousands of mosques throughout Europe. With larger congregations than there are in churches. And in every European city there are plans to build super-mosques that will dwarf every church in the region. Clearly, the signal is: we rule.
Many European cities are already one-quarter Muslim: just take Amsterdam, Marseille and Malmo in Sweden. In many cities the majority of the under-18 population is Muslim. Paris is now surrounded by a ring of Muslim neighbourhoods. Mohammed is the most popular name among boys in many cities. In some elementary schools in Amsterdam the farm can no longer be mentioned, because that would also mean mentioning the pig, and that would be an insult to Muslims. Many state schools in Belgium and Denmark only serve halal food to all pupils. In once-tolerant Amsterdam gays are beaten up almost exclusively by Muslims. Non-Muslim women routinely hear “whore, whore.” Satellite dishes are not pointed to local TV stations, but to stations in the country of origin. In France, school teachers are advised to avoid authors deemed offensive to Muslims, including Voltaire and Diderot; the same is increasingly true of Darwin. The history of the Holocaust can, in many cases, no longer be taught because of Muslim sensitivity. In England, Sharia courts are now officially part of the British legal system. Many neighbourhoods in France are no-go areas for women without head scarves. Last week, a man almost died after being beaten up by Muslims in Brussels, because he was drinking during the Ramadan. Jews are fleeing France in record numbers, on the run for the worst wave of anti-Semitism since World War II. French is now commonly spoken on the streets of Tel Aviv and Netanya, Israel. I could go on forever with stories like this. Stories about Islamization.
A total of fifty-four million Muslims now live in Europe. San Diego University recently calculated that a staggering 25 percent of the population in Europe will be Muslim just 12 years from now. Bernhard Lewis has predicted a Muslim majority by the end of this century.
Now these are just numbers. And the numbers would not be threatening if the Muslim-immigrants had a strong desire to assimilate. But there are few signs of that. The Pew Research Center reported that half of French Muslims see their loyalty to Islam as greater than their loyalty to France. One-third of French Muslims do not object to suicide attacks. The British Centre for Social Cohesion reported that one-third of British Muslim students are in favour of a worldwide caliphate. A Dutch study reported that half of Dutch Muslims admit they “understand” the 9/11 attacks.
Muslims demand what they call “respect.” And this is how we give them respect. Our elites are willing to give in – to give up. In my own country we have gone from calls by one cabinet member to turn Muslim holidays into official state holidays, to statements by another cabinet member, that Islam is part of Dutch culture, to an affirmation by the Christian-Democratic attorney general that he is willing to accept Sharia in the Netherlands if there is a Muslim majority. We have cabinet members with passports from Morocco and Turkey.
Muslim demands are supported by unlawful behaviour, ranging from petty crimes and random violence – for example, against ambulance workers and bus drivers, to small-scale riots. Paris has seen its uprising in the low-income suburbs, the banlieus. Some prefer to see these as isolated incidents, but I call it a Muslim Intifada. I call the perpetrators “settlers,” because that is what they are. They do not come to integrate into our societies; they come to integrate our society into their Dar-al-Islam. Therefore, they are settlers.
Much of this street violence I mention is directed exclusively against non-Muslims, forcing many native people to leave their neighborhoods, their cities, their countries.
Politicians shy away from taking a stand against this creeping Sharia. They believe in the equality of all cultures. Moreover, on a mundane level, Muslims are now a swing vote not to be ignored.
Our many problems with Islam cannot be explained by poverty, repression or the European colonial past, as the Left claims. Nor does it have anything to do with Palestinians or American troops in Iraq. The problem is Islam itself.
Allow me to give you a brief Islam 101. The first thing you need to know about Islam is the importance of the book of the Quran. The Quran is Allah’s personal word, revealed by an angel to Mohammed, the prophet. This is where the trouble starts. Every word in the Quran is Allah’s word and therefore not open to discussion or interpretation. It is valid for every Muslim and for all times. Therefore, there is no such a thing as moderate Islam. Sure, there are a lot of moderate Muslims. But a moderate Islam is non-existent.
