Category Archives: Islam in Canada

Muslim in Toronto does club and knife attack at Canadian Tire

Posted on by

From the Toronto Sun:

Toronto woman swears allegiance to ISIS, charged in store attack

TORONTO – A Scarborough woman swore allegiance to ISIS in a Scarborough courtroom where she appeared to face allegations that she swung a golf club at hardware store employees while screaming threats and Islamic chants.

Before Tuesday’s proceedings started, Justice of the Peace Alice Napier asked Rehab Dughmosh, 32, to identify herself in court — but the accused woman didn’t initially answer the question.

“ISIS — I pledge to the leader of the believers — Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi,” blurted the woman through an interpreter.

Al-Baghdadi is the leader of the Sunni militant jihadist group known as the Islamic State of Iraq (ISIS) and the Levant.

Dughmosh, who wore a black niqab and a forest-green prison sweat suit, agreed to “stay in jail,” rather than have a bail hearing at College Park courts Tuesday.

Dughmosh was remanded in custody and will appear via video at Scarborough Court of Justice on June 21.

 

 

Repost of video interview with George Massaad, who was with a group, thrown out of an Ottawa Restaurant for wanting freedom of speech

Posted on by

George was sitting with a group of men, women and even young children at an Ottawa watering hole called the Riverside Pub, where their waiter came over, demanded to know what they were talking about, then threw them out when he learned they were against totalitarian motion M103.

They were not being loud or disruptive, as the waiter had to ask several times what exactly their position was.

This is pure Soviet Union, where every waiter, accountant, Gardner is a political officer for the state determined to make sure everyone has the ‘right’ views.

And now the ‘right views’ are actually totalitarian. You must not say things that rub against the narrative. M103. And worse, you must say things that fit the narrative. C-16

Prospective Canadian Interfaith Conversation “Our Whole Society” Conference Participants, Attendees, and Media Representatives,

