Category Archives: irrational leftism
MP Andrew Bridgen, seems to be being bribed to go to Davos on the exact same day he is to lead a debate on excess deaths in the UK Parliament: John Campbell Ph.D.
Please watch this video and read the Tweet and compare it to the hundreds in jail for years with no trial for Jan 6 protest
Ezra Levant a victim of the real state of communism in Canada
This is my talk in Pembroke in August, attempting to explain how our various institutions of state actually work:
Two solid items on the Communist state of the West
It seems some of the big guys are calling it like it is.
A small sample:
[…]
Dennis Prager equates the mutilation of American schoolgirls with the enforced clitoridectomies of Muslim females – and he’s correct that it destroys whatever claim to moral superiority the west might once have had: it’s not merely the transformation of “the formerly good into the bad” but of the formerly good into the evil. It is not Putin or Chairman Xi or the mullahs who are slicing the breasts off thousands of middle-schoolers and rendering them infertile.
If you feel a wee bit queasy about mutilating little girls, well, unless you’re as rich as JK Rowling, better shut up, hater. Nevertheless, there are, as Marx would have said, internal contradictions in the new Utopia.
[…]
Unlike the constitution-wavers of the American right, the left does not live in abstractions. It makes hard-power calculations on what’s useful to them. Muslims are, and Jews aren’t. Tough, but, like the mobsters say, nothing personal, strictly business. Thus, according to Canada’s state-funded national broadcaster, “Israel started the Hamas war” – while that whole October 7th unpleasantness was just a bit of freelance rape and murder one has to accept (per Sadiq Khan) as the occasional price of living in a great global
citykibbutz.[…]
But, at the top, the people who are doing this to us are not doing it “unconsciously”. They understand very clearly that the new utopia can only be built on a mountain of corpses – from myocarditis, from body positivity, from diversity stabbings, from whatever it takes. I said some years ago that those tearing down statues of every king, queen and prime minister would soon move on to actual human beings: if you are determined to erase the entirety of the past, why would you balk at the abolition of human biology? In both cases, it is to ensure that there is no path back: no nation, no community, no family, no civilisational inheritance. You can only stagger onward, deeper into the void.
[…]
This year’s freshman class at the University of Vermont is two-thirds female; is it so hard to imagine it as an all-ladies’ college? And sooner than you think?
Heraclitus said “cold things warm, warm things cool, wet things dry and parched things get wet”. But even he might have been surprised to see men become women, and ugly men become beauty queens, and people who remember when only women were women become social pariahs. There is no “hypocrisy” or “inconsistency”; au contraire, it is admirably consistent: What serves the left’s interest is the destruction of all norms and of all the most basic societal building-blocks – and of the widespread confusion and disorientation that follows. For in chaos all things are possible: Forty per cent of French pre-schoolers are of a “migrant background“. There’s another one for Heraclitus: French children become non-French. But don’t worry, because soon all children will become, genetically speaking, non-anything – just as soon as they’ve perfected that “male womb“.
Click through for the whole article. It’s well worth the trip.
Bari Weiss gets a lot right here
This is very good. But it’s our view that if you see what is taking place and describe it, in effect you are controlled opposition. Seeing what is happening but failing to understand its nature or intent actually perpetuates it. Makes you a slave to it one way or another. This is not hypocrisy by McGill at Harvard or the other university heads. This is a very clear use of the dialectic to move the revolution forwards. It is nothing short of that. Bari is great here in terms of describing what took place at the hearings where these women shocked the nation with their stammering defence of calls for genocide as protected speech, but implemented punishments for “misgendering”. Which is proof of exactly our thesis. But goes off the rails when she claims that saying this or that is the moral equivalent of screaming the N word in public. The N word was just an earlier dialectic. One of the first tactics to make it a crime to use a word in ANY context at all. And yeah, while you may not find it as a crime on the law books, everyone knows that the punishment they fact for using it is tantamount to a criminal punishment. What you call it, makes no difference. Unless you call it the N word of course.
At 12 minutes though, she does in fact get way closer to the real issue. But the issue of DEI appears to be tactical. That is to say, the way the communists intend to destroy Israel. They are destroying Ireland, Scotland, Italy and other Western nation states through mass immigration and other forms of dialectical negation. Making it illegal to acknowledge the culture of the majority of the people in Western nations such as Christmas etc. but forced to accept massive street prayers by Muslims is another. The strategy, is the total and utter destruction of the nation state, of reason, of logic, and mostly of the individual. The rest is tactics. Get bogged down in those and you may win a battle or two now and again but you lose the war. Our failure, well one of many, is failing to think big enough to understand the enemy’s plans for us. Which is why so few could believe the vaxx was a bad idea.