The Quran calls for hatred, violence, submission, murder, and terrorism. The Quran calls for Muslims to kill non-Muslims, to terrorize non-Muslims and to fulfil their duty to wage war: violent jihad. Jihad is a duty for every Muslim; Islam is to rule the world – by the sword. The Quran is clearly anti-Semitic, describing Jews as monkeys and pigs.
The second thing you need to know is the importance of Mohammed, the prophet. His behaviour is an example to all Muslims and cannot be criticized. Now, if Mohammed had been a man of peace, let us say like Ghandi and Mother Theresa wrapped in one, there would be no problem. But Mohammed was a warlord, a mass murderer, a paedophile, and had several marriages – at the same time. Islamic tradition tells us how he fought in battles, how he had his enemies murdered and even had prisoners of war executed. Mohammed himself slaughtered the Jewish tribe of Banu Qurayza. He advised on matters of slavery, but never advised to liberate slaves. Islam has no other morality than the advancement of Islam. If it is good for Islam, it is good. If it is bad for Islam, it is bad. There is no gray area or other side.
Quran as Allah’s own word and Mohammed as the perfect man are the two most important facets of Islam. Let no one fool you about Islam being a religion. Sure, it has a god, and a here-after, and 72 virgins. But in its essence, Islam is a political ideology. It is a system that lays down detailed rules for society and the life of every person. Islam wants to dictate every aspect of life. Islam means “submission.” Islam is not compatible with freedom and democracy, because what it strives for is Sharia. If you want to compare Islam to anything, compare it to Communism or national-socialism, these are all totalitarian ideologies.
This is what you need to know about Islam, in order to understand what is going on in Europe. For millions of Muslims, the Quran and the live of Mohammed are not 14 centuries old, but are an everyday reality, an ideal, that guides every aspect of their lives. Now you know why Winston Churchill called Islam “the most retrograde force in the world,” and why he compared Mein Kampf to the Quran.
Which brings me to my movie, “Fitna.” I am a lawmaker, and not a movie maker. But I felt I had the moral duty to educate about Islam. The duty to make clear that the Quran stands at the heart of what some people call terrorism, but is in reality jihad. I wanted to show that the problems of Islam are at the core of Islam, and do not belong to its fringes.
Now, from the day the plan for my movie was made public, it caused quite a stir, in the Netherlands and throughout Europe. First, there was a political storm, with government leaders across the continent in sheer panic. The Netherlands was put under a heightened terror alert, because of possible attacks or a revolt by our Muslim population. The Dutch branch of the Islamic organisation Hizb ut-Tahrir declared that the Netherlands was due for an attack.
Internationally, there was a series of incidents. The Taliban threatened to organize additional attacks against Dutch troops in Afghanistan, and a website linked to Al Qaeda published the message that I ought to be killed, while various muftis in the Middle East stated that I would be responsible for all the bloodshed after the screening of the movie. In Afghanistan and Pakistan, the Dutch flag was burned on several occasions. Dolls representing me were also burned. The Indonesian President announced that I will never be admitted into Indonesia again, while the UN Secretary General and the European Union issued cowardly statements in the same vein as those made by the Dutch Government. I could go on and on. It was an absolute disgrace, a sell-out.
A plethora of legal troubles also followed, and have not ended yet. Currently the state of Jordan is litigating against me. Only last week there were renewed security agency reports about a heightened terror alert for the Netherlands because of “Fitna.”
Now, I would like to say a few things about Israel, because, very soon, we will get together in its capital. The best way for a politician in Europe to lose votes is to say something positive about Israel. The public has wholeheartedly accepted the Palestinian narrative, and sees Israel as the aggressor. I, however, will continue to speak up for Israel. I see defending Israel as a matter of principle. I have lived in this country and visited it dozens of times. I support Israel. First, because it is the Jewish homeland after two thousand years of exile up to and including Auschwitz, second because it is a democracy, and third because Israel is our first line of defense.