Posted on by
The Lawfare Project (LP), a non-profit legal think-tank based in New York City, notes with dismay the apparent failure of ethical due diligence of the Canadian Interfaith Conversation (CIC) in the course of planning the CIC’s pending conference in Ottawa, Canada. Scheduled for Saint Paul University on May 8-9, 2017, and titled “Our Whole Society: Religion & Citizenship at Canada’s 150th,” the conference and its failings appear to be the shared responsibility of the CIC and its “Our Whole Society” partner organizations, the Canadian Race Relations Foundation, and Cardus, a Canadian Christian organization.
The LP’s concern stems from the announced presence, among conference presenters, of Dr. Ingrid Mattson, former head of the Islamic Society of North America, and Ms. Amira Elghawaby, a representative of the National Council of Canadian Muslims.  These individuals are, in the LP’s opinion, unsuitable candidates for prominent roles in an interfaith gathering purporting to emphasize solidarity and tolerance, and aspiring to achieve a more peaceful world.
Dr. Ingrid Mattson was a longtime leader of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) when it was designated an unindicted co-conspirator in the successful US Holy Land Foundation terror-fundraising prosecution.  Mattson’s current position at Huron University College was the result of an endowment built around money from radical-Islamic sources.  Any number of her associates have been problematic from the perspective of Islamist supremacism, as have some of her teachings and preferred theological sources.  For more information on Mattson, see the LP’s news release, “Collapse of Mattson Libel Suit Signals Victory for Free Speech and The Lawfare Project,” including its links to court papers.
The LP is unaware of any attempt by Dr. Mattson to repudiate, publicly and by name, the various troubling individuals and organizations with which she is, or has been, connected.
Ms. Amira Elghawaby has for years been communications chief for the Canadian Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR.CAN), now renamed – deceptively, according to some – the National Council of Canadian Muslims (NCCM). NCCM/CAIR.CAN was established as the Canadian chapter of the radical, US-based Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), a Saudi-funded organization that was also designated an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation trial.  CAIR derived from the Islamic Association of Palestine (founded by Hamas operative Mousa Abu Marzook, who is now a US Specially Designated Global Terrorist), is said to be a Hamas-supporting organization, and has seen several of its officials and affiliates convicted of terrorism-related offenses.  Like CAIR, NCCM/CAIR.CAN is known for its exaggerated claims of “Islamophobia”, claims that have unnecessarily alarmed Canadian Muslims and thereby risked pushing young Muslims into radical hands.  For more about NCCM/CAIR.CAN, see the LP’s statement, “Lawfare Project Concerned about National Council of Canadian Muslims Participation in Global Affairs Canada event.” To the best of the LP’s knowledge, neither Ms. Elghawaby nor her organization have ever condemned, publicly and by name, CAIR and those CAIR officials and affiliates who have been convicted of terrorist offenses. Nor are they known to have publicly condemned Dr. Jamal Badawi, a former, long-serving official of NCCM/CAIR.CAN who recommends light physical punishment for “misbehaving” Muslim wives and has been a high-level Islamic Society of North America official – and a US unindicted co-conspirator in his own right.
In the United Against Terrorism handbook jointly produced by NCCM/CAIR.CAN and the closely connected, controversial Islamic Social Services Association, many people of good faith were shocked to find the handbook’s authors apparently attempting to mainstream Dr. Mattson and other questionable individuals by recommending them as scholars to whom Muslims and broader civil society could defer in matters of Islamic theological interpretation, particularly in counter-radicalization contexts.  To no one’s surprise, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police publicly withdrew its support for the handbook project. NCCM/CAIR.CAN, however, continues misleadingly to distribute the document, with the RCMP name and logo on it.
Was the inclusion of Mattson and Elghawaby in the “Our Whole Society” event the result of incompetence within CIC, its planning committee, and CIC partner organizations?  Was it reflective of one or more planning insiders’ conscious efforts to “launder” the two Islamists in Canada’s national capital, the better to facilitate their access to interfaith, media, government and other influential circles?
Perhaps it was a combination of these things. But incompetence cannot be ruled out, given the fact that a Canadian Interfaith Conversation webpage announcing that CIC executive committee members Mr. Zul Kassamali and Dr. Aileen van Ginkel would become the CIC co-chairs, featured what the Interfaith Conversation seemed to regard as a spiritually uplifting quotation of industrialist Henry Ford.  An accomplished anti-Semite, Mr. Ford produced a notorious hate-book, The International Jew, and his Nazi sympathies helped the auto-builder win Hitler’s 1st Class Grand Cross Order of the German Eagle in Gold with Star.
CIC might find a certain resonance in Mr. Ford’s ability to dupe Christian, Jewish and other well-meaning clerics and others about his true inclinations – and then to use such people for endorsements.
Following a review of the material herein provided and linked, CIC organizers and their Canadian Race Relations Foundation and Cardus partners will face a moral-ethical choice.  On the one hand, they could honestly and forthrightly admit that errors have been made. On the other, they might be too embarrassed to be honest, and might further condemn themselves by doubling down on their invitations to Dr. Mattson and Ms. Elghawaby.  The former, honorable course would avoid opening the CIC, its partners, presenters and sponsors to being used to legitimize individuals and organizations unworthy of the influence that involvement in a high-profile, spiritually oriented gathering could avail them. The latter course would dishonor all concerned and facilitate further penetration by undesirables into influential Canadian circles.
The choice made by the Canadian Interfaith Conversation and its associates will give a revealing indication of the true commitment of those involved, to morals, ethics and the integrity of Canada’s interfaith movement.
There is no shortage of moderate, mainstream Canadian Muslims, and Canada is fortunate to be the home of reputable organizations such as the Council for Muslims Facing Tomorrow. Seen in this light, the due diligence failure of the Canadian Interfaith Conversation, the Canadian Race Relations Foundation and Cardus, is all the more regrettable.
Sincerely,
Brooke Goldstein
[Published by third party request]

Québec will not create a “Muslim DPJ”, says Minister Charlebois

Posted on by

Awn original translation by Ava Lon with much thanks

from this Quebec newspaper, Le journal de Montreal 

PASCAL DUGAS BOURDON
Wednesday, 19 April 2017 3:37pm
UPDATE Wednesday, 19 April 2017 4:35pm

QUÉBEC | The Government of Quebec does not intend to establish a Muslim Youth Protection Directorate (DPJ), despite what the president of a community association in Montreal wishes.