Barri is awesome. We were so happy when she left the NYT as one of their editors, and still follow Alex Berenson, another ex-NYT professional who saw where it was heading. But antisemitism, while real, while the consequences of it will be catastrophic for a lot of people, seems to be another vector of attack from the meta view.
James Lindsay: 13 minutes- The Maoist methods behind Democrat messaging
Tucker Carlson with Owen Shroyer on his treatment by the US state and comparisons to actual criminals
Sorry, that is a really bad title. But what I want to say would be worse:
Tucker Carlson and Owen Shroyer demonstrate perfectly how a dialectically operated system works, even as the public still imagines they have rule of law.
Even Tucker and Own seem not to get it here. They remain amazed at the consistent selective enforcement against people who are ‘for Trump’ etc.
We see it as a revolutionary state applying revolutionary standards against anyone who is a counter-revolutionary. The more effective that person is, the harsher the treatment. Which explains what is happening to Trump perfectly.
James Lindsay on Maoism, and intersectionality
Germany approaches a total digital prison at a good clip
Please read the story details at RAIR Foundation
Communism Vs. Fascism
This is really good. Also the series, Chernobyl, which he mentions at the start, is also really good.
Much more on Walter Durante and the Holomodor here
Geert Wilders victory and let’s play Media Bullsh*t Bingo
PJ Watson on the electoral victory of Geert Wilders
Here is a link to a BBC assassination piece on Wilders. Perhaps we should adopt the Global Warming rhetorical scam-spotting game, Bullsh*t Bingo and adapt it to dialectical tactics by the MSM.
On your card you could have:
Insulting insinuations not used for leftist candidates. An example would be a critique of Wilders’ hair style but never attacking any leftist candidate for hair plugs or dye or any other form of quaff.
“Controversial”. One of my personal favorite dialectical/rhetorical weapons of the MSM. CBC uses it sprinkled on eggs every morning for breakfast. A politician is controversial if he is counter-revolutionary. If that politician or person is a communist revolutionary that word is not used. A general example would be a Prof. of Biology with Ph.D.s in the field, who says that a man cannot simply become a woman by saying so, is controversial. While a man claiming to be a woman on one day to take all the top spots in women’s sports and then going back to being a man afterwards is not controversial. Because of the stance that J.K. Rowling has taken on this, she is now considered a far right wing, and highly controversial figure. A Canadian nurse was investigated in fact, for involvement with a billboard saying I (heart) JK ROWLING.
(Her ordeal is still ongoing as of November 9th this year)
The article continues in more subtle ways to disparage Wilders. They discuss his arrest for a thought crime and that communist UK refused to allow him into the country, even though Wilders at that time was an MPs in the European Union and the UK was still inside the EU. This shows the real nature of the beast. The European Union is a revolutionary organization like the UN. Although their rules stipulate that one country must grant access to members of parliament from other EU states, the truth was that this only applies to agents of the revolution. This site emphasizes the single metric by which all things work today. And that is communist-revolution Vs. counter-revolution. The evidence for this is as common as gravel and salt on the roads in the winter in Canada. All processes work this way. When a court or hearing or ‘Human Rights Tribunal” adjudicates on the actual evidence, rule of law, and real human rights, meaning individual ones and not arbitrarily defined collective ones, it’s the exception.
In the case of Wilders, think of it this way. Leftist activists invent all kinds of bogus organization to create awards to give to left wing activists in order to add gravitas to their agenda. There is one dialectical-Jewish man (He uses his ethnicity as a sword and a shield to advance leftist objectives, hence ‘dialectic Jew) who heads a dialectical communist organization much like the SPLC in the US, in Canada who even speaks at events sponsored by CAIR-Canada (now NCCM) to combat ‘islamophobia ‘who’s talks are prefaced with all kinds of awards. We see this often with the left. It is a way of getting people to listen, and giving authority to people who have accomplished nothing but are advancing the communist agenda. With Wilders, they invent charges and events which are not legal or proper procedure which they know will fail under scrutiny of any court not yet fully revolutionary. But that doesn’t matter. What does, is that they can talk about the accusation. So kind of the inverse of the awards scam. For leftists, invent fake awards to give gravitas, for counter-revolutionaries, invent charges and prohibitions to destroy their public image. Alinsky Rule 13.
