Women’s group in UK working to end sharia in England

I recieved an email from a woman’s group and I am of course delighted to see women, certainly the largest and most commonly victimized groups by Islam, outwardly fighting this barbarianism. Below I reproduce the whole of the article and here is a link to the web site and various connected web sites such as this petition for ‘one law for all’. Please note, this group appears to be women from Islamic nations profoundly frustrated with western nations capitulation to political Islam.

Here is the audio podcast version of this article.      

Eeyore for Vlad

Transcript of Thought For the World’s thought for the day

Maryam Namazie

18th February 2009

One year on, the Archbishop of Canterbury has once again defended his comments on Sharia law.

Just the word itself is for me like a kick in the stomach. I find myself trying to catch my breath every time I hear it being uttered.

I mean Sharia is why so many of us have fled and are fleeing Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere.

To get as far away from it as possible.

Only to have it repackaged and sold to us by the US-led ‘liberators’ in Iraq and Afghanistan or by the Archbishop of Canterbury in Britain as the next best thing to sliced bread.

Contrary to claims of promoting social cohesion and ‘minority rights,’ Sharia in Britain is actually a capitulation to political Islam. Just as the Pakistani government’s agreement to allow the imposition of Sharia in the north-west this very week is an attempt to placate and appease the Islamists. It has nothing to do with freedom of religion and belief, or rights and choices. In fact, the stronger and more pervasive its hold, the less freedoms, rights and choices people – and particularly women – have.

Yes of course there is a difference between letting Islamic courts and councils decide on civil matters rather than criminal ones. But the difference is a matter of degree; the fundamentals are the same. Losing custody of your child at a pre-set age irrespective of the child’s welfare, being told to remain in an abusive relationship or having your forced marriage at 13 stamped with the approval of these sham courts can be just as destructive. In fact, discriminatory family and personal status codes are important pillars in the oppression of women in Islamic states. And much of the struggle for women’s rights is taking shape in countries like Iran against these very aspects of Sharia.

Moreover, rather than promote ‘minority’ rights and social cohesion, Sharia law promotes fragmentation and social conflict. It imposes different standards and norms for ‘different’ people. It denies universal and equal rights fought for and established by progressive social and working class movements over centuries. It gives precedence to the most regressive cultural and religious norms of the ruling elite rather than to human beings and their rights and lives.

Opposing Sharia law in Britain, as in Afghanistan or elsewhere isn’t an attack on people’s right to religion; it is a defence of people’s human rights.

After all, rights, equality and respect are for real live human beings not for beliefs and certainly not for inhumane political movements.

Phyllis Chesler: On the ‘honor killing’ recently in Buffalo

For anyone not familiar yet with Philis Chesler, she is the author who wrote the most excellent article on Islam and feminism titled ‘How Afghanistan Shaped my feminism’ which is a must read. Written some time ago, Phillis married an Afgani and moved with him to Afghanistan where she discovered some of the more fundamental differences between cultures. A truly worthwhile read.

Chesler Chronicles

On February 13, 2009, in Orchard Park, a suburb of Buffalo, 44 year-old Muzzamil Hassan, a prominent Muslim businessman was arrested for having be-headed his wife, 37 year-old Aasiya Z. Hassan. Yes, he beheaded her. Aasiya’s crime? She dared to obtain an order of protection which forced her violent husband out of their home.

We are now sadly familiar with some high profile Islamic beheadings of infidels in Muslim lands; Daniel Pearl, Nicholas Berg, immediately come to mind. Sadly, we are also familiar with the practice of beheading, dismembering, burying alive, and stoning Muslim (and sometimes Christian) women to death in Muslim lands. But this took place in a suburb of Buffalo, New York, in America, Land of the Free and Home of the Brave. What can this mean? Why behead a wife who wanted a divorce and who wanted to live free of daily violence? Why didn’t Hassan just agree to a divorce?

Because this foul murder is very probably an honor killing, a crime which has little to do with western-style domestic violence. Erie County District Attorney Frank A Sedita III has it all wrong. He commented: “Obviously, this is the worst form of domestic violence possible.”

