Environmental scientist, Tom Harris gave a talk at a secret location in Ottawa in November to examine the scientism of ‘Global Warming’ and climate hysteria in general. Tom also examined the connection between increasingly authoritarian policies being implemented and climate pseudo-science as the basis for these new restrictions on our liberties. Tom went one better. He looked at the historical amount of CO2 in the Earth’s atmosphere, and what the minimum requirement for life on Earth to exist actually is. If there is a climate crisis, it is the opposite to what we are being sold.
Category Archives: Global Warming
Bus Vs. communists
Some fascinating footage from locals in the affected areas of Hawaii
At this point, the only thing we can know is whatever we are told by authorities about a major event, would only be true if its purpose was malevolent. In other words, if it is true, it is because the information is meant to be damaging in some way. But in general, much we hear is the dialectical opposite of the truth if it is in the MSM.
Unfortunately, I know of no way to embed video from Substack, so you have to click through to see this. But the woman who made it makes some claims about the nature of the fires in Hawaii that, if it isn’t supported by the video evidence, neither is the official claims. Some of this just doesn’t make any sense at all. If you want to get to the Hawaii part, go stratight to 22 minutes. Before that she is tying in other events such as the Turkish Earthquakes and specific storms.
I’m not asking anyone to believe any analysis in this video. Just to watch it and see if it creates doubt in the official narratives of what took place in Hawaii. Again, as we now live in a mushroom farm, it is exceedingly difficult to know what is true, especially when it appears to come from our side. (cough cough FBI Qanon) So much has crossed this desk about buy back programs in Hawaii of the land by government, some of it seemingly sinister and part of the reset, and some of it presented as benign to help the afflicted from the fires. Then you have the scripted Global Boiling narrative out of leftist leaders and the UN being pitched as the cause.
I love the “death, Disease, Displacement”, guy. Reminds me of one of my favorite scenes from Ghostbusters
The “conspiracy theory” side of the debate seems to have focus on something called, DEW, or, Directed Energy Weapons. Given that lasers are very old tech, and MASERs (Microwave systematic emission of radiation) even older than lasers, it doesn’t seem a stretch that Raegan’s 1980s Star Wars program got done and with better methods than Rods from God.
Much like with the vaccines, perhaps the best thing to do, is start with what we know. And we KNOW that we are being lied to. And knowing what we are being lied to about, is a big boost towards knowing what is true, even if it is by process of elimination of what isn’t true.
We knew the people pushing the vaxx knew it wasn’t safe and effective. We didn’t know that it wasn’t safe or effective, we just knew the people pushing it didn’t know either. And that was enough for me not to take it as well as a lot of others.
We also know Global Warming is a total lie. That it was hotter in the 1930s than it is now, and frankly, Earth’s Climate lines up with sunspot activity perfectly, and CO2 levels actually FOLLOW temperature changes, as the oceans absorb and release CO2 as they cool or warm from the sun. So when certain disasters are blamed on man’s use of hydrocarbons, right away the flags should go up. So while each alternate theory explaining events can be as erroneous as the official one, given the right state of mind, a healthy skepticism without cynicism, one may come to know what is, or at least multiple what it is not, which in practical terms is often just as good as knowing what is. Knowing they lie is often as useful as knowing the truth. Because you can shape your decisions around the fact that you know they lie. Ask anyone who listens to CBC and took multiple doses of the mRNA.
UPDATE: This may go a long way to explaining why the water suddenly stopped flowing. Punchline, communism.
