Category Archives: irrational leftism

Indigiqueer and other dialectical neologisms, The Allison Inquiry and more: Links post 1 for Nov. 5, 2026

Posted on by — Leave a reply

1. I am posting this as a personal thing. One of the narrative attacks on the US that irks me the most, is the one that claims the US moon landing never took place. I watched it live, but granted, I was VERY young at the time. But what I do remember well, was that it was probably the most unifying event in Human history. The US went to great pains to make this a human accomplishment, rather than just an American one. People across the world celebrated it like a personal victory.

I have personally challenged, and castigated people on open line radio shows that were hawking their books or otherwise making a couple of bucks by denigrating this accomplishment as an American hoax. I put it in the same category as that history book now taught in high schools with a purely cynical and critical theory attack on the US.

So I found this video to be refreshing. Also for those interested, and looking for a great night’s entertainment, find the Australian film, The Dish. A very enjoyable account of how the moon landing was actually carried to the world by a small radio telescope in a sheep paddock in Australia. By the same people who did Strictly Ballroom and Castle I believe, which are also really charming and entertaining films.

2. There were 4 days of testimony at The Allison Inquiry in Ottawa in early Sept. We posted just a few of them, and especially where we had a chance to interview some of the people giving testimony. But not posting someone is not a measure of the quality or value of the testimony whatsoever. It is more a statement about what time permits, and what decisions have to be made completely independent of the value of the testimony. For those interested in what the Covid measures did to people, Canadians as the example here, but if you saw Senator Johnson’s testimony clearly it is also Americans, interested parties may want to watch all of it. Schedule a little time on weekends or something and pick one and watch.

Links to them all are here:

Day 1

Day 2

Day 3 and 4 can be seen by clicking day 1 or day 2 and scrolling down the page.

For the moment, here is a lawyer who is involved in litigation against the state who explains the machinery behind the ironically named, (dialectical) compensation program, where state money was funnelled to the bureaucracy and nearly none of it made it to vaxx injured Canadians.

This fellow also was profoundly inspirational. This is not a victim statement. This is a personal triumph over becoming a victim despite massive vaccine injury. It was extraordinary to be in the room when this man spoke. In a private conversation with him afterwards, his general knowledge and fields of expertise are as impressive as the bio he gave in the testimony.

3. The problem is that this kind of thing is so astonishingly common now, that we could, and many do like RMX news, make the entire content about showing incidents of Muslims and illegal migrants raping, stealing from, beating and killing indigenous Europeans.

Law is, and this is a point we simply do not make often enough, nothing at all but a codification of a people’s values. A group of people with shared values, be it a tribe or a country, is a nation. The Nation of Israel for example, refers to jews worldwide who are assumed to have a common set of shared values. And laws in all places are the codification of whatever values the people there have. Unless they are corrupted by communism of course.

When you mass import a large group of people into a location with fundamentally different values than those already there, the laws will change, because it becomes impossible to enforce the legacy laws. This is of course, accelerated by programs like multiculturalism, that insist the way to deal with Islamic mass sex-slavery of non-Muslim females is to make muslims into the police. This has very predictable results. One of the two men in the conversation below makes on critical error. It is not that Muslims see women as communal property. It is that Muslims see themselves as having the Allah-granted right to take as personal property any non-Muslim woman they want to and then do whatever they want with them. When it comes to Muslim women, they do not see them as communal property but as each man’s personal “tilth”.

4. This may be the most complicated protest sign yet on parliament Hill. If anyone has a clue what it is about, please explain in the comments.

5. I learned a new word today. I learned it while helping a friend film the monument for $15M (not including the value of the prime land it occupies) for “survivors” of LGBTQ+ETC oppression. The word is: INDIGIQUEER

Which is a neologism worthy of the German language that is an amalgam of “indigenous” – invoking the must-never-be-questioned suffering of the tribal peoples on the continent before Europeans sailed to North America – and “queer”, which people mistakenly think means homosexual, but in fact means taking a dialectical position against civilizational normalcy.

