Category Archives: Galloping statism

Rule of law in the UK pretty much now a museum exhibit you won’t be allowed to see

Posted on by

Katie Hopkins on the sentencing of some protestors, and the total ignoring of others

Katie seems to think this is all politics instead of a revolution. Frustrating in a way. The contrasting examples she gives are not, as she said, haphazard. They are perfectly consistent as they serve the revolution, and the dialectic obliteration of British people and their culture and laws and values and history from the UK forever and ever. That is the piece she doesn’t address in this video. I have a difficult time believing she doesn’t know that. She may be exercising a little bit of self preservation there. And fair enough.

From BBC:

Crushing of all media that is counter-narrative intensifies as list of media to be censored leaked in Spain

Posted on by

Newest item in Spain, leaked by Colonel Pedro Baños.

Read the story at RAIR

Here is a link to a previous post with a short list of new censorship across the West in item 1. Canada will lead the pack alongside Germany soon with bills C 63 and C 637. Details of which can be seen in the video below by constitutional Lawyer, John Carpay from his Ottawa Speech a few months ago.

Q&A 1

Q&A 2

One Quebec town is implementing QR codes for exit

Posted on by

Please watch this video and add it to the events described in the previous post to get a decent sense of the state Canada is in at this stage of the authoritarian revolution which has been implemented for some years now.

Read some story details here please.

Lawyer Peter Krusse explains the tyranny being imposed on the world by the UN WHO

Posted on by

14 minutes.

Psychiatrist, Dr Keith Ablow explains to Tucker Carlson why the DEA stole his laptop and guns and never returned them, or charged him with anything, ever

Posted on by

Protest videos against Trudopian MAiD slippery slope and where it might lead

Posted on by

First of all, all the videos from Tuesday’s protest against Trudeau’s plan to implement state applied killing to those with no criteria except mental illness are all at this post at RAIR Foundation. So please click through to see them all. Each of them are either speeches or interviews with the principles of the demontration. A few are below here as well. As usual, please click the little gear on the bottom right of the play window and select the highest quality to best see the details should you care to.

A few words from this site’s perspective.

The most obvious issue is the slippery slope argument. Once you allow the state to commit murder for certain reasons against their own citizens, then a revolutionary (Communist) government will expand the definitions to include anyone they want for any reason they want. But much more importantly is the less obvious issue. But one for which we have a series of clear and recent precedents, and all from this government now sitting in Ottawa. (In as much as the current government actually are the wielders of power, and not the COMINTERN and/or the PRC. Which frankly it probably is)

And that is that the language used to justify an act which removes a fundamental right, is always presented as kindness. That’s for openers. And the parameters are always set as voluntary. But they always end with mandatory.

Let’s look at how the mRNA vaxx roll out progressed.

Two weeks too flatten the curve became years.

More importantly, those who said the vaxx, once it was available would become mandatory were cancelled for being conspiracy nuts. People who accurately predicted exactly what the state would do, were diminished in every way they could at the time. Then those who argued that events shouldn’t happen as they actually did. Every aspect of the program was a lie from the start, each phase of which was meant to take you from, ‘yeah that seems reasonable’ to where we are today. And where we are with the vaxx is people dead in 6 figures that wouldn’t be, had they not taken the shots, and a growing list of symptoms, the newest of which is rapid hearing loss.

With more direct relevance to this post, state plans went from voluntary, to years later there are medical staff, doctors and nurses who had exemplary records and yet were destroyed for not pushing these shots based on their own personal expertise and often direct experience in the area in question. Doctors had very few choices in the absolute sense of the word. They could promote the shots vigorously as demanded by the state, they could warn people not to take them, and end their career forever, or they could retire and end the whole thing for themselves. I personally know many of all categories. One married couple of doctors I met early early on in the mandates, (and mandates they were) took early retirement because they knew this was an actual violation of the Nuremberg Code, which Canada signed on to as law in the 1950s.

So phase one: A minor temporary violation of your most sacred rights as an individual in a free society for the collective good. At least as presented.

Phase two: Voluntary becomes coerced, and temporary becomes either very long, or permanent, or very long with some aspects of the loss of liberty normalized and permanent.