UPDATE #2:
RFK Jr with Ed Dowd, who appears to be in Hawaii
Sometimes the biggest lies have such obvious refutations that we can’t even see them: Global Warming and buying beach front property
On recent weather events as used by Maoist mass line narrative attacks to promote the destruction of the individual via global warming active measures
The Global Warming Maoist mass line Narrative attack is ramping up as we all know. This time, climate is cooperating a bit with them. Which means that this is one of the rare times that actual science is required to refute the lies. Usually, the lies are obvious and people are forced to go along with them as signs of submissiveness to the narratives. So science doesn’t help and truth just gets you in trouble. In fact these are constants when you are dealing with the purveyors of the narratives. The value of truth and science is for those still willing to consider that the narratives may be lies, at least inwardly. To elaborate on that a moment, increasingly I meet people in day to day life that do know what is true about a variety of things and are afraid to discuss them openly and only refer to what is true in coded terms and not at all if strangers are within earshot. This is Canada today.
Before watching this documentary about climate, which is about an hour and truly the best thing made, please have a look at this page and note the sunspot number for today and the forecast and the general sunspot number for the summer if you can find that here.
After noting the sunspot number, please sit back and enjoy this documentary made by actual climate scientists, and not jet setting neo-Maoists about what drives climate. SURPRISE! It won’t be a surprise. But the reasoning and explanation for the source of climate changes on Earth is really excellent and the dynamic they discovered is new, and actually has real predictive value and can be tested with historical records, right back to Galileo. And it has been. And it fits perfectly with this model. Unlike global warming, which has yet to make a single correct prediction. Ever. This really is worth an hour if you want to be properly equipped to understand what drives climate. Clearly though, as we state repeatedly, you cannot convince a liar with the truth. But you can sometimes persuade their victims with it.
This site has a LOT of info about real climate science. Often the materials are pulled down and we don’t notice as we can’t check everything every day. But we keep a lot of it on this page. So please check it out and if you happen to notice a video missing, let us know in the comments and we will try and restore it.
John Kerry
https://twitter.com/JGaddisOfficial/status/1680261370972090369?s=20
Never drop the con John, NEVER drop the con.
The fundamentally communist reasoning of Ottawa’s energy plans
The clip below is from the City of Ottawa meeting of April 18th, 2023 where the city took questions on the radical plans to transform the energy grid, and life in Ottawa overall.
The first question asked to Angela Keller-Herzog was about the seeming reluctance of the city to consider what Hydro Ottawa had to say in response to the plan to make Ottawa run on solar and wind.
Herzog’s answer was straight out of one of the early anecdotes from Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s. famous book on the workings of the Soviet Union, The Gulag Archipelago.
The example he gives, illustrating the reversal of reality dictating policy, a central axiom of communism, was when the Soviet told the rail engineers that they had to double the amount each train carried on each trip. It was explained to the political officers that the tracks could only handle so much weight and to double the load would lead to catastrophes. The Soviets rounded up those engineers who refused to double the load and shot them. Then doubled the weight of the trains. Catastrophe followed resulting in hundreds of deaths and massive damage. The people who orchestrated that were given the Order of Lenin. (It may have been another honour, it has been a few years since I read book 1)
Listen to Keller-Herzog’s answer about the city not listening to Ottawa Hydro and see if there is a comparison there. The master plan must be supported. The reality of how much you can make by wind and solar is not to be discussed.
The next speaker is using reason to defeat the plan overall, but at the top layer of deception of the plan itself. This means that his objection, while scientifically accurate and verifiable and therefore, ‘true’ still operates on the base assumption that man made CO2 is causing climate change, or more precisely, Global Warming. I would go out on a limb and suggest that he knows the CO2-Global warming connection is utter nonsense, but realizes that our civilization is too far gone into the abyss of scientism to attack the base lie. It has been accepted as axiomatic, both by repetition and by extensive use of Discourse Theory. Still, worth watching as he attacks the plan on the basis of ‘even if true then…’.
The next presenter explains why we have to eat crap we don’t want. The excuse is the Carbon Footprint of food. Which again, is a branch of the base lie, that CO2 causes the world to heat up in a way that is somehow a bad thing. There is no science or reason to the presentation. Just a plan on how to make life less pleasant in order to reduce carbon in agriculture. Something one might suspect is related to this National Post article on Trudeau’s advisor, Mark Carney. Especially the part where he says his plan is to make our lives worse, not better. The presentation on making more plant based options, really means taking away your choice of what you want to eat. Note that prisons are on her list of where food will change.