To continue reading, press here, Chesler Chronicles

Founder of Muslim TV charged with beheading his wife.

From Jihad Watch:

New York: Founder and CEO of Muslim TV channel beheads wife

MuzzammilHassan.jpg
Founded TV network to combat negative perceptions of Muslims

Bridges TV founder and Chief Executive Muzzammil Hassan founded the TV network in 2004. According to a Reuters story at that time, “his wife came up with the idea in December 2001 while listening to the radio on a road trip.”:

“Some derogatory comments were being made about Muslims that offended her,” Hassan told Reuters ahead of Tuesday’s launch. “She was seven months pregnant, and she thought she didn’t want her kids growing up in this environment.”

So he founded Bridges TV to combat negative perceptions of Muslims.

But now that he has beheaded his wife, I’m afraid this prominent moderate Muslim will only be feeding those negative perceptions.

Click the link at the top for the rest of the story:

Dhimmi files Feb. 12 2009

When Vlad started just over a year ago, there where daily outrages on western nations by Islam and indications of pathetic submission by western governments. I would post them all as I found them with the odd bit of editorializing. Maybe once a week there would be something really astonishing which would deserve its own article also. Now of course events are so fast and furious, submission to irrational religious authority either from fear of violence or political correctness that there is simply too much to post in full or even be aware of. So now I will try and post daily Dhimmi files in point form with links attached. In less than one year, this is the extent of growth of Islam in the west and its demands on us to reshape our own civilization to accommodate it. This of course, in a growing atmosphere of containment on the media and authority never to publish anything critical of Islam and you can rest assured, most media listens. Many links come from the excellent site, The Religion of Peace

Selected paragraphs are taken from each article but click the links for proper context

UK Hospitals told not to have meetings where alchohol is served or any kind of lottery may be in place. (Isn’t alchohol an arab word?) From the Guardian UK

The rules on dealing with religious staff and patients state that all hospitals must be equipped with prayer rooms big enough to accommodate 20 worshippers and storage for religious items, as well as separate fridges for halal, kosher or vegetarian food and burqa-style gowns.

Doctors and nurses must also learn about “the concept of sin”, demonic possession and exorcism, and the belief systems of Paganism and Shamanism, so they can deal with the religious needs of patients.

However the new handbook also tells staff that they must respect atheists, and warns that the devoutly religious who try to preach to colleagues or patients about the evils of homosexuality or single mothers could be disciplined for “harassment”.

Street kid saves lives in the Philipines

COTABATO CITY, Philippines—A boy saved the lives of pedestrians civilians and commuters when he carried away from people what turned out to be an improvised explosive device left on a busy street here Wednesday night.

Colonel Domingo Gubway, chief of the military’s Task Force Cotabato, said unidentified motorcycle-riding men left a plastic bag containing a bomb fashioned from a 60-mm mortar shell with a mobile phone as trigger mechanism.

The explosive was left at a waiting shed at the corner of Sinsuat and Gutierrez Avenues at about 9 p.m

Health worker dies of wounds sustained in an acid attack while treating patients.

Oh yes it was a woman. Does that matter? We here in the west are becoming indentured to the Islamic notion of tribalism. If we hear a Jew is murdered by a Muslim or beaten up or attacked we may feel less shocked than if it was a protestant, unless that protestant is a minister for the church of England then we sort of get it. If we hear someone in the act of compassionate work of reducing suffering is attacked by acid and dies from it we may be less shocked when we know it was a woman who may not have been living according to the strictest rules of Islamic decorum for females. This shows the extent to which we are all becoming Islamic. It should be more outrageous to us that we mitigate horror based on that primitive and barbaric standard. Her name was Maria Shaw. There is no way she can rest in peace till we reclaim civilization from seventh century barbarians. Just because it’s hard to believe its happening, does not mean it is not happening. Perhaps I should say, We should feel no peace. But it is a fact. We will not have any aspect of peace till we do. Surrender will bring perpetual war.

For a little light reading, Fjordman speaks on how the anglosphere leads the way to surrender of the west to Islam. This is a good article but get yourself a drink first. Maybe a ham sandwich.

