Category Archives: Political Correctness

Germany: The Political Exploitation of a Murder

Posted on by

An original article by Carpe Diem:

When Khaled Idris Bahray, a 20-year-old Muslim ‘refugee’ from Eritrea, was found stabbed to death in the courtyard of his housing estate in Dresden on January 13, it didn’t take long for the media to link the murder to the local PEGIDA movement. Now, as his 26-year-old roommate Hassan Saleh, also a Muslim refugee from Eritrea, has confessed the murder, the media have become quiet.

dresden

Khaled Idris Bahray, Photo: Facebook

 

Right after Khaled Idris Bahray had been found dead in the courtyard of his flat, the media and the left launched a massive smear campaign against PEGIDA. For them it was obvious that he must have been killed by those ‘far right Neo-Nazis’.

 

Some events of the last days:

  • When police arrived at the scene, they found the body of the young man lying on his back, with blood coming out of his nose and mouth. An autopsy was immediately conducted, as MOPO24, a local newspaper, reported the very same day. Waiting for the results, police correctly said that they had no evidence for a murder at that time. However, for MP Volker Beck (Greens party) investigations took too long. Still assuming that it was racist murder, he lodged a complaint for an investigation into the possible obstruction of justice, and wrote on twitter:

“I have no understanding for the negligent approach of the investigation authorities.”

Also see International Business Times

  • Meanwhile, the media had started their smear campaign against PEGIDA. There was hardly any article not linking the death of Khaled Idris Bahray to the movement. This article from the ‘Guardian’ is just an example. There were many articles like this in the German media:
  • When the murderer, 26-year-old roommate of the victim, Hassan Saleh, hadn’t been taken into custody at that time, he still lived among the other refugees. He didn’t just meet Dresden’s major Helma Orosz there, but he also gave interviews to the press:

“ ’We are so afaid,’ says 26-year-old Hassan Saleh who had shared a room with Bahray. In Eritrea they had dreamed of the freedom in Germany and of safety, but since they were here, they are scared. Since they are here, there is ‘Pegida’. Khaled’s friends don’t understand what exactly these rallies mean, but they feel: They are not welcome here.”

and Continue Reading →

The problem with writing on Islamic atrocities.

Posted on by

If you imagine the most horrific thing human beings could possibly do to each other, even well beyond the most gory of horror films, non-supernatural ones at least, and then ask a friend to add details to make it worse and then post it as if it was news about what religious muslims do to other people in the name of islam, then chances are it has happened recently, or sometime in the past, or likely is about to.

This is a testament either to how awful Islam is as a motivating ideology as well as a wonderful testament to how poor our own imaginations are when it comes to doing awful things, that it takes a lot of effort and most of us never could have imagined the things we see frequently now.

Even so, a thing is either true or it is not and while it is increasingly difficult to know the difference, it remains an important distinction.

There are lots of sites that gleefully post anything that makes Islam look bad without verification and no link to sources. Some of those have turned out to be scenes from actual horror movies. Others may have been legit and others pure fabrication by someone on social media.

Does it do any good to the cause of waking up the West? Maybe or maybe not. But it certainly does none for the cause of reason, truth and integrity in what one does, and one would hope that is why we do this in order to preserve those values.

Videos were sent to me this morning that are too awful to see without sufficient warning. They are symptom inducing for people who already have PTSD this condition and could help bring it on for people who don’t but see enough of this I would imagine. Once again there is no source etc. given. Reluctantly, ill put a link to the Liveleak here and here.

But then you get mainstream news sources that are every bit as bad in terms of the effect it has one the victims, but not as horrifically presented post hoc. In other words, the people shown are dead either way. And so one can’t help but wonder if presenting horrifying material that may not be true as it has no source and the focus is so bad that it could easily be staged, actually negates the value of showing the truth to people as they get jaded to this kind of information once they find out that some of is staged.

Hard to say. History shows that propaganda works even, and perhaps especially if its pure fiction. Global warming, nuclear winter, ozone holes, ‘911 is an inside job’, the list is long.

Below is material about a recent atrocity committed by the Islamic State against people in cities they recently conquered. This material seems legit and very likely true as it is consistent with other verified Islamic acts of horror, and worse only in scale.

Business Insider: This Might Be The Most Horrific Single Massacre ISIS Has Committed

Islamic State militants drove 600 Shia, Christian, and Yazidi male prisoners into the middle of the desert, lined them up along the edge of a ravine, and executed them at point blank range, according to a report by Human Rights Watch released Thursday.