(Video explaining that below)

Here is a screen grab from the video of the monument, which itself is actually pretty cynical. It is essentially a giant phallic-like inside-out disco ball reminiscent of the 1980s Disco motif. For a monument that is to memorialize supposed oppression and injustice, it does not communicate anything resembling dignity.

imagine a Holocaust memorial as a statue of a bunch of religious-looking Jewish people dancing the Hora around the opening of a new retail store by analogy.

But this memorial to various persecuted sexual preference groups as an inverted disco ball, looks more like a money laundering op complete with (yes, for real) a strobe light inside to really enhance that disco ball effect.

But in its defence, the likely massive money-laundering true purpose of this object does make it very much Canadian.

 

To understaand the concept of “Queer” as it is actually used by the current crop of communist dialectical engineers, watch the following video:

Thank you all for checking out this site.

This is fascinating! Did you know that Roman Emperor’s actually tried the same con that Mamdani is attempting in New York and the NDP in Canada?

Leonard Cohen in 2009 describes writing in a nascent communist Canada/West

Posted on by — 1 Comment ↓

I thought this description, and Cohen’s repeated use of the term, “Slogan” to be very interesting. Especially back in 2009: He describes how various political slogans dramatically affects how and what artists can write and say.

In the following video, Counter-spell group discusses how what we call, Political Warfare, which appears to be what Cohen describes as ‘slogans’ is really a much older method of control of the public called, “Spell-craft”.

It’s a fascinating video and explains a great deal of modern political phenomenon. Specifically how nearly all of entire populations will, for example, inject themselves multiple times with untested gene therapy even though it should have been obvious to all of them, that all they were told about the disease and the shots were transparent lies. Nothing which has never been tested can be known to be “safe and effective” for example. So we know it was a lier.

At VladTepes we think of this kind of spell-craft as ‘incantations’. Repeat it enough and it has an effect on people. It becomes an instruction.

As it is in Britain, so it is in Canada: The trickle down effect of totalitarianism

Posted on by

First, a post or two about the state of freedom of thought in Great Britain. Watch this whole video please.

And now in Canada:

 

 

 

Please do not skip this post: FIVE major indicators of where Canada and the Anglosphere are now

Posted on by

1. Law Prof. Bruce Pardy speaks to how the state in Canada treated the Freedom convoy and its supporters are half of the equation proving that Canada was, is and is becoming an increasingly totalitarian authoritarian state.

On occasion one may find oneself in debate with leftists over the Freedom Convoy. So far, I have never had a disagreement with anyone who was actually in attendance. In fact I know of people who vehemently disagreed with the Convoy at the time until they were made to go and check it out in person, at which point, they admitted they had been lied to about it. However, all the people I have had this disagreement with, watch CBC, CTV and Global.

2. I found this interesting an a couple of levels. For one thing, I didn’t know she was talking about the UK till very far into the video. Which shows you that galloping statism, tyranny, is a Commonwealth wide issue. Not just Canada or the UK or Australia etc. But also because there is one point with which I very much disagree. She says this is not a new problem but has been developing over hundreds of years. This is not true. This is the result 100% of relatively recent efforts, maybe over 100 or so years by communist think tanks like The Frankfurt School, Runnymede Trust, The Fabian Society, the WEF, almost certainly the secret meetings of Bilderberg etc.

The battle between state power and individual power is indeed an ancient one. But the destruction of Republics, which basically formed after WW2 in the West is a recent effort, even if it has historical ties and precedents.

She also appears to be wearing a Catholic Rosary. Which kinda confirms that the only people willing to risk their personal liberty and safety for the rights of all of us, tend to be those who believe in God. Those who believe life is all you get, tend not to put themselves out for others like she is.

3. Similar stories in the West are quite common. This is because Muslim women are taught that the only virtue they can have is by supporting Islamic precepts, and the practice of Islamic precepts.

4. Can’t stress this importance of this enough, both to the UK and to Canada.

Note the dry contempt with which the Judge reads a Tweet, and then interprets it in a way to make it criminal and worthy of two years in prison.

The United States may have to give the same access to enter for British, Canadian and Australian people as they did once to Cubans.

Stephen Coughlin once, when at the curious meetings of the OSCE asked specifically if truth could be hate speech. This was May, of 2015. PLEASE pay close attention. This was clearly predicted by Maj. Coughlin and many others 11 years ago and earlier.

