The Latest Enemies of Iran: Dogs and Their Owners

From TIME

An Iranian woman holding a dog stands in front of a bank in Tehran

Morteza Nikoubazl / Reuters / Corbis

For much of the past decade, the Iranian government has tolerated what it considers a particularly depraved and un-Islamic vice: the keeping of pet dogs.

During periodic crackdowns, police have confiscated dogs from their owners right off the street; and state media has lectured Iranians on the diseases spread by canines. The cleric Gholamreza Hassani, from the city of Urmia, has been satirized for his sermons railing against “short-legged” and “holdable” dogs. But as with the policing of many other practices (like imbibing alcoholic drinks) that are deemed impure by the mullahs but perfectly fine to many Iranians, the state has eventually relaxed and let dog lovers be.
Those days of tacit acceptance may soon be over, however. Lawmakers in Tehran have recently proposed a bill in parliament that would criminalize dog ownership, formally enshrining its punishment within the country’s Islamic penal code. The bill warns that that in addition to posing public health hazards, the popularity of dog ownership “also poses a cultural problem, a blind imitation of the vulgar culture of the West.” The proposed legislation for the first time outlines specific punishments for “the walking and keeping” of “impure and dangerous animals,” a definition that could feasibly include cats but for the time being seems targeted at dogs. The law would see the offending animal confiscated, the leveling of a $100-to-$500 fine on the owner, but leaves the fate of confiscated dogs uncertain. “Considering the several thousand dogs [that are kept] in Tehran alone, the problem arises as to what is going to happen to these animals,” Hooman Malekpour, a veterinarian in Tehran, said to the BBC’s Persian service. If passed, the law would ultimately energize police and volunteer militias to enforce the ban systematically.

‘My life is in danger’: Fears of Pakistani woman gang-raped on orders of village elders as 13 out of 14 men are cleared

When the [yet to be written] news story appears detailing this womans grisly murder at least we can count on our [and their] politicians to “strongly condemn” and “ask/promise that those involved be brought to justice”.

Of course the idea that anyone from a Western government would propose replacing the promised foreign aid cheque with a letter of condemnation is insane.

MailOnline… A Pakistani victim of a village council-sanctioned gang rape, who became a symbol of the country’s oppressed women, says her life is in danger after the Supreme Court acquitted 13 men accused of the crime.

The ruling leaves just one of the initial 14 suspects in prison.

Mukhtaran Mai was attacked on the orders of a village council in Punjab province nine years ago as a punishment because her brother – who was 12 at the time – was judged to have offended the honour of a powerful clan by allegedly having an affair with one of its women.

Mai, aged 30, was an illiterate villager at the time but the seamstress defied taboos and shot to global fame by speaking out about her ordeal and taking her attackers to court.

Mai had accused 14 men of being involved in raping her in a stable and in 2002, a court sentenced six of them to death while acquitting the others citing a lack of evidence.

But in an appeal, the Lahore High Court not only upheld the eight acquittals but also overturned five of the six convictions. The death penalty for the sixth man, Abdul Khaliq, was commuted to life in prison.    

Mai appealed to the Supreme Court in 2005 but a three-judge bench rejected her appeal on Thursday, said Gohar Ali Shah, a lawyer for Mai. Continue Reading →

Rich should be FORCED to help the poor, says Archbishop of Canterbury

For all those people cheering the words of Dr Williams. Ask yourselves if you would be so supportive had he suggested that all those unemployed and on benefits should be forced to work in hospitals, deliver meals to the old and indigent and sweep and weed the public streets and parks.

 Mail Online… The rich and powerful should be required by law to spend some time every year helping the poor and needy, says the Archbishop of Canterbury.

Rowan Williams said today a return to the medieval tradition when monarchs ritually washed the feet of the poor would serve to remind politicians and bankers what should be the purpose of their wealth and power.

Speaking on BBC Radio 4 Today programme’s Thought For The Day slot, he said the Bible made clear it was the duty of the powerful to ensure ordinary people were ‘treasured and looked after’ – especially those without the resources to look after themselves.

‘What about having a new law that made all Cabinet members and leaders of political parties, editors of national papers and the hundred most successful financiers in the UK spend a couple of hours every year serving dinners in a primary school on a council estate, or cleaning bathrooms in a residential home?’ he suggested.

Alternatively, he said, they could walk the town streets at night as street pastors ‘ready to pick up and absorb something of the chaos and human mess you will find there, especially among young people’.Because the duty to serve would be compulsory, those involved would not be able to claim credit for doing it, he added.

Dr Williams acknowledged that it might just be ‘a nice fantasy to mull over during the holiday weekend’, but insisted that it could bring genuine benefits.

