“…tyranny being imposed… By Whom, exactly? U.N. Troops? Please.
The “Legality” this “lawyer” talks about is a Creation of an extra-National body that has No Ability to ‘force’ Anything on Anyone. Whatever ‘Orders’ this body issues CANNOT be ‘enforced’ except by Local Agents of Local governments… like the Covid-19 Scamdemic, it will be Local ‘officials’ ordering Local thugpigs to do non-Constitutional things… Locally. Like, right where the officials and thugpigs (and their families) Live.
Get the Picture? Local, Local, Local. Refuse to Comply, and when (not if) it becomes necessary, [stop] all they Send.
Sorry had to change a word. Can’t do any good if my site goes down.
I will have a proper answer for you soon, but its more augmenting than arguing.
Wrong.
The existing law enforcement and military will act on the citizens because using this as their ‘legal authority’. Their handlers, their employers – aka politicians, told them this was legal, because the politicians signed your and my sovereignity when they agreed to this WHO treaty. THAT’s what he’s trying to tell you. The WHO/UN doesn’t need to send in their troops, the governments that signed this treaty will use their own police and troops on their own citizens. This is their ‘legal authority’ to put you in a concentration camp, and you never agreed nor voted on it.
Responding to my comment? I thought I made it clear that the Local ‘government’ will and always are the ‘enforcers’ of Tyrannical ‘edicts’ no matter what the source. That the Local ‘authorities’ (and I mean from ‘federal’ on down) recognize some non-Constitutional, foreign entity as ‘legal authority’ doesn’t matter a Rat’s Ass when it comes Time to Defend ourselves from them. Remember, in Germany under National Socialism, it was “Legal” to send jews to Concentration Camps. Are you going to ‘get on the Train’ because “It’s the Law”?
I think you two are in agreement here.
The issue is the usurpation of our rights by authority, local or federal or international, to determine our lives under a false pretence of law.
This week I have listened to two lawyers speak about the mechanics of the end of human rights in Canada, although it applies to the West as a whole.
Neither had a strategic look at it. Just mechanical. It really was listening to a tour guide on Chiron’s ferry to Hades.
No one saying anything that the audience couldn’t see for themselves, and no description that offered any predictive value.
I suspect that at least one of the two lawyers, very prestigious ones, did have a strategic understanding of what was taking place around us, but is afraid to speak in those terms.
That itself does a better job of showing the zeitgeist than anything they actually said maybe.
Discover more from Vlad Tepes
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.
JamesRoguski – Rumble
https://rumble.com/user/JamesRoguski
UK Column + James Roguski’s Substack link
JamesRoguski – 17 hours ago
https://rumble.com/v4ooq3i-uk-column.html
Videos – Northern Light Convention
June 15th-17th 2923 in Bornholm, Denmark
https://www.scandinavianfreedom.events/2023
Videos
https://www.scandinavianfreedom.events/videos2023
Correction: The year is 2023 🙂
Northern Light Convention – June 15th-17th 2023
2 Rumble Pages
https://rumble.com/user/NorthernLightConvention
“…tyranny being imposed… By Whom, exactly? U.N. Troops? Please.
The “Legality” this “lawyer” talks about is a Creation of an extra-National body that has No Ability to ‘force’ Anything on Anyone. Whatever ‘Orders’ this body issues CANNOT be ‘enforced’ except by Local Agents of Local governments… like the Covid-19 Scamdemic, it will be Local ‘officials’ ordering Local thugpigs to do non-Constitutional things… Locally. Like, right where the officials and thugpigs (and their families) Live.
Get the Picture? Local, Local, Local. Refuse to Comply, and when (not if) it becomes necessary, [stop] all they Send.
Sorry had to change a word. Can’t do any good if my site goes down.
I will have a proper answer for you soon, but its more augmenting than arguing.
Wrong.
The existing law enforcement and military will act on the citizens because using this as their ‘legal authority’. Their handlers, their employers – aka politicians, told them this was legal, because the politicians signed your and my sovereignity when they agreed to this WHO treaty. THAT’s what he’s trying to tell you. The WHO/UN doesn’t need to send in their troops, the governments that signed this treaty will use their own police and troops on their own citizens. This is their ‘legal authority’ to put you in a concentration camp, and you never agreed nor voted on it.
Responding to my comment? I thought I made it clear that the Local ‘government’ will and always are the ‘enforcers’ of Tyrannical ‘edicts’ no matter what the source. That the Local ‘authorities’ (and I mean from ‘federal’ on down) recognize some non-Constitutional, foreign entity as ‘legal authority’ doesn’t matter a Rat’s Ass when it comes Time to Defend ourselves from them. Remember, in Germany under National Socialism, it was “Legal” to send jews to Concentration Camps. Are you going to ‘get on the Train’ because “It’s the Law”?
I think you two are in agreement here.
The issue is the usurpation of our rights by authority, local or federal or international, to determine our lives under a false pretence of law.
This week I have listened to two lawyers speak about the mechanics of the end of human rights in Canada, although it applies to the West as a whole.
Neither had a strategic look at it. Just mechanical. It really was listening to a tour guide on Chiron’s ferry to Hades.
No one saying anything that the audience couldn’t see for themselves, and no description that offered any predictive value.
I suspect that at least one of the two lawyers, very prestigious ones, did have a strategic understanding of what was taking place around us, but is afraid to speak in those terms.
That itself does a better job of showing the zeitgeist than anything they actually said maybe.