Samuel Huntington writes it so aptly: “Islam has bloody borders.” Israel is located precisely on that border. This tiny country is situated on the fault line of jihad, frustrating Islam’s territorial advance. Israel is facing the front lines of jihad, like Kashmir, Kosovo, the Philippines, Southern Thailand, Darfur in Sudan, Lebanon, and Aceh in Indonesia. Israel is simply in the way. The same way West-Berlin was during the Cold War.
The war against Israel is not a war against Israel. It is a war against the West. It is jihad. Israel is simply receiving the blows that are meant for all of us. If there would have been no Israel, Islamic imperialism would have found other venues to release its energy and its desire for conquest. Thanks to Israeli parents who send their children to the army and lay awake at night, parents in Europe and America can sleep well and dream, unaware of the dangers looming.
Many in Europe argue in favor of abandoning Israel in order to address the grievances of our Muslim minorities. But if Israel were, God forbid, to go down, it would not bring any solace to the West. It would not mean our Muslim minorities would all of a sudden change their behaviour, and accept our values. On the contrary, the end of Israel would give enormous encouragement to the forces of Islam. They would, and rightly so, see the demise of Israel as proof that the West is weak, and doomed. The end of Israel would not mean the end of our problems with Islam, but only the beginning. It would mean the start of the final battle for world domination. If they can get Israel, they can get everything. Therefore, it is not that the West has a stake in Israel. It is Israel.
It is very difficult to be an optimist in the face of the growing Islamization of Europe. All the tides are against us. On all fronts we are losing. Demographically the momentum is with Islam. Muslim immigration is even a source of pride within ruling liberal parties. Academia, the arts, the media, trade unions, the churches, the business world, the entire political establishment have all converted to the suicidal theory of multiculturalism. So-called journalists volunteer to label any and all critics of Islamization as “right-wing extremists” or “racists.” The entire establishment has sided with our enemy. Leftists, liberals and Christian-Democrats are now all in bed with Islam.
This is the most painful thing to see: the betrayal by our elites. At this moment in Europe’s history, our elites are supposed to lead us, to stand up for centuries of civilization – to defend our heritage. To honour our eternal Judeo-Christian values that made Europe what it is today. But there are very few signs of hope to be seen at the governmental level. Sarkozy, Merkel, Brown, Berlusconi; in private, they probably know how grave the situation is. But when the little red light goes on, they stare into the camera and tell us that Islam is a religion of peace, and we should all try to get along nicely and sing Kumbaya. They willingly participate in, what President Reagan so aptly called: “the betrayal of our past, the squandering of our freedom.”
If there is hope in Europe, it comes from the people, not from the elites. Change can only come from a grass-roots level. It has to come from the citizens themselves. Yet these patriots will have to take on the entire political, legal and media establishment.
Over the past years there have been some small, but encouraging, signs of a rebirth of the original European spirit. Maybe the elites turn their backs on freedom, the public does not. In my country, the Netherlands, 60 percent of the population now sees the mass immigration of Muslims as the number one policy mistake since World War II. And another 60 percent sees Islam as the biggest threat to our national identity. I don’t think the public opinion in Holland is very different from other European countries.
Patriotic parties that oppose jihad are growing, against all odds. My own party debuted two years ago, with five percent of the vote. Now it stands at ten percent in the polls. The same is true of all similarly-minded parties in Europe. They are gaining a foothold in the political arena, one voter at a time.
Now, for the first time, these patriotic parties will come together and exchange experiences. It may be the start of something big, something that might change the map of Europe for decades to come. It might also be Europe’s last chance.
This December a conference will take place in Jerusalem. Thanks to Professor Aryeh Eldad, a member of Knesset, we will be able to watch “Fitna” in the Knesset building and discuss the jihad. We are organizing this event in Israel to emphasize the fact that we are all in the same boat together, and that Israel is part of our common heritage. Those attending will be a select audience. No racist organizations will be allowed. And we will only admit parties that are solidly democratic.