‘It might do two things: reminding our leaders of what the needs really are at grassroots level so that those needs can never again just be remote statistics, and reminding the rest of us what politics and government are really for,’ he said.

Two middle eastern men trashed bibles in ‘multifaith’ prayer rooms at Ottawa Airport Friday April 15 2011

Why am I posting this unsubstantiated story? Because all the mass media has abandoned its role as informants and purveyors of news and instead, has become fabricators of opinion, making sure that nothing bad Muslims do reaches our understanding while exagerating anything anyone else might do, especially if Muslims are made uncomfortable by it. So I am left with no choice. When someone claims something was done, I know for a fact that by the time the news reports it, if it ever reports it, that it is likely no longer relevant. So I have to take the word of people who say they have seen things.

From the Lowel Green show, CFRA AM radio, Monday April 18 2011

CFRA Airport     

Muslim Council: women cannot debate wearing veil

From The Guardian:

H/T Dodo Can Spell (Which is more than I can do)

The body which claims to be the voice of Britain’s Muslims has told women that wearing the veil is “not open to debate”.

The statement will add to controversy about the veil
The statement will add to controversy about the veil Photo: ALAMY
Andrew Gilligan
By Andrew Gilligan 9:00PM BST 16 Apr 2011

The Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) said that not covering the face is a “shortcoming” and suggested that any Muslims who advocate being uncovered could be guilty of rejecting Islam

In a statement published on its website the MCB, warns: “We advise all Muslims to exercise extreme caution on this issue, since denying any part of Islam may lead to disbelief.

“Not practising something enjoined by Allah and his Messenger… is a shortcoming. Denying it is much more serious.”
The statement quotes from the Koran: “It is not for a believer, man or woman, that they should have any option in their decision when Allah and his Messenger have decreed a matter.”
The statement will add to controversy about the veil after France earlier this week banned the full-face covering.

Muslim Brotherhood to launch TV channel in May

Hany ElWaziry Al Masry Al Youm

<p>Saad al-Husseini, member of the Muslim Brotherhood&#39;s guidance bureau</p>

Photographed by other

The Muslim Brotherhood announced plans to launch TV channel “Egypt 25” next month to represent their proposed Freedom and Justice Party. The group also said it plans to move its headquarters from the Manial to Moqattam neighborhood of Cairo.

The Brotherhood plans to launch the channel within two weeks, at which time it will announce the budget for the station, said member Sobhi Saleh.

“We make use of media professionals and experts from within and outside our administrative offices and from within and outside Egypt,” said Saad al-Husseini, a member of the group’s guidance bureau.

Al-Husseini said the group is checking the opinions of its local councils in various governorates on its party platform, which he said would be announced after the committee responsible for drafting the platform discusses the feedback.

The Muslim Brotherhood said it is waiting for a fair trial for former President Hosni Mubarak, his family, and the officials of the former regime in retribution for the deaths of protesters. A fair trial would prevent future presidents from repeating the ‘pharaonic acts’ of the old regime and would also help Egypt recover any stolen funds, according to the group.

In a press statement, the group supported activists’ decision to suspend Friday protests this week, saying it would give authorities time to conduct investigations into corrupt officials.

The group added in its statement Thursday that people will take to the streets again if their demands are not met.

The Brotherhood also called on all classes to contribute to national production and prove that Egyptians are capable of saving their country from an economic crisis.

Muslim Brotherhood (MB)

Muslim Council: women cannot debate wearing veil

The body which claims to be the voice of Britain’s Muslims has told women that wearing the veil is “not open to debate”.

The Telegraph… The Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) said that not covering the face is a “shortcoming” and suggested that any Muslims who advocate being uncovered could be guilty of rejecting Islam.

That little statement from the MCB should be taken as a veiled threat, as rejecting Islam and apostasy are one in the same in the minds and laws of many Muslims and punishable by death.

In a statement published on its website the MCB, warns: “We advise all Muslims to exercise extreme caution on this issue, since denying any part of Islam may lead to disbelief.

“Not practising something enjoined by Allah and his Messenger… is a shortcoming. Denying it is much more serious.” Threat

The statement quotes from the Koran: “It is not for a believer, man or woman, that they should have any option in their decision when Allah and his Messenger have decreed a matter.” Pretty sure the Koran only speaks of modesty for all Muslims.

The statement will add to controversy about the veil after France earlier this week banned the full-face covering.

“There is no case for a French-style ban in the UK and virtually no serious person supports it,” said Haras Rafiq, of the moderate Muslim think-tank, Centri.

“But by this statement, effectively suggesting that the veil is an obligation, the MCB have put themselves at the opposite extreme of the spectrum.”

The statement is signed by the MCB’s then secretary-general, Mohammad Abdul Bari, and his deputy, Daud Abdullah. It was published in the wake of an earlier controversy about the niqab but passed without notice.

