The following interview was recorded on Monday evening, May 4th, and was a prelude to a conference at Parliament Hill begging Parliament to recall bill C-4 and protect children from the crazy dangerous ideology of Critical Gender Theory.
The event was a conference that Jeff Evely, a true Canadian hero put together with a lot of well known activists such as the two women interviewed in the videos below, as well as people like anti-trans activist, Scott Nugent from Matt Walsh’s film, What is a Woman?
This interview was difficult to do. At one point I had to take a break to recover from the impact of the first session, and then resume after a while and dig deeper into their personal experience.
The accompanying article is at RAIR Foundation and fleshes this out quite a bit. It is recommended.
For this site I want to take a different approach.
We discuss dialectics a lot in terms of communist theory. The Reader’s Links post every night has a decent definition. But another way of looking at it is that dialectics is merely finding ways of destroying things, but in a particular way. Like creating (or capturing as the case may be) an agency called, The Human Rights Commission where its sole purpose and effect is to destroy human rights by pitting collective rights, (which can be arbitrarily and whimsically defined), to destroy individual, or as we like to call them, real rights.
Many people when you mention the Hegelian dialectic respond with, “Oh! Thesis-counter thesis, synthesis!” Yeah I guess. But that doesn’t carry a lot of meaning really. If you flesh it out, where you take a thing, use it destroy itself and another thing such as its opposite and destroy both, well now baby you’re talkin dialectics!
And I can’t think of a better example than the trans movement. They take a person of one of the two sexes, and then create a synthesis by smashing it against its opposite sex using drugs and surgeries and ending up with something totally new. Broken, sterile as a rule, but new. Men cannot become women and same with the reverse. But both concepts are destroyed in the process, and that is the real aim. To obliterate the concept of “heteronormativity” in the human consciousness.
None of this is said to the people they experiment on though. They are just reassured that this will solve whatever problem they imagined they had, or really had. From normal teenaged girl stuff to serious trauma, they are often told that the solution lies in becoming sterilized and then sexually mutilated till whatever they have left as genitals don’t actually work at all.
It is also crucial to understand that in Canada, it is not a crime for an agent of the state, anything from a kindergarten teacher to a fireman or a cop or whatever, to convince a child to go to one of the spay & neuter abattoirs, dialectically named, “Trans-affirming Care” clinics and get mangled, but it is a jail-able offence to talk a child out of it. It is in the language of bill C4.
The bill is called the “Anti-Conversion therapy bill” and according to the bill, if you take a child who identifies as ‘trans’ and convince him to identify as ‘cis’ then you have done “conversion therapy” and must be jailed.
This serves another dialectical purpose. To establish that children belong to the state to do whatever they wish with them, and parents only have the responsibility to feed and house and clothe them. But not to teach them anything that might contradict a state narrative. Whatever it happens to be that day.
This is a major assault on reality at many levels. There is no such thing as transexual, (barring the extremely rare genetic conditions that generally get corrected at birth and even that is not trans-sexual, just a sort of generic error.) And taking a gay or lesbian person and altering them into a sort of simulacrum or imitation of the opposite sex would be absolutely the most extreme form of conversion therapy I can think of.
From Lesbian to straight man, from gay man to hetero women.
In any case, if this interview moves you, please share the videos with anyone and everyone you know who may have children or adolescents that are even toying with the idea of ruining the rest of their lives by indulging a corrupted and ideologically captured medical industry to mutilate those children.
There is one more video that we post fairly often here on this subject. It traces the history of this movement back to, what else, communist and dialectical roots. It is highly, highly recommended.
There will be a series of videos on the event on the 5th as the weeks progress. It takes time and effort to edit and prepare these videos. But more should follow hopefully as soon as tomorrow.
One last thought. MANY people we speak to on this and other issues which are in our opinion vectors of the communist revolution that has transformed Canada, will say this is about corruption. It is about doctors on the take. They make huge cash doing this, as the state pays (but only to trans, not to get repaired after) but this is not about corruption in the typical sense. Corruption is a tool by those who design these dialectic attacks to achieve the ideological ends. Transsexualism was in fact originally considered “4th wave feminism” and the idea most certainly was that there are no men or women. There are no differences between them and the notion of differences was cultural and must be destroyed. Presenting large numbers of of people to the public as obviously an amalgam of male traits and female traits will influence how people think of sexual dimorphism in our species. They want it, that beautiful thing, destroyed. Because that is what communism is about. And corruption of industries is a method of capturing them. It is the means. Not the ends.
Please do leave a comment. It would be appreciated by myself and all who participated in the events of Tuesday at Parliament Hill and Biker’s Church.