I will defend all Western countries but I feel especially close to Britain, which makes it all the more sad to see how humiliated this once-great nation currently is. The English language once conquered the world. Now the rest of the world is conquering the English-speaking countries. If current trends continue, people in Singapore will know English while the nation that created the English language will cease to exist.

At the same time as sharia law has gained official recognition as a part of the British legal system and Muslims proudly talk about conquering the Western world, a British woman was arrested because of a supposedly “racist” doll she kept in her window. In al-Britannia a Muslim man can claim benefits for children with multiple wives and brag about subduing the country and reducing its traditional inhabitants to second-rate citizens or worse, but you cannot have a “racially insensitive” doll in your own home, at least not if you’re white.

In my book Defeating Eurabia, I have a chapter about the situation in Britain. Since I’m already here I can again repeat that the book, which is available online as well in a printed version, can be republished for free online or in print and translated to other languages by anybody who wants to, as long as they do not represent a totalitarian ideology. I actively encourage people to do so.

Links for February 11 2009

Here are some links to events which seem worth knowing about or following previous reports here on VTB

The BBC has an anti Israel Bias? No freaking way! BBC spends something like USD $300,000 to suppress report on Bias

One particularly controversial incident came when Middle East correspondent Barbara Plett revealed she had cried as Yasser Arafat was close to death. In 2004 the Israeli government wrote to the BBC accusing reporter Orla Guerin of anti-Semitism and identifying with Palestinian terror groups. It has been suggested the BBC’s recent refusal to show a charity appeal for Gaza, sparking thousands of complaints, was a reaction to these accusations. Politicians have previously branded the corporation’s refusal to reveal the report as ‘absolutely indefensible’ as it is in the public interest.

The corporation has also employed top barristers to fight its case over the years that the legal battle has rumbled on.
Mr Sugar said: ‘It is sad that the BBC felt it necessary to spend hundreds of thousands of pounds of public money fighting for three years to try to load the system against those requesting information from it under the Freedom of Information Act.’ He added: ‘The BBC has finally lost its technical legal argument

Link to live blogging of Geert Wilders landing in the UK where he may well be arrested as persona non grata. This should be interesting. My prediction is that they will find a way to arrest him in such a way as we cannot see it and send him back politly. Fascists have learned from history while we have not. They know how to be more effective by avoiding obvious heavy handedness. This link was auto translated from Dutch but here is the original page. I think to watch it live costs a few dollars but the money will go to Geert’s fund. Well worth it. While we are on the topic of sloppy machine translations from Dutch here is a Winston Churchill quote translated from English to Dutch and then robot translated back into English. It astounds me how the mastery of the English language by Sir Winston manages to survive this double switch with lucidity and power. If somoene has a link to the original quote in English please post in the comments. What he said then, is just as true now. Thanks to the Gates of Vienna for those 2 links.

Also from GOV here is a video interview with Lord Pearson, the house of lords member who invited Geert to show his short film Fitna to the august body in the UK

Lord Pearson, “I wouldn’t put anything past this really weak and inexplicable British Government”

Then of course we have the obligatory ‘daily so outragious descision by Muslims that it’s nearly imposeble to believe its actually happening’ file. Muslim woman sentanced to 100 lashes for being gang raped in Saudi Arabia. Now of course we all know that Muslims routinly punish women for being raped but this is more brutal than usual and also more outragious as she was convicted of adultry and is not even married. Do read this story but do your best not to dismiss it as some far away event. In a globalized world we all know its a matter of months before sharia courts here in the west make the same calls with offical support. Frankly, It probably already is and any media that attempts to report on it is being threatened by Government and Muslims.

Take (it) off eh?

Ontario Court Justice Norris Weisman has ordered a Muslim woman to remove her niqab, full face veil, during the court proceedings in a sexual assault trial. After claiming her garment provided her comfort, when faced with it’s shedding she tried to convince the court that her garment was suddenly a religious requirement to which Justice Weisman rejected.

Editorials in Canadian newpapers have pointed to the collision of two basic rights: religious freedom versus the right of a defendant to face his (her) accusor. The burqa issue has once again resurfaced in the media with predictable arguments for and against and, rightfully so.