How Ottawa plans to change your life slide 1
Next is Nigel Ellis. His volume was very low on the video. I had to raise it to the level of the other speakers to be heard. He also played into the CO2 = Global Warming myth, but at least used science to show why the plans to reduce it are nonsense even if we accept the hypothesis as it is.
Karen Bourdeau asks some proper questions, like “When do you plan to ask the residents of Ottawa about your plan to “prohibit automotive oriented land use”. It should not be a rhetorical question because it is a policy that will destroy many generations of labour and development, and end much freedom and liberty. But we all know it is rhetorical. The Politburo doesn’t ask the public what it wants. It appoints experts to speak for the people, that give the answers the politburo wants. She also asks questions that appear to be related to a covert plan to implement 15 minute city type restrictions in Ottawa.
Next is an Ottawa U prof. His volume was very good. Loud even. So I bet you can guess what his politics are. He launches into full scale and undisguised Habermas Discourse Theory attacks against people who merely asked rational questions about the plan to radically transform Ottawa due to alleged CO2 effects on global climate. He expresses outward dismay that they were even allowed to speak and called them “essentially climate deniers”. This is a Frankfurt School dialectic where you destroy the people who disagree with your consensus view you are trying to impose on the majority. Call them names that effectively makes them thought criminals. For a refresher on the formal method of how this works, click through to this video on Marcuse and Habermas and making truth, hate speech.
It is also famously Saul Alinsky Rules for Radical rule XIII if memory serves.
This Prof. also wants a shift from voluntary to mandatory measures. Somehow, indigenous leadership and rights factor in to changing the climate.
Next is Danielle, who tries to steer the ship back towards safe shores by mentioning that even far left wing extremist, Michael Moore made a film exposing the green scam of wind and solar. She is followed by another climate scare advocate who demands more action to lower CO2.
After the delegations is questions to staff. Here’s one that doesn’t get asked. Why is Canada, which seems to be the most vocal nation in terms of pushing the Global Warming scare, actively working on their Century Initiative plan to increase Canada’s population to 100,000,000 people via immigration from hot countries, where their per-capita carbon footprint goes up by FOUR TIMES!
This ‘debate’ was not about competing visions for a better Ottawa or world. This was a confrontation of individual rights Vs. collective authoritarianism. Authoritarianism using any excuse it can make up to justify its actions. If Covid measures didn’t convince anyone that this is the plan, then don’t be surprised with what these people do to us in the name of ‘climate change’.
For a really comprehensive and science based, fact based analysis on the Climate Scare of Global Warming, please watch this video below and maybe take some notes in case you run into a believer.
Tucker Carlson for March 22, 2023
A full arsenal of facts for any future arguments about ‘climate change’
Friday night, Act4Canada hosted an event with two gentlemen who fully debunked climate change as well as the polices created to allegedly effect it. Please watch these two videos and familiarize yourselves with the facts. So useful!
If I wanted to reshape the world to have fewer people…
It occurs to me that our failings in the past decades all have one thing in common. We consistently and with a flawless record, fail to think as big as the people creating the problems facing us. That is to say, when we oppose a line of effort against us, we always treat the problem or issue as presented. When in fact it’s larger, and part of a much bigger planed assault on ourselves.
Take Global Warming.
There are a few layers of opposition. Those who know the science is fabricated and argue the science and try and get people to understand that Global Warming by man’s actions simply isn’t a real thing. That has nearly no chance of succeeding, but its one level of activism people can do.