This conference will be the start of an Alliance of European patriots. This Alliance will serve as the backbone for all organizations and political parties that oppose jihad and Islamization. For this Alliance I seek your support.
This endeavor may be crucial to America and to the West. America may hold fast to the dream that, thanks to its location, it is safe from jihad and Sharia. But seven years ago to the day, there was still smoke rising from ground zero, following the attacks that forever shattered that dream. Yet there is a danger even greater than terrorist attacks, the scenario of America as the last man standing. The lights may go out in Europe faster than you can imagine. An Islamic Europe means a Europe without freedom and democracy, an economic wasteland, an intellectual nightmare, and a loss of military might for America – as its allies will turn into enemies, enemies with atomic bombs. With an Islamic Europe, it would be up to America alone to preserve the heritage of Rome, Athens and Jerusalem.
Dear friends, liberty is the most precious of gifts. My generation never had to fight for this freedom; it was offered to us on a silver platter by people who fought for it with their lives. All throughout Europe American cemeteries remind us of the young boys who never made it home, and whose memory we cherish. My generation does not own this freedom; we are merely its custodians. We can only hand over this hard won liberty to Europe’s children in the same state in which it was offered to us. We cannot strike a deal with mullahs and imams. Future generations would never forgive us. We cannot squander our liberties. We simply do not have the right to do so.
This is not the first time our civilization is under threat. We have seen dangers before. We have been betrayed by our elites before. They have sided with our enemies before. And yet, then, freedom prevailed.
These are not times in which to take lessons from appeasement, capitulation, giving away, giving up or giving in. These are not times in which to draw lessons from Mr. Chamberlain. These are times calling us to draw lessons from Mr. Churchill and the words he spoke in 1942:
“Never give in, never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small, large or petty, never give in except to convictions of honour and good sense. Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy.”
To watch “Fitna,” click here.
New film on Islam and Jihad. Looks excellent from the clips!
Check this site for 6 clips on a new movie called ‘The Third Jihad’ which looks really well done and features interviews from high ranking CIA operatives as well as well known apostates such as Ayaan Hirsi Ali author of the most ecellent autobiography ‘Infidel’.
Its interesting that the clip on CAIR is not available on the site and I can’t help but wonder if it’s in any way connected to the disappearance of www.cairbaby.com which was a website who watched CAIR closely and published evidence of its duplicity and real agenda.
I’m waiting for my copy in the mail now
Pat Condell knocks another one right of the park. Pat you are the Babe Ruth of the anti Jihad
Film on honour killings, ‘Banned by PBS’
In segment four one may note that one of the main terrorists lives in Toronto Canada
Fundamentalist ideology in Canada
Canada’s first elected Muslim woman politician Moroccan born Fatima Houda-Pepin has expressed much discomfort concerning the radical interpretation of Islam spreading throughout Canada. What had shocked her most upon her arrival to the nation, was the level of indoctrination of Islamism, where many Muslim women are left veiled inside their own homes and are subjected to fundamentalist ideology preached by trained Imams who are often paid by foreigners to spread radical Islam. Their aim? To isolate Muslims from their host society to promote and secure Islamism on behalf of an intended global community without borders.
Houda-Pepin asserts that the ” Islam of knowledge and tolerance” is being transformed in Canada to a straight-jacket and reduced to a series of impositions most often perpetrated on women. A lack of knowledge of Islam and Muslims by the average Canadian allows radicals the free reign to impose their views and, coupled with the indifference of the authorities who believe that “ethnic trouble” is best settled within the community, Islamism is set free.
Islamist groups using this indifference and ignorance have shaped and adopted an aggressive strategy. They have positioned themselves as spokespeople for the Muslim ‘majority’ leaving the true majority of moderate Muslims anxious and concerned while trying to integrate into the mainstream society with peaceful purpose.
” This is the vulnerability of these communities among which the silent majority do not dare confront the Islamists on their own ground”, Houda-Pepin maintains.