It remains available on the MCB website as a statement of policy.

Other signatories of the statement include Imran Waheed, spokesman of the extremist group Hizb ut Tahrir and several other extremists including Haitham al-Haddad, who has denounced music as a “prohibited and fake message of love and peace”. All 27 signatories, who describe themselves as “Islamic groups and scholars,” are male.

Dr Bari stepped down as secretary-general of the MCB last year, but remains chairman of the hardline East London Mosque, whose chief imam, Abdul Qayum, also signed the statement.

Dr Bari is also a former president of the fundamentalist Islamic Forum of Europe, which controls the mosque and which advocates a sharia state in Europe.

The MCB received significant funding under the previous government and was seen as the main representative voice of Britain’s estimated 2.8 million Muslims but has not received any official money since February 2010.

The MCB did not respond to enquiries.

(PJM Exclusive) Iran’s Supreme Leader Declared the Mythical Figure in End of Times

New information offers more proof that the Iranian regime is truly messianic and intent on destroying the West and bringing about the reappearance of the 12th Imam.
April 13, 2011 – by ‘Reza Kahlili’

In my recent exposé of the Iranian documentary The Coming is Upon Us, I noted that the film informed Muslims throughout the world that the end times are near. I also showed  that “Seyed Khoarasani” — the mythical figure who will create the conditions for the end of times and the reappearance of the last Islamic messiah, the Shiites’ 12th Imam, by destroying Israel and the West — was revealed to be Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei. (See my articles here and here, as well as PJTV coverage here.)

Many of the Hadith, both from Sunni and Shiite sources, conclude that the figure “Seyed Khorasani” is the leader of the people in the East, or one of their high ranking officials who will pass on the flag of Islam to the last messiah. The Hadith also point out that Seyed Khorasani is from the province of Khorasan and has a sign or a disorder on his right hand. Ayatollah Khamenei is from the province of Khorasan and has a disorder of his right hand due to the injury he received in an assassination attempt in 1981.

Please click over to Pajamas Media for the rest of this critically important article.

Syria reverses ban on Veil

This is a longish article. I will bold the relevant bit. Thanks TF

From Google News:

Loyalty of Syrian military to President Assad is seen as airtight despite protests

By Elizabeth A. Kennedy, The Associated Press – 16 hours ago

CAIRO — Unlike the armies of Tunisia and Egypt, Syria’s military will almost certainly stand by the country’s leader as President Bashar Assad faces down an extraordinary protest movement.

Assad, and his father before him, stacked key military posts with members of their minority Alawite sect over the past 40 years, ensuring the loyalty of the armed forces by melding the fate of the army and the regime.

The power structure means there could be darker days ahead in Syria if the struggle for reform gathers steam. Analysts say the army would likely use force to protect the regime at all costs, for fear they will be persecuted if the country’s Sunni majority gains the upper hand.

“If there is going to be a change in Syria, it is going to be a bloody change,” said Hilal Khashan, a political science professor at the American University of Beirut. “Assad has the army, the intelligence and security agencies. These are strong agencies and they are specialized in internal oppression.”

The uprising in Syria is one of the more astonishing in the region, given that the Assad family has kept an iron grip on power for 40 years, in part by crushing every whisper of dissent. But more importantly, they filled the country’s most vital posts with Alawites, a branch of Shiite Islam that represents only about 11 per cent of the population. Syria is overwhelmingly Sunni Muslim.

At least 80 people have been killed as security forces cracked down on three weeks of demonstrations that echo the uprisings spreading across the Arab world. In Egypt and Tunisia, the armies sided with demonstrators seeking to overthrow their entrenched leaders and provided the fatal blow each time.

However, Syrian protesters cannot count on such support. Nevertheless, activists have called for protests to continue this week to honour the “martyrs” who have died.

Human rights activists already have criticized the security forces’ response to the protests. Human Rights Watch says the regime is using “unjustified lethal force against anti-government protesters.”

“For three weeks, Syria’s security forces have been firing on largely peaceful protesters in various parts of Syria,” said Sarah Leah Whitson, Middle East director at Human Rights Watch. “Instead of investigating those responsible for shootings, Syria’s officials try to deflect responsibility by accusing unknown ‘armed groups.'”

The unrest in Syria, which exploded nationwide nearly three weeks ago, is a new and highly unpredictable element of the Arab Spring, one that could both weaken a major Arab foe of the West and cause dangerous instability in one of the more fragile and potentially chaotic countries of the Mideast. The unrest could have implications well beyond Syria’s borders, given the country’s role as Iran’s top Arab ally and as a front line state against Israel.

Regime change in Syria would inevitably mean far greater powers for the Sunni majority — a concern for the country’s closest ally, Shiite power Iran.