I on the other hand, am not going to be caught arguing the merits of the burqa trap as a feminista issue of freedom, as I believe any woman has the fundamental right to be as stupid or oppressed as she sees fit wearing as much or as little as she pleases. Instead, my concern with this case lies solely with the proper administration of justice in a Canadian court room. One fundamental principle at trial is the requirement that all participants be visible and to challenge this inherited, fine value is to mock it’s merit. This case has little do with the niqab and everything to do with sharia law vying for equal status within the Canadian judiciary system. As a means to this end, the niqab is effectivly worn by poster chicks living the Whabbist cause, a visible argument for Islamist priority. This woman herself chose religion as a fall back position, a cherry picking event popular by Islamists.

Predictably her lawyer, sharia advocates and leftists with little to do since Bush vacated the Oval Office, are seeking that Justice Weisman’s order be overturned. This is an important case for Canadians to pay attention to since it will set a precedent and has the potential to change the fundamentals to the proper administration of justice in the Canadian court room. Unlike the mockery of justice that dominates an Islamic courtroom, Canada’s inherited British system is a well functioning reflection of a long standing model that serves democracy and the accused with purpose, fairness and equality.

Sharia certainly has no place in Canada’s courtrooms and for that matter, in Canada at all.

Saudi grand mufti endorses sexual perversion in Islam

So, here we have it. The ‘powerful’ grand mufti in Saudi Arabia, Abdul Aziz al-Sheikh states it is perfectly reasonable for girls as young as ten to be married off and those in opposition to this are doing these ‘brides’ an injustice. According to the grand mufti, Islamic sharia law is “not unjust for women”.

Really?

The grand mufti and the supporters of sharia, many of whom live in Canada, would be wise to recognize the growing number of Muslims and non-Muslims alike who directly oppose such extremist rhetoric. Visit muslimsagainstsharia.blogspot.com for a sample of such opposition. 

I ask the mufti, why start at ten? why not two or three? Heck, why not negotiate the arrangemnt in vitro? I would also ask why, if marriage is condoned for a girl of ten, is she not marrying a boy of her own age?  Why is she betrothed to a man old enough to be her great grandfather? Could it be that sexual perversion in Islam is a holy mandate and through this perversion, the countless lives of young girls are stolen to satisfy the sexual urges of old men? Could it be that sharia’s very existence depends upon condemning women to lives of servitude?

It is my contention that one of the primary reasons sharia law exists is to provide Muslim men an exit out of reason and morality, a cushion to provide mass ignorance a comfortable place to reside, with women being the collective scapegoats; the group identified as perfect slaves under Allah, (pnbwh). Without sharia, men in Islam would have to exist with women on an equal basis, a concept considered outrageous and immoral to many a Muslim mind. A concept far too western; far too Christian; far too un-Islamic.

But what would I know? I hail from a western nation where society provides opportunities for girls to grow up along side boys as individuals with choice, as whole women and men with value, unencumbered by ancient, holy regulation spewed by decrepid geriatrics; a society which does not condone the rape and slavery of minors to perpetuate the ignorance of Quaranic passages; a society which does not trade the lives of girls to satisfy the perverted demands of Muslim men who would otherwise be left by the wayside without the reliance of a holy creed.

My daughter is eleven and according to Abdul Aziz al-Sheikh she is of ripe age to marry a seventy year old if she were a Saudi. Likewise, my son is twelve and according to sharia (and if he too were Saudi), free to pursue his life unencumbered by the threat of slavery.  The grand mufti speaks of injustice and, indeed there is. The only injustice however, lies in the stolen lives of girls, rampant Muslim misogyny and the sexual perversion Islam endorses.

Grace

Book review by Phyllis Chesler on Nonie Darwish’s new book on sharia law

Author Nonie Darwish on Gaza and on the “Terrifying Global Implications of Sharia Law.

Gazan-Egyptian, Nonie Darwish, well known as a “Muslim Shahid’s daughter,” (her father died in battle against the Israelis), is an amazingly brave woman who, unsurprisingly, writes amazingly brave books. Her first book, Now They Call me Infidel. Why I Renounced Jihad for America, Israel, and the War on Terror was first published in 2006. She is also the founder of the organization Arabs for Israel.