We are not posting it as an “I told ya so!” but because often when the prediction and model used for it is paired with the results down the road, it helps to cement it home what has actually happened. This is a very hard pill for many to swallow. Probably not people who read this site, but for sure the friends and family of those who read this site. We are attempting to provide data points to help enough people come around before the panopticon is complete. Which is very soon. To hopefully mobilize people into some kind of action that will stop and reverse the galloping tyranny and destruction of our nation-states, as well as the total deracination of our identities.

5. On this last one, I argued with Grok for quite a while on its veracity. The way it is filmed, graded and edited, I was pretty sure it was fake. It has the classic Hollywood, Orange and teal set design and colour grading. I love that look, but it’s better reserved for fiction as that is its purpose in a way. To help people ease into a narrative. The camera angles and so on. But Grok assured me this is real and provided me with the links to the data to prove it.

So once again, another massive conspiracy theory which we are all shouted down for, becomes fact.

DNI Press Release 

DNI graphics as evidence of the contention of bio-labs in Ukraine and elsewhere, doing gain of function work etc. 

And now I really wanna know more about tick borne illnesses.

Thank you all for checking out this site.

This particular post feels like a kind of end game statement in a way. And in a way it is, This is the evidence that much of what we have claimed is happening, has now happened. As the statement at the Gates of Vienna says, “We are in a new phase of a very old war”. This is true. But this particular phase may mean that the normal means of defending one’s individual identity only exist as mirages, when they seem to exist at all.

Once again, we may have to look at the Egyptian example where the people took to the streets in 2011, and stayed there till they deposed a tyrant, not once, but twice within a short period. The first protests lasted from January 25th to February 11. The second round to depose Muslim Brotherhood leader, Mohammad Morsi, was in June/July of 2013. Both protests being around the same length as the Freedom Convoy in Ottawa, but with a LOT more people. But then the people have to have a cost benefit to motivate them to take to the streets like that, which the current communist state apparatus may be too clever to allow to occur.

Brilliant video comparing Orwell’s 1984 to Islam

Posted on by

The following video is tremendously enjoyable and offers a great deal of insight.

The article at RAIR has a couple of extra points of comparison as well. We recommend it.

Thinking more on it, the double-think component of the video is likely where the left is at across most of the West. People carry narrative truths with them and put them out front, even though the evidence of their own senses tell them it is clearly and conspicuously untrue. I’ll put the clip of Bezmenov on demoralization below. But in essence, this is the juncture of where we are at.

From political warfare to kinetic warfare.

Covert to overt communist-Islamic revolution

Mass line narrative attacks becomes double think. We believe that there are mass graves of Indian children at Residential Schools when in fact we know there are none.

“… To such an extent, that despite the abundance of information, no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interests of their family; themselves, their family, their community and their country. It’s a great brainwashing process, which goes very slow. and it’s divided into 4 basic stages. […] (until) exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who is demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell nothing to him. Even if I shower him with information, authentic proof with documents, with pictures, even if I take him by force to the Soviet Union and I show him a concentration camp, he will refuse to believe it.”

Doublethink. Like when Muslims are told to believe that the Earth is flat and made to believe it while taking flights around the world.

Screenshot

Ottawa Teacher, Amy McKay interview: As soon as she questioned the narrative on Gender Queer Theory she had to defend her licence in court

Posted on by

Important prelude:

I am trying to catch up on the people and events from May 5th and it has gotten a little complicated to figure out what has already been published here and what has not.

As it turns out, I have already published this interview with Amy McKay not that long ago. But the article we just wrote is quite different and offers perspective that is more generally applicable. So I will post it again. But if you have already watched the interview, feel free to skip this particular post.

The story can be read at RAIR Foundation

This interview took place during the more public presser of Jeff Evely’s May 5th event as a first effort to try and stop the state from mutilating and sterilizing children under the “Gender Affirming Care’ narrative attack label. It is the classic story of cancelation of anyone who cannot keep up with the revolutionary dialectics.

