Category Archives: Selective enforcement

Candace Owens has Twitter account suspended for exact tweet of new NYT editor

Posted on by

Candace Owens tweeted out the exact same phrase that the new, hate filled, racist editor of the New York Times did about old white people, but replaced the word “white” with the word “Black”. I saw this tweet not an hour ago.

Apparently, she had her twitter account immediately suspended. You know, as opposed to being made an editor at the New York Times.

It seems to have ben restored now, but she is currently doing a live periscope on this. When I find it, I will post it.

TWITTER SUSPENDS CANDACE OWENS — THEN SAYS IT WAS ‘AN ERROR’ AFTER BACKLASH

Twitter suspended conservative commentator Candace Owens on Sunday for imitating New York Times editorial board member Sarah Jeong’s anti-white tweets, but restored Owens’ account access following a backlash on social media.

(Candace also did one substituting black people for white people in an otherwise identical tweet to the new editor at the New York Times. The fact is, Twitter like the rest of social media along with the government-media complex, or should I say, the Marxist-deepstate-media complex, is brutally, even staggeringly biased and often doesn’t even bother to hide it anymore as Twitter did in this case. The New York Times made up a pathetic story about how this new editor was using a form of sarcasm in her tweets to illustrate a point but a rough search shows that was a lie and everyone knew it. As her speech at Harvard makes clear as day in the Saudi desert.

Postmortem on Lauren’s visit to Lakemba

Posted on by

For those who have not yet seen the stunning police reaction to Lauren’s planned visit to Lakemba, a heavily islamic part of Australia, you have to see it. The police literally just make up laws as needed to stop her. The ultimate in selective enforcement. Not just pointing at vague laws and deciding they apply to her and no one else, but literally just making up laws as they go along. Truly 3rd world.

Perfect example of selective enforcement

Posted on by

If a white person where to approach someone and call them an ethnic slur, or a slander based on sexual deviancy, and that person was to take offence and react physically, I think we can all safely say they would face no legal consequences. The person making the slur however very likely could be arrested in this new Orwellian age.

So why is it if a person is called a Nazi, they cannot react as they rightfully should?

It is a far far worse slur than the word that must not be spoken after all. It speaks to your character, actions and beliefs at the core. And as none of the Proud Boys are anything remotely like Nazis, and as ANTIFA and Socialist groups most certainly are close to them, well it makes one wonder doesn’t it?

The following tweet is by an American socialist group who feels they have the right to label anyone who is not a socialist a Nazi, and then heap any amount or kind of abuse on them they are capable of.

Count Dankula tweets a bitter bitter irony

Posted on by

This tweet, for those who do not know, is from the man who was tried and convicted of a speech crime for a joke video where he taught his girlfriend’s pug dog to appear to be a Nazi. Interestingly no one in the proceedings bothered to notice, not that it should have mattered, that the dog was just doing a trick on command and had no concept of Nazis, or that the stunt Count Dankula did in fact showed his firm belief that Nazis are the epitome of evil and that was the entire nature of the bet he had with his girlfriend about making her dog do something that was not viewable as cute in any way.

So his derision is more than earned by this obscenely untrue statement by Janet Street-Porter

Another young man assaulted for wearing a MAGA hat

Posted on by

This is an important story. This is about the new leftist violent tribalism that has infected nearly every walk of life. It has even hit James Woods now that his agent has decided not to represent him anymore, seemingly purely for ideological reasons. James Woods supports the president. And that is the only reason.

I hope its grounds for a suit.

…and Trump is the ‘racist’

Posted on by

Increasingly there is the appearance of special, or no rules, for muslims

Posted on by

Yesterday we posted on the standards of desecration of religious symbols, where a British man was killed for a bacon sandwich while serving a year prison term, while a muslim who delivered some  Indian takeaway to a Christian home got exactly nothing at all for actual vandalism of property of the family’s Cross.

Video below again:

Another example of selective enforcement, or more commonly called a ‘double standard’ happened this past week in Germany.

Germany has, wrongfully in my opinion, the most harsh laws against Holocaust denial.

If anyone wants to know what is true about that period of history, the Nazis were meticulous record keepers and there is more evidence of what took place there than most historical events of the 20th century, And if people wish to invent its non existence, no amount of evidence will suffice but forcing one belief will certainly add gravitas to their cause.

On top of that, people critical of Islam or mass muslim immigration in Germany have found themselves visited by police and worse. Many have been arrested for stating their opinions on social media where they are critical of islam or critical of government policies favouring islam.

And then we have this:

German rappers anti-Semitism lyrics probe dropped

Two German rappers will not be prosecuted after an outcry over lyrics about Auschwitz and the Holocaust.

 

Critics attacked Kollegah and Farid Bang for comparing their muscular bodies with those of Auschwitz inmates, and suggesting a new Holocaust.

 

But prosecutors said the artistic freedom was guaranteed by the constitution.

 

The gangsta rap lyrics, while offensive, did not amount to Holocaust denial or inciting violence, they said.

Düsseldorf prosecutor’s office spokesman Ralf Herrenbrück told German media that while the genre might be vulgar, misogynistic and homophobic, it would not be possible to bring charges.

 

The controversy surrounding the duo centres on two lines in their latest album JBG3 (Young, brutal, good looking 3).

One track includes the words: “My body is more defined than those of Auschwitz inmates.”

Another has the lyric: “I’m doing another Holocaust, coming with the Molotov.”

And so we see even more clearly how this whole thing works from this example than most.

For muslims, all the constitutional guarantees and freedoms of law apply. But for the indigenous, and non-muslim and non communist people of Europe, all the little unconstitutional hate crimes laws and an endless list of highly interpretable set of regulations apply such that we have in effect sharia.

Muslims can say and do as they want, and the rest of us are…

 

 

Ramadan in Germany: Muslims kick, punch Jews, say “If I see you again, I’ll slit your throat, you [expletive] Jew”

Posted on by

Check out this article from Jihad Watch. But whatever you do, do NOT make a Youtube video about it. Youtube is targeting any proof of islamic antisemitism and punishing the messenger over, and over again.

First, the article:

“Jewish Youths Attacked by Arabs in Berlin Train Station,” by David Israel, Jewish Press, June 4, 2018 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):

Another violent attack on Jews took place in Berlin Saturday night at Bahnhof Zoo station, according to Bild.

The newspaper reported: “A disgusting, brutal, anti-Semitic incident took place at Bahnhof Zoo last night. The victims: three young Jews. The perpetrators: three young Arabs. They said, among other things: ‘This is our town, our precinct. If I see you again, I’ll slit your throat, you [expletive] Jew.’”

Please click through to Jihad Watch for the whole thing.

Now, remember this video?

We had this very shortly after it was on Facebook and put it on our Youtube channel. It went viral from there across many Youtube channels, including, but not limited to, an actual white supremacist, antisemitic channel on Youtube.

However our, and only our, copy of this video was pulled and our channel got a “community Standards” strike for posting it, even though RT, and a dozen left wing German news sites had the exact same video from the same source, and some even may have downloaded it from our own video channel.

We appealed the decision and the appeal was rejected.

Then, a few weeks to a month later, after a second attempt at an appeal, which isn’t even allowed, and was probably ignored, all of a sudden, it was restored and the strike was removed.

Then, on June 5, at 8:20 PM came this:

Yup. Youtube is punishing me for their own decision to reinstate the video they took down months earlier.

Is Youtube just stupid? Fickle? Incompetent? Vicious? Is it content driven? If so, why deny the appeal, reinstate it then wait a month and take it down and apply a strike again.

Who knows. But one thing is for sure.

At this stage they are getting boring.

Please everyone, go to www.bitchute.com and create a user account and subscribe to our channel. Increasingly I will move new content there.

Youtube is just plain crazy.