I am honored to have her as a friend and a colleague. Nonie is a warm and eloquent woman. She is neither shrill nor angry. She is strong and passionate, a maternal figure, really, but she more than holds her own when she speaks. Nonie grew up in Gaza when it was under Egyptian control, and then moved to Cairo. She now lives in southern California and is the married mother of three children who are 14, 25, and 27 years old. She was formerly a Muslim.

Nonie is just publishing her second amazing book. It’s title: Cruel and Usual Punishment. The Terrifying Global Implications of Sharia Law.

This book is a landmark event whose timeliness is beyond compare. No American can afford NOT to read this book. Sharia law, which governs every area of Muslim life, is now increasingly infiltrating the West. Europe may be lost, America is now under siege. With profound bravery, Darwish documents the history and nature of Sharia law which is invariably mis-represented and mis-understood, both by its followers and by “infidels.”

Darwish soberly and clearly explains that the Qur’an and other holy works are not always translated accurately into non-Arabic languages and that Muslims are trained, (by that very law), to deny their own “poisonous” cruelty and to punish anyone who exposes the truth.

Darwish explains that Islam is not exactly a religion in the same way that Judaism or Christianity are; it is, rather a political ideology which seeks world domination and total control over the private lives of each individual. Darwish herself is an escapee from its “prison.” She therefore dares to imagine a “2084? in which America has become a totalitarian Islamic nation which subordinates and persecutes Christians and other religious minorities. Darwish offers practical, specific suggestions that Americans must implement in order to defeat this dreadful possibility before it is too late.

In addition, this is a very important book on the subject of women and Sharia law. Darwish explores the internalization of sexism by Muslim women and explains why Muslim women in the free West are so aggressive on behalf of a reactionary status quo; why they insist on veiling as a personal form of virtuous jihad; and what it means when they remain so cold-hearted and disconnected from the female victims of Sharia law who are being stoned, flogged, impoverished, separated from their children, etc.

I recently interviewed Nonie Darwish. However, I want to pre-empt that longer interview and share her response to my question about Gaza, her hometown. She views the Gaza conflict as completely and utterly “rooted in Sharia.” I have slightly edited her long answer, below.

Phyllis Chesler: What compelled you to write this important book?

Nonie Darwish: I wrote this book for several reasons. Every time I delved into the ills and challenges of Muslim society I discovered that there is an Islamic Law, inspired by scriptures, that stood in the way of any reform or change. Change itself is forbidden by Islamic Law. I also wrote this book to warn the West about what Sharia really is and how devastating it will be for human rights, relationships, and Western democracy. We have recently seen Muslim groups demand the practice of Islamic law (Sharia) in the West and with the blessing and support of some Western intellectuals and journalists.

By writing this book, I have no desire to offend the good and peace loving Muslims, but the truth must be told. Unfortunately the majority of Muslims do not know what is in their scriptures or their divine Laws that have a huge destructive impact on their society.

PC: What do you hope to accomplish?

ND: My hope is for the West to understand the threat that Islamic Sharia law poses to their democracy, their concept of equality under the law and their human rights values. The West should never allow Sharia to be practiced in Western democracies. I am also hopeful that my book will inspire Muslims to take an honest look at their oppressive religious laws and reform.

PC: Talk to me about Gaza, your hometown. What, in your opinion, is really going on there?

ND: The world needs to understand the roots of the eternal conflict, which is the Sharia law commandment to kill all Jews. Peace can only happen if such roots are exposed and understood.

For decades, Arabs had demanded that Israel end the occupation, and in 2005, Israel did so, disengaging unilaterally from Gaza. With their demands met, there was no ‘cycle of violence’ to respond to, no further justification for anything other than peace and prosperity. With its central location and beautiful beaches on the East Mediterranean, a peaceful and prosperous Gaza could become another Hong Kong; a shining trade and commerce center. But instead of choosing peace they chose Islamic jihad. Arabs of Ghaza rolled their rocket launchers to the border and started bombing Israeli civilians.