The example this site loves to use commonly is J. K. Rowling. A famously leftist author who, the moment she deviated from the leftist attack on the West by objecting to the introduction of men into women’s sports, she was not even allowed in to the cast party for the Harry Potter movies that she had written. Her books are beloved. So she is a good example. Of course they do this to high profile people as a message. But they do it to everyone in the most minor positions of authority. Like a high school teacher or a country doctor that dares notice a truth which is contrary to narrative established by consensus.

This is one high school teacher that came to support Jeff’s efforts on the hill that day. And, as it turns out, has found herself in court now to defend her teaching licence due to her failure to hate the right people and values.

Those of you who have not read or listened to the audiobook of 1984 in the last few years really would do well to do so again now. This is precisely the play in Canada and across much of the West, and even the US under Obama and Biden. The technology has changed, and the tactics vary. But the strategy is the same. Like with Islam, the left insists you hate who they tell you to hate, and believe what they tell you is truth. Jacinda Ardern even stated it plainly. But by that time, most are so demoralized already that they ignored it, or contextualized it to make it into something that wouldn’t shake their comfort level.

Amy McKay is facing total cancellation, at least professionally now, because she failed to hate BillBoard Chris, and failed to believe 2+2=5 in terms of gender queer narrative, which they mislabel a ‘theory’. A theory is a hypothesis that has data to support it, Gender queer theory is a Marxist destructive narrative attack on humanity that has an extraordinary amount of data opposing it, but was arrived at by consensus.

The model we use to describe events as they are taking place now across most of the West has predictive value. This goes a long way to affirming its credibility. That doesn’t make it perfect. But it does make it worth understanding.

Habermas, a second generation Frankfurt School thinker came up with the idea of Consensus theory. A leftist think tank comes up with a destructive narrative attack, like Gender Queer theory or anthropogenic Global Warming, and imposes it claiming it was a consensus, in this case meaning a creation by said think tank, and then imposed on the rest of us by using critical theory, “racist-transphobe-bigot” etc against anyone who tries to tell the truth on these issues. Amy’s story is definitely a classic example. But anyone who happens across this post can surely think of many, many more. Both in public life as well as people they likely know in their own orbits.

Older posts and videos from the same May 5th event:

Interview with two detransitioners on their personal stories about the consequences of the drugs and surgeries connected to the Trans-gender dialectic.

Chris Fleury, constitutional Lawyer fights to get men out of women’s prisons

 

 

Rebel Report on CBC active measures Aktivnye meropriyatiya

Posted on by

The following editorial on the video below was written by Johnny U and posted unedited:

Here is a piece by Rebel News that does not quite grasp its own profundity. It reveals Rebel and the people it is trying to help are missing a few vital keys to fully grasping what is going on: namely an active measure.

One definition:

The term, which dates back to the 1920s, includes operations such as espionage, propaganda, sabotage, assassination, and the collection of kompromat for blackmail purposes based on the foreign policy objectives of the Soviet and Russian governments.

Usually we only see the end results of an active measure. This means we see the headline shaming the political target, but not the setup that created the shame. Another example was the placement of Nazi flags by state actors among the Truckers Freedom Convoy, which was intended to disgrace that whole movement in the eyes of the Canadian public.

This Rebel report gives us a rare glimpse into the actual machinery of an active measure. The language of dialectics, of which active measures is a vital component, is difficult and abstract and hard to learn. It becomes, however, an increasingly blunt instrument the more one learns it. Metaphorically, describing in detail a loaded hand gun to a blind person is an abstraction until the gun is fired and the bullet hits them, whereupon the “Aha!” moment instantly erases all abstraction, along with the implied cleverness of the words used to describe the gun.

The full comment can be read here. 

The Gulag Archipelago, moral relativism and explaining why communist nations are so destructive

Posted on by

Occasionally in conversations with the willing about the nature of Communism, and how Western leaders are doing these things to us, and ultimately WHY they are doing these things to us, simply answering with teh word dialectics, is punishing the victim. Interestingly, that is actually not just the right answer, but why in fact these things are being done to the people of the formerly free west.

