Category Archives: Controlled opposition

What does ‘controlled opposition’ mean anyway?

Posted on by

This post is for Canadians, and anyone interested in Canada, or anyone in a system of government where leaders are picked using a similar system to Canada, either by intention or in reality.

First, let’s watch this video by Runkle of the Bailey on the Conservative Party legislation on self defence in the home against intruders.

The punch line is the CPC is pretending to enforce laws to allow defence of the self and the home while keeping it exactly the same.

Then we add this. Remember, one of the communist plays is to remove all power from parents over Children, unless you want to kill them before birth, and give all that power to the state.

That power would extend to the point where a state agent, say a socialist teacher, could persuade your child that they are born in the wrong body, but their body can be adjusted to be more like how they imagine themselves to be, and embark them on a course of radical surgeries and drugs that will mutilate and sterilize them for life no matter what else they ever do. The Conservatives accelerated a bill that would have the parents made criminal if they attempted to even suggest to their own young children that they delayed such a set of procedures till they were old enough to buy a beer, vote or get a pack of cigarettes.

Here is video of Parliament where the Conservatives ask to skip all the damn hullabaloo around bill C-4 and just pass it already without all that ceremonial reading of it, and pesky voting and so on.

My Google searches used to turn up an excellent US Library of Congress summary of the Canadian bill C-4 which was dialectically named, ‘Anti-conversion therapy’ legislation when in fact it was as conversion therapy as you can possibly get. Tricking people into becoming a simulacrum of the other sex and criminalizing parents who tried to stop it. It seems Google won’t give mt that result anymore. But Brave’s built in search engine will. 

Overall, the actions of the Conservative Party increasingly appear to be those of, not people who wish the restoration of something like a Republic.

Probably most obviously would be how the Liberal of Canada is bringing in Millions of people very alien to Canadian values and culture, and the Conservative Party seems to want to build them houses, rather than deport them, and restore immigration to something that works in Canadian interests, rather than for the ‘migrants’ at the expense of Canadian interests. Not to mention they seem to want to build these illegal immigrants homes at public expense.

So maybe we all need to think about what controlled opposition means to each of us, and decide if the Conservative Party fits.

If it does, some of us had better form a new party, or infiltrate and take over the Conservative one, and make it Conservative again.

MCPCA? MaCoPaCoAg? Make the Conservative Party Conservative again? Probably not possible. The few people in the party that tried got sidelined.

Remember the Conservative MP, Derrick Sloan, who held the largest attended and watched press conference in Canadian history during Covid? Kicked out of the party and not re elected.

This video was after he had already been removed from the party:

There are a few solid conservatives within the Conservative Party though. After the recent federal election, we published some speeches they made that were stellar in their unabashedly anti-communist content and clear awareness of the situation Canada is in now.

Those are all new members. Leslyn Lewis was always a solid Canadian Conservative and always had the courage to say out loud what needs to be done. She also was the only Conservative MP that I am aware of, to support the Freedom Convoy. She also very rightly suggested Canada leave the United Nations.

So maybe there is a feint hope for a political solution from the CPC. But not from the top.

 

Outrage bait and controlled opposition

Posted on by

There has been a great deal of kerfuffle recently, especially from DOGE, and less so, but still existent in Canada, about massive, ludicrous, unjustifiable amounts of money being spent on tiny, ludicrous, unjustifiable projects.

Just a few examples:

The more outrageous the name of the project studied, the better the distraction. The public gets properly outraged at “the use of taxpayer dollars” (it is far worse than that. it has little to nothing to do with taxpayer dollars. More on that later) and focuses anger and attention on that aspect of it.

My guess is, if the books were actually done on the “drag shows in Ecuador” they would find little to no money was actually spent on it. Or if it was, the majority of it rode a famous Australian Aboriginal hunting tool, back to source for redirection.

Understanding the strategy to recognize the tactics:

The Cloward Piven strategy has three vectors of attack, the purpose of which is to “Make America a communist country”.

1. Print enormous amounts of money so that the currency collapses

2. Import as many foreigners ideally who are hostile or alien to the American culture and legal system as possible

3. Grow the civil service as much as possible, where the principle job of the government employees is to oppress the public

And about point 3.

If anyone thinks it was really about tracking 600$ Venmo transactions, they can’t do math. Averaging 80K a year per agent, that would be an annual cost of 6.96 billion. The actual amounts recovered for tax fraud (Itself a questionable thing) is unlikely to be greater than that, and if it is, it is likely to be closer to extortion than taxation in a Republic. Also the early reports on this plan was that the IRS agents were to be armed. Can’t find anything on Biden saying that at the moment, but I dimly recall Biden saying that exactly himself at one point.

In the video linked above on point 3 from America Uncensored, they admit the new agents’ purpose is to go after lower and middle class Americans. Frankly, that is a surprise to hear. That part is certainly true.

The tie in:

By creating rage bait projects to be discovered, those who plan the destruction and deracination of Western cultures and peoples, they get everyone looking at the woke BS projects, while missing the likely bigger picture. Vector 1 of Cloward-Piven is used to fund projects intended to oppress the American peoples in as many ways as possible, and the likely largest reason, is the money to fund the actual invasion of Western nations by hostile aliens, who are being put in hotels and given larger amounts of state support than retirees and seniors who spent their entire lives in law abiding support of the nations in which they were born and raised.

So we have tactic 1 of Cloward Piven being used to fund tactics 2 and 3.

Not that we shouldn’t be upset about funding ludicrous sounding ‘woke’ projects across the world. Its just that we probably are not doing so, but are funding our own destruction via Cloward-Piven.

As to tax payer dollars, based on the amounts printed by the government(s), it is clear that taxation is not even necessary. They can print money to do whatever needs doing, since they are clearly printing the money to do all the ludicrous nonsense they claim to be doing. So at this point taxation is likely a tool to destroy the middle class. Like the 87000 new IRS agents were said to be doing in fact, by the Obiden admin itself. (See video linked in point 3)

Printing money destroys the value of itself.  It reduces in value with each printing over and above the wealth creation of the nation which issues it. The money created even if we ignore how it is used, destroys savings through inflation. A person could work their whole lives and live a life of self denial to have a secure retirement, and still find themselves dependant on a state due to the erosion of the value of their saved money, and the state they depend on may or may not have their interests at heart at any given moment.

This may be another way in which the vast majority of non-leftists become controlled opposition and assist their own destruction.

At last, a clear explanation as to why genuine patriots are turning against Alberta premiere, Danielle Smith

Posted on by

There is been a great deal of rumours and mutterings about her and her failures to correct major issues for which she was elected. Personally, I had hoped it was controlled op to try and separate her from her base. This is a common tactic. But at least the following explanation makes the case as to why people have a legitimate reason to be highly suspicious of her actual agenda

And when you add in this statement by Smith, it gets difficult to mumble one’s way past it