Then, there are those who think Global Warming is a dialectic device to take control of especially Western industrial man using control of CO2 production as a means of ending productivity, or at least being in full control of it. One may notice that no alternatives to create of energy, such as nuclear or other means can be allowed. Only the problem of CO2 must remain in the forefront as a means to shape the future. Even when there are multiple ways to create the needed energy without producing it. Bad solutions, like electric cars are encouraged. Sorry, not bad solutions, things that kinda sorta look like solutions but actually make no difference or add to the problem and create new ones.
But a real psychopath might take it to the next level.
Imagine being so committed to the idea that the world has too many people on it that you needed to embark on a serious plan to reduce the world’s population.
Imagine that you had convinced enough people that the world was warming, despite all the evidence to the contrary, to the point that no one would interfere with a plan to geo-engineer the atmosphere to block out solar radiation for a time that would significantly cool the Earth.
Imagine that you had managed to get millions of people from warm parts of the Earth to move to cooler parts, even though it would multiply their carbon footprint by a factor of FOUR and the resources needed for life are far greater for each individual in say, Canada than in Namibia.
Imagine that the people doing the geo-engineering to “solve Global Warming” know damn well it isn’t happening. They would also then know that a warmer Earth means more food and more plant life and more animal life. Especially if the level of CO2 goes up a few more parts per billion.
So what would happen to the available food supply if the temperature of the Earth’s most productive growing regions fell by a few degrees?
Put bluntly, if geo-engineering tech for climate control exists and is being deployed, it may not be to stop global warming, but reduce the ability to produce food.
Hurricanes and Global Warming: Historical facts on American weather
Tom Harris: The scam of the climate crisis, and Ottawa’s authoritarian non-solution to the non-crisis
Anyone who is paying attention should know how important this information is since the UN, WEF and Google has created a totalitarian cabal to make sure you can never see this by searching for it.
Please read the story details here at RAIR Foundation
WEF – United Nations Says “We Own The Science”
Melissa Fleming, of the United Nations Department of Global Communications team, says that through their partnership with Google, they have been able to eliminate any opposing viewpoints from coming up when people search ‘climate change’ through the worlds most popular search engine.
https://twitter.com/KateTalksTruth/status/1576320140928778240
Important Lowell Green reboot show on Ottawa’s full on authoritarian revolution disguised as Climate justice
For those who don’t know Lowell Green, he was the finest voice on Ottawa radio for decades. When Bell Media bought CFRA, the talk-radio station that Lowell was by far the most popular voice. They waited till they could phase him out, and once that was done, they mass fired all the conservative hosts. Even ones who had the highest ratings in Canada for that time slot. I’m thinking of Pastor John Council as one example. But Nick Vandergragt was also sacked in the same meeting. Now CFRA is another narrative voice peddling the same leftist dialectics as everyone else. Think CNN without all the hair.
Bell Media also owns CTV, and a dozen or so other media outlets in Canada.
Today, Lowell Green did a show on Facebook. I had no idea he was even still on the air, or had a public profile at all. But he does, and anyone living in the Western world needs to listen to today’s show if you want to know your present or your near future. But if you are in Canada, and especially in Ottawa, and especially if you own any property at all, you really, really have to watch this:
(I grabbed this off of Facebook and placed it on an open platform which doesn’t track you, and also isn’t Facebook. When you watch tonight’s Tucker, you will have yet another giant reason to despise Facebook. Turns out they did help rig the election, and now they are blaming it on the FBI. Which while also true, doesn’t change a damn thing about Facebook’s rigging by preventing fundraising and censoring pro-trump groups.
Actual climatology – just the facts ma’am with Prof. Ian Plimber
Remember the climate huxter, David Suzuki? In the 80s he used to shill for communists by claiming Western industry was going to destroy the Earth by putting out soot (Carbon) that would block out the sun and cause an ice age. He called this, ‘Nuclear Winter’. Then, once CBC buried all the video of him saying this bilge, he reappeared with the exact opposite narrative and started saying carbon from Western industry would cause ‘global warming’.