Extremism more often than not, is initially rooted within minorities themselves. In 1990 fundamentalists called to impose sharia law in Toronto only to be quickly smacked down by Muslim women. The call re-surfaced again in 2003 this time with a more polished sales pitch, an increased level of aggression and a broader reach. The second smack down came from the province of Ontario. The national and international level of opposition toward sharia’s adoption was fierce and in May of 2005 members of the Quebec National Assembly voted unanimously to reject a motion to implement Islamic law. Within thirteen years, the high level of mainstream ignorance of Islamism had lowered and continues to drop due in large part to the efforts of many like Ms. Houda-Pepin and others who understand and expose the danger of extremist ideology.
The radicals once again had to regroup and reposition. Not ones to miss an opportunity to step up the rhetoric, they judged Houda-Pepin as a racist, secular-Muslim Liberal leading Canada on a dangerous path with her rejection of sharia.
Bear in mind, set backs of this nature are considered only minor, frustrating nuisances and in no way signal defeat. Islamist influence continues to spread where it’s proponents lead a conflict within nations considered morally corrupt, Godless and decadent. The strategy involves using laws which guarantee religious freedom to gain ground for sharia, by which each and every Muslim must adhere. By keeping communities closed, criticism at bay, moderates intimidated into silence and law-fare flowing, sharia may be successfully implemented. Lives are governed according to Quaranic principle regardless of a host nation’s secular system and the ‘community without borders’ for the ummah is further secured.
As you may imagine Fatima Houda-Pepin is not well regarded amongst the Planet Islam set. But that’s not important. What is, is the increasing awareness that Islamists work diligently in Canada and around the globe to foster and implant an ideology so completely incompatible with the fundamentals of basic human dignity and respect for individual freedom.
(thank you to www.thereligionofpeace.com).
Grace
Pat Condell on Sharia in the UK
Initially I had used an embed code from youtube.com but they saw fit to remove it. Interesting editorial call I think given the number of Islamist snuff films available on that site. There are however videos far far more critical of Islam on youtube some of which are embedded here on the movie page. I tend to think therefore, that this was because Pat singled out the Saudis somewhat and they have a rather well fatted bureaucracy more aggressively pursuing any defamation of Saudi Arabia itself and its denizens than Disney has in case someone abuses a picture of Minnie Mouse.
In any case I went to Pat’s own blog www.patcondell.com and fetched it back for all of you
Eeyore
More. Oct. 3 2008 TROP managed to post this gem:
‘YouTube’ must erase anti-Islam material: KHRS
Urging the authorities to take the necessary legal action in case the website fails to erase the statements, Al-Damkhi stressed “uttering profanities against Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) is the worst form of human rights violation in the world. Attacks on the values and tenets of Islam are extremely dangerous and unacceptable.”
Al-Damkhi pointed out the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) strongly condemns attacks on the holy prophets and religions. He confirmed KHRS recognizes the importance of freedom of conducting scientific research, exchange of information, and significance of the latest technologies and media on human lives, but it is against how ‘YouTube’ depicts Islam. He said this is an outright violation of the human rights of millions of Muslims all over the world.
Once again we see Muslims using the machinery of political correctness in its most irrational form. Moral equivalence between a group who’s sole binding tie is ideological, and attempting to make that ideology above reproach in the way a democratic nation may make irrational condemnation of a group who’s defining attributes are racial or otherwise non behavioral.
In essence the Kuwaiti logic could be equally applied to communists Nazis or any other political group and in the case of Pat Condell made to silence dissent and more importantly perhaps although perhaps not, silence defense of ones own values against the current assault by Islam on western culture, history values and law.
Eeyore for Vlad
Fjordman on Holland
If you read nothing else today do read this. Lifted from The Gates Of Vienna
Eeyore for Vlad
The noted blogger Fjordman is filing this report via Gates of Vienna.
For a complete Fjordman blogography, see The Fjordman Files. There is also a multi-index listing here.