So if doctors could be forced to take the vaxx, and punished heavily if they recommended against it, or more factually, failed to aid in the coercion of the public to take it, how will this apply to “assisted suicide”? Will doctors initially be able to offer people to kill them if they are in a limited category of special circumstances, and then discover that the categories basically include anyone who might ask for it? Where from there? Will doctors then be encouraged to recommend it to people who are inconvenient to the state? Like vaxx victims or veterans who are badly damaged? And how long, like the vaxx policies, till doctors risk losing their entire careers if they don’t literally coerce people to take the triple death shot (explained in one of the videos below) should they meet criteria decided by the state? Remember how Trudeau spoke about the unvaxxed. It is the position of this site that the mRNA injections actually represented another set of unspoken categories. The revolution-compliant Vs. the counter-revolutionaries. Those who would not take the shots were resistant to state diktats. They believed in themselves as an individual with God given rights or at least rights, and were therefore everything Trudeau, Biden and the rest of the COMINTERN said they were, which makes sense in the context of this metric. Just not in the surface context. But those who took the shots were good comrades. Obedient to the state and in their willingness to submit to something gladly or not, that they really should have questioned more.

This process must be considered when looking at the whole issue of giving the state the power to murder people. Even if the use of that word isn’t perfect. After all, in reality, murder means killing without the right permission. And only the state can give that permission. Which is why soldiers seldom get charged with it unless they kill someone the state doesn’t want killed at that moment. So state killing is a better term than murder. But since the state should not have the power to kill its own citizens even if they request it, maybe we can go either way on which word to use.

Alex Schadenberg Executive Director APC

Human Rights Attorney, Lia Milousis

Colin Postma:

For the other three videos including a Montreal doctor and others, please click through to RAIR where a description of the issue and where it is at now is available.

The Senate yesterday voted to delay the implementation of mental illness as a stand-alone category till 2027. This is good. It means the next government will likely strike it down. Or, there is another plan to approach this from another direction that won’t attract as much public condemnation but will grant the state the same powers. That is how it usually goes.

Two different items from two countries from two border issues, yet curiously the same

Posted on by

Curiously incompetent Press Secretary to majorly demented US president-usurper, Joe Biden

Meanwhile, in Canada, the law seems curiously flexible and can also be directed against people trying to actually obey the law. Just like above.

Germany approaches a total digital prison at a good clip

Posted on by

Please read the story details at RAIR Foundation

Dinesh D’Souza on his new film and the nature of the current police state in the USA

Posted on by

According to the definition of insurrection used call J6 participants “insurrectionists” the people who took over the Capitol building in opposition to Israel retaliatory strikes on Gaza most certainly are within that definition. In fact far more blatantly. They did not walk politely between the velvet ropes. They actually obstructed procedures and chanted slogans in unison. Here is the actual definition.

So how many of those participants will be treated like this?

75 minute interview of Dinesh D’Souza on his new movie, Police State

https://policestatefilm.net

FBI raids man’s home with MASTER COMBINATION to his gun safe

Posted on by

If anyone thinks that anything is secure from Big Brother, think again. Even your home safe has a master access that the state can get with a phone call, and from the sound of it, without even a judge signing off on it

Frankly, I think this calls for a class action suit by everyone that owns a safe which has a master access and about which, they were previously unaware.

Sexualization of Children and dialectics: Media, Leftist activists group in collusion at many levels

Posted on by

A very important event took place in Ottawa yesterday. One which has implications for school board workers and teachers that should be of some concern. What makes it so important isn’t just what took place, but who did not show up for it and the likely reason why not. The absence of these groups indicates collusion between the organized left, and broadcast media as a greater conspiracy to dialectically destroy classical Canada and the values of those Canadians, and to do so with a consistent set of Maoist narrative attacks. Yes, that will be explained.

Let’s start with the event. Something like three to five hundred Muslims went to the OCDSB to protest the entirety of the sexual indoctrination of children at Ottawa schools. And to be a little clearer, I think it is safe to estimate that the Islamic objections to SOGI [Sexual Orientation Gender Identity] is with with a broader brush than the protest on Friday, which was by a very diverse group of people. Led by Josh Alexander and Billboard Chris, The videos of which can be seen here, more focussed on the most destructive aspects of it.