The inmates, taken from a local prison, were forced to count themselves as they lined up before members of the jihadist militant group opened fire on them with machine guns.

Video alleged to be from Iraq and seems quite legit

Digital Journal article on this or some other massacre.

As our own governments try to deal with their own unique problems muslims have created in all our societies, primarily by lying to the public about the consequences of having a religious islamic population, along with a kind of secret detente creating immunity for muslims from our secular laws, and as religious leaders for the same reasons heap fiction upon untruth upon tactical manipulation to their own congregants in order to avoid the kind of conflict that indeed should happen if the public was properly informed and properly led, we become numb to information and indifferent to the truth of it and it becomes progressively easier for each and every one of us to cling to the narrative with which we are comfortable. So its always good to run a check on questionable materials even if it supports our point of view and its also good to run a self check on our own beliefs and make sure that the cause we fight for is based on reality.

I think we know it is in the Counter-Jihad. But still, lets make sure we can verify our claims or we lose all those we need to join the fight. And this is a critical stage.

As the day goes by more and more stories on this event will surface. I’m sure they will appear in the comments.

Eeyore for VladTepesBlog

 

Dispatches Channel4 show on Islamic infiltration of UK schools

Posted on by

First, here are a couple of links that should bring you to the show.

1. The official one which only works if you are in the UK.

2. This one which kinda works everywhere but you may have to close some annoying adds and try a few times but it does play. (Better links will likely appear sooner or later)

Those of you who know how to use a VPN may want to set their location for somewhere in England and watch it on the original link.

This documentary starts out fairly well and does some reasonable exposing of some of the horror that takes place at schools now run by islamic authority. But it quickly turns on Jewish and Christian schools and tries to make the moral equivalence, if not directly by inference, that not teaching evolution as fact is equivalent to a Muslim school having speakers in who advocate murder of homosexuals and islamic supremacy etc. etc.

Yes, one of the most extreme sects of Jews seem to have underground schools where kids are taught in substandard buildings and probably do not get the standard British education among other things, and, if it is as presented, it should be stopped immediately. But the Christian schools in their example just taught creation in science class, (which is wrong no matter what you believe, as creation is a faith based idea and non-quantifiable and therefore not science even if true) and cannot be compared to what takes place in these muslim schools.

It is unfortunate that in the interest of ‘balance’ they had to pretty much destroy some solid points they made and expose some genuine problems which are a threat to British societies and even sovereignty by comparing it to annoying but relatively banal problems that no-doubt do exist in other faith based schools.

When they can find a Jewish or Christian school that advocates killing of the other, of treating music as a crime or one of the other myriad issues at Muslim schools which are anathema to British culture and history and law, then they can be included. Sadly though, by the end, it looked like a kind of dhimmitude on the part of the video maker as they tried to hard to say that it didn’t represent real islam, and that other religions do this too without any sort of percentage that might give a hint as to how widespread it might be across these faith groups.

In any case, its worth watching even if it makes you angry by the end.

Eeyore for Vlad

 

 

Sri Lanka. Cutting through the spin.

Posted on by

The news has been featuring several bits of mis, dis, and contextually amiss information about events in Sri Lanka where Buddhists and muslims have seen escalating conflict.

US president Obama has even weighed in on it on the side of the muslims as he is wont to do whenever muslims face the consequences of actions they set in motion around the world.

Here are a few of links from just the past 48 hours illustrating the classic media narrative there:

1. TIME: Buddhist Gangs attack muslim businesses 

2. US denies visa to Sri Lankan Buddhist Monk

3. Another report of Buddhists as perpetrators of all problems between communities in Sri Lanka

4. Here is a perfect example of BBC reporting on Sri Lankan religious strife 

This interview I did with one of the leaders of the Buddhist group at the center of much of this conflict spoke with me at length and with great precision on some of what came before the events which the BBC, among others, decided they would report on.

Here is a video which is not in English but the description over at Youtube is at least, and you can see that it is acknowledging the aggression against Buddhists in Sri Lanka.

It should be noted that in the map of the new Caliphate that was released by Al-Qaeda branch, ISIS/ISIL, Sri Lanka is to become a part of it in the near term. Buddhists, who have already lost several entire nations to Islam, Afghanistan to name only one (How did we think the 100 Ft. tall Buddha statues got there in the first place?) in past campaigns to destroy all things on Earth not Islamic, are understandably concerned about how that affects the future of their culture, values and peoples.