Here is he blackmailing children to send him money to save the polar bears.
The worst kind of ugly climate propaganda: David Suzuki targets kids at Christmas in the name of climate change
Here’s the popup
messagesolicitation you get when you visit the website for the first time:
Climate change is melting the North Pole and it’s no longer safe for Santa and his Workshop. So our dear old friend is packing up the sleigh to find somewhere else to live.
You can help! Move your mouse over this website to find gifts you can buy Santa to help him set up a temporary Workshop and protect the North Pole for his return.
Of course, you’re savvy enough to know we won’t be sending actual gifts to Santa. You will receive a tax receipt for 100% of your purchase and proceeds will be used by the David Suzuki Foundation to support our critical work to protect nature and the environment from threats like climate change.
Buying these green gifts and personalized ecards on behalf of hard-to-buy-for friends or relatives on your holiday list is a great way to show you’re thinking of them — and the planet!
The current vaccine, digital currencies, Covid, and lots of other attacks on the west via language, are not the first lines of effort against classical thought. Crypto-environmentalism was most definitely one of them. A line of effort is a point of focus for a disinformation campaign intended to damage a target in specific ways.
Let’s take a purely hypothetical and absurd example as I find fiction often helps to illustrate a point.
One of the main targets of disinformation would be the enemy military. So imagine if you can, that say, the US military picked a man to be a four star general who openly stated he was really a woman, and they picked him, not because he was the best candidate with a peculiarity but specifically because he is a man who insists he is a woman, and has some of the outward trappings of a female, but clearly is not one.
Just to add to the impossibility of this farcical situation, imagine the military was paying for cosmetic surgery for any person to sort of kind of look like the other sex, making them sterile for sure, but also making them less effective as soldiers, and certainly taking them out of potential combat for some long period of time.
Then imagine that the military would put time money and effort into making flight suits specially for pregnant women, where the high G forces of fighter jets would most certainly damage or destroy a gestating baby no matter what the costume worn. G forces are G forces. And the human limit is about 9 Gs for a fit healthy person with no hangover. Imagine what just 2 or 3 X the normal pull of gravity would do to a developing embryo. The most expensive abortion of all time.
(It is possible that the military developed a flight suit, which is basically just customized overalls for pilots and not a G suit for pregnant women. This should have cost about USD $19.95 at wall mart though. A normal flight suit with some spandex around the middle would work fine.)
All of this seems absurd of course. As absurd as if the US government picked a supreme court judge who said as she wasn’t a biologist, she didn’t know the difference between men and women.
Clearly none of these things could possibly happen. But if they did, it would mean the end game of a massively successful disinformation campaign intended to damage all aspects of the machinery of state. And these hypotheticals would represent just one other line of effort. The attack on basic taxonomy. It has become effectively a criminal offence, even if punished outside of the legal space, to advocate or claim there is truth in classical thinking on the biology of sex. On chemistry of climate. On asking for proof of the safety of medicines. Of asking for availability of medicine which is safe and actually works.
It would almost be like as if a Climate activist were to go to the Louvre, disguised as an old woman, and rip of the wig and attack the painting of the Mona Lisa with a cake. What has the Mona Lisa to do with climate? Global warming activism is about one thing. A line of effort against classical thought, culture and values and especially industry. The Mona Lisa is a major symbol of classical artistic achievement. So if such an absurd thing where to happen, well that might explain it.
And then there is defence of Western culture from one of the most pernicious disinformation attacks of all, the oxymoronic concept of “multiculturalism”. Culture is a set of values which each society codifies into law. Having more than one set of these laws operating within on jurisdiction is not sustainable. Either you have animal cruelty laws or you do not. You cannot allow muslims to slaughter goats or sheep in the garage because they feel its a religious/cultural obligation on them. Either men and women are equal before the law, or they are not. The multicultural aspect of the disinformation lines of effort could go on for volumes. But the point is made.