But this event Tuesday at the Ottawa Carleton District School Board appears to have been organized through the mosques, and the participants would be 85% Muslim at a guess. The protest Friday, was against sexualizing children and especially getting them on dangerous drugs and talking them into dangerous surgical procedures in the name of Trans-rights, which would make them monsters of a sort for life. Neither male or female and certainly not natural in any sense. Sterile, and in a very high category for suicide, with complications from these procedures which can be unimaginable, and likely few would do it if they were properly informed.

The Friday protest was met with a very well organized leftist counter-protest and lots and lots of broadcast media. And while the initial protest would have just been a walk up and down Broadview and maybe a few speeches to the converted, the counter-protest was positively illegal. They blockaded the entire road at multiple points. More to the point, each time a protestor tried to engage the leftists, who sported PSAC, (Canadian government Union flags), and other communist symbols and initiate language for communism, such as hats that read: “Veteran of the Class War”, at yesterday’s Islamic protest right at the HQ of the Ottawa Carleton District School Board, no MSM TV crews were visible, and no leftist counter demonstration except for one woman who had a sign claiming to be Muslim and a friend of LGBTQ. She can be found counter-protesting at every event by non-Leftists in Ottawa pretty much, which somewhat lessens the effect.

 

To the point: Over the years, many concerned Canadians have had protests over the acceptance of Islamic norms in Canada. The limits of freedom of speech which Islam demands, is extreme. The punishments for violating them often fatal. Many teachers, activists and journalists and satirists have been murdered by Muslims across the West in Islamic continuous efforts to crush any criticism of Islam or its icons. The central dogma that homosexuals should be killed according to Islamic scripture as another easy example. One simply cannot even talk about that without being shut down, despite it being an obvious truth. Iran hangs homosexuals and Saudi Arabia decapitates them with a sword. It’s no secret except from anyone watching MSM. The keeping of sex slaves and slaves in general. And while Islam employs direct violence and force to prevent these opinions from having an effect on people’s views of Islam, or diminishing the authority of Islam in the minds of the public, the leftist-media collusion uses something more akin to a Maoist narrative attack.

The left will insist that any attempt to expose the actual scripture, history and current behaviour of Islam in countries with sharia law, and that is a lot of countries, is Islamophobic. Nazi. Intolerant. Hateful. As a tactic this could be codified in a couple of ways. Alinsky’s rule 13 for example, or DARVO, DARVO certainly comes very close. But this tactic is consistent, and at the very least, tacit collusion between organized leftist groups and the MSM And across the spectrum of pseudo-realities and narratives. If you try to present the truth about climate-science publicly at best you will be ignored, but if someone sees it, you will be demonized as a climate denier. It needs both a leftist group on the ground and a captured, (read communist) main stream media to work. You have the leftists who make damn sure that the message, (which is usually true) of the initial protest is not heard, and that they are made to look evil, thuggish and intolerant. Then the media will spin the reporting such that the left, which is always the more aggressive group, is actually the victims of the conservatives. The left must be portrayed as defending a vulnerable minority. Those who attempt to pierce the narratives with truth, will be dialectically destroyed with Discourse theory, DARVO, Alinsky 13, lets just call all these variations on Marxist critical theory.

So when a Muslim group actually organized a protest and had Quranic quote signs, full Islamic gear on the women and several men who appeared to be imams, and were very clear about how they felt about the attack on their children in schools via sexual messaging, the left knew they could not counter-protest as the big-lie would be exposed on two fronts, and the media knew they could not attend and have on the record, the Islamic view of sexual messaging in the schools.

Just now the following comment came to the site:

Today CBC kids news, child reporter named Saab Vahedyousef explained on the kids show what the term 2SLGBTQQIPAA stands for.  “Two-Spirit, Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, Questioning, Intersex, Pansexual, Asexual, Allies

So while hundreds of Muslims, whole families protested in person against a much wider spectrum of issues of deviant sexuality from an Islamic perspective, CBC is promoting a Muslim child gleefully explaining what the letters mean in sexual alphabet soup. And this is why they were not there. CBC, like Global and CTV, are not news services or even information services in any way. They are dialectic machines of destruction, working with leftist groups to create and enforce narratives that they all know are untrue, and profoundly damaging to not just our culture, but to all cultures.

I hope CBC et al remembers how it worked out for the communists after the Iranian revolution they caused. Because that is likely the future here.

And down the street a few minutes from the OCDSB HQ, a sign for a Church. One you hardly ever see in front of a mosque: