Of course there is no way one can speak about this in any direct way in Canada. Probably even indirectly would cause problems since clearly the same layer of actual state control exists above all Commonwealth nations right now. What has been happening across the Anglosphere, and even Germany and Italy and Spain, maybe especially Germany, is the same. And all these polices aren’t accidentally destructive but as destructive as possible with no other redeeming features. None of the reasons given for the policies of mass immigration are true. Not one. Which adds a lot of momentum to the frequently used expression, “With the left, the point is never the point – the revolution is always the point”.

So if one looks at the recent events in Ireland and now Scotland from a future historical perspective, academically, one could compare them to what happened in Romania under Nicolae Ceau?escu. Or in Egypt twice in roughly one year very modern times where two tyrants were deposed in a row by the people taking to the streets. The French Revolution, unfortunate as that was in many ways, the Reconquista, which may be the closest parallel although I do not believe the Spanish/Visigoth leadership invited the Muslims in to take over and implement the sharia and enslave the locals. Which is 100% the case now in the West.

And now there is a revolt taking place in Scotland.

Of course these kinds of actions were fully anticipated by the architects of the destruction of Western Civilization. In Canada, all the many laws being passed to censor and control speech online and in every other way is clearly for the purpose of stopping people from opposing state narratives, and more importantly, stopping them from organizing against the implementation of state narratives. Nothing like the Freedom Convoy will ever be allowed to happen again, although things like the BLM riots will of course happen as often as they are useful to the COMINTERN.

What remains is the one question that has applied for a very long time now.

Will the Scots and Irish and any other nation that wishes to preserve its own laws, culture, values and peoples rise up in sufficient numbers such that the agents who deploy force on behalf of the state will drop their weapons, or deploy their weapons on behalf of the people? This is what happened in several of the examples given, and a little research, we can be certain was the case very often in overthrowing the state for good or for bad.

Of course this becomes impossible once the state replaces the army and police with the people it invites in to these nations and pays them to maintain their own values and customs. They have zero investment in their host nation and have no motivation to side with the actual people. I think there are reasons to suspect that is happening in several Western nations now. So again, speaking strictly from an analytical and historical perspective, the window for effective action against communist totalitarian state control lies between when the public feels the cost benefit of fighting back makes it worth the risk to themselves, their families and their wealth, and when the state replaces all its security apparatus with cultures that hate the legacy population.

(Those of you that get these emails and do not click through to the post should be aware there is a video on the Scottish rebellion embedded in this post. So click through to the site.)