Below is a short excerpt from the Gulag Archipelago, where the reasoning of the torturers themselves is explained. By now it should appear familiar to all. Not just the sophisticated in the methods of the left, but all in the West who have observed what is being done to them with great bewilderment and horror, and shouted about as hypocrisy or corruption. It is of course neither. Corruption is a means to an ends. A way in which the temple can be torn down by destroying the systems that keep it up. But the goal, the telos, is the destruction of the temple. How is merely tactics.

The segment from the Gulag Archipelago:

It would also be incorrect to ascribe to 1937 the “discovery”
that the personal confession of an accused person was more im-
portant than any other kind of proof or facts. This concept had
already been formulated in the twenties. And 1937 was just
the year when the brilliant teaching of Vyshinsky came into its
own. Incidentally, even at that time, his teaching was transmitted
only to interrogators and prosecutors-for the sake of their
morale and steadfastness. The rest of us only learned about it
twenty years later-when it had already come into disfavor-
through subordinate clauses and minor paragraphs of newspaper
articles, which treated the subject as if it had long been widely
known to all.

It turns out that in that terrible year Andrei Yanuaryevich
(one longs to blurt out, “Jaguaryevich”) Vyshinsky, availing
himself of the most flexible dialectics (of a sort nowadays not
permitted either Soviet citizens or electronic calculators, since to
them yes is yes and no is no), pointed out in a report which
became famous in certain circles that it is never possible for
The Interrogation 101 mortal men to establish absolute truth, but relative truth only.

He then proceeded to a further step, which jurists of the last two
thousand years had not been willing to take: that the truth estab-
lished by interrogation and trial could not be absolute, but only,
so to speak, relative.

Therefore, when we sign a sentence ordering
someone to be shot we can never be absolutely certain, but only
approximately, in view of certain hypotheses, and in a certain
sense, that we are punishing a guilty person.

Thence arose the
most practical conclusion: that it was useless to seek absolute
evidence–for evidence is always relative-or unchallengeable
witnesses-for they can say different things at different times.
The proofs of guilt were relative, approximate, and the interro-
gator could find them, even when there was no evidence and no
witness, without leaving his office, “basing his conclusions not
only on his own intellect but also on his Party sensitivity,

his moral forces” (in other words, the superiority of someone who
has slept well, has been well fed, and has not been beaten up)
“and on his character” (Le., his willingness to apply cruelty!).
Of course, this formulation was much more elegant than
Latsis’ instructions. But the essence of both was the same.
In only one respect did Vyshinsky fail to be consistent and
retreat from dialectical logic: for some reason, the executioner’s
bullet which he allowed was not relative but absolute . …

Thus it was that the conclusions of advanced Soviet jurispru-
dence, proceeding in a spiral, returned to barbaric or medieval
standards. Like medieval torturers, our interrogators, prosecutors,
and judges agreed to accept the confession of the accused as the
chief proof of guilt.

However, the simple-minded Middle Ages used dramatic and picturesque methods to squeeze out the desired confessions: the
rack, the wheel, the bed of nails, impalement, hot coals, etc. In
the twentieth century, taking advantage of our more highly de-
veloped medical knowledge and extensive prison experience (and
someone seriously defended a doctoral dissertation on this
theme), people came to realize that the accumulation of such
impressive apparatus was superfluous and that, on a mass scale,
it was also cumbersome. And in addition . . .

In addition, there was evidently one other circumstance. As
always, Stalin did not pronounce that final word, and his sub-
ordinates had to guess what he wanted. Thus, like a jackal, he left
himself an escape hole, so that he could, if he wanted, beat a
retreat and write about “dizziness from success.” After all, for
the first time in human history the calculated torture of millions
was being undertaken, and, even with all his strength and power,
Stalin could not be absolutely sure of success.

In dealing with such an enormous mass of material, the effects of the experiment
might differ from those obtained from a smaller sample. An un-
foreseen explosion might take place, a slippage in a geological
fault, or even world-wide disclosure. In any case, Stalin had to
remain innocent, his sacred vestments angelically pure.
We are therefore forced to conclude that no list of tortures
and torments existed in printed form for the guidance of interro-
gators! Instead, all that was required was for every Interrogation
Department to supply the tribunal within a specified period with
a stipulated number of rabbits who had confessed everything.
And it was simply stated, orally but often, that any measures and
means employed were good, since they were being used for a
.lofty purpose; that no interrogator would be made to answer for
the death of an accused; and that the prison doctor should inter-
fere as little as possible with the course of the investigation.