The reasons for choosing violence over peace is due to Sharia. Mainstream Sharia books define Jihad as: “to war against non-Muslims to establish the religion.” (Shafi’i Sharia 09.0). Jihad is not just the duty of the individual Muslim, it is also the main duty of the Muslim head of State (the Calipha): “A Muslim calipha is entrusted to take his people into war and command offensive and aggressive Jihad. He must organize Jihad against any non-Muslim government.

Zia-Ul-Haq, former President of Pakistan, said “jihad in terms of warfare is a collective responsibility of the Muslim Ummah.”

Some people seem to think that such laws are just historical relics, on the books, but not in practice or in control of the minds of Muslims. But that is the kind of denial we cannot afford; these laws rule the hearts, minds and actions of a majority of Muslim individuals and States around the world today. These scriptures are taught, preached and promoted as the incontrovertible and eternal word of God and funded by Saudi petrodollars throughout the world, including Western nations such as the U.K. and the United States.

How can a Muslim leader or individual avoid the hundreds of Quran and Hadith commandments to Muslims to kill Jews and Christians? How can a Muslim leader face his devout Muslim subjects with a decision of friendship and peace with Jews when the mosques all over the Middle East recite Mohammed’s commandment to Muslims: “The Hour [Resurrection] will not take place until the Muslims fight the Jews, and kill them. And the Jews will hide behind the rock and tree, and the rock and tree will say: Oh Muslim, oh servant of Allah, this is a Jew behind me, come and kill him!” (Sahih Muslim 41:6985, also Sahih Bukhari 4:52:177).

This Hadith, issued by Mohammad was issued in the 7th century, not after the 1948 creation of the State of Israel. It is not a response to modern-day grievances; it is a permanent commandment.

This is the real basis of the Arab/Israeli conflict: not a conflict over land or occupation, but a divine Muslim obligation to destroy neighboring (non-Muslim) Israel, where Jews are no longer dhimmis but are free to rule themselves. We cannot ignore the root of the problem in Muslim scriptures. That is the true force behind the hate and propaganda Jihadist machine against Jews in the Muslim world.

Some Muslims tell me that they don’t believe in Sharia and question why am I making a big deal about it. My answer is that Sharia is the law of the land in 54 Muslim countries and many Muslim groups are demanding Sharia in the West. In 1990, 45 Muslim countries signed the Cairo Human Rights Declaration which stated that Sharia has supremacy over the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

The Muslim world must look within to its sacred laws, scriptures, sermons, teaching and preaching, and reform the obstacles for peace that have condemned them to a permanent state of jihad. The non-Muslim world must have no illusions.

Thank you, Nonie. Stay tuned for Part Two of my conversation with this most admirable dissident.

Some links Jan 3 09

Here is a really well done article from powerlines blog. I think though that it should be clear from the 06 war with Hizbulah that its mostly Reuters which is absurdly biased and not necessarily the media as a whole. But he does make a good case for overall bias.

Taliban announces sharia law on areas of NWFP Pakistan. No music movies or women allowed out of the house except for medical emergencies. Maybe Canada can send in some comandos disguised as Buddha statues.

Excellent article from gates of Vienna on how the UN treats Russian actions against Islamic towns. It’s especially funny when Russia begins with “You just cant reason with Islamic terrorists”

Vaclaav Klaus president of the Czech Republic and current EU chair explains to the UN that Israel is fighting a defensive war.

Some video of the religion of peace rally in Toronto. The police escorted away the non anti Israel people who where non threatening for ‘their own safety’. I must say Canada disgusts me at times. Safety over anything at the expense of all freedom and meaning.

Bangladeshi court frees kidnapped beaten doctor forced into marriage by family

Forced marriage’ doctor returns home to London after being kidnapped by her parents and says: ‘I forgive them’

By James Nye
Last updated at 10:51 AM on 16th December 2008 From The Daily Mail UK
doc

Dr Humayra Abedin arrives at Heathrow Airport from Bangladesh this morning

An NHS doctor held captive by her parents in Bangladesh arrived back in Britain today after a court stepped in to secure her freedom.
Dr Humayra Abedin, a trainee NHS GP, was allegedly bound and gagged and subjected to violent beatings during the four months she was held in Dhaka.