“We do not intend to create a parallel DPJ,” wrote the cabinet Minister for Youth Protection, Lucie Charlebois, in response to an email sent by QMI Agency.[Canadian media company]

“Currently, the DYPs of Quebec assume their responsibilities for the entire Quebec population, regardless of denominations. DPJs always make decisions based on the best interests of the children, “it was added.

The president of the Association Défi-lles et des ailes, Soraya Zaïdi, made several people raise their eyebrows, on Wednesday, after pleading in favor of the creation of a DPJ for Muslims.

“We dream of creating a DYP for the Muslim community. For we do not want our children to suffer a double heartbreak. […] When the child is placed and removed from his family, and a second tear when he is snatched from his culture, “said Mrs. Zaïdi at a benefit evening held last Friday.

The candidate of Québec solidaire in Gouin, Gabriel Nadeau-Dubois, was present at the event. Although he has published a photo of himself with several of the participants at this benefit evening, including Ms. Zaïdi, he says he does not agree with these remarks.

“For one last time: I oppose the idea of a” Muslim DPJ “. Public services must be non-denominational. End of the story,” wrote Mr. Nadeau-Dubois on Twitter, Wednesday morning.

(Once again proving that muslims do not seek equal rights but special rights in Canada)

Could the first item in this post be the cause of the second?

Posted on by

And then this:

From the Toronto Sun

Bill C-6, which proposes changes to the Citizenship Act does a number of troubling things:

– removes the right to revoke citizenships from dual nationals convicted terrorists;

– ends the obligation for new citizens 14-18 and 55-65 to know either English or French or even pass a citizenship test;

– reduces the number of days someone must spend in Canada before they are eligible for citizenship;

– eliminates the obligation that a new citizen will have to “intend” to reside in Canada.

Canada is a generous country. We allow new citizens, under most conditions, to retain the passport of their birth. These individuals become fully eligible for all the benefits from our generous social safety net that Canadians have worked so hard over generations to provide.

These benefits include but are not limited to our universal health care system, Old Age Security, Guaranteed Income Supplement, as well as access to our education system.

H/T Shabnam A.

Trudeau Airport: Three more employees lost their security cards

Posted on by

(This is a follow up from the story about the Muslim employees at Montreal’s Trudeau airport who are under terrorism investigation but actually worked on the Tarmac at Trudeau airport. Video at bottom of post.)

An original translation by Ava Lon with much thanks.

From this Quebec based French language news site:

Published on April 10, 2017 at 17:15 | Updated at 5:15 pm

Trudeau Airport: Three other employees lost their security cards

A total of five employees at the Montréal-Trudeau airport had their security cards suspended.

MYLÈNE CRÊTE
The Canadian Press
OTTAWA

The security cards of three more employees of the Montréal-Trudeau airport have been suspended, confirmed Transport Minister Marc Garneau on Monday without specifying the reasons.

These three employees therefore no longer have access to the safe area of the airport, but are still working there.

“Two weeks ago I asked my department to look at the protocols and the risk factors that exist at Trudeau Airport-we do this every now and then at every airport-and there are three people who have had their security clearance temporarily withdrawn because we are investigating certain details, “he said in response to a journalist’s question.

The Minister added that the safety rating of these employees will remain lower for the duration of this investigation.

“I cannot give you the specifics for obvious reasons, but I can confirm that we do it from time to time,” he added.

It’s yet another case after the case of two other employees at the airport whose security card was suspended because they showed signs of radicalization, as revealed by a report on the show J.E. last week.

The 16,000 employees who have access to the Trudeau Airport secure area are reviewed every 24 hours in light of the information contained in a police database, Marc Garneau said. A procedure that has existed for a long time, he argued.

More than 1,000 people have lost their access cards or simply have not been hired by the airport in the last two years, either because they were unreliable, incompetent or for medical reasons, the Minister said.

A “nonchalant attitude”

Conservative MP Gérard Deltell believes Minister Garneau was nonchalant when the news broke out last week.