Let us consider the case of the Netherlands. Islamic practices there gain more and more public acceptance. There is talk of making Islamic holidays public holidays because Holland is a “Judeo-Christian-Islamic” society, whatever that is. There are plans for a Muslim-only hospital, and former Justice Minister Piet Hein Donner stated that the Dutch should give Muslims more freedoms to behave according to their traditions: “For me it is clear: if two-thirds of the Dutch population should want to introduce the Sharia tomorrow, then the possibility should exist,” according to him. “It would be a disgrace to say: ‘That is not allowed!’“
The idea is by no means far-fetched. Unofficial sharia courts have been operating for years in major European cities and gradually gain official acceptance. In September 2008 it was made known that British authorities will formally accept rulings of sharia courts on certain matters. This means that Britain has not just culturally but also legally surrendered to its new Muslim masters. The political elites will put up no resistance whatsoever to continued Islamization.
Britain is one of the worst countries in the Western world, which says a lot given how bad many others are, but it belongs to a growing group of nations where the authorities have more or less surrendered to Islamic rule, openly promote Islamic “culture”, and harass those who resist. One could add Sweden, the Netherlands, Belgium, and probably France to the list, which keeps growing. Norway, Spain, Austria, Germany and others are not far behind.
The Netherlands, which for centuries was a haven for those seeking more freedom of thought, is becoming an increasingly totalitarian society as a direct result of mass immigration in general and Muslim immigration in particular. This is the reason why the insightful Hans Janssen, Professor of Modern Islamic Ideology at Utrecht University, stated that a peaceful society that wishes to remain existent “will have to find a way to defend itself through non-peaceful means from people who are not peaceful.” According to Jansen, Muslim fundamentalists frequently make threats, but Dutch media remain silent about them.
Sharia comes to the UK
Sharia comes to the UK
Britain will come to regret this, but whether or not it will before it’s too late is an open question. More on this story. “Revealed: UK’s first official sharia courts,” by Abul Taher in The Sunday Times, September 14 (thanks to all who sent this in):
ISLAMIC law has been officially adopted in Britain, with sharia courts given powers to rule on Muslim civil cases.The government has quietly sanctioned the powers for sharia judges to rule on cases ranging from divorce and financial disputes to those involving domestic violence.
Rulings issued by a network of five sharia courts are enforceable with the full power of the judicial system, through the county courts or High Court.
Previously, the rulings of sharia courts in Britain could not be enforced, and depended on voluntary compliance among Muslims.
Who will be responsible for enforcement now?
It has now emerged that sharia courts with these powers have been set up in London, Birmingham, Bradford and Manchester with the network’s headquarters in Nuneaton, Warwickshire. Two more courts are being planned for Glasgow and Edinburgh.Sheikh Faiz-ul-Aqtab Siddiqi, whose Muslim Arbitration Tribunal runs the courts, said he had taken advantage of a clause in the Arbitration Act 1996.
Under the act, the sharia courts are classified as arbitration tribunals. The rulings of arbitration tribunals are binding in law, provided that both parties in the dispute agree to give it the power to rule on their case.
Siddiqi said: “We realised that under the Arbitration Act we can make rulings which can be enforced by county and high courts. The act allows disputes to be resolved using alternatives like tribunals. This method is called alternative dispute resolution, which for Muslims is what the sharia courts are.” […]
In fact, Muslim tribunal courts started passing sharia judgments in August 2007. They have dealt with more than 100 cases that range from Muslim divorce and inheritance to nuisance neighbours.
It has also emerged that tribunal courts have settled six cases of domestic violence between married couples, working in tandem with the police investigations.
Did they wink at domestic violence because of Qur’an 4:34? Does anyone know? Does anyone care?
Siddiqi said he expected the courts to handle a greater number of “smaller” criminal cases in coming years as more Muslim clients approach them. “All we are doing is regulating community affairs in these cases,” said Siddiqi, chairman of the governing council of the tribunal.Jewish Beth Din courts operate under the same provision in the Arbitration Act and resolve civil cases, ranging from divorce to business disputes. They have existed in Britain for more than 100 years, and previously operated under a precursor to the act.