Wilders was convicted of inciting discrimination, although later acquitted, and he was refused entry to the UK back in 2009.
Accused. They took him to court over asking his constituency a question of immigration policy. The actual job of government. They accused and tried him twice of a thought/speech crime because the question he asked, “Do you want more Moroccan immigration (to the Netherlands) or less”? was a counter-revolutionary one. See in a contemporary democracy you have total freedom of speech so long as its all in perfect accordance with the communist nation-destroying, individual-crushing agenda. Wilders dared ask the people of the Netherlands what they want for the future of the Netherlands and was tried twice and acquitted for it. But the BBC uses that accusation as a cudgel. Same as his rejection from the UK, which is actually a breach of rules, if not illegal, of the UK not Wilders. The BBC are dialectical engineers.
For those interested, here is Geert’s closing statement at one of the struggle sessions trials he was put through over this matter:
But Europe’s far right believes their views have now become more mainstream.
This one above we all know. It’s called, Moving the Goal Posts. What was once the absolute obvious reasonable goals of any nation state, to protect itself, to protect its citizens, to have equality before law for all etc. etc. is now “far right wing”. There is a double irony here. The left, in what is probably the greatest con of the 20th century, have convinced people that the Nazis are some how right wing. The National Socialist Worker’s Party under Hitler, far right wing by some act of alchemy. The party who”s leader’s speeches, notably at Nuremberg, quoted Marx chapter and Verse, who hated the Russians because he didn’t think they could pull off socialism while the Germans could, those guys were right wing. All powerful state and the crushing of individual rights is in no way right wing. That is Hegelian/Marxist communism. Libertarian, maximal individual rights with minimal state power, is the true right wing. And there is the double, and maybe even triple irony. It means that Wilders, Orban, Trump, The new Argentinian guy, possibly Poilievre in Canada and other people the media call “far right wing” are in reality somewhat right wing, but in the opposite way of the impression they are trying to create. Frankly, by libertarian standards, all these leaders are still more collectivist and big government than is desirable. So in fact they are just more right wing in the good way than the revolutionary communists now running the Western world and its media and institutions. Hence the triple irony.
With a little more effort we could flesh out all the score card points for Bullsh*t bingo of leftist dialectical journalism. Probably all of it from that one BBC article, although I’m sure there are other devices they may have neglected to use in that one article. Feel free to leave ones you may have noticed in the comments.
Tom Harris: CO2 is the stuff of life
Environmental scientist, Tom Harris gave a talk at a secret location in Ottawa in November to examine the scientism of ‘Global Warming’ and climate hysteria in general. Tom also examined the connection between increasingly authoritarian policies being implemented and climate pseudo-science as the basis for these new restrictions on our liberties. Tom went one better. He looked at the historical amount of CO2 in the Earth’s atmosphere, and what the minimum requirement for life on Earth to exist actually is. If there is a climate crisis, it is the opposite to what we are being sold.
Stephen Coughlin: Communism is only the dialectic attack on Western civilization
On tearing down posters of Israeli hostages
Freedom of speech is a thing. But isn’t freedom to be heard? While putting up posters is technically not a real public venue, it isn’t like everyone with an issue, especially leftist ones, don’t plaster all Canadian cities with every issue they can thing of, including calls to join the Communist party. Before we became communist, bands used this method to advertise shows. Now its all left wing issues.
During Covid, groups like the White Rose would plaster cities in Canada with stickers exposing the insanity of the various Covid measures and the vaxx. One group posted stickers that only had the Nuremberg code on it. Leftists would of course, tear them down. Presumably because now, the right to individual bodily autonomy is a right wing thing. Unless its for an abortion of course. Which goes back to “with the left, the point is never the point. The Revolution is always the point.”
Here are a few clips of people tearing down posters put up by groups looking to raise awareness of the hostages in Gaza taken by Hamas:
This woman and her husband get doxxed on this thread. But not on this video. So don’t click through if you object to that sort of thing. Also we know this is Canada. Probably Toronto. The woman becomes kinetic in the last few seconds of this clip.
UK and Germany: Police remove posters of missing children