Please be warned, this is recorded over the phone from Sri Lanka, the sound is medium, his accent is thick and he is speaking quickly as well as being very diplomatic. But the information is there. If you are looking for some context and counter-spin to the narrative that seems to be the new global standard of, ‘in all things, muslims are the victims’.

Denmark: Arson attack against Buddhist Temple

Posted on by

 By Nicolai Sennels

(The scorch marks on the temple covered with a grey wooden plate)

When people from The Danish Defence League put up stickers with the famous cartoon of Muhammed with head under his bomb, the police took DNA samples and stormed the sticker-criminals in their own homes. When “unknown” people tried to burn down a Buddhist temple located not far from a mosque inspired by the Muslim Brotherhood that has already been connected to terrorism, there is “no sign of harassment”. In fact, the fire was so miraculous, that it did not even produce any flame or smoke… As the police seem unterested in finding out who did it, we will probably never know. But fact is, that Muslims have found out that Buddhists do a pretty good job at fighting back – which is what we see in China, Thailand and Burma (US troops also met overwhelming Buddhist resistance in Vietnam, Korea and Japan).

“On Tuesday morning at 7 users of a Buddhist temple in Killerupgade were met with a nasty surprise. During the night, unknown men had tried to set fire to the temple. …The perpetrators had put combustible material at a wooden door, which was burned.’- But there has never been any flame or smoke. Therefore, the fire department was not contacted. It has not been necessary, says Kim Munksgaard, who immediately denied that there is harassment of the temple.- There is no sign of harassment against the temple or the users of it, said the police.'”

Source: http://www.uriasposten.net/archives/57348 

Austrian TV presenter calls Geert Wilders a “Nazi“

Posted on by

 

Was it just a slip of the tongue, or was it an intentional defamation of Geert Wilders?

On May 22nd, presenter of Austrian’s TV channel “Plus 4”, Norbert Oberhauser (picture), called Geert Wilders and other EU-sceptic politicians “National Socialists” or briefly “Nazis” on his show “Guten Abend Österreich” (Good evening Austria).

It is just unacceptable to defame the famous Dutch politician and leader of the Party for Freedom (PVV), Geert Wilders, as a National Socialist, since he is known as a great friend of Israel. If you disagree with Mr Norbert Oberhauser, you can contact Plus 4 TV:

PULS 4 TV GmbH & Co KG

Chief executive: Markus Breitenecker

(responsible for content)

Maria Jacobi Gasse 1

A-1030 Wien

phone: + 43/1/999 88 – 0

fax: + 43/1/999 88 – 8888

ma*****************@***s4.com

Source: PI-News

http://www.pi-news.net/2014/05/oesterreichischer-tv-moderator-bezeichnet-geert-wilders-als-nationalsozialisten/

[Article and translation by Carpe Diem. I would like to add, that Geert Wilders falls politically into the category of classical liberal and would have been called a pinko commie’ by much of the US mainstream of the 1950s for his defense of gay rights and Jewish people. To call him a Nazi is the height of deception. Eeyore]

If there is another killing in Belgium, the Government and the media are criminal conspirators.

Posted on by

I wrote this few paragraphs as a kind of afterthought on my last post last night. But the more I think about it, the more relevant I think it is. For those of you that agree with the sentiment of it, please feel free to send it out to people by email, repost it, send the link out, copy it and paste it as a comment where relevant etc.

—————————

I have harped on about the following issue a couple of times already but it seems too important a point to let go just yet.

The entire point of a government, security services and media is to protect and inform the public. The fact is that two men went into a museum and arbitrarily shot people to death. The fact that the museum was a Jewish one is largely irrelevant as the people they shot could have been anyone. The media not only did not give a description of the attackers, even once it was known that both of them were still at large and very likely on their way to another target, but covered for whatever government agency denied the information.

Read this excerpt from one of the eye witnesses:

An antique-shop owner, who saw the killer and made eye contact with him as he walked away through the centre of the touristic district, said he was impassive and cold after the murders.

“I caught his eye. There was no expression whatsoever on his face.”

Furthermore, no one, and I mean no one, would spend good money on a security system that just gave fuzzy stills of someone’s hat. They have photos and videos of the perp I am certain, which are better than what we saw. I don’t think they even make cameras that bad anymore. And it was repeatedly stated that there were eye witnesses but no one thought to ask them for a description of the perp and none of the news agencies, not BBC or CNN even mentioned that there was no description of the mass murders currently at large in Belgian streets. An omission that is too large and across too many organizations to be accidental. This has to be policy.