It is claimed she was kidnapped by her parents after she rejected the potential husband they had found for her in Bangladesh.
Dr Abedin was taken into the protection of the Bangladeshi High Court and handed over to the British High Commission to allow her to fly home to Britain.

Her Malaysia Airways flight touched down at London’s Heathrow airport at 4.47am today.
When asked how it felt to be home, she smiled wearily and said: ‘I’m exhausted but very happy to be home. The flight was okay but it was long.’
Dr Abedin was escorted to the passport control area by two police officers and airport officials. Dressed in a pink salwar kameez and yellow trousers, she kept her head down as she left the plane.

She was quickly escorted to a police car waiting outside the terminal.

Her lawyer representing her in the UK, Anne-Marie Hutchinson, said special arrangements had been made so she did not have to walk through the terminal when the flight landed.

She said the doctor has been left traumatised by her experience and will not go back into her London home.

More…

However it is now highly unlikely Dr Abedin will be able to return to her home in Upton Park. She will instead be housed at a refuge to protect her from any potential threat from family members.

She said: ‘She is in a state of shock. She is having real difficulty in taking it all in. She won’t go home. I’ll be putting her in touch with some women’s groups.’

When the judge had delivered his verdict, her father Mohammad Abedin broke down in tears and began wailing while Dr Abedin, of Upton Park, east London, sat passively at the front of the court.

doc

Dr Abedin was given a police escort through the airport

After the ruling, she told reporters: ‘I’m relieved that I’m free, I’m happy. I just want to say thank you to all those who supported and helped me. I’m fine and I’m feeling happy. I don’t have any bad feelings towards them, they are my parents so I don’t have any bad feelings.’

The alleged kidnapping happened in August when Dr Abedin visited Bangladesh after hearing her mother was ill.

Legal action began after her friends heard she was allegedly being beaten and held against her will.

Dr Abedin’s Hindu boyfriend in London said her parents assaulted her to get her to end their relationship and marry a fellow Muslim.

The software engineer, who is afraid to reveal his identity, became gravely concerned for her safety after the doctor made a secret call pleading to be rescued.

The 44-year-old Hindu Bangladeshi, who was living with Dr Abedin in East Ham, said: ‘She was begging me to help her.’

It is believed Dr Abedin’s parents fed her sedatives and admitted her to a hospital under false claims she was suffering a psychiatric illness.

Previously they had refused to bring the 32-year-old to court on five separate occasions, claiming she was mentally incapacitated.

As the court convened today there were fears she would again fail to appear. However, she was ushered in at around 11.45am amid much pushing and shoving.
The NHS doctor in happier times

The NHS doctor in happier times

The court later ruled that Dr Abedin be surrendered to the British High Commission following a High Court ruling in London filed under new laws to prevent forced marriages and protect victims.

Justice Syed Mohmed Hossain said: ‘Children are not the slaves of their parents. They must have their own freedoms. If I were to reveal what Humayra has said in her statement then her parents would be in trouble. What I have heard reminds me of the dark times, the old ages we had in Bangladesh.’

He added: ‘She requested the court not to put her parents in trouble because of what they did to her.

‘But I am saying what you (the parents) have done to her is not acceptable. If there’s any further problem you will be in big trouble.’

The court ordered Dr Abedin’s parents to hand over her passport and she was given a police escort to the British High Commission.

Dr Abedin trained as a doctor in Bangladesh before coming to Britain in 2002, when she studied for a Masters in public health at Leeds University. She trained at Whipps Cross Hospital in East London and was due to start in a GP’s surgery in August.

Forced marriages remain commonplace in Bangladesh, activists say. The British High Commission in Dhaka said it assisted in 56 cases between April 2007 and March 2008.
Dr Abedin said she was ‘relieved to be free’, but added that she didn’t have any ‘bad feelings’ towards her parents.

A Foreign Office spokesman said: ‘Forced marriage is an appalling and indefensible practice that the government is working hard to stop.’

Lawyer Sara Hossain said: ‘The High Court has issued an order under the Forced Marriage Act that she must be released by her family and allowed to return to the UK.