“The only thing the Minister had to do is kick his foot and say ‘wait a minute’, put his fist on the table and say stop, we need to correct the situation,” he said.

He believes that Minister Garneau must do more to restore public confidence in the safety rating of airport employees.

“A person who is in this situation is one person too many,” he said.

Last week’s report:

From March 28 2017

Muslims force Jewish kid out of school in Germany, school backs it as “normal”, Smoking illegal for non-Muslims in Ottawa

Posted on by

1, Muslims beat up Jewish student at German school because they learned he was Jewish.

 

BERLIN — The case of a British Jewish child forced to leave his Berlin school after being subjected to anti-Semitic violence has provoked outrage and soul-searching in Germany.

The 14-year-old, who cannot be named under child protection laws, was beaten, kicked and threatened with a replica gun after he revealed to fellow pupils that he was Jewish.

He endured a campaign of intimidation by Muslim pupils who told him “Muslims hate Jews. All Jews are murderers.”

His British mother, who asked not to be named to protect the identity of her son, told the The Daily Telegraph the school had done little to stop the bullying.

“They told us this is normal for adolescents from this background, that they’re just trying to find their identity,” she said. “But it shouldn’t be normal. I’ve never experienced such direct anti-Semitism before in all the years I’ve lived in Germany.”

(German authorities make excuses for Muslims who harras and intimidate Jews right out of the system, while turning in their German fellow nationals who report the facts as they are and suggest that “Normal Muslim behaviour” should be discouraged. ANTIFA will call the objectors to Antisemitism NAZIS and fascists and stand behind the people turning in their coworkers who pointed out the problem. And this is where we are at today.

The National Post has no comments on this article

2. Hookah bars to launch legal challenge of Ottawa’s waterpipe ban

(So, to clarify, Canadians, who’s culture for over 100 years was to smoke cigarettes, usually Export A or Du Maurier, and drink beer, usually Molson’s Ex, Labatt’s Blue or ’50’, at a bar while watching hockey and trying to meet girls, find that while hockey is still on TV at most bars, you cannot smoke, you have to be very careful how much you drink and trying to meet girls can lead to harassment charges.

So Canadian, my culture, has been made all but illegal. While Muslim immigrants are getting a ‘human rights lawyer’ to grant them special rights, not equal rights, so that tobacco can be used in public facilities as defined by the no-smoking laws of Ottawa, for ‘Arab’ bars as its part of their culture.

 

 

Ontario Progressive Conservative party, all “progressive”, and anti-conservative

Posted on by

This post is about a mutiny by the actual members of the riding association of King-Vaughn in the greater Toronto area.

This is a long but important story and its very important that its properly explained.

So it will take place across a number of posts.

To begin with, its important to understand that the leader of the Ontario PC party, Patrick Brown, has been violating the rules of the party and working via a series of irregularities seemingly to create an effect.

The effect is an Ontario government run by people he has hand picked over the actual riding nominees, who are disproportionately Muslim, and/or people with a track record of being far to the left.

In something like 20 ridings, the actual person picked by the riding association has been dumped by the party leader in favour of someone they parachuted in.

This is a lot like what now Prime Minister Trudeau did, using the excuse of a more balanced party, but really to pay off debts to the people who got him elected.

The far left and the Muslim Brotherhood.

In today’s story, the riding of King Vaughn fought back. When they heard that their candidate was to be discarded, one who it was clear to all in the riding association would have won the nomination in a landslide, in favour of someone none of the riding association board had even met before, they tried to cancel the nomination meeting.

But the party executive went ahead with it anyway.

The riding association people were not happy. The footage you are about to watch is some of the minutes inside the meeting.

Reporters were not allowed in. And most people do not know how to use their phone recorders well. So this footage is not spectacularly clear. But the message is.

I am told that David Menzies of The Rebel was outside the meeting doing interviews. Hopefully he will have much more soon on this.

Interviews with some who went to attend this meeting should follow this week as well.

Anyone reading this post in Ontario, Please look over the Freedom Party’s website. They seem to be the only people in politics in Ontario that still believe in Greek thought, Western values, rule of law, and classical civilization.