So I ask the public. What is the point of having a government who deliberately misinforms you in order to protect the image of exceptionally bad policy they are too afraid to back down from, or a security service more concerned about the reputation of the ideology that motivated the attack than they are of preventing another one, and a mass media who work three shifts to avoid informing the public on matters that are quite literally life and death.

The time to learn basics about information, logic, reason and responsibility of these agencies is surely here. We as the public need to inform each other, and assist each other in understanding what criteria is for actual information. Because at the moment we do not have a news media. We have general anesthesia.

Eeyore for Vlad.

UPDATE on murder of 4 people at Jewish Museum in Brussels.

Posted on by

Don’t even bother. They have a man in custody, they have video footage of the attack. They are looking for a second suspect but as usual there is no description of the killers nor does anyone even ask who they are or what they looked like. For all we know the second killer, who soon I wager they will announce never existed as that seems to be the pattern, is on his way to kill more people somewhere else but no one can defend themselves as they have no idea who to look out for.

What exactly has happened to the world when people are no longer entitled to the basic information they need to survive and the media will not even ask? The BBC doesn’t even bother to mention that the person is thought to be of terrestrial origins for that matter. All the media acts like the information is irrelevant. This link is from 8 minutes ago and I have no idea why the BBC even bothered to issue this update when there is no actual new information in it. Just the illusion that they are informing us. 

Journalism now leftist-Islamic propaganda in the UK

Posted on by

Check out this article from the Birmingham Mail.

The actual event is that someone drove a car at speed into a crowd of 14 men, apparently targeting them all because they belonged to the EDL but doing a lot of physical harm to one man who is the leader of the Sikh division of the English Defense League.If you read the article however, the entire thing is vilification of the EDL with barely a word about the serious crime that was committed, the attempted murder or injury of 14 people because the driver or whoever he represents does not agree with the message of the EDL.

In the article, it goes on to vilify the EDL thusly:  “The EDL play on the historical animosity that exists between some sections of the Sikh and Muslim community”. The article drips with contempt for the EDL at this point.

However it utterly fails to explain why that ‘historical animosity’ exists. I suspect it has something to do with the Islamic attempts to exterminate Hindus and Sikhs from the face of the earth on numerous occasions. But I would have to look that up to be sure. Something about General Tamerlan perhaps.

The article continues: “No doubt the EDL will use this incident to portray themselves as victims.”

If having a car drive into your group as an attempt to kill or maim you does not make you a victim then the UK has moved from Orwellian to Kafkaesque. Do the authors of this leftist propaganda rag not understand that once they create this kind of targeted attack form of journalism that it can and will be pointed at them as soon as the right variable changes? Ownership, person who funds it, government etc? This kind of ‘reporting’ is an atrocity and a crime on the public no matter who it favors. Human beings, and dogs for that matter, make choices based on available information. When you deceive them, you rob them of the right of free will.

Two men have already been arrested, but not named, that allegedly drove the vehicle. Is it because UK law forbids naming a suspect until formally arraigned? Doubtful as non-Muslims are outed by the press the moment they are suspected if memory serves. Or is it because if the two are muslims it changes the equation of the slant this article shows. Either way, the people of the free world would do well to start learning the basics of determining what and what does not constitute information.

H/T EDL Buck

VICE News on muslim patrols and Britain First in East London

Posted on by

I still find it highly repugnant that so many news agencies feel the need to label a group that supports British law as it is democratically created, and represents the culmination of English culture and heritage for literally thousands of years, as somehow morally equivalent to a group that uses fascist theocratic thuggery to enforce an alien legal system on the world. It is the height of post modern thought. This kind of relativism is something I hoped VICE would be above given their reporting on North Korea and Liberia, both of which are excellent and highly not PC.

Compare what Britain First says at 9:15  to what the various muslim groups demand.

To ask immigrants who moved to a nation to abide by its laws and not illegally enforce their own is hardly morally equivalent. nor is it ‘far right’ as the term is popularly used, to mean Nazi like, which is actually far left. The true meaning of far right would be me. I believe in small government and maximal individual rights and a clean clear separation of mosque and state and not allowing any group to break the law using the fiction of collective rights. In other words, a Jeffersonian liberal.

H/T M.

And please feel free to head over to the YT channel where this video lives and join in on the comments there. The statements of VICE News need tone challenged.