‘She’s free to go, she’s been set at liberty and she wants to return to the UK. We’re delighted with the result, the rights of a Bangladeshi woman have been protected as they should be.

‘Dr Abedin looks very relieved, she’s a very brave woman.’

Dr Abedin came to the UK six years ago to study for a Masters degree in public health at Leeds University.

She had hoped to become a registrar at a GP surgery in east London in August but had returned to Dhaka after receiving news her mother had taken ill.

Really excelent speech about sharia in the UK. Please watch and sign the petition.

This is one of many really superb videos on One Law For All.org. They are also hosting a petition for all to sign and this group claims to have had a major influence on Ontario’s near miss with acceptance of Sharia law. Really do watch this video and visit the site above. They are doing great work and deserve our support. After all, its for us they are doing it.

Eeyore for Vlad.

As an aside I wonder if they will accept my bacon cheese burka for the art competition

[kaltura-widget wid=”q4v82zpf30″ width=”410″ height=”364″ addpermission=”3″ editpermission=”3″ /]

An American Fatwa on women having jobs (Thanks Grace)

(notice how the word ‘fantasize’ is spelled)

Fatwa # 6696 from United States

Date: Friday, October 4th 2002
Category
Title
How to deal with woman that wants to work.
Question
I would like to know how to deal with the woman who wants to do a job. She thinks that, if she doesn’t work she doesn’t have economic independency despite the fact that I am giving her enough pocket money from which she is being able save after her personal expenses like buying gifts for her friends and other. She keeps telling me that she wants to work. I told her that it’s not good and if I am able to find a job where there is no male intervention I will let you go for that. She ususally doesn’t speak to other males and she did it since her school. So, she said, she will not speak to them at all. I told her you have to talk to other males in the office as you will work under them. So, she told either I don’t believe her or may be I am having a crooked mentality that is too outdated to accept the women emancipation. Even she asked me how was that I work while there are females in the office. I told her that I never talk to them and most of them are working in lower rank than that of mine. I also told her that if I have to talk them, then I always keep my eyes lower and I don’t go on chatting with them. For that she got angry. She said “What do you think, I will go and chat with the male colleagues in the office. You don’t believe me at all…….” . She refers to her college teacher who advised her not to be dependent on somebody. Moreover, she feels that I am overtaken by possesiveness for her where she is too open to let me go to the office with women.
Answer
According to the Shari?ah, the Qur?aan and Ahaadith, the woman?s place is at home. It is the responsibility of the husband to support his wife and fulfil all her needs. If a woman does not have any financial support, then only she may seek employment. In such a situation, she must adhere to the laws of Hijaab. The concept of females working merely for economic independency has no basis in the Shari?ah. In fact, it is a root of many evils. It is this economic independency in a woman that gives her the courage to break her marital home. Consider the marital breakdown in the US (4-5) due to woman independency. If she was dependant, or her husband, she would exercise restraint and maintain her marriage. That is best in the interest of her family, husband and children. It does not mean that a woman should be dependant on men merely to maintain her marriage. We have merely expressed the wisdom of a female being dependant. This also does not mean a female cannot be rich. She may earn an income but without violating the laws of the Shari?ah. Firstly, a wife must get the consent of her husband to work. If the husband refuses, she cannot work. She must adhere to the laws of Hijaab. Any violation of the laws of Hijaab even with the consent of the husband is not permissible. that includes working in an environment of males, females mixing. Not talking to the opposite gender is not sufficient grounds for permissibility. The form and shape of a female must be concealed from a male. Segregation of sexes is an integral part of Deen. That maintains a healthy and pure mind. A mind contaminated with the different forms and shapes of woman is death to spirituality. It leads to funtasising of the opposite gender which is a strong and motivating cause for every form of illicit relationship. If your wife wants to work, you may consider any form of home industry or alternatively she may have some skills to offer to woman. There are many woman who require services in the form of guidance and counseling. Your wife should consider undertaking a course of studying about a Muslim woman?s role and assist other woman. There is a great need for such counseling and guidance, especially in the US. That will be a great contribution from her side. She may also charge a fee for her time. and Allah Ta’ala Knows Best Mufti Ebrahim Desai