Politicians and church leaders expressed concerns that this could mark the beginnings of a “parallel legal system” based on sharia for some British Muslims.
Dominic Grieve, the shadow home secretary, said: “If it is true that these tribunals are passing binding decisions in the areas of family and criminal law, I would like to know which courts are enforcing them because I would consider such action unlawful. British law is absolute and must remain so.”
Douglas Murray, the director of the Centre for Social Cohesion, said: “I think it’s appalling. I don’t think arbitration that is done by sharia should ever be endorsed or enforced by the British state.”
There are concerns that women who agree to go to tribunal courts are getting worse deals because Islamic law favours men.
Siddiqi said that in a recent inheritance dispute handled by the court in Nuneaton, the estate of a Midlands man was divided between three daughters and two sons.
The judges on the panel gave the sons twice as much as the daughters, in accordance with sharia. Had the family gone to a normal British court, the daughters would have got equal amounts.
In the six cases of domestic violence, Siddiqi said the judges ordered the husbands to take anger management classes and mentoring from community elders. There was no further punishment.
In each case, the women subsequently withdrew the complaints they had lodged with the police and the police stopped their investigations.
Siddiqi said that in the domestic violence cases, the advantage was that marriages were saved and couples given a second chance.
Inayat Bunglawala, assistant secretary-general of the Muslim Council of Britain, said: “The MCB supports these tribunals. If the Jewish courts are allowed to flourish, so must the sharia ones.”
Except Jewish courts do not rule on the basis of a law that Jews are laboring to impose upon the whole of British society. Sharia courts are. Will Bunglawala address this distinction? Of course not.
Fjordman’s suggestion, and a test case for it.
The venerable Fjordman, one of the best, if not the best writer of the anti Jihad made a rather interesting suggestion on Gates of Vienna. He responded to an article about how a Muslim Lawyer in the Netherlands was allowed not to stand up when the judge enters a courtroom he is in, as its his religious beliefe not to show that kind of deference to another ‘person’. (of course its probably that he wont show respect to a Kufaar)
Fjordman suggested that we, the anti jihad begin to make a list for post occupation times, with the optimistic assumptions of course that we do win, of collaborators with Islam who are selling out their own people, values and cultures for the purpose of a kind of Nuremberg trial after all this is done.
The original article and Fjordman’s suggestion are linked above to the words Gates of Vienna.
This I think if done in a non threatening manner but a serious one, could actually be a good reminder for elected representatives as well as appointed authority in western lands of what they are playing with when they appease Islamists on demands while ignoring those whom they represent and serve. So perhaps by way of experiment we can watch a fairly predictable scenario unfold.
CAIR, The Council on American Islamic relations, and a well known supporter of terrorism Jihad and Islamic manifest destiny, has issued a list of demands for many fields about how Muslims are to be treated in North America.
It is worth reading as much as one can stomach of what changes CAIR and other Islamic organizations want us to change, things like having nurses assist Muslim patients in hospitals to wash their feet 5 times a day for prayer, and a very long list of extras, and find out who in Canada and the US agree to any of these demands and publish their names on a list. It is important that our representatives know that we are unhappy with this kind of destruction of our own system. If they are not made aware of it, why should they stop appeasing?
Have a read of the various lists of demands and try at least to make a mental note of how fast you notice these things being implemented and at the expense of rational use of resources.
On how we must present Islam in schools:
The 20 page document on how Islam is to be presented in our media
Thanks a million to grace by the way who diligently found these links and is a tireless worker for liberal democracy.
Im way overdue to have some content by Brigitte gabriele
Here are a series of videos by a woman who was a Christian Lebanese and had most of her family and property killed and destroyed by Muslims invading Lebanon.
The first two are here on top. She is a good speaker and there may not be much readers of this blog do not already know about Islam in these videos but I post them for those catching up as well as those who may imagine that Christians support Hizbolah in Lebanon which of course, they do not.
There are many more vids of her below the fold. A seven part series which is very thorough and detailed about among other things, what is being preached and taught in US Mosques.