The protests began in Daraa, an agricultural city of about 300,000 near the border with Jordan, after security forces arrested a group of high school students who scrawled anti-government graffiti on a wall — apparently inspired by the popular uprisings sweeping the Arab world.

The region is parched and impoverished, suffering sustained economic problems from a yearslong drought.

The demonstrations have brought Syria’s sectarian tensions into the open for the first time in decades — a taboo subject because of the Assad family’s dynasty of minority rule. Assad’s father, Hafez, crushed a Sunni Muslim fundamentalist uprising in Hama in 1982, shelling the town and killing tens of thousands in a massacre that still terrifies Syrians.

Although the three weeks of protests are unprecedented in Syria — one of the most tightly controlled countries in the Middle East — some believe memories of Hama could dampen long-term enthusiasm for open dissent.

“The Hama experience is in the minds and souls of Syrians,” Khashan said. “We are seeing every week small and limited demonstrations in Syria, but they are continuing. Demands for change are not stopping although they are small. There is fear because the oppressive regime has taught them and it in the minds of the Syrians the oppressive state is ready to do anything in order to stay in power.”

The strength of the protest movement is difficult to gauge because Syria has expelled and detained journalists and made sweeping arrests. Fear of detention is omnipresent in Syrians’ minds — the country’s widely despised emergency law, in place for decades, gives the regime a free hand to arrest people without charge.

Besides the campaign of intimidation, fear of sectarian warfare is a serious deterrent to dissent — and not only because of the devastation in Hama. Syria is home to more than 1 million refugees from neighbouring Iraq, who serve as a clear testament to the dangers of regime collapse and fracture in a religiously divided society. They also see the seemingly intractable sectarian tensions in Lebanon as a cautionary tale for their own lives.

Assad has been playing on those fears of sectarian warfare as he works to quell any popular support for the uprising.

He has blamed the unrest on a foreign plot to sow sectarian strife — a claim that echoes pronouncements from almost every other besieged leader in the region.

But many say Assad is simply brushing aside real cries for reform.

“It is unlikely that external conspirators are so skilled at multitasking that they can foment citizen rebellions simultaneously in Egypt, Tunisia, Libya, Jordan, Yemen, Bahrain and Syria,” Rami Khouri, director of the Issam Fares Institute of Public Policy and International Affairs at the American University of Beirut, said in a recent editorial in Lebanon’s Daily Star newspaper.

Assad has made some gestures toward reform by sacking his Cabinet and promising to set up committees to look into replacing the emergency law.

On Wednesday, he closed the country’s only casino and reversed a decision that bans teachers from wearing the Islamic veil, moves seen an attempt to appease religious conservatives in the Sunni majority.

Wednesday’s decisions were unusual concessions to religious concerns in Syria, which promotes a strictly secular identity — something that analysts say is integral to keeping the country’s simmering sectarian tensions at bay.

Pastor Jones responds to the Afghan riots

This woman who interviews Jones is quite bereft of any understanding of any of the issues she herself raises. The near desperate attempt to resuscitate moral and cultural relativism by this media person is itself offensive. Thanks Kitman for this video. Here is the CTV clip I posted the other night of the riots in Afghanistan.

Malaysia clerics ban ‘poco-poco’ dance for Muslims

h/t Gates of vienna

KUALA LUMPUR, Malaysia (AP) — Islamic clerics in a Malaysian state want Muslims to avoid a popular dance they claim has Christian influences.

The “poco-poco” is a line dance that is common at social events in Muslim-majority Malaysia. It is widely thought to have originated in Indonesia.

Islamic scholars in Malaysia’s Perak state say they believe the “poco-poco” is traditionally a Christian dance and that its steps make the sign of the cross.

State cleric Harussani Idris Zakaria said Friday the scholars have issued an edict forbidding the dance. It is not clear if other states will ban it.

Some Muslims insist the ban is unnecessary. Malaysian clerics have also banned yoga for Muslims and barred girls from behaving like tomboys, but the edicts are not legally binding.

Below, the Poco Poco dance

Group of Australian Jews lobby to make Jewish religious zone, pissing everyone off in the process.

This is such a bad idea. I do have a suggestion though for the woman who wants to go out on a Saturday. Try the following. Go out on a Saturday. The only thing stopping you is imaginary authority. You do not have to obey it, and if you do not there are no measurable consequences other than what men might do to you who want you to obey these non-laws.

So just get up and leave the house. And if you want to obey this Jewish law, then don’t find some work around by creating a god-zone. That is equally offensive frankly. You want to obey Jewish law by breaking Jewish law using some Jewish zone work around. Either stay at home or leave the house but don’t involve the whole neighbourhood.