So from all this it becomes clear that moral and cultural relativism was a dialectic we can all see was launched on the West to destroy our sacred beliefs and the value of ourselves as a people and a culture. We also see how doctors where made to follow state narratives on Covid, the vaxx, and now MAiD in an ends justifies the means moral relativistic framework which cedes massive amounts of power to the state which it should never, ever have.

And continues to agglomerate by the month across Western Europe and Canada.

On the advancement of Communism, Mark Carney’s agenda BRILLIANTLY laid out in a Tweet, and a couple of words about Pit Bulls: Links 1 for May 2, 2026

Posted on by

1. Remember, the Detective Helen Grus story is a microcosm, or a rather an excellent data point for what has happened to our civilization. The replacement of Rule of Law and all that means, to a narrative based, dialectical system where the state determines what is true, and the only real crime is defying a state narrative. Especially from a place of any kind of authority. The preceding statement, for what it is worth, is my personal definition for what communism actually is, as opposed to what it’s useful idiots agitate for at yesterday’s ‘May Day’ marches across parts of Canada.

RAIR Foundation has a lot of information about the hearings of Det. Helen Grus. For those not familiar, click through and catch up if you like.

2. A couple of items on yesterday’s Useful Idiots day in Canada. CTV of course, parrots the Communist party line brilliantly, framing it as requested, “Protecting Workers Rights” when of course, in Communist countries there are exactly ZERO workers rights and that lack of rights is highly taken advantage of by the state.

It is also amazing how CTV managed to hide the Communist iconography that permeates these demos and marches. That takes real effort. It should also be noted that whenever actual liberal minded people asking for constitutional rights, freedom of speech, freedom of bodily autonomy etc. etc. attempts any kind of protest, these people will make sure its as unpleasant as possible for them. Conversely, they have all their antisemitic, Anti-Israel, anti-Nation-State, anti freedom protests frequently, often several times a week and sometimes every day, and no western minded group opposes them. We believe in their freedom of speech. They do not believe in ours. It doesn’t take a lot of math to see exactly how that did, is, and will work out. Which brings us to item 3. How we win.

This one is FAR more representative. Look closely at the iconography. it is an excellent blend of every ideology which wishes to attack and destroy individualism, Western civilization and control people, even if the final outcome of that destruction is not agreed upon. We see that the anti-West communist movement has perfectly merged with the”Palestinian anti-Israel narrative attacks, and a lot of vegan iconography is also present. This stands to reason as the subtext is that the state should ban meat and force people to eat what they are told. We can see that in the form of the protestors who dress up as pigs, cows and chickens as was represented in Ottawa and Montreal. This is also in perfect harmony with Mark Carney’s stated agenda in his book, Values.

3. Rep. Mike Belcher, who has the X account, Counterspell and does some of the best material on the dialectical nature of the left, and perhaps more importantly, how we beat them, has done a 2 part video on this issue.

Part 1

Part 2. 

Both videos are on Substack which there is no way to embed here that I am aware of. Below though, is one we post often and offers context to the above. And frankly everything else. Which is how the ancient art of spell craft has become Political Warfare in the modern era. First by the Soviets, and now by everyone. Additionally, reading the definition of dialectics as we present it in the Reader’s Links every day also offers context.

4. Speaking of communism:

Sorry that wasn’t enthusiastic enough…

Speaking of communism, PLEASE watch the video below. it is the best thing on Mark Carney and his actions and intentions since Peter Foster’s article in the NP that this site posts probably once a month since it was published.

5. I do not believe this Tweet. I do not believe they will serve anything like the time given. I’d be surprised if they served any time at all.

Thank you all for checking out this site,

 

Meanwhile, the state of surveillance in the US of A

Posted on by

Please watch this video carefully and understand it. There is a lot of deception around the intended use of this equipment which is clearly revealed from 10:30 to 11:00 in to the video.

A friend who is an expert in IT added. “Imagine covid measures today (with this technology)”

I would add, I am confident we won’t have to imagine it soon.

A possible simple explanation of what dialectics are

Posted on by

Today walking through a Quebec swamp a thought came suddenly.

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions.

In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

Avi Lewis, James Lindsay and “Lived experience” explained

Posted on by

The other day we did a post on the appointment of the head of the NDP, a former CBC talk show host and man who operates under communist systems of reasoning, at least in policy, beliefs, method of thinking etc. if not openly stated as such, Avi Lewis.

We got a comment rightfully admonishing us or at least correcting us for using the term, “Lived Experience” when he was attempting to negate Ayaan Hirsi Ali’s actual experience and hard knowledge about the nature of Islam, freedom, and the Islamic countries she actually lived in which Lewis likely has never even visited. as well as the freedom the United States and the West offered her.

Avi Lewis is a woke Leftist masquerading as a normal politician; as such, he is using “lived experience” as a dialectical term of art and trying to make us buy it as normal English.

So, as he means it, he is precisely correct. “Lived experience” would be for Ali to place her personal experience in the proper revolutionary framework. That would make it impossible for her to criticise a revolutionary ally such as “radical” Muslims for anything other than failing to act even more in support of the revolution. Since she’s not placing “radical” islam in the proper class context of fellow victim of multiple and intersecting types of oppression and who is awake to being a victim of these oppressions (and therefore at war with the oppressors) she is ipso facto not expressing “lived experience.”

We were in fact, mocking the entire concept by using the term, which is as Peter B points out, is indeed initiate language for dialectical purposes, but in the way in which people would normally understand it. But then we fail to actually consistently explain the nature of the attacks on reality via dialectical tactics.

Below is James Lindsay’s video on the term, “Lived Experience”. It is simply explained and directly on point.

While Lindsay’s explanation is on point, and very good. It might be simpler to reduce the concept of the dialectical use of language and concepts, and even naming things to destroy the thing itself.

The Human Rights Commissions in Canada are to destroy individual rights, and that is all they do.

The dialectical use of “lived experience” is to destroy real science and the lived experience of those who’s experience contradicts the Marxist revolutionary’s intentions.

Dialectical climatology is about rewriting the science to make it appear as if the world will be destroyed if we do not deconstruct Western Civilization immediately. Exactly as they did with “Nuclear Winter”. Some went as far as to claim it was a solar system wide event. (In a rare case of genuine irony, since the sunspot cycle was more active for a few decades it actually was a solar system wide phenomenon which itself destroys the concept of anthropogenic Global warming since no one was driving a Ford F 150 on Mars.)

“Trans-affirming care” is a dialectical term that actually means to spay or neuter children, or severely brainwashed or mentally unwell older children.

Multiculturalism is my favourite one. It actually means to use one culture against another until there are no cultures left. It works extremely well against tolerant cultures but it has never worked against Islam, because Islam knows what it believes and can’t be conned into believing something else equally ludicrous and destructive to themselves as a culture.

“Health-Canada”, say no more.

Black Lives Matters was a communist minstrel show.

“ANTIFA”, do I really need to explain that one?

Feminism: A war on women via dialectical lines of operation.

Even the concept of Racism as it is now is a dialectical term, even though most are not ready to hear that. But everywhere outside of the Western world, racism of one form or another is policy. Even law. Like only Muslims can go to Mecca or Medina, all others can’t even take that exit off the highway, and Muslim countries have concrete laws diminishing the legal status of non Muslims under Dhimmitude. In China, non-Han Chinese pay double or more for everything. In Africa you had better be the right tribe in certain areas. It is only in the West where racism is considered problematic. And the consequences of it, while initially classically liberal, meaning that all people of any race so long as they shared Western values were welcome, were great. I mean that really. But once they added multiculturalism, it means at BEST the total Balkanization of the Western world, and probably the replacement of governments with local war lords. For sure this is likely already happening in the UK.

But the term is dialectical because racism is used as a weapon against whatever target race they intend, which in theory will eventually be all of them. That is the communist way.

The list of dialectically named issues is too long to post them all or more to the point, even remember them all in one post. So those who think of others, please post them in the comments.